Effect of different reconstruction algorithms on computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) performance in ultra-low dose CT colonography

European Journal of Radiology

Volumn 84, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 547-554

  Lee, Eun Sun ^a   Kim, Se Hyung ^a   Im, Jong Pil ^a   Kim, Sang Gyun ^a   Shin, Cheong Il ^a   Han, Joon Koo ^a   Choi, Byung Ihn ^a  

^a Seoul National University Hospital   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Colonic polyps; Computed tomographic colonography; Computer assisted diagnosis; Radiation protection

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BODY POSTURE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL POLYP; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MALE; POLYPECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION PROTECTION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIGMOIDOSCOPY; ULTRA LOW DOSE COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; COLON POLYP; EVALUATION STUDY; MIDDLE AGED; PROCEDURES; RADIOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARDS; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ADULT; AGED; ALGORITHMS; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 84933280343     PISSN: 0720048X     EISSN: 18727727     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2014.11.031     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bresalier RS. Early detection of and screening for colorectal neoplasia. Gut Liver 2009;3(2):69-80.
2. Johnson CD, Chen MH, Toledano AY, Heiken JP, Dachman A, Kuo MD, et al. Accuracy of CT colonography for detection of large adenomas and cancers. N Engl J Med 2008;359(12):1207-17.
3. Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ, Leung WK, Winter TC, Hinshaw JL, et al. CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 2007;357(14):1403-12.
4. Lee BI, Hong SP, Kim SE, Kim SH, Kim HS, Hong SN, et al. Korean guidelines for colorectal cancer screening and polyp detection. Clin Endosc 2012;45(1):25-43.
5. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, Smith RA, Brooks D, Andrews KS, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: a joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. CA Cancer J Clin 2008;58(3):130-60.
6. Weizman AV, Nguyen GC. Colon cancer screening in 2010: an update. Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol 2010;56(2):181-8.
7. Albert JM. Radiation risk from CT: implications for cancer screening. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013;201(1):W81-7.
8. van Gelder RE, Venema HW, Florie J, Nio CY, Serlie IW, Schutter MP, et al. CT colonography: feasibility of substantial dose reduction - comparison of medium to very low doses in identical patients. Radiology 2004;232(2): 611-20.
9. Iannaccone R1, Catalano C, Mangiapane F, Murakami T, Lamazza A, Fiori E, et al. Colorectal polyps: detection with low-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography versus two sequential colonoscopies. Radiology 2005;237(3):927-37.
10. Chang KJ, Caovan DB, Grand DJ, Huda W, Mayo-Smith WW. Reducing radiation dose at CT colonography: decreasing tube voltage to 100 kVp. Radiology 2013;266(3):791-800.
11. Shin CI, Kim SH, Lee ES, Lee DH, Hwang EJ, Chung SY, et al. Ultra-low peak voltage CT colonography: effect of iterative reconstruction algorithms on performance of radiologists who use anthropomorphic colonic phantoms. Radiology 2014;273(3):759-71 [Epub 2014 July 11].
12. Deák Z, Grimm JM, Treitl M, Geyer LL, Linsenmaier U, Körner M, et al. Filtered back projection, adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction, and a model-based iterative reconstruction in abdominal CT: an experimental clinical study. Radiology 2013;266(1):197-206.
13. Silva AC, Lawder HJ, Hara A, Kujak J, Pavlicek W. Innovations in CT dose reduction strategy: application of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;194(1):191-9.
14. Pickhardt PJ, Lubner MG, Kim DH, Tang J, Ruma JA, del Rio AM, et al. Abdominal CT with model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR): initial results of a prospective trial comparing ultralow-dose with standard-dose imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2012;199(6):1266-74.
15. Choi JW, Lee JM, Yoon JH, Baek JH, Han JK, Choi BI. Iterative reconstruction algorithms of computed tomography for the assessment of small pancreatic lesions: phantom study. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2013;37(6):911-23.
16. Volders D, Bols A, Haspeslagh M, Coenegrachts K. Model-based iterative reconstruction and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction techniques in abdominal CT: comparison of image quality in the detection of colorectal liver metastases. Radiology 2013;269(2):469-74.
17. Willemink MJ, de Jong PA, Leiner T, de Heer LM, Nievelstein RA, Budde RP, et al. Iterative reconstruction techniques for computed tomography Part 1: technical principles. Eur Radiol 2013;23(6):1623-31.
18. McLaughlin PD, Murphy KP, Hayes SA, Carey K, Sammon J, Crush L, et al. Non-contrast CT at comparable dose to an abdominal radiograph in patients with acute renal colic; impact of iterative reconstruction on image quality and diagnostic performance. Insights Imaging 2014;5(2):217-30.
19. Vardhanabhuti V, Riordan RD, Mitchell GR, Hyde C, Roobottom CA. Image comparative assessment using iterative reconstructions: clinical comparison of low-dose abdominal/pelvic computed tomography between adaptive statistical, model-based iterative reconstructions and traditional filtered back projection in 65 patients. Invest Radiol 2014;49(4):209-16.
20. Yoon MA, Kim SH, Lee JM, Woo HS, Lee ES, Ahn SJ, et al. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and Veo: assessment of image quality and diagnostic performance in CT colonography at various radiation doses. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2012;36(5):596-601.
21. Flicek KT, Hara AK, Silva AC, Wu Q, Peter MB, Johnson CD. Reducing the radiation dose for CT colonography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: a pilot study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195(1):126-31.
22. Neri E, Faggioni L, Regge D, Vagli P, Turini F, Cerri F, et al. CT colonography: role of a second reader CAD paradigm in the initial training of radiologists. Eur J Radiol 2011;80(2):303-9.
23. Park HS, Kim SH, Kim JH, Lee JG, Kim SG, Lee JM, et al. Computer-aided polyp detection on CT colonography: comparison of three systems in a high-risk human population. Eur J Radiol 2010;75(2):e147-57.
24. Petrick N, Haider M, Summers RM, Yeshwant SC, Brown L, Iuliano EM, et al. CT colonography with computer-aided detection as a second reader: observer performance study. Radiology 2008;246(1):148-56.
25. Wi JY, Kim SH, Lee JY, Kim SG, Han JK, Choi BI. Electronic cleansing for CT colonography: does it help CAD software performance in a high-risk population for colorectal cancer? Eur Radiol 2010;20(8):1905-16.
26. Bongartz G, Golding SJ, Jurik AG, Leonardi M, van Meerten EVP, Geleijns J. European guidelines on quality assurance for computed tomography; 2004. p. 70.
27. Kim SH, Lee JM, Shin CI, Kim HC, Lee JG, Kim JH, et al. Effects of spatial resolution and tube current on computer-aided detection of polyps on CT colonographic images: phantom study. Radiology 2008;248(2):492-503.
28. Liedenbaum MH, de Vries AH, Halligan S, Bossuyt PM, Dachman AH, Dekker E, et al. CT colonography polyp matching: differences between experienced readers. Eur Radiol 2009;19(7):1723-30.
29. Ghetti C, Palleri F, Serreli G, Ortenzia O, Ruffini L. Physical characterization of a new CT iterative reconstruction method operating in sinogram space. J Appl Clin Med Phys 2013;14(4):4347.
30. Lee MW, Kim SH, Park HS, Lee JG, Joo SM, An S, et al. An anthropomorphic phantom study of computer-aided detection performance for polyp detection on CT colonography: a comparison of commercially and academically available systems. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2009;193(2):445-54.