Component positioning in primary total hip replacement: A prospective comparative study of two anterolateral approaches, minimally invasive versus gluteus medius hemimyotomy

Orthopaedics and Traumatology: Surgery and Research

Volumn 97, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 14-21

  Mouilhade, F ^a   Matsoukis, J ^b   Oger, P ^c   Mandereau, C ^a   Brzakala, V ^a   Dujardin, F ^a  

^a ROUEN UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (France)

^b J Monod Hospital   (France)

^c Mignot Hospital   (France)

Author keywords

Implant positioning; Mini incision; Rottinger; Total hip arthroplasty; Watson Jones

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT;

ACETABULUM; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CREATINE KINASE BLOOD LEVEL; FEMALE; HEMATOCRIT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MUSCLE INJURY; MYOTOMY; OPERATION DURATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TISSUE INJURY; TOTAL HIP PROSTHESIS;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MUSCLE, SKELETAL; OSTEOARTHRITIS, HIP; PATIENT POSITIONING; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79651474941     PISSN: 18770568     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.otsr.2010.05.013     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Wenz J.F., Gurkan I., Jibodh S.R. Mini-incision total hip arthroplasty: a comparative assessment of perioperative outcomes. Orthopedics 2002, 25:1031-1043.
2. DiGioia A.M., Plakseychuk A.Y., Levison T.J., Jaramaz B. Mini-incision technique for total hip arthroplasty with navigation. J Arthroplasty 2003, 18:123-128.
3. Wright J.M., Crockett H.C., Delgado S., Lyman S., Madsen M., Sculco T.P. Mini-incision for total hip arthroplasty: a prospective, controlled investigation with 5-year follow-up evaluation. J Arthroplasty 2004, 19:538-545.
4. Woolson S.T., Mow C.S., Syquia J.F., Lannin J.V., Schurman D.J. Comparison of primary total hip replacements performed with a standard incision or a mini-incision. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2004, 86:1353-1358.
5. Pagnano M.W., Leone J., Lewallen D.G., Hanssen A.D. Two-incision THA had modest outcomes and some substantial complications. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005, 441:86-90.
6. Bal B.S., Haltom D., Aleto T., Barrett M. Early complications of primary total hip replacement performed with a two-incision minimally invasive technique. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2005, 87:2432-2438.
7. Mardones R., Pagnano M.W., Nemanich J.P., Trousdale R.T. The Frank Stinchfield Award: muscle damage after total hip arthroplasty done with the two-incision and mini-posterior techniques. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005, 441:63-67.
8. Lin Y.C., Chen C.H., Huang H.T., Su J.Y., Fu Y.C., Chang J.K., et al. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty using a posterolateral approach: technique and preliminary results. Kaohsiung J Med Sci 2007, 23:611-617.
9. Chen D.W., Hu C.C., Chang Y.H., Yang W.E., Lee M.S. Comparison of clinical outcome in primary total hip arthroplasty by conventional anterolateral transgluteal or 2-incision approach. J Arthroplasty 2009, 24:528-532.
10. Hart R., Stipcak V., Janecek M., Visna P. Component position following total hip arthroplasty through a miniinvasive posterolateral approach. Acta Orthop Belg 2005, 71:60-64.
11. Lewinnek G.E., Lewis J.L., Tarr R., Compere C.L., Zimmerman J.R. Dislocations after total hip-replacement arthroplasties. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1978, 60:217-220.
12. Widmer K.H., Zurfluh B. Compliant positioning of total hip components for optimal range of motion. J Orthop Res 2004, 22:815-821.
13. Seki M., Yuasa N., Ohkuni K. Analysis of optimal range of socket orientations in total hip arthroplasty with use of computer-aided design simulation. J Orthop Res 1998, 16:513-517.
14. D'Lima D.D., Chen P.C., Colwell C.W. Optimizing acetabular component position to minimize impingement and reduce contact stress. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2001, 83(Suppl. 2):87-91.
15. Kleemann R.U., Heller M.O., Stoeckle U., Taylor W.R., Duda G.N. THA loading arising from increased femoral anteversion and offset may lead to critical cement stresses. J Orthop Res 2003, 21:767-774.
16. Heller M.O., Bergmann G., Deuretzbacher G., Claes L., Haas N.P., Duda G.N. Influence of femoral anteversion on proximal femoral loading: measurement and simulation in four patients. Clin Biomech 2001, 16:644-649.
17. Thomine J.M., Duparc F., Dujardin F., Biga N. Transgluteal approach to the hip by anterior hemimyotomy of the gluteus medius. Rev Chir Orthop 1999, 85:520-525.
18. Bertin K.C., Rottinger H. Anterolateral mini-incision hip replacement surgery: a modified Watson-Jones approach. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 429:248-255.
19. Charnley J. The long-term results of low-friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1972, 54:61-76.
20. d'Aubigne R.M., Postel M. The classic: functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis 1954. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2009, 467:7-27.
21. Harris W.H. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1969, 51:737-755.
22. Kim Y.H. Comparison of primary total hip arthroplasties performed with a minimally invasive technique or a standard technique: a prospective and randomized study. J Arthroplasty 2006, 21:1092-1098.
23. Laffosse J.M., Chiron P., Tricoire J.L., Giordano G., Molinier F., Puget J. Prospective and comparative study of minimally invasive posterior approach versus standard posterior approach in total hip replacement. Rev Chir Orthop 2007, 93:228-237.
24. Coventry M.B. Late dislocations in patients with Charnley total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1985, 67:832-841.
25. Harris W.H. Advances in surgical technique for total hip replacement: without and with osteotomy of the greater trochanter. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1980, 146:188-204.
26. Bellamy N., Buchanan W.W., Goldsmith C.H., Campbell J., Stitt L.W. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol 1988, 15:1833-1840.
27. Perneger T.V., Leplege A., Etter J.F., Rougemont A. Validation of a French-language version of the MOS 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) in young healthy adults. J Clin Epidemiol 1995, 48:1051-1060.
28. Ranawat C.S., Dorr L.D., Inglis A.E. Total hip arthroplasty in protrusio acetabuli of rheumatoid arthritis. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 1980, 62:1059-1065.
29. Dorr L.D., Maheshwari A.V., Long W.T., Wan Z., Sirianni L.E. Early pain relief and function after posterior minimally invasive and conventional total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, blinded study. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2007, 89:1153-1160.
30. Chimento G.F., Pavone V., Sharrock N., Kahn B., Cahill J., Sculco T.P. Minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty 2005, 20:139-144.
31. Bennett D., Ogonda L., Elliott D., Humphreys L., Beverland D.E. Comparison of gait kinematics in patients receiving minimally invasive and traditional hip replacement surgery: a prospective blinded study. Gait Posture 2006, 23:374-382.
32. Lawlor M., Humphreys P., Morrow E., Ogonda L., Bennett D., Elliott D., et al. Comparison of early postoperative functional levels following total hip replacement using minimally invasive versus standard incisions. A prospective randomized blinded trial. Clin Rehabil 2005, 19:465-474.
33. Williams S.L., Bachison C., Michelson J.D., Manner P.A. Component position in 2-incision minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty compared to standard total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23:197-202.
34. Berger R.A., Jacobs J.J., Meneghini R.M., Della Valle C., Paprosky W. Rosenberg AG. Rapid rehabilitation and recovery with minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2004, 429:239-247.
35. Chung W.K., Liu D., Foo L.S. Mini-incision total hip replacement--surgical technique and early results. J Orthop Surg 2004, 12:19-24.
36. Duwelius P.J., Burkhart R.L., Hayhurst J.O., Moller H., Butler J.B. Comparison of the 2-incision and mini-incision posterior total hip arthroplasty technique: a retrospective match-pair controlled study. J Arthroplasty 2007, 22:48-56.
37. Ogonda L., Wilson R., Archbold P., Lawlor M., Humphreys P., O'Brien S., et al. A minimal-incision technique in total hip arthroplasty does not improve early postoperative outcomes. A prospective, randomized, controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2005, 87:701-710.
38. Wall S.J., Mears S.C. Analysis of published evidence on minimally invasive total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23(Suppl. 7):55-58.
39. Pour A.E., Parvizi J., Sharkey P.F., Hozack W.J., Rothman R.H. Minimally invasive hip arthroplasty: what role does patient preconditioning play?. J Bone Joint Surg (Am) 2007, 89:1920-1927.
40. Georges J.L., Le Feuvre C., Metzger J.P., Chopin N., Vacheron A. Markers for early diagnosis of myocardial infarction. Lancet 1993, 342:1553.
41. Cairns J.A., Missirlis E., Walker W.H. Usefulness of serial determinations of myoglobin and creatine kinase in serum compared for assessment of acute myocardial infarction. Clin Chem 1983, 29:469-473.
42. Madsen M.S., Ritter M.A., Morris H.H., Meding J.B., Berend M.E., Faris P.M., et al. The effect of total hip arthroplasty surgical approach on gait. J Orthop Res 2004, 22:44-50.
43. Meneghini R.M., Smits S.A., Swinford R.R., Bahamonde R.E. A randomized, prospective study of 3 minimally invasive surgical approaches in total hip arthroplasty: comprehensive gait analysis. J Arthroplasty 2008, 23(Suppl. 1):68-73.
44. Teet J.S., Skinner H.B., Khoury L. The effect of the "mini" incision in total hip arthroplasty on component position. J Arthroplasty 2006, 21:503-507.
45. O'Brien D.A., Rorabeck C.H. The mini-incision direct lateral approach in primary total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005, 441:99-103.
46. Tannast M., Langlotz U., Siebenrock K.A., Wiese M., Bernsmann K., Langlotz F. Anatomic referencing of cup orientation in total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2005, 436:144-150.
47. Widmer K.H. A simplified method to determine acetabular cup anteversion from plain radiographs. J Arthroplasty 2004, 19:387-390.
48. Pradhan R. Planar anteversion of the acetabular cup as determined from plain anteroposterior radiographs. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 1999, 81:431-435.
49. Dorr L.D., Wan Z. Causes of and treatment protocol for instability of total hip replacement. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1998, 355:144-151.
50. Laffargue P., Pinoit Y., Tabutin J., Giraud F., Puget J., Migaud H. Computer-assisted positioning of the acetabular cup for total hip arthroplasty based on joint kinematics without prior imaging: preliminary results with computed tomographic assessment. Rev Chir Orthop 2006, 92:316-325.