Ultra-low peak voltage CT colonography: Effect of iterative reconstruction algorithms on performance of radiologists who use anthropomorphic colonic phantoms

Radiology

Volumn 273, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 759-771

  Shin, Cheong Il ^a   Kim, Se Hyung ^a   Lee, Eun Sun ^a   Lee, Dong Ho ^a   Hwang, Eui Jin ^a   Chung, Se Yeong ^b   Lee, Jeong Min ^a   Han, Joon Koo ^a   Choi, Byung Ihn ^a  

^a Seoul National University Hospital   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University Hospital Healthcare System Gangnam Center   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL RADIOGRAPHY; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; FILTERED BACK PROJECTION; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; IMAGING PHANTOM; ITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION ALGORITHM; JOB PERFORMANCE; NOISE MEASUREMENT; PHYSICIAN ATTITUDE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RADIATION DOSE REDUCTION; RADIOLOGICAL PARAMETERS; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIMULATION; ANIMAL; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COLON POLYP; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER PROGRAM; PROCEDURES; RADIATION DOSE; RADIOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; STANDARDS; SWINE;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOFTWARE; SWINE;

EID: 84916601850     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.14140192     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Levin B, Lieberman DA, McFarland B, et al. Screening and surveillance for the early detection of colorectal cancer and adenomatous polyps, 2008: A joint guideline from the American Cancer Society, the US Multi-Society Task Force on Colorectal Cancer, and the American College of Radiology. Gastroenterology 2008;134(5):1570-1595
2. Berrington de González A, Kim KP, Knudsen AB, et al. Radiation-related cancer risks from CT colonography screening: A risk-benefit analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2011;196(4):816-823
3. Brenner DJ, Georgsson MA. Mass screening with CT colonography: Should the radiation exposure be of concern? Gastroenterology 2005;129(1):328-337
4. Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C, et al. Detection of colorectal lesions: lower-dose multi-detector row helical CT colonography compared with conventional colonoscopy. Radiology 2003;229(3):775-781
5. Cohnen M, Vogt C, Beck A, et al. Feasibility of MDCT Colonography in ultra-low-dose technique in the detection of colorectal lesions: Comparison with high-resolution video colonoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004; 183(5):1355-1359
6. Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C, et al. Computed tomographic colonography without cathartic preparation for the detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 2004;127 (5):1300-1311
7. Vogt C, Cohnen M, Beck A, et al. Detection of colorectal polyps by multislice CT colonography with ultra-low-dose technique: Comparison with high-resolution videocolonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 2004;60(2): 201-209
8. Iannaccone R, Catalano C, Mangiapane F, et al. Colorectal polyps: Detection with lowdose multi-detector row helical CT colonography versus two sequential colonoscopies. Radiology 2005;237(3):927-937
9. Kim SH, Lee JM, Shin CI, et al. Effects of spatial resolution and tube current on computer-aided detection of polyps on CT colonographic images: Phantom study. Radiology 2008;248(2):492-503
10. Fisichella VA, Båth M, Allansdotter Johnsson A, et al. Evaluation of image quality and lesion perception by human readers on 3D CT colonography: Comparison of standard and low radiation dose. Eur Radiol 2010;20(3):630-639
11. Flicek KT, Hara AK, Silva AC, Wu Q, Peter MB, Johnson CD. Reducing the radiation dose for CT colonography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: A pilot study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195(1): 126-131
12. Yoon MA, Kim SH, Lee JM, et al. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and Veo: Assessment of image quality and diagnostic performance in CT colonography at various radiation doses. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2012;36(5):596-601
13. Chang KJ, Caovan DB, Grand DJ, Huda W, Mayo-Smith WW. Reducing radiation dose at CT colonography: Decreasing tube voltage to 100 kVp. Radiology 2013;266(3):791-800
14. Ginsburg M, Obara P, Wise L, Wroblewski K, Vannier MW, Dachman AH. BMI-based radiation dose reduction in CT colonography. Acad Radiol 2013;20(4):486-492
15. Fletcher JG, Grant KLR, Fidler JL, et al. Validation of dual-source single-tube reconstruction as a method to obtain half-dose images to evaluate radiation dose and noise reduction: Phantom and human assessment using CT colonography and sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction (SAFIRE). J Comput Assist Tomogr 2012;36(5):560-569
16. Elojeimy S, Tipnis S, Huda W. Relationship between radiographic techniques (kilovolt and milliampere-second) and CTDI(VOL). Radiat Prot Dosimetry 2010;141(1):43-49
17. Vardhanabhuti V, Loader R, Roobottom CA. Assessment of image quality on effects of varying tube voltage and automatic tube current modulation with hybrid and pure iterative reconstruction techniques in abdominal/ pelvic CT: A phantom study. Invest Radiol 2013;48(3):167-174
18. Schabel C, Fenchel M, Schmidt B, et al. Clinical evaluation and potential radiation dose reduction of the novel sinogram-affirmed iterative reconstruction technique (SAFIRE) in abdominal computed tomography angiography. Acad Radiol 2013;20(2): 165-172
19. Sagara Y, Hara AK, Pavlicek W, Silva AC, Paden RG, Wu Q. Abdominal CT: Comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195(3):713-719
20. Oda S, Utsunomiya D, Funama Y, et al. A knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction algorithm: Can super-low-dose cardiac CT be applicable in clinical settings? Acad Radiol 2014;21(1):104-110
21. Yuki H, Utsunomiya D, Funama Y, et al. Value of knowledge-based iterative model reconstruction in low-kV 256-slice coronary CT angiography. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr 2014;8(2):115-123
22. Park HS, Kim SH, Kim JH, et al. Computer- aided polyp detection on CT colonography: Comparison of three systems in a high-risk human population. Eur J Radiol 2010;75(2):e147-e157
23. Choi JI, Kim SH, Kim SH, et al. Comparison of accuracy and time-efficiency of CT colonography between conventional and panoramic 3D interpretation methods: An anthropomorphic phantom study. Eur J Radiol 2011;80(2):e68-e75
24. American Association of Physicists in Medicine. Size-Specific Dose Estimates (SSDE) in Pediatric and Adult Body CT Examinations (Task Group 204). College Park, Md: American Association of Physicists in Medicine, 2011; 14.
25. United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation (UNSCotEoA). UNSCEAR 2000 Report Vol 1: Sources and Effects of Ionizing Radiation, Annex D. New York, NY: United Nations Publishing, 2000; 400
26. Wilson JM, Christianson OI, Richard S, Samei E. A methodology for image quality evaluation of advanced CT systems. Med Phys 2013;40(3):031908
27. Chen CM, Chu SY, Hsu MY, Liao YL, Tsai HY. Low-tube-voltage (80 kVp) CT aortography using 320-row volume CT with adaptive iterative reconstruction: lower contrast medium and radiation dose. Eur Radiol 2014;24(2): 460-468
28. Löve A, Olsson ML, Siemund R, Stålhammar F, Björkman-Burtscher IM, Söderberg M. Six iterative reconstruction algorithms in brain CT: A phantom study on image quality at different radiation dose levels. Br J Radiol 2013;86(1031):20130388.