Anterolateral Minimally Invasive Total Hip Arthroplasty. A Prospective Randomized Controlled Study With a Follow-Up of 1 Year

Journal of Arthroplasty

Volumn 26, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 1362-1372

  Martin, Robin ^c   Clayson, Patrick E ^a   Troussel, Serge ^a   Fraser, Brian P ^b   Docquier, Pierre Louis ^c  

^a Orthopaedic Surgery Department   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^c CLINIQUES UNIVERSITAIRES SAINT LUC   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Anterolateral minimally invasive hip arthroplasty; Costs; CT scan; Gait analysis; Randomized controlled study; R ttinger minimally invasive approach

Indexed keywords

MORPHINE;

ADULT; AGED; ANTEROLATERAL MINIMALLY INVASIVE HIP SURGERY; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GAIT; HEALTH CARE COST; HETEROTOPIC OSSIFICATION; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OPERATION DURATION; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; PROSTHESIS LOOSENING; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURGICAL APPROACH; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS; TRANSGLUTEAL HARDINGE APPROACH;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; GAIT; HIP JOINT; HIP PROSTHESIS; HUMANS; INCIDENCE; LENGTH OF STAY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; POSTOPERATIVE HEMORRHAGE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 80755140614     PISSN: 08835403     EISSN: 15328406     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.arth.2010.11.016     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Levine B.R., Klein G.R., Di Cesare P.E. Surgical approaches in total hip arthroplasty. A review of the mini-incision and MIS literature. Bull NYU Hosp Jt Dis 2007, 65:5.
2. Bertin K.C., Röttinger H. Anterolateral mini-incision hip replacement surgery. A modified Watson-Jones approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 429:248.
3. D'Arrigo C., Speranza A., Monaco E., et al. Learning curve in tissue sparing total hip replacement: comparison between different approaches. J Orthop Trauma 2009, 10:47.
4. Wohlrab D., Droege J.W., Mendel T., et al. Minimally invasive vs. transgluteal total hip replacement. A 3-month follow-up of a prospective randomized clinical study. Orthopäde 2008, 37:1121.
5. Kiebzak G.M., Campbell M., Mauerhan D.R. The SF-36 general health status survey documents the burden of osteoarthritis and the benefits of total joint arthroplasty: but why should we use it?. Am J Manag Care 2002, 8:463.
6. Thomine J.M., Duparc F., Dujardin F., et al. Transgluteal approach to the hip by anterior hemimyotomy of the gluteus medius. Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot 1999, 85:520.
7. Gruen T.A., McNeice G.M., Amstutz H.C. "Modes of failure" of cemented stem-type femoral components: a radiographic analysis of loosening. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1979, 141:17.
8. DeLee J.G., Charnley J. Radiological demarcation of cemented sockets in total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1976, 121:20.
9. Brooker A.F., Bowerman J.W., Robinson R.A., et al. Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement. Incidence and a method of classification. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1973, 55:1629.
10. Aubry S., Marinescu A., Forterre O., et al. Definition of a reproducible method for acetabular anteversion measurement at CT. J Radiol 2005, 86:399.
11. Madsen M.S., Ritter M.A., Morris H.H., et al. The effect of total hip arthroplasty surgical approach on gait. J Orthop Res 2004, 22:44.
12. Lim M.R., Huang R.C., Wu A., et al. Evaluation of the elderly patient with an abnormal gait. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 2007, 15:107.
13. Ince A., Kemper M., Waschke J., et al. Minimally invasive anterolateral approach to the hip: risk to the superior gluteal nerve. Acta Orthop 2007, 78:86.
14. Howell J.R., Masri B.A., Duncan C.P. Minimally invasive versus standard incision anterolateral hip replacement: a comparative study. Orthop Clin North Am 2004, 35:153.
15. McGrory B.J., Finch M.E., Furlong P.J., et al. Incision length correlates with patient weight, height, and gender when using a minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty. J Surg Orthop Adv 2008, 17:7.
16. Dorr L.D., Maheshwari A.V., Long W.T., et al. Early pain relief and function after posterior minimally invasive and conventional total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, blinded study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89:1153.
17. Ogonda L., Wilson R., Archbold P., et al. Minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve early postoperative outcomes. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005, 87:701.
18. Pour A.E., Parvizi J., Sharkey P., et al. Minimally invasive hip arthroplasty: what role does patient preconditioning play?. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2007, 89:1920.
19. Kim Y.H. Comparison of primary total hip arthroplasties performed with a minimally invasive technique or a standard technique. A prospective and randomized study. J Arthroplasty 2006, 21:1092.
20. Shitama T., Kiyama T., Naito M., et al. Which is more invasive-mini versus standard incisions in total hip arthroplasty?. Int Orthop 2009, epub.
21. Chimento G., Pavone V., Sharrock N., et al. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. A prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20:139.
22. Lawlor M., Humphreys P., Morrow E., et al. Comparison of early postoperative functional levels following total hip replacement using minimally invasive versus standard incisions. A prospective randomized blinded trial. Clin Rehabil 2005, 19:465.
23. de Verteuil R., Imamura M., Zhu S., et al. A systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness and economic modelling of minimal incision total hip replacement approaches in the management of arthritic disease of the hip. Health Technol Assess 2008, 12:iii.
24. McCarney R., Warner J., Iliffe S., et al. The Hawthorne effect: a randomised, controlled trial. BMC Med Res Methodol 2007, 3:30.
25. Hart R., Stipcak V., Janecek M., et al. Component position following total hip arthroplasty through a miniinvasive posterolateral approach. Acta Orthop Belg 2005, 60.
26. Jameson S.S., Howcroft D.W., McCaskie A.W., et al. Injury to the lateral femoral cutaneous nerve during minimally invasive hip surgery: a cadaver study. Ann R Coll Surg Engl 2008, 90:216.
27. Bennett D., Ogonda L., Elliott D., et al. Comparison of immediate postoperative walking ability in patients receiving minimally invasive and standard-incision hip arthroplasty. A prospective blinded study. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22:490.
28. Dorr L.D., Thomas D., Long W.T., et al. Psychologic reasons for patients preferring minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2007, 458:94.