Corporate Social Responsibility in Europe and the U.S.: Insights from Businesses’ Self-presentations

Journal of International Business Studies

Volumn 33, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 497-514

  Maignan, Isabelle ^a   Ralston, David A ^b  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0036745455     PISSN: 00472506     EISSN: 14786990     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8491028     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Adams, Carol A., Wan-Ying Hill & Clare B. Roberts. 1998. Corporate Social Reporting Practices in Western Europe: Legitimating Corporate Behaviour? British Accounting Review, 30: 1-21.
2. Bennett, Roger. 1998. Corporate Philanthropy in France, Germany, and the U.K.-International Comparisons of Commercial Orientation Towards Company Giving in European Nations. International Marketing Review, 15(6): 458-475.
3. Clarkson, Max B. E. 1995. A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance. Academy of Management Review, 20(1): 92-117.
4. Clough, Shepard B. 1960. Philanthropy and the Welfare State in Europe. Political Science Quarterly, 37: 87-93.
5. ESIS. 2000. Information Society Indicators in the Member States of the European Union-A Report Prepared by the ESIS Project Management Support Team. October, http://europa.eu.int/ ISPQ/esis/default.htm
6. Esrock, Stuart L. & Greg B. Leichty. 1998. Social Responsibility and Corporate Web Pages: Self-Presentation or Agenda-Setting? Public Relations Review, 24(3): 305-319.
7. Esrock, Stuart L. & Greg B. Leichty &. 2000. Organization of Corporate Web Pages: Publics and Functions. Public Relations Review, 26(3): 327-344.
8. Gardner, Meryl P. & Philip Shuman. 1988. Sponsorships and Small Businesses. Journal of Small Business Management, 26 (4): 44-52.
9. Grahl, J. & P. Teague. 1997. Is the European Social Model Fragmenting? New Political Economy, 2(3): 405-426.
10. Gray, Rob, Dave Owen & Carol Adams. 1996. Accounting and Accountability. Hemel Hempstead, U.K.: Prentice Hall Europe.
11. Handelman, Jay M. & Stephen J. Arnold. The Role of Marketing Actions with a Social Dimension: Appeals to the Institutional Environment. Journal of Marketing, 63 (July): 33-48.
12. Hooghiemstra, Reggy. 2000. Corporate Communication and Impression Management-New Perspectives Why Companies Engage in Corporate Social Reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 27: 55-68.
13. Langlois, Catherine C. & Bodo B. Schlegelmich. 1990. Do Corporate Codes of Ethics Reflect National Character? Evidence from Europe and the United States. Journal of International Business Studies, 21(4), 519-539.
14. Lewis, Alan & Craig Mackenzie. 2000. Support for Investor Activism among U.K. Ethical Investors. Journal of Business Ethics, 3: 215-222.
15. Maignan, Isabelle, O.C. Ferrell, & G. Tomas M. Hult. 1999. Corporate Citizenship: Cultural Antecedents and Business Benefits. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(4): 455-469.
16. Rowley, Timothy J. & Shawn Berman. A Brand New Brand of Corporate Social Performance. Business # Society, 39 (4): 397-412.
17. Sen, S. and C.B. Bhattacharya. 2001. Does Doing Good Always Lead to Doing Better? Consumer Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38 (May): 225-243.
18. Swanson, Diane L. 1995. Addressing a Theoretical Problem by Reorienting the Corporate Social Performance Model. Academy of Management Review, 20 (1): 43-64.
19. USIC (United States Internet Council) & ITTA Inc. 2000. State of the Internet http://wslogic.com/
20. Vogel, David. 1992. The Globalization of Business Ethics: Why America Remains Distinctive. California Management Review, Fall: 30-49.
21. Weaver, Gary R. 2001. Ethics Programs in Global Businesses: Culture’s Role in Managing Ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 30(1): 3-15.
22. Wood, Donna J. 1991. Corporate Social Performance Revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16(4): 691-718.
23. Wood, Donna J & Raymond E. Jones. 1995. Stakeholder Mismatching: A Theoretical Problem in Empirical Research on Corporate Social Performance. The International Journal of Organizational Analysis, 3 (3): 229-267.