Using individual interest and conscientiousness to predict academic effort: Additive, synergistic, or compensatory effects?

Journal of Personality and Social Psychology

Volumn 109, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 142-162

  Trautwein, Ulrich ^a   Lüdtke, Oliver ^b   Nagy, Nicole ^c   Lenski, Anna ^d   Niggli, Alois ^e   Schnyder, Inge ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE FOR SCIENCE AND MATHEMATICS EDUCATION   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

^d HUMBOLDT UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

^e Department of Research and Development College of Teacher Education Fribourg   (Switzerland)

^f UNIVERSITY OF FRIBOURG   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Academic effo; Conscientiousness; Interest

Indexed keywords

ACHIEVEMENT; ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; CONSCIENCE; DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; MOTIVATION; PSYCHOLOGY; SCHOOL; STUDENT;

ACHIEVEMENT; ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; CONSCIENCE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MOTIVATION; SCHOOLS; STUDENTS;

EID: 84933177488     PISSN: 00223514     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/pspp0000034     Document Type: Article

References (99)

1. Aguinis, H., Gottfredson, R. K., & Culpepper, S. A. (2013). Best-practice recommendations for estimating cross-level interaction effects using multilevel modeling. Journal of Management, 39, 1490-1528. http://dx .doi.org/10.1177/0149206313478188
2. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interaction. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
3. Asendorpf, J. B., & van Aken, M. A. G. (2003). Personality-relationship transaction in adolescence: Core versus surface personality characteristics. Journal of Personality, 71, 629-666. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.7104005
4. Bandalos, D. L. (2002). The effects of item parceling on goodness-of-fit and parameter estimate bias in structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 78-102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0901_5
5. Bauer, D. J., & Curran, P. J. (2005). Probing interactions in fixed and multilevel regression: Inferential and graphical techniques. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 40, 373-400. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327906mbr4003_5
6. Bidjerano, T., & Dai, D. Y. (2007). The relationship between the Big-Five model of personality and self-regulated learning strategies. Learning and Individual Differences, 17, 69-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif .2007.02.001
7. Boekaerts, M., Pintrich, P., & Zeidner, M. (Eds.). (2000). Handbook of self-regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
8. Bong, M. (2001). Between-and within-domain relations of academic motivation among middle and high school students: Self-efficacy, task value, and achievement goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 23-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.93.1.23
9. Borkenau, P., & Ostendorf, F. (1993). NEO-Fünf-Faktoren-Inventar (NEO-FFI) nach Costa und McCrae [NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEOFFI) by Costa and McCrae]. Göttingen, Germany: Hogrefe.
10. Borsboom, D., Mellenbergh, G. J., & van Heerden, J. (2003). The theoretical status of latent variables. Psychological Review, 110, 203-219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.110.2.203
11. Cervone, D. (2005). Personality architecture: Within-person structures and processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 56, 423-452. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.56.091103.070133
12. Cham, H., West, S. G., Ma, Y., & Aiken, L. S. (2012). Estimating latent variable interactions with nonnormal observed data: A comparison of four approaches. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 47, 840-876. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2012.732901
13. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
14. Costa, P. T., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO PI-R) and NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI): Professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
15. Denissen, J. J. A., Zarrett, N. R., & Eccles, J. S. (2007). I like to do it, I'm able, and I know I am: Longitudinal couplings between domain-specific achievement, self-concept, and interest. Child Development, 78, 430-447. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01007.x
16. De Raad, B., & Schouwenburg, H. C. (1996). Personality in learning and education: A review. European Journal of Personality, 10, 303-336. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0984(199612)10:5_303::AIDPER262 3.0.CO;2-2
17. Dettmers, S., Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Kunter, M., & Baumert, J. (2010). Homework works if homework quality is high: Using multilevel modeling to predict the development of achievement in mathematics. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 467-482. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0018453
18. Dicke, A.-L., Lüdtke, O., Trautwein, U., Nagy, G., & Nagy, N. (2012). Judging students' achievement goal orientations: Are teacher ratings accurate? Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 844-849. http://dx .doi.org/10.1016/j.lindif.2012.04.004
19. Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.41.020190.002221
20. Duckworth, A., & Gross, J. J. (2014). Self-control and grit: Related but separable determinants of success. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23, 319-325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0963721414541462
21. Eccles, J. S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109-132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
22. Eccles, J., Wigfield, A., Harold, R. D., & Blumenfeld, P. (1993). Age and gender differences in children's self-and task perceptions during elementary school. Child Development, 64, 830-847. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1131221
23. Emmons, R. A. (1989). Exploring the relations between motives and traits:The case of narcissism. In D. Buss & N. Cantor (Eds.), Personality psychology: Recent trends and emerging directions (pp. 32-44). New York: Springer. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4684-0634-4_3
24. Enders, C. K. (2010). Applied missing data analysis. New York: Guilford Press.
25. Fleeson, W., & Gallagher, P. (2009). The implications of Big Five standing for the distribution of trait manifestation in behavior: Fifteen experiencesampling studies and a meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1097-1114. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0016786
26. Freudenthaler, H., Spinath, B., & Neubauer, A. (2008). Predicting school achievement in boys and girls. European Journal of Personality, 22, 231-245. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.678
27. Funder, D. C. (2001). Personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 197-221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.197
28. Ganzach, Y. (1997). Misleading interaction and curvilinear terms. Psychological Methods, 2, 235-247. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.2.3.235
29. Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26-34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.48.1.26
30. Hidi, S., & Ainley, M. (2008). Interest and self-regulation: Relationships between two variables that influence learning. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 77-109). New York: Routledge.
31. Hidi, S., & Renninger, K. A. (2006). The four-phase model of interest development. Educational Psychologist, 41, 111-127. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4102_4
32. Hofmann, D. A., & Gavin, M. B. (1998). Centering decisions in hierarchical linear models: Implications for research in organizations. Journal of Management, 24, 623-641. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/014920639802400504
33. Jackson, J. J., Hill, P. L., & Roberts, B. W. (2012). Misconceptions of traits continue to persist: A response to Bandura. Journal of Management, 38, 745-752. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0149206312438775
34. John, O. P., Donahue, E. M., & Kentle, R. L. (1991). The Big Five Inventory-Versions 4a and 54. Berkeley: University of California, Berkeley, Institute of Personality and Social Research.
35. John, O. P., Naumann, L. P., & Soto, C. J. (2008). Paradigm shift to the integrative Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and conceptual issues. In O. P. John, R. W. Robins, & L. A. Pervin (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and Research (pp. 114-158). New York: Guilford Press.
36. John, O. P., & Srivastava, S. (1999). The Big Five trait taxonomy: History, measurement, and theoretical perspectives. In L. A. Pervin & O. P. John (Eds.), Handbook of personality: Theory and research (2nd ed., pp. 102-138). New York: Guilford Press.
37. Jonkmann, K., Rose, N., & Trautwein, U. (Eds.). (2013). Tradition und Innovation: Entwicklungsverläufe an Haupt-und Realschulen in Baden-Württemberg und Mittelschulen in Sachsen-Abschlussbericht für die Länder Baden-Württemberg und Sachsen [Tradition and innovation:Student development in two German states]. Tübingen, Germany: Projektbericht an die Kultusministerien der Länder.
38. Kandler, C., Zimmermann, J., & McAdams, D. P. (2014). Core and surface characteristics for the description and theory of personality differences and development. European Journal of Personality, 28, 231-243. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/per.1952
39. Katz, I., Assor, A., Kanat-Maymon, Y., & Bereby-Meyer, Y. (2006). Interest as a motivational resource: Feedback and gender matter, but interest makes the difference. Social Psychology of Education, 9, 27-42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11218-005-2863-7
40. Kelava, A., Werner, C., Schermelleh-Engel, K., Moosbrugger, H., Zapf, D., Ma, Y., West, S. G. (2011). Advanced nonlinear latent variable modeling: Distribution analytic LMS and QML estimators of interaction and quadratic effects. Structural Equation Modeling, 18, 465-491. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2011.582408
41. Kishton, J. M., & Widaman, K. F. (1994). Unidimensional versus domain representative parceling of questionnaire items: An empirical example. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 54, 757-765. http://dx.doi .org/10.1177/0013164494054003022
42. Klein, A., & Moosbrugger, H. (2000). Maximum likelihood estimation of latent interaction effects with the LMS method. Psychometrika, 65, 457-474. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02296338
43. Krapp, A. (2002). Structural and dynamic aspects of interest development:Theoretical considerations from an ontogenetic perspective. Learning and Instruction, 12, 383-409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00011-1
44. Lang, F. R., Lüdtke, O., & Asendorpf, J. B. (2001). Testgüte und psychometrische Äquivalenz der deutschen Version des Big Five Inventory (BFI) bei jungen, mittelalten und alten Erwachsenen [Validity and psychometric equivalence of the German version of the Big Five Inventory in young, middle-aged and old adults]. Diagnostica, 47, 111-121. http://dx.doi.org/10.1026//0012-1924.47.3.111
45. Lee, K., & Ashton, M. C. (2008). The HEXACO personality factors in the indigenous personality lexicons of English and 11 other languages. Journal of Personality, 76, 1001-1054. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j .1467-6494.2008.00512.x
46. Little, T. D., Cunningham, W. A., Shahar, G., & Widaman, K. F. (2002). To parcel or not to parcel: Exploring the question and weighing the merits. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 151-173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_1
47. Lounsbury, J. W., Sundstrom, E., Loveland, J., & Gibson, L. W. (2003). Broad versus narrow personality traits in predicting performance of adolescents. Learning and Individual Differences, 14, 67-77.
48. Lüdtke, O., Trautwein, U., Nagy, G., & Köller, O. (2004). Eine Validierungsstudie zum NEO-FFI in einer Stichprobe junger Erwachsener: Effekte des Itemformats, faktorielle Validität und Zusammenhänge mit Schulleistungsindikatoren [A validation of the NEO-FFI in a sample of young adults: Effects of the response format, factorial validity, and relations with indicators of academic achievement]. Diagnostica, 50, 134-144. http://dx.doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924.50.3.134
49. MacCallum, R. C., & Mar, C. M. (1995). Distinguishing between moderator and quadratic effects in multiple regression. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 405-421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.118.3.405
50. Marsh, H. W. (1986). Verbal and math self-concepts: An internal/external frame of reference model. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 129-149. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00028312023001129
51. Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Muthén, B., Asparouhov, T., Morin, A. J. S., Trautwein, U., & Nagengast, B. (2010). A new look at the Big Five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling. Psychological Assessment, 22, 471-491. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019227
52. Marsh, H. W., Lüdtke, O., Nagengast, B., Trautwein, U., Abduljabbar, A. S., Abdelfattah, F., & Jansen, M. (2015). Dimensional comparison theory: Paradoxical relations between self-beliefs and achievements in multiple domain. Learning and Instruction, 35, 16-32.
53. Marsh, H. W., Wen, Z., Hau, K.-T., & Nagengast, B. (2013). Structural equation models of latent interaction and quadratic effects. In G. R. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (2nd ed., pp. 267-308). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
54. McAdams, D. P., & Pals, J. L. (2006). A new Big Five: Fundamental principles for an integrative science of personality. American Psychologist, 61, 204-217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.61.3.204
55. McClelland, G. H., & Judd, C. M. (1993). Statistical difficulties of detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 376-390. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.114.2.376
56. McCrae, R. R., & Costa, P. T., Jr. (2008). Empirical and theoretical status of the five-factor model of personality traits. In G. J. Boyle, G. Matthews, & D. H. Saklofske (Eds.), The Sage handbook of personality theory and assessment (pp. 273-294). London: Sage. http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781849200462.n13
57. McCrae, R. R., & Löckenhoff, C. E. (2010). Self-regulation and the Five-Factor Model of personality traits. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of personality and self-regulation (pp. 145-168). West Sussex, UK:Wiley-Blackwell.
58. Mischel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1995). A cognitive-affective system theory of personality: Reconceptualizing situations, dispositions, dynamics, and invariance in personality structure. Psychological Review, 102, 246-268. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.246
59. Möller, J., & Husemann, N. (2006). Internal comparisons in everyday life. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 342-353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.98.2.342
60. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (1998-2013). Mplus user's guide. Los Angeles, CA: Author.
61. Nagengast, B., Marsh, H. W., Scalas, L. F., Xu, M. K., Hau, K.-T., & Trautwein, U. (2011). Who took the "_" out of expectancy-value theory? A psychological mystery, a substantive-methodological synergy, and a cross-national generalization. Psychological Science, 22, 1058-1066. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0956797611415540
62. Nagy, G., Trautwein, U., Baumert, J., Köller, O., & Garrett, J. (2006). Gender and course selection in upper secondary education: Effects of academic self-concept and intrinsic value. Educational Research and Evaluation, 12, 323-345. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13803610600765687
63. Nesselroade, J. R. (1991). The warp and the woof of the developmental fabric. In R. Downs, L. Liben, & D. S. Palermo (Eds.), Visions of aesthetics, the environment, and development: The legacy of Joachim F. Wohlwill (pp. 213-240). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
64. Noftle, E. E., & Robins, R. W. (2007). Personality predictors of academic outcomes: Big Five correlates of GPA and SAT scores. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 116-130. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.93.1.116
65. Pintrich, P. R., & de Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33-40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
66. Poropat, A. E. (2009). A meta-analysis of the five-factor model of personality and academic performance. Psychological Bulletin, 135, 322-338. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0014996
67. Rast, P., Macdonald, S. W. S., & Hofer, S. M. (2012). Intensive measurement designs for research on aging. GeroPsych, 25, 45-55. http://dx.doi .org/10.1024/1662-9647/a000054
68. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
69. Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., Cheong, Y. F., & Congdon, R. T. (2004). HLM 6: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modelling. Lincolnwood, IL:Scientific Software International.
70. Reis, H. T., Sheldon, K. M., Gable, S. L., Roscoe, J., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). Daily well-being: The role of autonomy, competence, and relatedness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 419-435. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167200266002
71. Roberts, B. W., & Pomerantz, E. M. (2004). On traits, situations, and their integration: A developmental perspective. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8, 402-416. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_5
72. Roisman, G. I., Newman, D. A., Fraley, R. C., Haltigan, J. D., Groh, A. M., & Haydon, K. C. (2012). Distinguishing differential susceptibility from diathesis-stress: Recommendations for evaluating interaction effects. Development and Psychopathology, 24, 389-409. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0954579412000065
73. Sansone, C., & Thoman, D. B. (2006). Maintaining activity engagement:Individual differences in the process of self-regulating motivation. Journal of Personality, 74, 1697-1720. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00425.x
74. Sansone, C., Thoman, D. B., & Smith, J. L. (2010). Interest and selfregulation:Understanding individual variability in choices, effort, and persistence over time. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of personality and self-regulation (pp. 192-217). Chichester, England: Wiley-Blackwell. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781444318111.ch9
75. Sansone, C., Weir, C., Harpster, L., & Morgan, C. (1992). Once a boring task always a boring task? Interest as a self-regulatory mechanism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 379-390. http://dx .doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.3.379
76. Sansone, C., Wiebe, D. J., & Morgan, C. (1999). Self-regulating interest:The moderating role of hardiness and conscientiousness. Journal of Personality, 67, 701-733. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-6494.00070
77. Saucier, G. (1998). Replicable item-cluster subcomponents in the NEO Five-Factor Inventory. Journal of Personality Assessment, 70, 263-276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa7002_6
78. Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147-177.
79. Schiefele, U. (1991). Interest, learning, and motivation. Educational Psychologist, 26, 299-323. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00461520.1991.9653136
80. Schmitz, B., & Skinner, E. (1993). Perceived control, effort, and academic performance: Interindividual, intraindividual, and multivariate timeseries analyses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64, 1010-1028. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.6.1010
81. Schunk, D. H., & Zimmerman, B. J. (Eds.). (2008). Motivation and self-regulated learning: Theory, research, and applications. New York:Routledge.
82. Sherman, R. A., Nave, C. S., & Funder, D. C. (2010). Situational similarity and personality predict behavioral consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 330-343. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0019796
83. Snijders, T. A. B., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London: Sage.
84. Spengler, M., Lüdtke, O., Martin, R., & Brunner, M. (2013). Personality is related to educational outcomes in late adolescence: Evidence from two large-scale achievement studies. Journal of Research in Personality, 47, 613-625. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2013.05.008
85. Sterba, S. K., & MacCallum, R. C. (2010). Variability in parameter estimates and model fit across random allocations of items to parcels. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 45, 322-358. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00273171003680302
86. Trautwein, U. (2007). The homework-achievement relation reconsidered:Differentiating homework time, homework frequency, and homework effort. Learning and Instruction, 17, 372-388. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2007.02.009
87. Trautwein, U., & Lüdtke, O. (2007). Students' self-reported effort and time on homework in six school subjects: Between-students differences and within-student variation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99, 432-444. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.99.2.432
88. Trautwein, U., & Lüdtke, O. (2009). Predicting homework motivation and homework effort in six school subjects: The role of person and family characteristics, classroom factors, and school track. Learning and Instruction, 19, 243-258. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.05.001
89. Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Kastens, C., & Köller, O. (2006). Effort on homework in grades 5-9: Development, motivational antecedents, and the association with effort on classwork. Child Development, 77, 1094-1111. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.2006.00921.x
90. Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Roberts, B. W., Schnyder, I., & Niggli, A. (2009). Different forces, same consequence: Conscientiousness and competence beliefs are independent predictors of academic effort and achievement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1115-1128. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0017048
91. Trautwein, U., Lüdtke, O., Schnyder, I., & Niggli, A. (2006). Predicting homework effort: Support for a domain-specific, multilevel homework model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 438-456.
92. Trautwein, U., Marsh, H. W., Nagengast, B., Lüdtke, O., Nagy, G., & Jonkmann, K. (2012). Probing for the multiplicative term in modern expectancy-value theory: A latent interaction modeling study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 763-777. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0027470
93. Tsai, Y.-M., Kunter, M., Lüdtke, O., Trautwein, U., & Ryan, R. (2008). What makes lessons interesting? The role of situational and individual factors in three school subjects. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 460-472. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.100.2.460
94. Wagerman, S. A., & Funder, D. C. (2007). Acquaintance reports of personality and academic achievement: A case for conscientiousness. Journal of Research in Personality, 41, 221-229. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2006.03.001
95. West, S. G., Ryu, E., Kwok, O.-M., & Cham, H. (2011). Multilevel modeling: Current and future applications in personality research. Journal of Personality, 79, 2-50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.2010.00681.x
96. Wigfield, A. (1994). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation:A developmental perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 6, 49-78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF02209024
97. Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. S. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68-81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/ceps.1999.1015
98. Winter, D. G., John, O. P., Stewart, A. J., Klohnen, E. C., & Duncan, L. E. (1998). Traits and motives: Toward an integration of two traditions in personality research. Psychological Review, 105, 230-250. http://dx.doi .org/10.1037/0033-295X.105.2.230
99. Zimmerman, B., & Pons, M. (1986). Development of a structured interview for assessing student use of self-regulated learning strategies. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 614-628. http://dx.doi .org/10.3102/00028312023004614