Effects of spatial resolution and tube current on computer-aided detection of polyps on CT colonographic images: Phantom study

Radiology

Volumn 248, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 492-503

  Se, Hyung Kim ^a   Jeong, Min Lee ^a   Shin, Cheong Il ^a   Hyo, Chul Kim ^a   Lee, Joon Goo ^b   Jong, Hyo Kim ^a,b   Jin, Young Choi ^c   Hyo, Won Eun ^d   Joon, Koo Han ^a   Jae, Young Lee ^a   Byung, Ihn Choi ^a  

^a Seoul National University Hospital   (South Korea)

^b Seoul National University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^c Yonsei University   (South Korea)

^d Ewha Womans University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; COLON POLYP; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ANALYSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; NONHUMAN; PHANTOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SWINE; THICKNESS; TISSUE SECTION; ALGORITHM; ANIMAL; IMAGE QUALITY; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIOGRAPHY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

ALGORITHMS; ANIMALS; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SWINE;

EID: 49049094056     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2482071025     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Cancer facts & figures 2006. American Cancer Society Web site. http://www.cancer.org/. Accessed January 2, 2007.
2. Wender RC. Barriers to screening for colorectal cancer. Gastrointest Endosc Clin N Am 2002;12:145-170.
3. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 2003;349:2191-2200.
4. Svensson MH, Svensson E, Lasson A, Hellstrom M. Patient acceptance of CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy: prospective comparative study in patients with or suspected of having colorectal disease. Radiology 2002;222:337-345.
5. Gluecker TM, Johnson CD, Harmsen WS, et al. Colorectal cancer screening with CT colonography, colonoscopy, and double-contrast barium enema examination: prospective assessment of patient perceptions and preferences. Radiology 2003;227:378-384.
6. Rockey DC, Paulson E, Niedzwiecki D, et al. Analysis of air contrast barium enema, computed tomographic colonography, and colonoscopy: prospective comparison. Lancet 2005;365:305-311.
7. Mulhall BP, Veerappan GR, Jackson JL. Meta-analysis: computed tomographic colonography. Ann Intern Med 2005;142:635-650.
8. Cotton PB, Durkalski VL, Pineau BC, et al. Computed tomographic colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a multicenter comparison with standard colonoscopy for detection of colorectal neoplasia. JAMA 2004;291:1713-1719.
9. Yoshida H, Masutani Y, MacEneaney P, Rubin DT, Dachman AH. Computerized detection of colonic polyps at CT colonography on the basis of volumetric features: pilot study. Radiology 2002;222:327-336.
10. Yoshida H, Nappi J, MacEneaney P, Rubin DT, Dachman AH. Computer-aided diagnosis scheme for detection of polyps at CT colonography. RadioGraphics 2002;22:963-979.
11. Summers RM, Beaulieu CF, Pusanik LM, et al. Automated polyp detector for CT colonography: feasibility study. Radiology 2000;216:284-290.
12. Summers RM, Yao J, Pickhardt PJ, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy computer-aided polyp detection in a screening population. Gastroenterology 2005;129:1832-1844.
13. Barish MA, Soto JA, Ferrucci JT. Consensus on current clinical practice of virtual colonoscopy. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;184:786-792.
14. Taylor SA, Laghi A, Lefere P, Halligan S, Stoker J. European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology (ESGAR): consensus statement on CT colonography. Eur Radiol 2007;17:575-579.
15. Ling SH, Summers RM, Loew MH, McCollough CH, Johnson CD. Computer-aided detection of polyps in a colon phantom: effect of scan orientation, polyp size, collimation, and dose. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2002;26:1013-1018.
16. Sundaram P, Beaulieu CF, Paik DS, Schraedley-Desmond P, Napel S. CT colonography: does improved z resolution help computer-aided polyp detection? Med Phys 2003;30:2663-2674.
17. Siegel S. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: McGrawHill, 1988.
18. Ringl H, Schernthaner RE, Kulinna-Cosentini C, et al. Lossy three-dimensional JPEG2000 compression of abdominal CT images: assessment of the visually lossless threshold and effect of compression ratio on image quality. Radiology 2007;245:467-474.
19. Lui YW, Macari M, Israel G, Bini EJ, Wang H, Babb J. CT colonography data interpretation: effect of different section thicknesses - preliminary observations. Radiology 2003;229:791-797.
20. Taylor SA, Halligan S, Bartram CI, et al. Multi-detector row CT colonography: effect of collimation, pitch, and orientation on polyp detection in a human colectomy specimen. Radiology 2003;229:109-118.
21. Wessling J, Fischbach R, Meier N, et al. CT colonography: protocol optimization with multi-detector row CT - study in an anthropomorphic colon phantom. Radiology 2003;228:753-759.
22. Won HJ, Choi BI, Kim SH, Kim YI, Youn BJ, Han JK. Protocol optimization of multidetector computed tomography colonography using pig colonic phantoms. Invest Radiol 2005;40:27-32.
23. Power NP, Pryor MD, Martin A, Horrocks J, McLean AM, Reznek RH. Optimization of scanning parameters for CT colonography. Br J Radiol 2002;75:401-408.
24. van Gelder RE, Venema HW, Serlie IW, et al. CT colonography at different radiation dose levels: feasibility of dose reduction. Radiology 2002;224:25-33.
25. Macari M, Bini EJ, Xue X, et al. Colorectal neoplasms: prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection. Radiology 2002;224:383-392.
26. McCollough CH. Optimization of multidetector array CT acquisition parameters for CT colonography. Abdom Imaging 2002;27:253-259.
27. Hara AK, Johnson CD, MacCarty RL, Welch TJ, McCollough CH, Harmsen WS. CT colonography: single- versus multi-detector row imaging. Radiology 2001;219:461-465.
28. Park SH, Ha HK, Kim MJ, et al. False-negative results at multi-detector row CT colonography: multivariate analysis of causes for missed lesions. Radiology 2005;235:495-502.