Abdominal CT with Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction (MBIR): Initial results of a prospective trial comparing ultralow-dose with standard-dose imaging

American Journal of Roentgenology

Volumn 199, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 1266-1274

  Pickhardt, Perry J ^a   Lubner, Meghan G ^a   Kim, David H ^a   Tang, Jie ^a   Ruma, Julie A ^a   Del Rio, Alejandro Muñoz ^a   Chen, Guang Hong ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

Author keywords

Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction (ASIR); CT; Dose reduction; Low dose CT radiation; Model based iterative reconstruction (MBIR)

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIVER INJURY; LOW ENERGY RADIATION; MALE; PANCREAS INJURY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RADIATION DOSE; RADIOLOGIST;

CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIATION PROTECTION; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOGRAPHY, ABDOMINAL; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84870903463     PISSN: 0361803X     EISSN: 15463141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2214/AJR.12.9382     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography: an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med 2007; 357:2277-2284 (Pubitemid 350190758)
2. Pearce MS, Salotti JA, Little MP, et al. Radiation exposure from CT scans in childhood and subsequent risk of leukaemia and brain tumours: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet 2012; 380:499-505
3. Singh S, Kalra MK, Hsieh JA, et al. Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques. Radiology 2010; 257:373-383
4. Sagara Y, Hara AK, Pavlicek W, et al. Comparison of low-dose CT with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and routine-dose CT with filtered back projection in 53 Patients. AJR 2010; 195:713-719
5. Flicek KT, Hara AK, Silva AC, Wu Q, Peter MB, Johnson CD. Reducing the radiation dose for CT colonography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction: a pilot study. AJR 2010; 195:126-131
6. Prakash P, Kalra MK, Kambadakone AK, et al. Reducing abdominal CT radiation dose with adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Invest Radiol 2010; 45:202-210
7. Hara AK, Paden RG, Silva AC, Kujak JL, Lawder HJ, Pavlicek W. Iterative reconstruction technique for reducing body radiation dose at CT: feasibility study. AJR 2009; 193:764-771
8. Kambadakone AR, Chaudhary NA, Desai GS, Nguyen DD, Kulkarni NM, Sahani DV. Low-dose MDCT and CT enterography of patients with Crohn disease: feasibility of adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. AJR 2011; 196:1340; [web]W743-W752
9. Lubner MG, Pickhardt PJ, Tang J, Chen GH. Reduced image noise at low-dose multidetector CT of the abdomen with prior image constrained compressed sensing algorithm. Radiology 2011; 260:248-256
10. Mitsumori LM, Shuman WP, Busey JM, Kolokythas O, Koprowicz KM. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus filtered back projection in the same patient: 64 channel liver CT image quality and patient radiation dose. Eur Radiol 2012; 22:138-143
11. Marin D, Nelson RC, Rubin GD, Schindera ST. Body CT: technical advances for improving safety. AJR 2011; 197:33-41
12. McCollough C, Cody D, Edyvean S, et al.; American Association of Physicists in Medicine (AAPM). The measurement, reporting and management of radiation dose in CT. Report no.: 96. College Park, MD: AAPM, 2008
13. Deak PD, Smal Y, Kalender WA, Multisection CT protocols: sex- and age-specific conversion factors used to determine effective dose from doselength product. Radiology 2010; 257:158-166
14. Noël PB, Fingerle AA, Renger B, Münzel D, Rummeny EJ, Dobritz M. Initial performance characterization of a clinical noise-suppressing reconstruction algorithm for MDCT. AJR 2011; 197:1404-1409
15. Lee SJ, Park SH, Kim AY, et al. A prospective comparison of standard-dose CT enterography and 50% reduced-dose CT enterography with and without noise reduction for evaluating Crohn disease. AJR 2011; 197:50-57
16. Gervaise A, Osemont B, Lecocq S, et al. CT image quality improvement using adaptive iterative dose reduction with wide-volume acquisition on 320-detector CT. Eur Radiol 2012; 22:295-301
17. Chen GH, Tang J, Leng S. Prior image constrained compressed sensing (PICCS): a method to accurately reconstruct dynamic CT images from highly undersampled data sets. Med Phys 2008; 35:660-663 (Pubitemid 351190885)
18. Health Physics Society Website. Radiation risk in perspective: position statement of the Health Physics Society. hhps.org/documents/risk-ps010-2.pdf. Published January 1996. Updated July 2010. Accessed July 27, 2012
19. Brenner DJ, Georgsson MA. Mass screening with CT colonography: should the radiation exposure be of concern? Gastroenterology 2005; 129:328-337 (Pubitemid 41002065)
20. Mahesh M. NCRP report number 160: its significance to medical imaging. J Am Coll Radiol 2009; 6:890-892
21. National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements. Ionizing radiation exposure of the population of the United States. Report no. 93. Bethesda, MD: NCRP, 1987