Reduced dislocation rates and excellent functional outcomes with large-diameter femoral heads

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 28, Issue 8, 2013, Pages 1415-1420

  Stroh, D Alex ^a   Issa, Kimona ^a   Johnson, Aaron J ^a   Delanois, Ronald E ^a   Mont, Michael A ^a  

^a SINAI HOSPITAL OF BALTIMORE   (United States)

Author keywords

Big femoral head; Dislocation rate; Harris hip score; Implant survivorship; Large diameter; Total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BONE RADIOGRAPHY; DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS; DISLOCATION; FEMALE; FEMUR DISLOCATION; FEMUR HEAD; FOLLOW UP; FRACTURE REDUCTION; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HEMATOMA; HIP; HUMAN; INFECTION; LUNG EMBOLISM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; RISK; SUBLUXATION; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; WOUND DRAINAGE;

BIG FEMORAL HEAD; DISLOCATION RATE; HARRIS HIP SCORE; IMPLANT SURVIVORSHIP; LARGE-DIAMETER; TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; FEMUR HEAD; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HIP DISLOCATION; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; PREVALENCE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84883212744     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2012.11.017     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Phillips C.B., Barrett J.A., Losina E., et al. Incidence rates of dislocation, pulmonary embolism, and deep infection during the first six months after elective total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003, 85-A(1):20.
2. Bystrom S., Espehaug B., Furnes O., et al. Femoral head size is a risk factor for total hip luxation: a study of 42,987 primary hip arthroplasties from the Norwegian Arthroplasty Register. Acta Orthop Scand 2003, 74(5):514.
3. Berry D.J., von Knoch M., Schleck C.D., et al. Effect of femoral head diameter and operative approach on risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005, 87(11):2456.
4. von Knoch M., Berry D.J., Harmsen W.S., et al. Late dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1949, 84-A(11):2002.
5. Beaule P.E., Schmalzried T.P., Udomkiat P., et al. Jumbo femoral head for the treatment of recurrent dislocation following total hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2002, 84-A(2):256.
6. Ong K.L., Mowat F.S., Chan N., et al. Economic burden of revision hip and knee arthroplasty in Medicare enrollees. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, 446:22.
7. Grigoris P., Grecula M.J., Amstutz H.C. Tripolar hip replacement for recurrent prosthetic dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1994, (304):148.
8. Biedermann R., Tonin A., Krismer M., et al. Reducing the risk of dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: the effect of orientation of the acetabular component. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2005, 87(6):762.
9. Peak E.L., Parvizi J., Ciminiello M., et al. The role of patient restrictions in reducing the prevalence of early dislocation following total hip arthroplasty. A randomized, prospective study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005, 87(2):247.
10. Callaghan J.J., O'Rourke M.R., Goetz D.D., et al. Use of a constrained tripolar acetabular liner to treat intraoperative instability and postoperative dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: a review of our experience. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, (429):117.
11. Berton C., Girard J., Krantz N., et al. The Durom large diameter head acetabular component: early results with a large-diameter metal-on-metal bearing. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2010, 92(2):202.
12. Mont M.A., Issa K., Naziri Q., et al. The use of dual-mobility bearings in difficult hip arthroplasty reconstructive cases. Surgical Technology International XXI 2012, 234.
13. Shapiro G.S., Weiland D.E., Markel D.C., et al. The use of a constrained acetabular component for recurrent dislocation. J Arthroplasty 2003, 18(3):250.
14. Lombardi A.V., Skeels M.D., Berend K.R., et al. Do large heads enhance stability and restore native anatomy in primary total hip arthroplasty?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2011, 469(6):1547.
15. Smith T.M., Berend K.R., Lombardi A.V., et al. Metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty with large heads may prevent early dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005, 441:137.
16. Sikes C.V., Lai L.P., Schreiber M., et al. Instability after total hip arthroplasty: treatment with large femoral heads vs constrained liners. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23(7 Suppl):59.
17. Harris W.H. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1969, 51(4):737.
18. DeLee J.G., Charnley J. Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1976, (121):20.
19. Gruen T.A., McNeice G.M., Amstutz H.C. "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1979, (141):17.
20. Etienne G., Ragland P.S., Mont M.A. Use of constrained acetabular liners in total hip arthroplasty. Orthopedics 2005, 28(5):463.
21. Garbuz D.S., Masri B.A., Duncan C.P., et al. The Frank Stinchfield Award: dislocation in revision THA: do large heads (36 and 40mm) result in reduced dislocation rates in a randomized clinical trial?. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2012, 470(2):351.
22. Kung P.L., Ries M.D. Effect of femoral head size and abductors on dislocation after revision THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007, 465:170.
23. Bistolfi A., Crova M., Rosso F., et al. Dislocation rate after hip arthroplasty within the first postoperative year: 36mm versus 28mm femoral heads. Hip international: The Journal of Clinical and Experimental Research on Hip Pathology and Therapy 2011, 21(5):559.
24. Zijlstra W.P., van den Akker-Scheek I., Zee M.J., et al. No clinical difference between large metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty and 28-mm-head total hip arthroplasty?. Int Orthop 2011, 35(12):1771.
25. Peters C.L., McPherson E., Jackson J.D., et al. Reduction in early dislocation rate with large-diameter femoral heads in primary total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22(6 Suppl 2):140.
26. Hedlundh U., Ahnfelt L., Hybbinette C.H., et al. Dislocations and the femoral head size in primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1996, (333):226.
27. Kelley S.S., Lachiewicz P.F., Hickman J.M., et al. Relationship of femoral head and acetabular size to the prevalence of dislocation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998, (355):163.
28. Yuan L., Shih C. Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 1999, 119(5-6):263.
29. Amstutz H.C., Le Duff M.J., Beaule P.E. Prevention and treatment of dislocation after total hip replacement using large diameter balls. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, (429):108.
30. Cuckler J.M., Moore K.D., Lombardi A.V., et al. Large versus small femoral heads in metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2004, 19(8 Suppl 3):41.
31. Khatod M., Barber T., Paxton E., et al. An analysis of the risk of hip dislocation with a contemporary total joint registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2006, 447:19.
32. Plate J.F., Seyler T.M., Stroh D.A., et al. Risk of dislocation using large- vs. small-diameter femoral heads in total hip arthroplasty. BMC Res Notes 2012, 5:553.