CT colonography with computer-aided detection as a second reader: Observer performance study

Radiology

Volumn 246, Issue 1, 2008, Pages 148-156

  Petrick, Nicholas ^b   Haider, Maruf ^a   Summers, Ronald M ^a   Yeshwant, Srinath C ^a   Brown, Linda ^a   Iuliano, Edward M ^c   Louie, Adeline ^a   Choi, J Richard ^d   Pickhardt, Perry J ^e  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^b CENTER FOR DRUG EVALUATION AND RESEARCH   (United States)

^c GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d WALTER REED ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BARIUM; DIATRIZOATE; SCAN C; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COLON ADENOMA; COLONOSCOPY; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; COMPUTER ASSISTED RADIOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGING SYSTEM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; ROC CURVE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;

AGED; COLONIC POLYPS; COLONOGRAPHY, COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC; COLONOSCOPY; DIAGNOSIS, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 37349012159     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2453062161     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JR, Hwang I, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy to screen for colorectal neoplasia in asymptomatic adults. N Engl J Med 2003;349:2191-2200.
2. Summers RM, Yao J, Pickhardt PJ, et al. Computed tomographic virtual colonoscopy computer-aided polyp detection in a screening population. Gastroenterology 2005;129:1832-1844.
3. Jerebko AK, Summers RM, Malley JD, Franaszek M, Johnson CD. Computer-assisted detection of colonic polyps with CT colonography using neural networks and binary classification trees. Med Phys 2003;30:52-60.
4. Morin RL. Editorial: TRIP update. J Digit Imaging 2004;17:78-79.
5. Shi R, Schraedley-Desmond P, Napel S, et al. CT colonography: influence of 3D viewing and polyp candidate features on interpretation with computer-aided detection. Radiology 2006;239:768-776.
6. Taylor SA, Halligan S, Slater A, et al. Polyp detection with CT colonography: primary 3D endoluminal analysis versus primary 2D transverse analysis with computer-assisted reader software. Radiology 2006;239;759-767.
7. Pickhardt PJ, Choi JH. Electronic cleansing and stool tagging in CT colonography: advantages and pitfalls with primary three-dimensional evaluation. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;181:799-805.
8. Dodd LE, Wagner RF, Armato SG 3rd, et al. Assessment methodologies and statistical issues for computer-aided diagnosis of lung nodules in computed tomography: contemporary research topics relevant to the lung image database consortium. Acad Radiol 2004;11:462-475.
9. Beiden SV, Wagner RF, Campbell G. Components-of-variance models and multiple-bootstrap experiments: an alternative method for random-effects, receiver operating characteristic analysis. Acad Radiol 2000;7:341-349.
10. Summers RM, Johnson CD, Pusanik LM, Malley JD, Yonssef AM, Reed JE. Automated polyp detection at CT colonography: feasibility assessment in a human population. Radiology 2001;219:51-59.
11. Summers RM, Beaulieu CF, Pusanik LM, et al. Automated polyp detector for CT colonography: feasibility study. Radiology 2000;216:284-290.
12. Summers RM, Jerebko AK, Franaszek M, Malley JD, Johnson CD. Colonic polyps: complementary role of computer-aided detection in CT colonography. Radiology 2002;225:391-399.
13. Metz CE. Fundamental ROC analysis. In: Beutel J, Kundel HL, Van Matter RL, eds. Handbook of medical imaging. Bellingham, Wash: The Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineers Press, 2000; 751-769.
14. Kobayashi T, Xu XW, MacMahou H, Metz CE, Doi K. Effect of a computer-aided diagnosis scheme on radiologists' performance in detection of lung nodules on radiographs. Radiology 1996;199:843-848.
15. Wagner RF, Beiden SV, Metz CE. Continuous versus categorical data for ROC analysis: some quantitative considerations. Acad Radiol 2001;8:328-334.
16. Zalis ME, Barish MA, Choi JR, et al. CT colonography reporting and data system: a consensus proposal. Radiology 2005;236:3-9.
17. Obuchowski NA. Receiver operating characteristic curves and their use in radiology. Radiology 2003;229:3-8.
18. Dorfman DD, Berbaum KS, Metz CE. Receiver operating characteristic rating analysis: generalization to the population of readers and patients with the jackknife method. Invest Radiol 1992;27:723-731.
19. Dorfman DD, Berbaum KS, Lenth RV. Multireader, multicase receiver operating characteristic methodology: a bootstrap analysis. Acad Radiol 1995;2:626-633.
20. Zou KH, Fielding JR, Silverman SG, Tempany CM. Hypothesis testing I: proportions. Radiology 2003;226:609-613.
21. Metz CE. Software programs available from the Kurt Rossmann Laboratories: LABMRMC software. Chicago, Ill: University of Chicago, 2004.
22. Metz CE. Some practical issues of experimental design and data analysis in radiological ROC studies. Invest Radiol 1989;24:234-245.