Natural or Artificial: Is the Route of L2 Development Teachable?

Language Learning

Volumn 65, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 152-180

  Zhang, Xian ^a,b   Lantolf, James P ^c  

^a GUANGDONG UNIVERSITY OF FOREIGN STUDIES   (China)

^b RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Concept based instruction; Natural sequence; Processability theory; Sociocultural theory; Teachability hypothesis

Indexed keywords

EID: 84937968684     PISSN: 00238333     EISSN: 14679922     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/lang.12094     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Bonilla, C. (2012). Testing processability theory in L2 Spanish: Can readiness or markedness predict development? Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Pittsburgh.
2. Boss, B. (1996). German grammar for beginners: The teachability hypothesis and its relevance to the classroom. In C. Arbonés Solà, J. Rolin-Ianziti, & R. Sussex (Eds.), Who's afraid of teaching grammar (pp. 93-103). Queensland, Australia: University of Queensland Press.
3. Bresnan, J. (2001). Lexical-functional syntax. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
4. Dyson, B. (2009). Processability theory and the role of morphology in English as a second language development: A longitudinal study. Second Language Research, 25, 355-376.
5. Ellis, R. (1989). Are classroom and naturalistic acquisition the same? A study of the classroom acquisition of German word order rules. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 308-328.
6. Ellis, R. (2006). Modelling learning difficulty and second language proficiency: The differential contributions of implicit and explicit knowledge. Applied Linguistics, 27, 431-463.
7. Erlam, R. (2006). Elicited imitation as a measure of L2 implicit knowledge: An empirical validation study. Applied Linguistics, 27, 464-491.
8. Farley, A., & McCollam, K. (2004). Learner readiness and L2 production in Spanish: Processability theory on trial. Estudios de Lingüística Aplicada, 40, 47-69.
9. Felix, S. W. (1981). The effect of formal instruction on second language acquisition. Language Learning, 31, 87-112.
10. Flynn, S. (1987). A parameter-setting model of L2 acquisition: Experimental studies in anaphora. Dortrecht, Netherlands: Reidel.
11. Gallimore, R., & Tharp, R. (1981). The interpretation of elicited imitation in a standardized context. Language Learning, 31, 369-392.
12. Gal'perin, P. I. (1970). An experimental study in the formation of mental actions. In E. Stones (Ed.), Reading in educational psychology: Learning and teaching (pp. 142-154). New York: Barnes and Noble.
13. Gal'perin, P. I. (1992). Stage-by-stage formation as a method of psychological investigation. Journal of Russian and Eastern European Psychology, 30, 60-80.
14. Gao, X. D. (2005). Noun phrase morphemes and topic development in L2 Mandarin Chinese: A processability perspective. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Wellington, Victoria, New Zealand.
15. Gattegno, C. (1976). The common sense of teaching foreign languages. New York: Educational Solutions.
16. Jansen, L. (2008). Acquisition of German word order in tutored learners: A cross-sectional study in a wider theoretical context. Language Learning, 58, 185-231.
17. Kessler, J-U., & Pienemann, M. (2011). Research methodology. How do we know about developmental schedules? In M. Pienemann & J-U. Kessler (Eds.), Studying processability (pp. 84-96). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
18. Lambert, W. E., & Tucker, R. G. (1972). Bilingual education of children: The St. Lambert experiment. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
19. Lantolf, J. P., & Poehner, M. E. (2014). Sociocultural theory and the pedagogical imperative in L2 education: Vygotskian praxis and the theory/research divide. New York: Routledge.
20. Lantolf, J. P., & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Sociocultural theory and the genesis of second language development. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
21. Mackey, A. (1999). Input, interaction and second language development: An empirical study of question formation in ESL. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 557-587.
22. Mansouri, F., & Duffy, L. (2005). The pedagogic effectiveness of developmental readiness in ESL grammar instruction. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 28, 81-99.
23. Morgan-Short, K., Finger, I., Grey, S., & Ullman, M. T. (2012). Second language processing shows increased native-like neural responses after months of no exposure. PLoS One, 7, e32974.
24. Negueruela, E. A. (2003). A sociocultural approach to the teaching-learning of second languages: Systemic-theoretical instruction and L2 development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA.
25. Paradis, M. (2009). Declarative and procedural determinants of second languages. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
26. Piaget, J. (1950). The psychology of intelligence. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
27. Pienemann, M. (1984). Psychological constraints on the teachability of languages. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 6, 186-214.
28. Pienemann, M. (1987). Determining the influence of instruction on L2 speech processing. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 10, 83-113.
29. Pienemann, M. (1989). Is language teachable? Psycholinguistic experiments and hypotheses. Applied Linguistics, 10, 52-79.
30. Pienemann, M. (1998). Language processing and second language development: Processability theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
31. Pienemann, M. (2005). Cross-linguistic aspects of processability theory. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
32. Pienemann, M. (2007). Processability theory. In B. VanPatten & J. Williams (Eds.), Theories in second language acquisition (pp. 137-154). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
33. Pienemann, M., Di Biase, B., & Kawaguchi, S. (2005). Extending processability theory. In M. Pienemann (Ed.), Cross-linguistic aspects of processability theory (pp. 199-252). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
34. Pienemann, M., & Johnston, M. (1987). Factors influencing the development of language proficiency. In D. Nunan (Ed.), Applying second language acquisition research (pp. 45-141). Adelaide, Australia: National Curriculum Resource Centre.
35. Radloff, C. F. (1991). Sentence repetition testing for studies of community bilingualism. Arlington: Summer Institute of Linguistics and the University of Texas at Arlington.
36. Spada, N., & Lightbown, P. M. (1999). Instruction, first language influence, and developmental readiness in second language acquisition. Modern Language Journal, 83, 1-22.
37. Ullman, M. T. (2005). A cognitive neuroscience perspective on second language acquisition: The declarative/procedural model. In C. Sanz (Ed.), Mind and context in adult second language acquisition: Methods, theory, and practice (pp. 141-178). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.
38. Van Patten, B. (1996). Input processing and grammar instruction in second language acquisition. Northwood, NJ: Ablex.
39. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
40. Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
41. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Volume 1. New York: Plenum.
42. Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Volume 3: Problems of the theory and history of psychology. New York: Plenum.
43. Wang, X. (2011). Grammatical development among Chinese L2 learners: From a processability account. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Newcastle University. New Castle Upon Tyne, UK.
44. Williams, J. N. (2012). Working memory and SLA. In S. M. Gass & A. Mackey (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 427-441). New York: Routledge.
45. Xun, L. (2005). New practical Chinese reader (Book 1). Beijing, China: Beijing Language and Culture University Press.
46. Zhang, X. (2014). The teachability hypothesis and concept-based instruction: Topicalization in Chinese as a second language. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Pennsylvania State University. University Park, PA.
47. Zhang, Y. (2001). Second language acquisition of Chinese grammatical morphemes: A processability perspective. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, The Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
48. Zhang, Y. (2007). Testing the topic hypothesis: The L2 acquisition of Chinese syntax. In F. Mansouri (Ed.), Second language acquisition research: Theory-construction and testing (pp. 145-171). Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.