Integrated learning: Ways of fostering the applicability of teachers' pedagogical and psychological knowledge

Frontiers in Psychology

Volumn 6, Issue JUN, 2015, Pages

  Harr, Nora ^a   Eichler, Andreas ^b   Renkl, Alexander ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDUCATION FREIBURG   (Germany)

Author keywords

Experimental design; General pedagogical psychological knowledge; Instructional design; Pedagogical content knowledge; Teacher education

Indexed keywords

EID: 84940507938     PISSN: None     EISSN: 16641078     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00738     Document Type: Article

References (80)

1. Ainsworth, S. (1999). The functions of multiple representations. Comput. Educ. 33, 131-152. doi: 10.1016/S0360-1315(99)00029-9.
2. Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: a conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learn. Instr. 16, 183-198. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2006.03.001.
3. Ainsworth, S., Bibby, P., and Wood, D. (2002). Examining the effects of different multiple representational systems in learning primary mathematics. J. Learn. Sci. 11, 25-61. doi: 10.1207/S15327809JLS1101_2.
4. American Psychological Association. (2010). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
5. Anderson, J. R., and Lebiere, C. (1998). The Atomic Components of Thought. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
6. Ayres, P. (2013). Can the isolated-elements strategy be improved by targeting points of high cognitive load for additional practice? Learn. Instr. 23, 115-124. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.08.002.
7. Baddeley, A. D. (2012). Working memory: theories, models, and controversies. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 63, 1-29. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100422.
8. Ball, D. L. (2000). Bridging practices: intertwining content and pedagogy in teaching and learning to teach. J. Teach. Educ. 51, 241-247. doi: 10.1177/0022487100051003013.
9. Ball, D. L., Thames, M. H., and Phelps, G. (2008). Content knowledge for teaching: what makes it special? J. Teach. Educ. 59, 389-407. doi: 10.1177/0022487108324554.
10. Bandura, A. (1986). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social Cognitive Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
11. Berthold, K., and Renkl, A. (2009). Instructional aids to support a conceptual understanding of multiple representations. J. Educ. Psychol. 101, 70-87. doi: 10.1037/a0013247.
12. Berufsverband deutscher Psychologinnen und Psychologen. (2005). Ethische Richtlinien der DGPs und des BDP. Available at: http://www.bdp-verband.org/bdp/verband/ethik.shtml.
13. Bodemer, D. (2008). "Multiple externe repräsentationen [Multiple external representations]," in Schlüsselbegriffe der Medienpsychologie [Key Concepts of Media Psychology], eds N. Krämer, S. Schwan, D. Unz, and M. Suckfüll (Stuttgart: Kohlhammer), 166-172.
14. Borko, H., and Putnam, R. T. (1996). "Learning to teach," in Handbook of Educational Psychology, eds D. C. Berliner and R. C. Calfee (New York, NY: Macmillan), 673-708.
15. Bullough, R. V. (2001). Pedagogical content knowledge circa 1907 and 1987: a study in the history of an idea. Teach. Teach. Educ. 17, 655-666. doi: 10.1016/S0742-051X(01)00022-1.
16. Cochran-Smith, M., and Zeichner, K. M.(eds). (2005). Studying Teacher Education: The Report of the AERA Panel on Research and Teacher Education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
17. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
18. Colhoun, J., Gentner, D., and Loewenstein, J. (2008). "Learning abstract principles through principle-case comparison," in Proceedings of the 30th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, Austin, TX, 1659-1664.
19. Darling-Hammond, L. (2006). Powerful Teacher Education: Lessons from Exemplary Programs. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
20. Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 64, 135-168. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-113011-143750.
21. Duval, R. (2006). A cognitive analysis of problems of comprehension in a learning of mathematics. Educ. Stud. Math. 61, 103-131. doi: 10.1007/s10649-006-0400-z.
22. Eichelmann, A., Narciss, S., Schnaubert, L., and Melis, E. (2012). Typische fehler bei der addition und subtraktion von brüchen-ein review zu empirischen fehleranalysen. [Typical mistakes in addition and subtraction of fraction-a review of empirical error analyses]. J. Math. Didakt. 33, 29-57. doi: 10.1007/s13138-011-0031-5.
23. Eichler, A., and Vogel, M. (2009). Leitidee Daten und Zufall: Von Konkreten Beispielen zur Didaktik der Stochastik [Main Idea Data and Chance: From Concrete Examples to Didactics of Stochastics]. Wiesbaden: Vieweg + Teubner.
24. Eitel, A., Scheiter, K., Schüler, A., Nyström, M., and Holmqvist, K. (2013). How a picture facilitates the process of learning from text: evidence for scaffolding. Learn. Instr. 28, 48-63. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2013.05.002.
25. Engle, R. W. (2002). Working memory capacity as executive attention. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 11, 19-23. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.00160.
26. Ericsson, K. A., and Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychol. Rev. 102, 211-245. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.211.
27. Finn, C. E. (2001). How to Get Better Teachers-and Treat them Right. Hoover Digest. Available at: http://www.hoover.org/publications/hoover-digest/article/7136 [accessed March 10, 2014].
28. Gentner, D., Loewenstein, J., Thompson, L., and Forbus, K. D. (2009). Reviving inert knowledge: analogical abstraction supports relational retrieval of past events. Cogn. Sci. 33, 1343-1382. doi: 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2009.01070.x.
29. Goldstone, R. L., and Day, S. B. (2012). Introduction to 'new conceptualizations of transfer of learning'. Educ. Psychol. 47, 149-152. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2012.695710.
30. Grossman, P. (2008). Responding to our critics: from crisis to opportunity in research on teacher education. J. Teach. Educ. 59, 10-23. doi: 10.1177/0022487107310748.
31. Grossman, P., Compton, C., Igra, D., Ronfeldt, M., Shahan, E., and Williamson, P. W. (2009). Teaching practice: a cross-professional perspective. Teach. Coll. Rec. 111, 2055-2100.
32. Grossman, P., and McDonald, M. (2008). Back to the future: directions for research in teaching and teacher education. Am. Educ. Res. J. 45, 184-205. doi: 10.3102/0002831207312906.
33. Grossman, P., and Richert, A. E. (1988). Unacknowledged knowledge growth: a re-examination of the effects of teacher education. Teach. Teach. Educ. 4, 53-62. doi: 10.1016/0742-051X(88)90024-8.
34. Harr, N., Eichler, A., and Renkl, A. (2014). Integrating pedagogical content knowledge and pedagogical/psychological knowledge in mathematics. Front. Psychol. 5:924. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00924.
35. Hasemann, K. (1986). Mathematische Lernprozesse: Analysen mit Kognitionstheoretischen Modellen [Mathematical Learning Processes: Analyses with Theoretical Cognition Models]. Braunschweig: Vieweg. doi: 10.1007/978-3-663-14035-1.
36. Hashweh, M. Z. (1987). Effects of subject-matter knowledge in the teaching of biology and physics. Teach. Teach. Educ. 3, 109-120. doi: 10.1016/0742-051X(87)90012-6.
37. Hattie, J. (2009). Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. Oxford: Routledge.
38. Hefendehl-Hebeker, L. (1996). Brüche haben viele gesichter [Fractions have many faces]. Mathematik lehren [Teach. Math.] 78, 20-22, 47-48.
39. Heinze, A., Star, J. R., and Verschaffel, L. (2009). Flexible and adaptive use of strategies and representations in mathematics education. ZDM 41, 535-540. doi: 10.1007/s11858-009-0214-4.
40. Hoffman, B., and Schraw, G. (2010). Conceptions of efficiency: applications in learning and problem solving. Educ. Psychol. 45, 1-14. doi: 10.1080/00461520903213618.
41. Holyoak, K. J. (2012). "Analogy and relational reasoning," in The Oxford Handbook of Thinking and Reasoning, eds K. J. Holyoak and R. G. Morrison (New York, NY: Oxford University Press), 234-259. doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199734689.001.0001.
42. Kalyuga, S. (2006a). Assessment of learners' organised knowledge structures in adaptive learning environments. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 20, 333-342. doi: 10.1002/acp.1249.
43. Kalyuga, S. (2006b). Rapid assessment of learners' proficiency: a cognitive load approach. Educ. Psychol. 26, 735-749. doi: 10.1080/01443410500342674.
44. Kalyuga, S. (2008). When less is more in cognitive diagnosis: a rapid online method for diagnosing learner task-specific expertise. J. Educ. Psychol. 100, 603-612. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.100.3.603.
45. Kennedy, M. M., Ahn, S., and Choi, J. (2008). "The value added by teacher education," in Handbook of Research on Teacher Education: Enduring Questions in Changing Contexts, 3rd Edn, eds M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, D. J. McIntyre, and K. E. Demers (New York, NY: Routledge), 1247-1271.
46. Kleickmann, T., Richter, D., Kunter, M., Elsner, J., Besser, M., Krauss, S., et al. (2013). Teachers' content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge: the role of structural differences in teacher education. J. Teach. Educ. 64, 90-106. doi: 10.1177/0022487112460398.
47. Koehler, M. J., and Mishra, P. (2005). What happens when teachers design educational technology? The development of technological pedagogical content knowledge. J. Educ. Comput. Res. 32, 131-152. doi: 10.2190/0EW7-01WB-BKHL-QDYV.
48. Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., and Cain, W. (2013). What is technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK)? J. Educ. 193, 13-19.
49. Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., Kereluik, K., Shin, T. S., and Graham, C. R. (2014). "The technological pedagogical content knowledge framework," in Handbook of Research on Educational Communications and Technology, eds J. M. Spector, M. D. Merrill, J. Elen, and M. J. Bishop (New York, NY: Springer), 101-112. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4614-3185-5_9.
50. Koehler, M. J., Mishra, P., and Yahya, K. (2007). Tracing the development of teacher knowledge in a design seminar: integrating content, pedagogy and technology. Comput. Educ. 49, 740-762. doi: 10.1016/j.compedu.2005.11.012.
51. Ministerium für Kultus, Jugend und Sport des Landes Baden-Württemberg. (2004). Bildungsstandards für Mathematik im Gymnasium [Educational Standards of Mathematics for Academic High School]. Available at: http://www.bildung-staerkt-menschen.de/service/downloads/Bildungsstandards/Gym/GymMbs.pdf [accessed January 28, 2014].
52. Mishra, P., and Koehler, M. J. (2006). Technological pedagogical content knowledge: a framework for teacher knowledge. Teach. Coll. Rec. 108, 1017-1054. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9620.2006.00684.x.
53. National Board for Professional Teaching Standards. (2013). AYA/Mathematics Standards. Available at: http://www.nbpts.org/sites/default/files/documents/certificates/NB-Standards/nbpts-certificate-aya-math-standards/_10.01.13.pdf [accessed October 10, 2014].
54. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and Standards for School Mathematics. Available at: http://www.nctm.org/standards/content.aspx?id$=$16909 [accessed October 20, 2014].
55. Niess, M. L., van Zee, E. H., and Gillow-Wiles, H. (2010). Knowledge growth in teaching mathematics/science with spreadsheets: moving PCK to TPACK through online professional development. J. Digit. Learn. Teach. Educ. 27, 42-52. doi: 10.1080/21532974.2010.10784657.
56. Paas, F. G. W. C., Tuovinen, J. E., Tabbers, H., and Van Gerven, P. W. M. (2003). Cognitive load measurement as a means to advance cognitive load theory. Educ. Psychol. 38, 63-71. doi: 10.1207/S15326985EP3801_8.
57. Paas, F. G. W. C., and van Merriënboer, J. J. G. (1994). Instructional control of cognitive load in the training of complex cognitive tasks. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 6, 351-371. doi: 10.1007/BF02213420.
58. Padberg, F. (2009). Didaktik der Bruchrechnung: Für Lehrerausbildung und Lehrerfortbildung [Didactics of Fractions: For Teacher Education and Continuing Education of Teachers]. Heidelberg: Spektrum, Akad. Verlag.
59. Rau, M. A., Aleven, V., and Rummel, N. (2009). "Intelligent tutoring systems with multiple representations and self-explanation prompts support learning of fractions," in Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Amsterdam, 441-448.
60. Renkl, A. (2014). Towards an instructionally-oriented theory of example-based learning. Cogn. Sci. 38, 1-37. doi: 10.1111/cogs.12086.
61. Renkl, A., Mandl, H., and Gruber, H. (1996). Inert knowledge: analyses and remedies. Educ. Psychol. 31, 115-121. doi: 10.1207/s15326985ep3102_3.
62. Schnotz, W., and Bannert, M. (2003). Construction and interference in learning from multiple representation. Learn. Instr. 13, 141-156. doi: 10.1016/S0959-4752(02)00017-8.
63. Schwonke, R., Berthold, K., and Renkl, A. (2009). How multiple external representations are used and how they can be made more useful. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 23, 1227-1243. doi: 10.1002/acp.1526.
64. Schwonke, R., Ertelt, A., Otieno, C., Renkl, A., Aleven, V., and Salden, R. J. C. M. (2013). Metacognitive support promotes an effective use of instructional resources in intelligent tutoring. Learn. Instr. 23, 136-150. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2012.08.003.
65. Segall, A. (2004). Revisiting pedagogical content knowledge: the pedagogy of content/the content of pedagogy. Teach. Teach. Educ. 20, 489-504. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2004.04.006.
66. Seidel, T., Blomberg, G., and Renkl, A. (2013). Instructional strategies for using video in teacher education. Teach. Teach. Educ. 34, 56-65. doi: 10.1016/j.tate.2013.03.004.
67. Seidel, T., and Shavelson, R. J. (2007). Teaching effectiveness research in the past decade: the role of theory and research design in disentangling meta-analysis results. Rev. Educ. Res. 77, 454-499. doi: 10.3102/0034654307310317.
68. Seufert, T., and Brünken, R. (2006). Cognitive load and the format of instructional aids for coherence formation. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 20, 321-331. doi: 10.1002/acp.1248.
69. Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educ. Res. 15, 4-14. doi: 10.3102/0013189X015002004.
70. Shulman, L. S. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform. Harv. Educ. Rev. 57, 1-23. doi: 10.17763/haer.57.1.j463w79r56455411.
71. Sweller, J., Ayres, P., and Kalyuga, S. (2011). Cognitive Load Theory. Berlin: Springer. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-8126-4.
72. Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J. G., and Paas, F. G. W. C. (1998). Cognitive architecture and instructional design. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 10, 251-296. doi: 10.1023/A:1022193728205.
73. Universität Freiburg. (2014). Lehramt an Gymnasien. Available at: http://www.zlb.uni-freiburg.de/zlb-veroeffentlichungen/lehramt-an-gymnasien-gympo.pdf [accessed May 5, 2015].
74. Unsworth, N., Heitz, R. P., Shrock, J. C., and Engle, R. W. (2005). An automated version of the operation span task. Behav. Res. Methods 37, 498-505. doi: 10.3758/BF03192720.
75. van Gog, T., and Paas, F. (2008). Instructional efficiency: revisiting the original construct in educational research. Educ. Psychol. 43, 16-26. doi: 10.1080/00461520701756248.
76. Voss, T., Kunter, M., and Baumert, J. (2011). Assessing teacher candidates' general pedagogical/psychological knowledge: test construction and validation. J. Educ. Psychol. 103, 952-969. doi: 10.1037/a0025125.
77. Whitehead, A. N. (1929). The Aims of Education and Other Essays. New York, NY: The Free Press.
78. Wittmann, E. C. (1981). Grundfragen des Mathematikunterrichts [Fundamental Questions of Math Class]. Braunschweig: Vieweg. doi: 10.1007/978-3-322-91539-9.
79. Zech, F. (1996). Grundkurs Mathematikdidaktik: Theoretische und Praktische Anleitungen für das Lehren und Lernen von Mathematik [Basic Course in Mathematics Education: Theoretical and Practical Instructions for Teaching and Learning Mathematics]. Weinheim: Beltz.
80. Zeichner, K. (2012). The turn once again toward practice-based teacher education. J. Teach. Educ. 63, 376-382. doi: 10.1177/0022487112445789.