Model-based Iterative Reconstruction and Adaptive Statistical Iterative Reconstruction Techniques in Abdominal CT: Comparison of Image Quality in the Detection of Colorectal Liver Metastases

Radiology

Volumn 269, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 469-474

  Volders, David ^a   Bols, Alain ^a   Haspeslagh, Marc ^b   Coenegrachts, Kenneth ^a  

^a Department of Radiology ^*  (Belgium)

^b Hospital Administration and Statistics   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADAPTIVE STATISTICAL ITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; ARTIFACT; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; COLORECTAL LIVER METASTASIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOSIMETRY; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE QUALITY; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MODEL BASED ITERATIVE RECONSTRUCTION; MULTIDETECTOR COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RADIATION DOSE REDUCTION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; TUMOR VOLUME; ABDOMINAL RADIOGRAPHY; COLORECTAL TUMOR; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; LIVER TUMOR; METASTASIS; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; RADIATION DOSE; RADIOGRAPHY; VERY ELDERLY; ANALOGS AND DERIVATIVES; DIAGNOSTIC USE; PROCEDURES; SECONDARY;

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; DRUG DERIVATIVE; IOBITRIDOL; IOHEXOL;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; COLORECTAL NEOPLASMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; FEMALE; HUMANS; IOHEXOL; LIVER NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOGRAPHY, ABDOMINAL; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 84886661454     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13130002     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Jurik AG, Jessen KA, Hansen J. Image quality and dose in computed tomography. Eur Radiol 1997;7(1):77-81. (Pubitemid 127538526)
2. Kalra MK, Maher MM, Toth TL, et al. Strategies for CT radiation dose optimization. Radiology 2004;230(3):619-628. (Pubitemid 38252854)
3. Blake SP, Weisinger K, Atkins MB, Raptopoulos V. Liver metastases from melanoma: detection with multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT. Radiology 1999;213(1):92-96. (Pubitemid 29470411)
4. Heyer CM, Mohr PS, Lemburg SP, Peters SA, Nicolas V. Image quality and radiation exposure at pulmonary CT angiography with 100- or 120-kVp protocol: prospective randomized study. Radiology 2007;245(2):577-583. (Pubitemid 47612541)
5. Diel J, Perlmutter S, Venkataramanan N, Mueller R, Lane MJ, Katz DS. Unenhanced helical CT using increased pitch for suspected renal colic: an effective technique for radiation dose reduction? J Comput Assist Tomogr 2000;24(5):795-801. (Pubitemid 32204312)
6. Leipsic J, Nguyen G, Brown J, Sin D, Mayo JR. A prospective evaluation of dose reduction and image quality in chest CT using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2010;195(5):1095-1099.
7. Pontana F, Duhamel A, Pagniez J, et al. Chest computed tomography using iterative reconstruction vs filtered back projection (part 2): image quality of low-dose CT examinations in 80 patients. Eur Radiol 2011;21(3):636-643.
8. Pontana F, Pagniez J, Flohr T, et al. Chest computed tomography using iterative reconstruction vs filtered back projection (part 1): evaluation of image noise reduction in 32 patients. Eur Radiol 2011;21(3):627-635.
9. Prakash P, Kalra MK, Digumarthy SR, et al. Radiation dose reduction with chest computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique: initial experience. J Comput Assist Tomogr 2010;34(1):40-45.
10. Sato J, Akahane M, Inano S, et al. Effect of radiation dose and adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction on image quality of pulmonary computed tomography. Jpn J Radiol 2012;30(2):146-153.
11. Singh S, Kalra MK, Gilman MD, et al. Adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: a pilot study. Radiology 2011;259(2):565-573.
12. Thibault JB, Sauer KD, Bouman CA, Hsieh J. A three-dimensional statistical approach to improved image quality for multislice helical CT. Med Phys 2007;34(11):4526-4544. (Pubitemid 350029675)
13. Yu Z, Thibault JB, Bouman CA, Sauer KD, Hsieh J. Fast model-based x-ray CT reconstruction using spatially nonhomogeneous ICD optimization. IEEE Trans Image Process 2011;20(1):161-175.
14. Bossuyt PM, Reitsma JB, Bruns DE, et al. Towards complete and accurate reporting of studies of diagnostic accuracy: the STARD initiative. Radiology 2003;226(1):24-28. (Pubitemid 36163903)
15. Moher D, Schulz KF, Altman DG. The CONSORT statement: revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomised trials. Lancet 2001;357(9263):1191-1194. (Pubitemid 32378696)
16. Boone J, Strauss K, Cody D, et al. Sizespecific dose estimates (SSDE) in pediatric and adult body CT examinations. Report of AAPM Task Group 204. College Park, Md: American Association of Physicists in Medicine, 2011.
17. Singh S, Kalra MK, Hsieh J, et al. Abdominal CT: comparison of adaptive statistical iterative and filtered back projection reconstruction techniques. Radiology 2010;257(2):373-383.
18. Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 1977;33(1):159-174. (Pubitemid 8054849)
19. Katsura M, Matsuda I, Akahane M, et al. Model-based iterative reconstruction technique for radiation dose reduction in chest CT: comparison with the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction technique. Eur Radiol 2012;22(8):1613-1623.
20. Neroladaki A, Botsikas D, Boudabbous S, Becker CD, Montet X. Computed tomography of the chest with model-based iterative reconstruction using a radiation exposure similar to chest x-ray examination: preliminary observations. Eur Radiol 2013;23(2):360-366.
21. Brenner DJ, Shuryak I, Einstein AJ. Impact of reduced patient life expectancy on potential cancer risks from radiologic imaging. Radiology 2011;261(1):193-198.