Electronic cleansing for CT colonography: Does it help CAD software performance in a high-risk population for colorectal cancer?

European Radiology

Volumn 20, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 1905-1916

  Wi, Jae Yeon ^a   Kim, Se Hyung ^a   Lee, Jae Young ^a   Kim, Sang Gyun ^a   Han, Joon Koo ^a   Choi, Byung Ihn ^a  

^a Seoul National University Hospital   (South Korea)

Author keywords

CAD; CT colonography; Detection of colonic polyps; Electronic cleansing EC related artefacts

Indexed keywords

BARIUM; DIATRIZOATE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COLONOSCOPY; COLORECTAL CANCER; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOGRAPHY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FEMALE; HIGH RISK POPULATION; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; ILEOCECAL VALVE; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; INTESTINE POLYP; INTESTINE PREPARATION; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

ALGORITHMS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DIATRIZOATE MEGLUMINE; FECES; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PATTERN RECOGNITION, AUTOMATED; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RISK FACTORS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SUBTRACTION TECHNIQUE;

EID: 77957943809     PISSN: 09387994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-010-1765-z     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Vining DJ, Gelfand DW, Bechtold RE et al (1994) Technical feasibility of colon imaging with helical CTand virtual reality. AJR Am J Roentgenol 162 (S): 104
2. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I et al (2003) Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 349:2191-2200
3. Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ et al (2007) CT colonography versus colonoscopy for the detection of advanced neoplasia. N Engl J Med 357:1403-1412
4. Graser A, Stieber P, Nagel D et al (2009) Comparison of CT colonography, colonoscopy, sigmoidoscopy and faecal occult blood tests for the detection of advanced adenoma in an average risk population. Gut 58:241-248
5. Yoshida H, Dachman AH (2004) Computer-aided diagnosis for CT colonography. Semin Ultrasound CT MR 25:419-431
6. Halligan S, Altman DG, Mallett S et al (2006) Computed tomographic colonography: assessment of radiologist performance with and without computer-aided detection. Gastroenterology 131:1690-1699
7. Baker ME, Bogoni L, Obuchowski NA et al (2007) Computer-aided detection of colorectal polyps: can it improve sensitivity of less-experienced readers? Preliminary findings. Radiology 245:140-149
8. Petrick N, Haider M, Summers RM et al (2008) CT colonography with computer-aided detection as a second reader: observer performance study. Radiology 246:148-156
9. Ristvedt SL, McFarland EG, Weinstock LB, Thyssen EP (2003) Patient preferences for CTcolonography, conventional colonoscopy, and bowel preparation. Am J Gastroenterol 98:578-585
10. Lefere PA, Gryspeerdt SS, Dewyspelaere J et al (2002) Dietary fecal tagging as a cleansing method before CT colonography: initial results polyp detection and patient acceptance. Radiology 224:393-403
11. Lefere P, Gryspeerdt S, Marrannes J, Baekelandt M, Van Holsbeeck B (2005) CT colonography after fecal tagging with a reduced cathartic cleansing and a reduced volume of barium. AJR Am J Roentgenol 184:1836-1842
12. Callstrom MR, Johnson CD, Fletcher JG et al (2001) CT colonography without cathartic preparation: feasibility study. Radiology 219:693-698
13. Iannaccone R, Laghi A, Catalano C et al (2004) Computed tomographic colonography without cathartic preparation for the detection of colorectal polyps. Gastroenterology 127:1300-1311
14. Yoon SH, Kim SH, Kim SG et al (2009) Comparison study of different bowel preparation regimens and different fecal tagging agents on tagging efficacy, patients' compliance, and diagnostic performance of computed tomographic colonography: preliminary study. J Comput Assist Tomogr 35:238-244
15. Zalis ME, Perumpillichira J, Del Frate C, Hahn PF (2003) CT colonography: digital subtraction bowel cleansing with mucosal reconstruction initial observations. Radiology 226:911-917
16. Cai W, Zalis ME, Nappi J, Harris GJ, Yoshida H (2008) Structure-analysis method for electronic cleansing in cathartic and noncathartic CT colonography. Med Phys 35:3259-3277
17. Johnson CD, Manduca A, Fletcher JG et al (2008) Noncathartic CT colonography with stool tagging: performance with and without electronic stool subtraction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 190:361-366
18. Kim SH, Lee JM, Shin CI et al (2008) Effects of spatial resolution and tube current on computer-aided detection of polyps on CT colonographic images: phantom study. Radiology 248:492-503
19. Kim SH, Lee JM, Eun HW et al (2007) Two-versus three-dimensional colon evaluation with recently developed virtual dissection software for CT colonography. Radiology 244:852-864
20. Näppi J, Yoshida H (2008) Adaptive correction of the pseudo-enhancement of CT attenuation for fecal-tagging CT colonography. Med Image Anal 12:413-426
21. Liu J, Yao J, Summers RM (2008) Scale-based scatter correction for computer-aided polyp detection in CT colonography. Med Phys 35:5664-5671
22. Taylor SA, Brittenden J, Lenton J et al (2009) Influence of computer-aided detection false-positives on reader performance and diagnostic confidence for CT colonography. AJR Am J Roentgenol 192:1682-1689
23. Kim SH, Lee JM, Lee JG et al (2007) Computer-aided detection of colonic polyps at CT colonography using a Hessian matrix-based algorithm: preliminary study. AJR Am J Roentgenol 189:41-51
24. Park HS, Kim SH, Kim JH et al (2007) Computer-aided polyp detection on CT colonography: comparison of three systems in a high-risk human population. Radiology 100 (P)