Misleading Interaction and Curvilinear Terms

Psychological Methods

Volumn 2, Issue 3, 1997, Pages 235-247

  Ganzach, Yoav ^a  

^a TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0001238112     PISSN: 1082989X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/1082-989X.2.3.235     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Anderson, N. H. (1982). Methods of information integration theory: New York: Academic Press.
3. Birnbaum, N. H., & Stegner, S. E. (1981). Measuring the importance of cues in judgment for individuals: Subjective theories of I.Q. as a function of heredity and environment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 17, 159-182.
4. Budescu, D. V. (1980). A note on polynomial regression. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 15, 497-508.
5. Busemeyer, J. R., & Jones, L. E. (1983). Analysis of multiplicative combination rules when the causal variables are measured with error. Psychological Bulletin, 93, 549-562.
6. Center for Human Resource Research. (1995). National Longitudinal Study of Youth: User's guide 1995. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.
7. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
8. Cohen, J., & Cohen, P. (1983). Applied multiple regression/correlation for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
9. Conger, A. J. (1974). A revised definition of suppressor variables: A guide to their identification and interpretation. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 32, 579-599.
10. Cortina, J. M. (1993). Interaction, nonlinearity and multicolinearity: Implications for multiple regression. Journal of Management. 19, 915-922.
11. Cronbach, L. J. (1987). Statistical tests for moderator variables: Flaws in analyses recently proposed. Psychological Bulletin, 102, 414-417.
12. Darlington, R. B. (1968). Multiple regression in psychological research and practice. Psychological Bulletin, 69, 161-182.
13. Darlington, R. B. (1990). Regression and linear models. New York: McGraw-Hill.
14. Dawes, R. M., & Corrigan, B. (1974). Linear models in decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 81, 95-106.
15. Einhorn, H. J. (1970). The use of nonlinear, noncompensatory models in decision making. Psychological Bulletin, 73, 221-230.
16. Einhorn, H. J. (1971). The use of nonlinear, noncompensatory models as a function of task and amount of information. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 6, 1-27.
17. Einhorn, H. J. (1974). Cue definition and residual judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 12, 30-49.
18. Fazio, R.H., Sherman, F.J., & Herr, P.M. (1982). The feature-positive effect in the self-perception process: Does not doing matter as much as doing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 404-411.
19. Ganzach, Y. (1993). Goals as determinants of nonlinear, noncompensatory judgment strategies. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 56, 422-440.
20. Ganzach, Y. (1994). Theory and configurality in expert and layman judgment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 79, 439-448.
21. Ganzach, Y. (1995). Nonlinear models of clinical judgment: Meehl's data revisited. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 422-429.
22. Ganzach, Y. (in press-a). Configurality in judgment: Is it a bias? Psychonomic Bulletin and Review.
23. Ganzach, Y. (in press-b). Nonlinearity, multicolinearity and the probability of type II error in detecting interaction. Journal of Business Research.
24. Ganzach, Y., & Czaczkes, B. (1995). On detecting nonlinear noncompensatory judgment strategies: Comparison of alternative regression models. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 61, 168-177.
25. Ganzach, Y., & Czaczkes, B. (1996). Judgment strategies: Nonlinear, noncompensatory, and nonlinear-noncompensatory (Working paper). Tel Aviv, Israel: Tel Aviv University.
26. Ganzach, Y., & Krantz, D. H. (1991). The psychology of moderate prediction: II. Leniency and uncertainty. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 48, 169-192.
27. Goldberg, L. R. (1971). Five models of clinical judgment: An empirical comparison between linear and nonlinear representation of the human inference process. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 6, 458-479.
28. Jaccard, J., Turrisi, R., & Wan, C. K. (1990). Interaction effects in multiple regression. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
29. Johnson, E. J. (1988). Expertise and decision making under uncertainty: Performance and process. In M. T. H. Chi, R. Glaser, & M. J. Farr (Eds.), The nature of expertise (pp. 209-228). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
30. Klayman, J., & Ha, Y. W. (1987). Confirmation, disconfirmation, and information in hypothesis testing. Psychological Review, 94, 211-228.
31. Krantz, D. H., & Tversky, A. (1971). Conjoint measurement analysis of composition rules in psychology. Psychological Review, 78, 151-169.
32. Lubinski, D., & Humphreys, L. G. (1990). Assessing spurious "moderator effects": Illustrated substantively with the hypothesized ("synergistic") relation between spatial and mathematical ability. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 385-393.
33. McClelland, G. H., & Judd, C. M. (1993). Statistical difficulties in detecting interactions and moderator effects. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 376-390.
34. MacCullum, R. C., & Marr, C. M. (1995). Distinguishing between moderator and quadratic effects in multiple regression. Psychological Bulletin, 118, 405-421.
35. Meehl, P. (1959). A comparison of clinicians with five statistical methods of identifying psychotic MMPI profiles. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 6, 102-109.
36. Sackett, P. R., Harris, M. M., & Orr, J. M. (1987). On seeking moderator variables in meta-analysis of correlational data: A Monte Carlo investigation of statistical power. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 302-310.
37. Shepperd, J. A. (1991). Cautions in assessing spurious "moderator effects." Psychological Bulletin, 110, 315-317.
38. Snyder, M., & Campbell, B. H. (1980). Testing hypotheses about other people: The role of the hypothesis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 6, 421-426.
39. Tzelgov, J., & Henik, A. (1991). Suppression situations in psychological research: Definitions, implications, and applications. Psychological Bulletin, 109, 524-536.
40. Weber, E. U. (1994). From subjective probability to decision weights: The effect of asymmetric loss functions on the evaluation of uncertain outcomes and events. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 228-242.
41. Wiggins, N., & Hoffman, P. J. (1968). Three models of clinical judgment. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 73, 70-77.