Minimally invasive versus classic procedures in total hip arthroplasty: A double-blind randomized controlled trial

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 469, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 200-208

  Goosen, Jon H M ^a   Kollen, Boudewijn J ^a   Castelein, René M ^b   Kuipers, Bart M ^a   Verheyen, Cees C ^a  

^a ISALA HOSPITAL   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGED; BODY MASS; CONFERENCE PAPER; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HARRIS HIP SCORE; HUMAN; INCISION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERIOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

EID: 78951476330     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11999-010-1331-7     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. RL Barrack 2003 Dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: implant design and orientation J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 11 89 99 12670135
2. N Bellamy WW Buchanan CH Goldsmith J Campbell LW Stitt 1988 Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee J. Rheumatol. 15 1833 1840 1:STN:280:DyaL1M7lslCrsQ%3D%3D 3068365
3. D Bennett L Ogonda D Elliot L Humphreys M Lawlor D Beverland 2007 Comparison of immediate postoperative walking ability in patients receiving minimally invasive and standard-incision hip arthroplasty: a prospective blinded study J. Arthroplasty 22 490 495 10.1016/j.arth.2006.02.173 17562403
4. AF Brooker JW Bowerman RA Robinson LH Riley Jr 1973 Ectopic ossification following total hip replacement: incidence and a method of classification J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 55 1629 1632 1:STN:280:DyaE2M7hsVylsA%3D%3D 4217797
5. JJ Callaghan EA Salvati PM Pellicci PD Wilson Jr CS Ranawat 1985 Results of revision for mechanical failure after cemented total hip replacement, 1979 to 1982: a two to five-year follow-up J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 67 1074 1085 1:STN:280:DyaL2M3ovFCjsQ%3D%3D 4030826
6. GF Chimento V Pavone N Sharrock B Kahn J Cahill TP Sculco 2005 Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study J. Arthroplasty 20 139 144 10.1016/j.arth.2004.09.061 15902851
7. J Dawson R Fitzpatrick A Carr D Murray 1996 Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 78 185 190 1:STN:280:DyaK283gvFCnsQ%3D%3D 8666621
8. LD Dorr AV Maheshwari WT Long Z Wan LE Sirianni 2007 Early pain relief and function after posterior minimally invasive and conventional total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, randomized, blinded study J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 89 1153 1160 10.2106/JBJS.F.00940 17545416
9. PA Frndak TH Mallory AV Lombardi Jr 1993 Translateral surgical approach to the hip: the abductor muscle "split" Clin Orthop Relat Res. 295 135 141 8403638
10. A Gibson 1950 Posterior exposure of the hip joint J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 32 183 186 15422015
11. WH Harris 1969 Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 51 737 755 1:STN:280:DyaF1M3gtlWltQ%3D%3D 5783851
12. MA Hartzband 2004 Posterolateral minimal incision for total hip replacement: technique and early results Orthop. Clin. North Am. 35 119 129 10.1016/S0030-5898(03)00119-6 15062697
13. WC Head AD Cuellar RH Emerson Jr PC Peters Jr 1992 Disease and specific considerations in total hip replacements Curr. Opin. Rheumatol. 4 199 203 1:STN:280:DyaK383ls1Wiug%3D%3D 10.1097/00002281-199204000-00011 1581148
14. HL Hoeksma CH Van Den Ende HK Ronday A Heering FC Breedveld 2003 Comparison of the responsiveness of the Harris Hip Score with generic measures for hip function in osteoarthritis of the hip Ann. Rheum. Dis. 62 935 938 1:STN:280:DC%2BD3svjtFSksA%3D%3D 10.1136/ard.62.10.935 12972470
15. JR Howell DS Garbuz CP Duncan 2004 Minimally invasive hip replacement: rationale, applied anatomy, and instrumentation Orthop. Clin. North Am. 35 107 118 10.1016/S0030-5898(03)00112-3 15062696
16. YH Kim 2006 Comparison of primary total hip arthroplasties performed with a minimally invasive technique or a standard technique: a prospective and randomized study J. Arthroplasty 21 1092 1098 10.1016/j.arth.2006.01.015 17162166
17. AS Laurence 2000 Serum myoglobin and creatine kinase following surgery Br. J. Anaesth. 84 763 766 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD3cXksF2kt70%3D 10895753
18. DH Lin MH Jan TK Liu YF Lin SM Hou 2007 Effects of anterolateral minimally invasive surgery in total hip arthroplasty on hip muscle strength, walking speed, and functional score J. Arthroplasty 22 1187 1192 10.1016/j.arth.2006.11.011 18078889
19. S Nakamura K Matsuda N Arai N Wakimoto T Matsushita 2004 Mini-incision posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty Int. Orthop. 28 214 217 10.1007/s00264-004-0570-1 15168084
20. L Ogonda R Wilson P Archbold M Lawlor P Humphreys S O'Brien D Beverland 2005 A minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve early postoperative outcomes: a prospective, randomized, controlled trial J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 87 701 710 10.2106/JBJS.D.02645 15805196
21. A Sarmiento E Ebramzadeh WJ Gogan HA McKellop 1990 Cup containment and orientation in cemented total hip arthroplasties J. Bone Joint Surg. Br. 72 996 1002 1:STN:280:DyaK3M%2FmtVKlsg%3D%3D 2246305
22. TP Sculco 2004 Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: in the affirmative J. Arthroplasty 19 4 suppl 1 78 80 10.1016/j.arth.2004.02.021 15190555
23. TP Sculco LC Jordan WL Walter 2004 Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: the Hospital for Special Surgery experience Orthop. Clin. North Am. 35 137 142 10.1016/S0030-5898(03)00116-0 15062699
24. RG Sellers D Lyles LD Dorr 1988 The effect of pelvic rotation on alpha and theta angles in total hip arthroplasty Contemp Orthop. 17 67 70
25. JS Teet HB Skinner L Khoury 2006 The effect of the "mini" incision in total hip arthroplasty on component position J. Arthroplasty 21 503 507 10.1016/j.arth.2005.06.011 16781401
26. SJ Wall SC Mears 2008 Analysis of published evidence on minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty J. Arthroplasty 23 7 suppl 55 58 10.1016/j.arth.2008.06.010 18922374
27. JE Ware Jr M Kosinski MS Bayliss CA McHorney WH Rogers A Raczek 1995 Comparison of methods for the scoring and statistical analysis of SF-36 health profile and summary measures: summary of results from the Medical Outcomes Study Med. Care 33 4 suppl AS264 AS279 7723455
28. ST Woolson JM Hartford A Sawyer 1999 Results of a method of leg-length equalization for patients undergoing primary total hip replacement J. Arthroplasty 14 159 164 1:STN:280:DyaK1M7mtlKjsQ%3D%3D 10.1016/S0883-5403(99) 90119-5 10065720
29. ST Woolson CS Mow JF Syquia JV Lannin DJ Schurman 2004 Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a standard incision or a mini-incision J. Bone Joint Surg. Am. 86 1353 1358 15252080