Surgical approach and patient-reported outcomes after total hip replacement

HIP International

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 355-361

  Smith, Alison J ^a   Wylde, Vikki ^a   Berstock, James R ^b   Maclean, Angus D ^a   Blom, Ashley W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRISTOL   (United Kingdom)

^b SOUTHMEAD HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Arthroplasty; Assessments; Hip; Operative; Patient outcome; Replacement; Surgical procedure

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HIP PAIN; HUMAN; JOINT FUNCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; SELF REPORT; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL RISK; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; HIP JOINT; HUMANS; MALE; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; PAIN; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUESTIONNAIRES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; SELF REPORT; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84866428170     PISSN: 11207000     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5301/HIP.2012.9455     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Jones CA, Voaklander DC, Johnston DW, Suarez-Almazor ME. Health related quality of life outcomes after total hip and knee arthroplasties in a community based population. J Rheumatol 2000;27:1745-52.
2. Nikolajsen L, Brandsborg B, Lucht U, Jensen TS, Kehlet H. Chronic pain following total hip arthroplasty: a nationwide questionnaire study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2006;50: 495-500.
3. Wylde V, Blom AW, Whitehouse SL, Taylor AH, Pattison GT, Bannister GC. Patient-Reported Outcomes After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Comparison of Midterm Results. J Arthroplasty 2009;24:210-6.
4. Nilsdotter AK, Petersson IF, Roos EM, Lohmander LS. Predictors of patient relevant outcome after total hip replacement for osteoarthritis: a prospective study. Ann Rheum Dis 2003;62:923-930.
5. Anakwe RE, Jenkins PJ, Moran M. Predicting dissatisfaction after total hip arthroplasty: a study of 850 patients. J Arthroplasty 2011;26:209-13.
6. MacWilliam CH, Yood MU, Verner JJ, McCarthy BD, Ward RE. Patient-related risk factors that predict poor outcome after total hip replacement. Health Serv Res 1996;31: 623-38.
7. Fortin PR, Clarke AE, Joseph L, et al. Outcomes of total hip and knee replacement: preoperative functional status predicts outcomes at six months after surgery. Arthritis Rheum 1999;42:1722-8.
8. Biring GS, Masri BA, Greidanus NV, Duncan CP, Garbuz DS. Predictors of quality of life outcomes after revision total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2007;89:1446-51.
9. Palan J, Beard DJ, Murray DW, Andrew JG, Nolan J. Which approach for total hip arthroplasty: anterolateral or posterior? Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467:473-7.
10. Jolles BM, Bogoch ER. Posterior versus lateral surgical approach for total hip arthroplasty in adults with osteoarthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(3):CD003828.
11. Blom AW, Rogers M, Taylor AH, Pattison G, Whitehouse S, Bannister GC. Dislocation following total hip replacement. The Avon Orthopaedic Centre experience. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2008;90:658-62.
12. Mäkelä K, Eskelinen A, Pulkkinen P, Paavolainen P, Remes V. Cemented total hip replacement for primary osteoarthritis in patients aged 55 years or older: results of the 12 most common cemented implants followed for 25 years in the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2008; 90:1562-9.
13. Corten K, Bourne RB, Charron KD, Au K, Rorabeck CH. What works best, a cemented or cementless primary total hip arthroplasty?: Minimum 17-year followup of a randomized controlled trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2010;469: 209-17.
14. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988;15:1833-40.
15. Mahomed N, Gandhi R, Daltroy L, Katz J. The self-administered patient satisfaction scale for primary hip and knee arthroplasty. Arthritis 2011; 2011:591253. Epub 2011 Jan 10.
16. Ware JE, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-item short-form health survey. Med Care 1996;34:220-3.
17. Akaike, H. Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: Petrov BN, Csaki F, eds. Second International Symposium on Information Theory. Budapest: Akailseoniai-Kiudo 1973;267-81.
18. Papke LE, Wooldridge J. Econometric methods for fractional response variables with an application to 401(k) plan participation rates. Journal of Applied Econometrics 1996;11: 619-32.
19. Graubard BI, Korn EL. Predictive margins. Biometrics 1999;55: 652-9.
20. Singh JA, Lewallen D. Age, gender, obesity, and depression are associated with patient-related pain and function outcome after revision total hip arthroplasty. Clin Rheumatol 2009; 28:1419-30.
21. Bingefors K, Isacson D. Epidemiology, co-morbidity, and impact on health-related quality of life of self-reported headache and musculoskeletal pain-a gender perspective. Eur J Pain 2004;8:435-50.
22. Quintana JM, Escobar A, Aguirre U, Lafuente I, Arenaza JC. Predictors of health-related quality-of-life change after total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009;467:2886-94.
23. Gandhi R, Razak F, Davey JR, Mahomed NNJ. Metabolic syndrome and the functional outcomes of hip and knee arthroplasty. Rheumatol 2010;37:1917-22.
24. Department of Health. Our NHS Our future: NHS next stage review. London: TSO; 2007.
25. Devlin NJ, Appleby J. Getting the most out of PROMS: putting health outcomes at the heart of NHS decision-making. London: The King's Fund; 2010.
26. US Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration. Guidance for industry: patientreported outcome measures: use in medical product development to support labelling claims. 2009. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/ Guidances/UCM193282. pdf. Accessed September 2010.