Randomized controlled trial of abductor muscle damage in relation to the surgical approach for primary total hip replacement: Minimally invasive anterolateral versus modified direct lateral approach

Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery

Volumn 131, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 179-189

  Müller, Michael ^a   Tohtz, Stephan ^a   Springer, Ivonne ^a   Dewey, Marc ^a   Perka, Carsten ^a  

^a CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Abductor muscle damage; Gluteus medius muscle; Magnetic resonance imaging; Minimally invasive anterolateral approach; Total hip arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

CREATINE KINASE; MYOGLOBIN;

ABDUCTION; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COXITIS; FEMALE; GLUTEUS MEDIUS MUSCLE; GLUTEUS MINIMUS MUSCLE; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MUSCLE ATROPHY; MUSCLE INJURY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PROTEIN BLOOD LEVEL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SKELETAL MUSCLE; SURGICAL APPROACH; TENDON LESION; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCLE, STRIATED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SINGLE-BLIND METHOD; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE;

EID: 79951724250     PISSN: 09368051     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00402-010-1117-0     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Baker AS, Bitounis VC (1989) Abductor function after total hip replacement. An electromyographic and clinical review. J Bone Joint Surg Br 71:47-50 (Pubitemid 19049578)
2. Bauer R, Kerschbaumer F, Poisel S et al (1979) The transgluteal approach to the hip joint. Archives of orthopaedic and traumatic surgery 95:47-49 (Pubitemid 10162849)
3. Berger RA (2004) The technique of minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty using the two-incision approach. Instr Course Lect 53:149-155
4. Berger RA (2003) Total hip arthroplasty using the minimally invasive two-incision approach. Clin orthopaed Relat Res:232-241
5. Bernasek TL, Lee WS, Lee HJ et al (2010) Minimally invasive primary THA: anterolateral intermuscular approach versus lateral transmuscular approach. Archives of orthopaedic and traumatic surgery
6. Berry DJ (2005) "Minimally invasive" total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg 87:699-700
7. Berry DJ, Berger RA, Callaghan JJ et al (2003) Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Development, early results, and a critical analysis. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Orthopaedic Association, Charleston, South Carolina, USA, June 14, 2003. J Bone Joint Surg 85-A:2235-2246 (Pubitemid 37385929)
8. Bertin KC, Rottinger H (2004) Anterolateral mini-incision hip replacement surgery: a modified Watson-Jones approach. Clin Orthop Rel Res:248-255 (Pubitemid 39579220)
9. Bos JC, Stoeckart R, Klooswijk AI et al (1994) The surgical anatomy of the superior gluteal nerve and anatomical radiologic bases of the direct lateral approach to the hip. Surg Radiol Anat 16:253-258
10. Chimento GF, Pavone V, Sharrock N et al (2005) Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty 20:139-144 (Pubitemid 40342699)
11. Cohen RG, Katz JA, Skrepnik NV (2009) The relationship between skeletal muscle serum markers and primary THA: a pilot study. Clin Orthopaed Rel Res 467:1747-1752
12. Comstock C, Imrie S, Goodman SB (1994) A clinical and radiographic study of the "safe area" using the direct lateral approach for total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 9:527-531 (Pubitemid 24321141)
13. Digioia AM 3rd, Plakseychuk AY, Levison TJ et al (2003) Miniincision technique for total hip arthroplasty with navigation. J Arthroplasty 18:123-128 (Pubitemid 36278513)
14. Goutallier D, Postel JM, Bernageau J et al. (1994) Fatty muscle degeneration in cuff ruptures. Pre- and postoperative evaluation by CT scan. Clin Orthop Related Res:78-83
15. Hardinge K (1982) The direct lateral approach to the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 64:17-19
16. Hungerford DS (2004) Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: in opposition. J Arthroplasty 19:81-82
17. Kenny P, O'brien CP, Synnott K et al (1999) Damage to the superior gluteal nerve after two different approaches to the hip. J Bone Joint Surg 81:979-981
18. Laffosse JM, Chiron P, Molinier F et al (2007) Prospective and comparative study of the anterolateral mini-invasive approach versus minimally invasive posterior approach for primary total hip replacement. Early results. Int Orthop 31:597-603
19. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159-174 (Pubitemid 8054849)
20. Mardones R, Pagnano MW, Nemanich JP et al (2005) The Frank Stinchfield Award: muscle damage after total hip arthroplasty done with the two-incision and mini-posterior techniques. Clin Orthop Rel Res 441:63-67 (Pubitemid 44384204)
21. Meneghini RM, Pagnano MW, Trousdale RT et al (2006) Muscle damage during MIS total hip arthroplasty: Smith-Petersen versus posterior approach. Clin Orthop Rel Res 453:293-298 (Pubitemid 44900996)
22. Mow CS, Woolson ST, Ngarmukos SG et al (2005) Comparison of scars from total hip replacements done with a standard or a mini-incision. Clin Orthop Rel Res 441:80-85 (Pubitemid 44384207)
23. Muller M, Tohtz S, Winkler T et al (2010) MRI findings of gluteus minimus muscle damage in primary total hip arthroplasty and the influence on clinical outcome. Archives of orthopaedic and traumatic surgery
24. Nakamura S, Matsuda K, Arai N et al (2004) Mini-incision posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty. Int Orthop 28:214-217 (Pubitemid 39150316)
25. O'brien DA, Rorabeck CH (2005) The mini-incision direct lateral approach in primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Related Res 441:99-103
26. Ogonda L, Wilson R, Archbold P et al (2005) A minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve early post-operative outcomes. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg 87:701-710 (Pubitemid 40489343)
27. Peck CN, Foster A, Mclauchlan GJ (2006) Reducing incision length or intensifying rehabilitation: what makes the difference to length of stay in total hip replacement in a UK setting? Int Orthop 30:395-398
28. Pfirrmann CW, Notzli HP, Dora C et al (2005) Abductor tendons and muscles assessed at MR imaging after total hip arthroplasty in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients. Radiology 235:969-976 (Pubitemid 40695896)
29. Picado CH, Garcia FL, Marques W Jr (2007) Damage to the superior gluteal nerve after direct lateral approach to the hip. Clin Orthop Rel Res 455:209-211 (Pubitemid 46213733)
30. Potter HG, Foo LF, Nestor BJ (2005) What is the role of magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of total hip arthroplasty? HSS J 1:89-93
31. Roth A, Layher F, Venbrocks RA (2006) Transgluteal mini-incision. Technique and our own results. Der Orthopade 35(744):746-750
32. Sculco TP (2003) Is smaller necessarily better? American journal of orthopedics Belle Mead, NJ, 32:169
33. Svensson O, Skold S, Blomgren G (1990) Integrity of the gluteus medius after the transgluteal approach in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 5:57-60 (Pubitemid 20159295)
34. Woolson ST, Mow CS, Syquia JF et al (2004) Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a standard incision or a mini-incision. J Bone Joint Surg 86-A:1353-1358 (Pubitemid 38886521)
35. Wright JM, Crockett HC, Delgado S et al (2004) Mini-incision for total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, controlled investigation with 5-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 19:538-545 (Pubitemid 38993180)