Discussion: How Different Can Perspectives on L2 Development Be?

Language Learning

Volumn 65, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 210-232

  Hulstijn, Jan H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Interlanguage development; Orders and sequences; Second language acquisition

Indexed keywords

EID: 84938491470     PISSN: 00238333     EISSN: 14679922     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/lang.12096     Document Type: Note

References (54)

1. Bohnacker, U. (2004). Nonnative acquisition of verb second: On the empirical underpinnings of universal L2 claims. In M. den Dikken & C. M. Tortora (Eds.), The function of function words and functional categories (pp. 41-76). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
2. Bresnan, J. (2001). Lexical functional syntax. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
3. Cancino, H., Rosansky, E. J., & Schumann, J. H. (1978). The acquisition of English negatives and interrogatives by native Spanish speakers. In E. M. Hatch (Ed.), Second language acquisition: A book of readings (pp. 207-230). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
4. Carroll, S. E. (2007). Autonomous induction theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition: An introduction (pp. 155-173). Mahwah., NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Chomsky, N. (2013). Problems of projection. Lingua, 130, 33-49.
6. Croft, W. (2009). Syntax is more diverse, and evolutionary linguistics is already here. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 453-454.
7. de Bot, K., Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2007). A dynamic systems theory approach to second language acquisition. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 10, 7-21.
8. Dimroth, C. (2013). Learner varieties. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 3256-3263). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
9. Dimroth, C., Rast, R., Starren, M., & Watorek, M. (2013). Methods for studying the learning of a new language under controlled input conditions: The VILLA project. EUROSLA Yearbook, 13, 109-138.
10. Dulay, H. C., & Burt, M. K. (1974). Natural sequences in child second language acquisition. Language Learning, 24, 37-53.
11. Dyson, B. (2009). Processability theory and the role of morphology in English as a second language development: A longitudinal study. Second Language Research, 25, 355-376.
12. Ellis, N. C. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143-188.
13. Ellis, R. (2015). Researching acquisition sequences: Idealisation and de-idealisation in SLA. [Special Issue]. Language Learning, 65, 181-209.
14. Ellis, R., Loewen, S., Elder, C., Erlam, R., Philp, J., & Reinders, H. (2009). Implicit and explicit knowledge in second language learning, testing and teaching. Bristol, UK: Multilingual Matters.
15. Eskildsen, S. W. (2015). What counts as a developmental sequence? Exemplar-based L2 learning of English questions. [Special Issue]. Language Learning, 65, 33-62.
16. Eskildsen, S. W. (2012). L2 negation constructions at work. Language Learning, 62, 335-372.
17. Eskildsen, S. W., & Cadierno, T. (2007). Are recurring multi-word expressions really syntactic freezes? Second language acquisition from the perspective of usage-based linguistics. In M. Nenonen & S. Niemi (Eds.), Collocations and idioms 1: Papers from the First Nordic Conference on Syntactic Freezes, Joensuu, May 19-20, 2007 (pp. 86-99). Joensuu, Finland: Joensuu University Press.
18. Filipović, L., & Hawkins, J. A. (2013). Multiple factors in second language acquisition: The CASP model. Linguistics, 51, 145-176.
19. Fodor, J. (1980). On the impossibility of acquiring "more powerful" structures. In M. Piatelli-Palmarini (Ed.), Language and learning: The debate between Jean Piaget and Noam Chomsky (pp. 142-149). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20. Glahn, E., Håkansson, G., Hammarberg, B., Holmen, A., Hvenekilde, A., & Lund, K. (2001). Processability in Scandinavian second language acquisition. Studes in Second Language Acquisition, 23, 389-416.
21. Goldschneider, J. M., & DeKeyser, R. M. (2001). Explaining the "Natural order of L2 morpheme acquisition" in English: A meta-analysis of multiple determinants. Language Learning, 51, 1-50.
22. Hatch, E. M. (1983). Psycholinguistics: A second language perspective. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
23. Hawkins, J. A., & Filipović, L. (2012). Criterial features in L2 English: Specifying the reference levels of the Common European Framework. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
24. Håkansson, G., Pienemann, M., & Sayehli, S. (2002). Transfer and typological proximity in the context of L2 processing. Second Language Research, 18, 250-273.
25. Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of language: Brain, meaning, grammar, evolution. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
26. Klein, W., & Perdue, C. (1997). The basic variety (or: Couldn't natural languages be much simpler?). Second Language Research, 13, 301-347.
27. Klein Gunnewiek, E. A. (2000). Sequenzen und Konsequenzen. Zur Entwicklung niederländischer Lerner im Deutschen als Fremdsprache [Sequences and consequences: Development of Dutch learners of German as a foreign language]. Amsterdam: Rodopi.
28. Lantolf, J. P. (2012). Sociocultural theory: A dialectical approach to L2 research. In S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 57-72). New York: Routledge.
29. Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2014). Sociocultural theory and the pedagogical imperative in L2 education: Vygotskian praxis and the research/practice divide. New York: Routledge.
30. Lenzing, A. (2013). The interface between comprehension and production in SLA. Paper presented at the13th International Symposium of Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition, Lunds Universitet, Sweden.
31. Lenzing, A, (2014). Shared syntax in L2 acquisition-exploring the interface between grammatical encoding and decoding. Paper presented at the 14th International Symposium of Processability Approaches to Language Acquisition, University of Paderborn.
32. Lenzing, A. (2015). Exploring regularities and dynamic systems in L2 development. [Special Issue]. Language Learning, 65, 89-122.
33. Lieven, E., & Tomasello, M. (2008). Children's first language acquisition from a usage-based perspective. In P. Robinson & N. C. Ellis (Eds.), Handbook of cognitive linguistics and second language acquisition (pp. 168-196). New York: Routledge.
34. Lowie, W., & Verspoor, M. (2015). Variability and variation in acquisition orders: A dynamic reevaluation. [Special Issue]. Language Learning, 65, 63-88.
35. MacWhinney, B. (Ed.). (1999). The emergence of language. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
36. Meisel, J. M., Clahsen, H., & Pienemann, M. (1981). On determining developmental stages in natural second languages acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 3, 109-135.
37. Nevins, A., Pesestky, D., & Rodrigues, C. (2008). Pirahã exceptionality: A reassessment. Language, 85, 355-404.
38. Oaksford, M., & Chater, N. (2007). Bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
39. O'Grady, W. (2005). Syntactic carpentry: An emergentist approach to syntax. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
40. O'Grady, W. (2012). Language acquisition without an acquisition device. Language Teaching, 45, 116-130.
41. O'Grady, W. (2015). Processing determinism. [Special Issue]. Language Learning, 65, 6-32.
42. Ortega, L. (2014). Trying out theories on interlanguage: Description and explanation over 40 years of L2 negation research. In Z. Han & E. Tarone (Eds.), Interlanguage: Forty years later (pp. 173-201). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
43. Pienemann, M. (1984). Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6, 186-214.
44. Pienemann, M. (1998). Language processing and second language development: Processability Theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
45. Pienemann, M. (2015). An outline of Processability Theory and its relationship to other approaches to SLA. [Special Issue]. Language Learning, 65, 123-151.
46. Pienemann, M., Di Biase, B., Kawaguchi, S., & Håkansson, G. (2005). Processibility, typological distance and L1 transfer. In M. Pienemann (Ed.), Cross-linguistic aspects of Processibility Theory (pp. 85-116). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
47. Pienemann, M., & Keßler, J.-U., (2012). Processibility theory. In S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 228-246). London: Routledge.
48. Pienemann, M., Keßler, J.-U., & Lenzing, A. (2013). Developmentally moderated transfer and the role of the L2 in L3 acquisition. In A. Flymann Mattsson & C. Norrby (Eds.), Language acquisition and use in multilingual contexts: Theory and practice (pp. 142-159). Lund, Sweden: Travaux de L'Institute Linguistique de Lund.
49. Rooryck, J., Smith, N. V., Liptak, A., & Blakemore, D. (2010). Editorial introduction to the special issue of Lingua on Evans & Levinson's "The myth of language universals." Lingua, 120, 2651-2656.
50. Sharwood Smith, M., & Truscott, J. (2005). Stages or continua in second language acquisition: A MOGUL solution. Applied Linguistics, 22, 219-240.
51. Sharwood Smith, M., & Truscott, J. (2014). The multilingual mind: A modular processing perspective. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
52. Spinner, P. (2013). Language production and reception: A Processability Theory study. Language Learning, 63, 704-739.
53. VanPatten, B. (2012). Input processing. In S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 268-281). New York: Routledge.
54. Zhang, X., & Lantolf, J. P. (2015), Natural or artificial: Is the route of L2 development teachable? [Special Issue]. Language Learning, 65, 152-180.