Accuracy of two digital implant impression systems based on confocal microscopy with variations in customized software and clinical parameters

International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Implants

Volumn 30, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 56-64

  Giménez, Beatriz ^a   Pradíes, Guillermo ^a   Martínez Rus, Francisco ^a   özcan, Mutlu ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD COMPLUTENSE DE MADRID   (Spain)

^b University of Zürichk   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Dental implant; Digital impression; Implant angulation; Implant depth; Intraoral scanner

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; TOOTH IMPLANT;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; DENTAL ABUTMENT; DENTAL IMPRESSION; DENTAL PROCEDURE; HUMAN; LASER; MAXILLA; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS; SURGERY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TOOTH IMPLANT; TOOTH IMPLANTATION; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN; DENTAL ABUTMENTS; DENTAL IMPLANTATION; DENTAL IMPLANTS; DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS; DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE; DENTAL MODELS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS, IMPLANT-SUPPORTED; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LASERS; MAXILLA; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84942258106     PISSN: 08822786     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.11607/jomi.3689     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Gunne J, Jemt T, Linden B. Implant treatment in partially edentulous patients: A report on prostheses after 3 years. Int J Prosthodont 1994;7:143-148.
2. Jemt T, Linden B, Lekholm U. Failures and complications in 127 consecutively placed fixed partial prostheses supported by Brånemark implants: From prosthetic treatment to first annual checkup. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 1992;7:40-44.
3. Wenneberg A, Albrektsson T. Current challenges in successful rehabilitation with oral implants. J Oral Rehabil 2010;38:286-294.
4. Yannikakis S, Prombonas A. Improving the fit of implant prosthetics: An in vitro study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28:126-134.
5. Aglietta M, Siciliano VI, Zwahlen M, et al. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of implant-supported fixed dental prostheses with cantilever extensions after an observation period of at least 5 years. Clin Oral Implants Res 2009;20:441-451.
6. Lee H, Ercoli C, Funkenbush PD, Feng C. Effect of subgingival depth of implant placement on the dimensional accuracy of the implant impression: An in vitro study. J Prosthet Dent 2008;99:107-113.
7. Akalin ZF, Ozkan YK, Ekerim A. Effects of implant angulation, impression material, and variation in arch curvature width on implant transfer model accuracy. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28: 149-157.
8. Lee SJ, Gallucci GO. Digital vs. conventional implant impressions: Efficiency outcomes. Clin Oral Implants Res 2012;22:111-115.
9. Howell KJ, McGlumphy EA, Drago C, Knapik G. Comparison of the accuracy of Biomet 3i Encode Robocast Technology and conventional implant impression techniques. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2013;28:228-240.
10. Jo SH, Kim S, Shim JS, Lee KW, Moon HK. Effect of impression coping and implant angulation on the accuracy of implant impressions: An in vitro study. J Adv Prosthodont 2010;2:128-133.
11. Patzelt SB, Emmanouilidi A, Stampf S, Strub JR, Att W. Accuracy of full-arch scans using intraoral scanners. Clin Oral Investig 2014;18: 1687-1694.
12. Mehl A, Ender A, Mörmann W, Attin T. Accuracy testing of a new intraoral 3D camera. Int J Comput Dent 2009;12:11-28.
13. Syrek A, Reich G, Ranftl D, et al. Clinical evaluation of all-ceramic crowns fabricated from intraoral digital impressions based on the principle of active wavefront sampling. J Dent 2010;38:553-559.
14. Henkel GL. A comparison of fixed prostheses generated from conventional vs digitally scanned dental impressions. Compend Contin Educ Dent 2007;28:422-431.
15. Brawek PK, Wolfart S, Endres L, Kirsten A, Reich S. The clinical accuracy of single crowns exclusively fabricated by digital workflow: The comparison of two systems. Clin Oral Invest 2013;17:2119-2125.
16. Seelbach P, Brueckel C, Wöstmann B. Accuracy of digital and conventional impression technique and workflow. Clin Oral Invest 2013;17:1759-1764.
17. Kim SY, Kim MJ, Han JS, Yedi IS, Lim YJ, Kwon HB. Accuracy of dies captured by an intraoral digital impression system using parallel confocal imaging. Int J Prosthodont 2013;26:161-163.
18. Luthardt RG, Loos R, Quaas S. Accuracy of intraoral data acquisition in comparison to the conventional impression. Int J Comput Dent 2005;8:283-294.
19. Güth JF, Keul C, Stimmelmayr M, Beuer F, EdelhoffD. Accuracy of digital models obtained by direct and indirect data capturing. Clin Oral Invest 2013, 17:1201-1208.
20. Karl M, Shubinski P, Taylor T. Effect of intraoral scanning on the passivity of fit of implant-supported fixed partial prostheses. Quintessence Int 2012:43:555-563.
21. Ender A, Melh A. Full arch scans: Conventional versus digital impressions-An in-vitro study. Int J Comput Dent 2011;14:11-21.
22. Van der Meer WJ, Andriessen FS, Wismeijer D, Ren Y. Application of intra-oral dental scanners in the digital workflow of implantology. PLoS ONE 2012;7(8):e43312.
23. Ender A, Mehl A. Influence of scanning strategies on the accuracy of digital intraoral scanning systems. Int J Comput Dent 2013;16:11-21.
24. Giménez B, Özcan M, Martínez-Rus F, Pradíes G. Accuracy of a digital impression system based on active wavefront sampling technology for implants considering operator experience, implant angulation and depth. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res 2013 Jul 24. [Epub ahead of print].
25. Giménez B, Özcan M, Martínez-Rus F, Pradíes G. Accuracy of a digital impression system based on parallel confocal laser technology for implants with consideration of operator experience and implant angulation and depth. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2014;29:853-862.
26. Jemt T, Hjalmarsson L. In vitro measurements of precision of fit of implant supported frameworks. A comparison between "virtual" and "physical" assessments of fit using two different techniques of measurements. Clin Implant Dental Relat Research 2012;5:175-182.
27. Jang HK, Kim S, Shim JS, Lee KW, Moon HS. Accuracy of impressions for internal-connection implant prosthesis with various divergent angles. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2011;26:1011-1015.
28. Assuncao WG, Filho HG, Zaniquelli O. Evaluation of transfer impressions for osseointegrated implants at various angulations. Implant Dent 2004;13:358-366.
29. Assuncao WG, Tabata LF, Cardoso A, Rocha EP, Gomes EA. Prosthetic transfer impression accuracy evaluation for osseointegrated implants. Implant Dent 2008;17:248-256.
30. Vigolo P, Fonzi F, Majzoub Z, Cordioli G. An evaluation of impression technique for multiple internal connection implant prostheses. J Prosthet Dent 2004;92:470-476.
31. Choi JH, Lim YJ, Yim SH, Kim CW. Evaluation of the accuracy of implant-level impression techniques for internal-connection implant prostheses in parallel and divergent models. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2007;22:761-768.
32. Kim S, Nicholls JI, Han CH, Lee KH, Lee WK. Displacement of implant components from impressions to definitive casts. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants 2006;21:747-755.