International Cultural Diversification and Corporate Social Performance in Multinational Enterprises: The Role of Slack Financial Resources

Management International Review

Volumn 55, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 323-353

  Aguilera Caracuel, Javier ^a   Guerrero Villegas, Jaime ^a   Vidal Salazar, María Dolores ^b   Delgado Márquez, Blanca L ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD PABLO DE OLAVIDE   (Spain)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Corporate social performance; Corporate social responsibility; International cultural diversification; Multinational enterprises; Slack financial resources

Indexed keywords

EID: 84931560847     PISSN: 09388249     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11575-014-0225-4     Document Type: Article

References (134)

1. Aguilera-Caracuel, J., Hurtado-Torres, N. E., & Aragón-Correa, J. A. (2012). Does international experience help firms to be green: a knowledge based view of how international experience and organisational learning influence proactive environmental strategies. International Business Review,21(5), 847–861.
2. Aguilera-Caracuel, J., Hurtado-Torres, N. E., Aragón-Correa, J. A., & Rugman, A. M. (2013). Differentiated effects of formal and informal institutional distance between countries on the environmental performance of multinational enterprises. Journal of Business Research,66(12), 2657–2665.
3. Ahmadjian, C., & Robinson, P. (2001). Safety in numbers: downsizing and the deinstitutionalization of permanent employment in Japan. Administrative Science Quarterly,46(4), 622–654.
4. Allouche, J., & Laroche, P. (2005). A meta-analytical investigation of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Revue de Gestion des Ressources Humaines,57(1), 18–41.
5. Ang, Z., & Maasingham, P. (2007). National culture and the standardization versus adaptation of knowledge management. Journal of Knowledge Management,11(2), 5–21.
6. Antonacopoulou, E. P., & Meric, J. (2005). From power to knowledge relationships: stakeholder interactions as learning partnerships. In M. Bonnafous-Boucher & Y. Pesqueux (Eds.), Stakeholders and corporate social responsibility: European perspectives (pp. 125–147). London: Palgrave Macmillan.
7. Aragón-Correa, J. A., & Sharma, S. (2003). A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy. Academy of Management Review,28(1), 71–88.
8. Arthaud-Day, M. L. (2005). Transnational corporate social responsibility: a tri-dimensional approach to international CSR research. Business Ethics Quarterly,15(1), 1–22.
9. Bansal, P. (2005). Evolving sustainably: a longitudinal study of corporate sustainable. Strategic Management Journal,26(3), 197–218.
10. Bansal, P., & Clelland, I. (2000). The market risk of corporate environmental illegitimacy. Academy of Management Meeting. Best paper proceedings.
11. Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: a model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal,43(4), 717–736.
12. Barin-Cruz, L., & Boehe, D. M. (2010). How do leading retail MNCs leverage CSR globally: insights from Brazil. Journal of Business Ethics,91(2), 243–263.
13. Berry, J. W. (2006). Contexts of acculturation. In D. L. Sam & J. W. Berry (Eds.), Cambridge handbook of acculturation psychology (pp. 27–42). New York: Cambridge University Press.
14. Bhagat, R., Kedia, B., & Triandis, H. (2002). Cultural variation in the crossborder transfer of organizational knowledge: an integrative framework. Academy of Management Review,27(2), 204–221.
15. Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2004). Doing better at doing good: when, why, and how consumers respond to corporate social initiatives. California Management Review,47(1), 9–24.
16. Bondy, K., Moon, J., & Matten, D. (2012). An institution of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in multi-national companies (MNCs): form and implications. Journal of Business Ethics,111(2), 281–299.
17. Bowen, F. E. (2002). Organizational slack and corporate greening: broadening the debate. British Journal of Management,13(4), 305–316.
18. Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2003). The effect of stakeholder preferences, organizational structure and industry type on corporate community involvement. Journal of Business Ethics,45(3), 213–226.
19. Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2008). Does it pay to be different: an analysis of the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Strategic Management Journal,29(12), 1325–1343.
20. Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2005). Corporate community contributions in the United States and the United Kingdom. Journal of Business Ethics,56(1), 15–26.
21. Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review,4(4), 497–505.
22. Cespa, G., & Cestone, G. (2007). Corporate social responsibility and managerial entrenchment. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy,16(3), 741–771.
23. Cheng, B., Loannou, L., & Serafeim, G. (2014). Corporate social responsibility and access to finance. Strategic Management Journal,35(1), 1–23.
24. Choi, J., & Wang, H. (2009). Stakeholder relations and the persistence of corporate financial performance. Strategic Management Journal,30(8), 895–907.
25. Christmann, P. (2004). Multinational companies and the natural environment: determinants of global environmental policy standardization. Academy of Management Journal,47(5), 747–760.
26. Christmann, P., & Taylor, G. (2001). Globalization and the environment: determinants of firm self-regulation in China. Journal of International Business Studies,32(3), 439–458.
27. Connell, R. W. (2005). Change among the gatekeepers: man, masculinities, and gender equality in the global arena. Signs,30(3), 1801–1825.
28. Cornell, B., & Shapiro, A. C. (1987). Corporate stakeholders and corporate finance. Financial Management,16(1), 5–14.
29. Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2010). Business ethics: managing corporate citizenship and sustainability in the age of globalization (3rd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
30. Cyert, R., & March, J. (1963). The behavioural theory of the firm. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.
31. Davidson, W., & Worrell, D. L. (1988). The impact of announcements of corporate illegalities on shareholder returns. Academy of Management Journal,31(1), 195–200.
32. Davis, K. (1973). The case for and against business assumption of social responsibilities. Academy of Management Journal,16(2), 312–322.
33. Deckop, J. R., Merriman, K. K., & Gupta, S. (2006). The effects of CEO pay structure on corporate social performance. Journal of Management,32(3), 329–342.
34. Delmas, M. (2001). Stakeholders and competitive advantage: the case of ISO 14001. Production and Operations Management,10(3), 343–358.
35. Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): the role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews,12(1), 8–19.
36. Durán-Herrera, J. J., & Bajo-Davó, N. (2013). Incidencia de las variables institucionales del país de origen de las empresas multinacionales en su performance financiero. Universia Business Review, first semester,37, 52–67.
37. Feldman, S. J., Soyka, P., & Ameer, P. (1997). Does improving a firm’s environmental management system and environmental performance result in a higher stock price? Journal of Investing,6(4), 87–97.
38. Fombrun, C., & Shanley, M. (1990). What’s in a name: reputation building and corporate strategy. Academy of Management Journal,33(2), 233–258.
39. Freeman, E. (1984). Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman Press.
40. Freeman, R. E., Harrison, J. S., & Wicks, A. C. (2007). Managing for stakeholders: survival, reputation, and success. New Haven: Yale University Press.
41. Frooman, J. (1997). Socially irresponsible and illegal behavior and shareholder wealth: a metaanalysis of event studies. Business and Society,36(5), 221–249.
42. Fryxell, G. E., & Wang, J. (1994). The fortune corporate reputation index: reputation for what? Journal of Management,20(1), 1–14.
43. Garriga, E., & Mele, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics,53(1/2), 52–71.
44. Godfrey, P. C., Merrill, C. B., & Hansen, J. M. (2009). The relationship between corporate social responsibility and shareholder value: an empirical test of the risk management hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal,30(4), 425–445.
45. Grant, R. M. (1987). Multinationality and performance among British manufacturing companies. Journal of International Business Studies,18(3), 79–89.
46. Gray, R., Javad, M., Power, D. M., & Sinclair, C. D. (2001). Social and environmental disclosure and corporate characteristics: a research note and extension. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting,28(3/4), 327–356.
47. Griffin, J. J., & Mahon, J. F. (1997). The corporate social performance and corporate financial performance debate: twenty-five years of incomparable research. Business and Society,36(1), 5–31.
48. Hah, K., & Freeman, S. (2013). Multinational enterprise subsidiaries and their CSR: a conceptual framework of the management of CSR in smaller emerging economies. Journal of Business Ethics,122(1), 125–136.
49. Hair, J. F., Andersson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (2009). Multivariate analysis (6th ed.). Madrid: Prentice Hall.
50. Hall, R. (1992). The strategic analysis of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal,13(2), 135–144.
51. Hamann, R. (2004). Corporate social responsibility, partnerships, and institutional change: the case of mining companies in South Africa. Natural Resources Forum,28(4), 278–290.
52. Hart, S. L. (1997). Beyond greening: strategies for sustainable world. Harvard Business Review,75(1), 66–76.
53. Hart, S. L., & Christensen, C. M. (2002). The great leap: driving innovation from the base of the pyramid. MIT Sloan Management Review,44(1), 51–57.
54. Hausman, J. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica,46(6), 1251–1271.
55. Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (1996). The determinants of an environmentally responsive firm: an empirical approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,30(3), 381–395.
56. Hillman, A. J., & Keim, G. D. (2001). Shareholder value, stakeholder management, and social issues: what’s the bottom line? Strategic Management Journal,22(2), 125–139.
57. Hitt, M., Black, S., & Porter, L. (2006). Administración. México D. F.: Pearson-Prentice Hall.
58. Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Kim, H. (1997). International diversification: effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal,40(4), 767–799.
59. Hoeffler, S., & Keller, K. L. (2002). Building brand equity through corporate societal marketing. Journal of Public Policy and Marketing,21(1), 78–89.
60. Hofstede, G. H. (1980). Culture consequences: international differences in work-related values. London: Sage Publications.
61. Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
62. Hong, H., Kubik, J. D., & Scheinkman, J. A. (2011). Financial constraints on corporate goodness. Working paper, Princeton University.
63. Jamali, D. (2008). A stakeholder approach to corporate social responsibility: a fresh perspective into theory and practice. Journal of Business Ethics,82(1), 213–231.
64. Jamali, D. (2010). The CSR of MNC subsidiaries in developing countries: global, local, substantive or diluted. Journal of Business Ethics,93(2), 181–200.
65. Julian, S. D., & Ofori-Dankwa, J. C. (2013). Financial resource availability and corporate social responsibility expenditure in a Sub-saharan economy: the institutional difference hypothesis. Strategic Management Journal,34(11), 1314–1330.
66. Kacperczyk, A. (2009). With greater power comes greater responsibility: takeover protection and corporate attention to stakeholders. Strategic Management Journal,30(3), 261–285.
67. Kakabadse, N. K., Rozuel, C., & Lee-Davies, L. (2005). Corporate social responsibility and stakeholder approach: a conceptual review. International Journal of Business Governance and Ethics,1(4), 277–302.
68. Kang, J. (2013). The relationship between corporate diversification and corporate social performance. Strategic Management Journal,34(1), 94–109.
69. Kim, W. C., Hwang, P., & Burgers, W. P. (1989). Global diversification strategy and corporate profit performance. Strategic Management Journal,10(1), 45–57.
70. Kim, W. C., Hwang, P., & Burgers, W. P. (1993). Multinationals’ diversification and the risk-return trade-off. Strategic Management Journal,14(4), 275–286.
71. King, A. A., & Shaver, J. M. (2001). Are aliens green: assessing foreign establishments’ environmental conduct in the United States. Strategic Management Journal,22(11), 1069–1086.
72. Kogut, B., & Singh, H. (1988). The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies,19(3), 411–433.
73. Kolk, A., & van Tulder, R. (2010). International business, corporate social responsibility and sustainable development. International Business Review,19(2), 119–125.
74. Kostova, T., & Roth, K. (2002). Adoption of an organizational practice by subsidiaries of multinational corporations: institutional and relational effects. Academy of Management Journal,45(1), 215–233.
75. Kostova, T., Roth, K., & Dacin, T. (2008). Institutional theory in the study of multinational corporations: a critique and new directions. Academy of Management Review,33(4), 994–1006.
76. Kraatz, M. S., & Zajac, E. J. (2001). How organizational resources affect strategic change and performance in turbulent environments: theory and evidence. Organization Science,12(5), 632–657.
77. Lichtenstein, D. R., Drumwright, M. E., & Braig, B. M. (2004). The effect of corporate social responsibility on customer donations to corporate-supported nonprofits. Journal of Marketing,68(4), 16–32.
78. Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2009). The debate over doing good: corporate social performance, strategic marketing levers, and firm-idiosyncratic risk. Journal of Marketing,73(6), 198–213.
79. Madhok, A. (1997). Cost, value and foreign market entry mode: the transaction and the firm. Strategic Management Journal,18(1), 39–61.
80. Maignan, I., & Ferrell, O. C. (2004). Corporate social responsibility and marketing: an integrative framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,3(1), 1–18.
81. Maignan, I., & Ralston, D. (2002). Corporate social responsibility in Europe and the US: insights from businesses’ self-presentations. Journal of International Business Studies,33(4), 497–514.
82. Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: whither social initiatives by business? Administrative Science Quarterly,48(2), 268–305.
83. Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). Corporate citizenship: toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review,30(1), 166–179.
84. Maxwell, J., Rothenberg, S., Briscoe, F., & Marcus, A. (1997). Green schemes: corporate environmental strategies and their implementation. California Management Review,39(3), 118–134.
85. McGuire, J. B., Sundgren, A., & Schneeweiss, T. (1988). Corporate social responsibility and firm financial performance. Academy of Management Review,31(4), 854–872.
86. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: a theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review,26(1), 117–127.
87. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review,22(4), 853–886.
88. Mohan, A. (2006). Global corporate social responsibilities management in MNCs. Journal of Business Strategies,23(1), 9–32.
89. Montgomery, C. (1994). Corporate diversification. Journal of Economic Perspectives,8(3), 163–178.
90. Mooij, M., & Hofstede, G. (2010). The Hofstede model applications to global branding and advertising strategy and research. International Journal of Advertising,29(1), 85–110.
91. Moore, G. (2001). Corporate social and financial performance: an investigation in the UK supermarket industry. Journal of Business Ethics,34(3/4), 167–180.
92. Morsing, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility as strategic auto-communication: on the role of external stakeholders for member identification. Business Ethics,15(2), 171–182.
93. Nohria, N., & Gulati, R. (1996). Is slack good or bad for innovation? Academy of Management Journal,39(5), 1245–1264.
94. Orlitzky, M. (2001). Does firm size confound the relationship between corporate social performance and firm financial performance? Journal of Business Ethics,33(2), 167–180.
95. Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F. L., & Rynes, S. L. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: a meta-analysis. Organization Studies,24(3), 403–441.
96. Perrini, F., Russo, A., Tencati, A., & Vurro, C. (2011). Deconstructing the relationship between corporate social and financial performance. Journal of Business Ethics,102(1), 59–76.
97. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2002). The competitive advantage of corporate philanthropy. Harvard Business Review,80(12), 56–68.
98. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). How to reinvent capitalism: and unleash a wave of innovation and growth. Harvard Business Review,89(1–2), 62–77.
99. Preston, L. E., & O’Bannon, D. P. (1997). The corporate social-financial performance relationship: a typology and analysis. Business and Society,36(4), 419–429.
100. Reimann, F., Ehrgott, M., Kaufmann, L., & Carter, C. R. (2012). Local stakeholders and local legitimacy: MNEs’ social strategies in emerging economies. Journal of International Management,18(1), 1–17.
101. Rodríguez, P., Siegel, D. S., Hillman, A., & Eden, L. (2006). Three lenses on the multinational enterprise: politics, corruption, and corporate social responsibility. Journal of International Business Studies,37(6), 733–746.
102. Ronen, S., & Shenkar, O. (1985). Clustering countries on attitudinal dimensions: a review and synthesis. Academy of Management Review,10(3), 435–454.
103. Russo, M. V., & Fouts, P. A. (1997). A resource-based perspective on corporate environmental performance and profitability. Academy of Management Journal,40(3), 534–559.
104. Salzmann, O., Ionescu-Somers, A., & Steger, U. (2005). The business case for corporate sustainability: literature review and research options. European Management Journal,23(1), 27–36.
105. Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2008). Globalization and corporate social responsibility. In A. Crane et al. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 413–431). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
106. Scholtens, B., & Dam, L. (2007). Cultural values and international differences in business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics,75(3), 273–284.
107. Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Beyond individualism/collectivism: new dimensions of values. In U. Kim et al. (Eds.), Individualism and collectivism: theory application and methods (pp. 176–181). Newbury Park: Sage Publications.
108. Schylander, E., & Martinuzzi, A. (2006). ISO 14001: experiences, effects and future challenges: a national study in Austria. Business Strategy and the Environment,16(2), 133–147.
109. Sen, S., Bhattacharya, C. B., & Korschun, D. (2006). The role of corporate social responsibility in strengthening multiple stakeholder relationships: a field experiment. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science,34(2), 158–166.
110. Sharfman, M. P., Shaft, T. M., & Anex, R. P. (2009). The road to cooperative supply-chain environmental management: trust and uncertainty among proactive firms. Business Strategy and the Environment,18(1), 1–13.
111. Sharma, S. (2000). Managerial interpretations and organizational context as predictors of corporate choice of environmental strategy. Academy of Management Journal,43(4), 681–697.
112. Shenkar, O. (2001). Cultural distance revisited: towards a more rigorous conceptualization and measurement of cultural differences. Journal of International Business Studies,32(3), 519–535.
113. Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (1989). Management entrenchment: the case of manager-specific investments. Journal of Financial Economics,25(1), 123–139.
114. Smith, K. T., Smith, M., & Wang, K. (2010). Does brand management of corporate reputation translate into higher market value? Journal of Strategic Marketing,18(3), 201–221.
115. Sternberg, E. (1997). The defects of stakeholder theory. Corporate Governance,5(1), 3–10.
116. Stone, G., Joseph, M., & Blodgett, J. (2004). Toward the creating of an eco-oriented corporate culture: a proposed model of internal and external antecedents leading to industrial firm eco-orientation. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing,19(1), 68–84.
117. Strike, V. M., Gao, J., & Bansal, P. (2006). Being good while being bad: social responsibility and the international diversification of US firms. Journal of International Business Studies,37(6), 850–862.
118. Surroca, J., Tribó, J. A., & Waddock, S. (2010). Corporate responsibility and financial performance: the role of intangible resources. Strategic Management Journal,31(5), 463–490.
119. Surroca, J., Tribó, J. A., & Zahra, S. A. (2013). Stakeholder pressure on MNEs and the transfer of socially irresponsible practices to subsidiaries. Academy of Management Journal,56(2), 549–572.
120. Taneja, S. S., Taneja, P. K., & Gupta, R. K. (2011). Researches in corporate social responsibility: a review of shifting focus, paradigms, and methodologies. Journal of Business Ethics,101(3), 343–364.
121. Teece, D., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal,18(7), 509–533.
122. Transparency International (2004). TI Corruption Perceptions Index 2004. Berlin: Transparency International Secretariat.
123. Turker, D. (2009). Measuring corporate social responsibility: a scale development study. Journal of Business Ethics,85(4), 411–427.
124. Voss, G. B., Sirdeshmukh, D., & Voss, Z. G. (2008). The effects of slack resources and environmental threat on product exploration and exploitation. Academy of Management Journal,51(1), 147–164.
125. Waddock, S. A., & Graves, S. B. (1997). The corporate social performance-financial performance link. Strategic Management Journal,18(4), 303–319.
126. Wang, L., & Juslin, H. (2009). The impact of Chinese culture on corporate social responsibility: the harmony approach. Journal of Business Ethics,88(3), 433–451.
127. Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economics institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press.
128. Wood, D. J. (2010). Measuring corporate social performance: a review. International Journal of Management Review,12(1), 50–84.
129. World Bank (1995). World development indicators. Washington: World Bank Publications. http://www.worldbank.org. Accessed June 2012.
130. World Business Council for Sustainable Development (2004). Cross cutting themes: corporate responsibility. http://www.wbcsd.org. Accessed May 2004.
131. The Hofstede Centre. http://geert-hofstede.com/countries.html. Accessed June 2012.
132. Yang, X., & Rivers, C. (2009). Antecedents of CSR practices in MNCs’ subsidiaries: a stakeholder and institutional perspective. Journal of Business Ethics,86(2), 155–169.
133. Yeoh, P. (2004). International learning: antecedents and performance implications among newly internationalizing companies in an exporting context. International Marketing Review,21(4/5), 511–535.
134. Zahra, S. A., Neubaum, D. O., & Huse, M. (2000). Entrepreneurship in medium-size companies: exploring the effects of ownership and governance systems. Journal of Management,26(5), 947–976.