Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and Veo: Assessment of image quality and diagnostic performance in CT colonography at various radiation doses

Journal of Computer Assisted Tomography

Volumn 36, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 596-601

  Yoon, Min A ^a   Kim, Se Hyung ^a   Lee, Jeong Min ^a   Woo, Hyoun Sik ^a   Lee, Eun Sun ^a   Ahn, Se Jin ^a   Han, Joon Koo ^a  

^a Seoul National University Hospital   (South Korea)

Author keywords

ASiR; colon; CT colonography; polyp; Veo

Indexed keywords

COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSIS; DOSIMETRY; HEALTH CARE; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; ITERATIVE METHODS; PHANTOMS; QUALITY CONTROL;

ASIR; COLON; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY COLONOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE; FILTERED BACK PROJECTION; FILTERED BACK-PROJECTION; IMAGE NOISE; PHANTOMS; POLYP; VEO;

IMAGE QUALITY;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; COLON POLYP; COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHIC COLONOGRAPHY; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE; RADIODIAGNOSIS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SWINE;

EID: 84866711802     PISSN: 03638715     EISSN: 15323145     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e31826092be     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Svensson MH, Svensson E, Lasson A, et al. Patient acceptance of CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy: prospective comparative study in patients with or suspected of having colorectal disease. Radiology. 2002;222:337-345.
2. van Gelder RE, Venema HW, Serlie IW, et al. CT colonography at different radiation dose levels: feasibility of dose reduction. Radiology. 2002;224:25-33.
3. Leipsic J, Labounty TM, Heilbron B, et al. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: assessment of image noise and image quality in coronary CT angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195:649-654.
4. Silva AC, Lawder HJ, Hara A, et al. Innovations in CT dose reduction strategy: application of the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction algorithm. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194:191-199.
5. Thibault JB. Veo CT model-based iterative reconstruction. GE Healthcare.
6. Flicek KT, Hara AK, Silva AC, et al. Reducing the radiation dose for CT colonography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: a pilot study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195:126-131.
7. Kambadakone AR, Chaudhary NA, Desai GS, et al. Low-dose MDCT and CT enterography of patients with Crohn disease: feasibility of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2011;196:W743-752.
8. van Gelder RE, Birnie E, Florie J, et al. CT colonography and colonoscopy: assessment of patient preference in a 5-week follow-up study. Radiology. 2004;233:328-337.
9. Macari M, Bini EJ, Xue X, et al. Colorectal neoplasms: prospective comparison of thin-section low-dose multi-detector row CT colonography and conventional colonoscopy for detection. Radiology. 2002;224:383-392.
10. Singh S, Kalra MK, Hsieh J, et al. Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques. Radiology. 2010;257:373-383.
11. Singh S, Kalra MK, Gilman MD, et al. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: a pilot study. Radiology. 2011;259:565-573.
12. Fisichella VA, Båth M, Allansdotter Johnsson A, et al. Evaluation of image quality and lesion perception by human readers on 3D CT colonography: comparison of standard and low radiation dose. Eur Radiol. 2010;20:630-639.