An Institution of Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) in Multi-National Corporations (MNCs): Form and Implications

Journal of Business Ethics

Volumn 111, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 281-299

  Bondy, Krista ^a   Moon, Jeremy ^b   Matten, Dirk ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BATH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^c YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Business case; Corporate social responsibility; Critical perspectives; Institutional theory; Multi national corporations

Indexed keywords

EID: 84870387079     PISSN: 01674544     EISSN: 15730697     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-012-1208-7     Document Type: Article

References (144)

1. Aguilera, R. V., Rupp, D., Williams, C. A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multi-level theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 836-863.
2. Arenas, D., Lozano, J., & Albareda, L. (2009). The role of NGOs in CSR: Mutual perceptions among stakeholders. Journal of Business Ethics, 88, 175-197.
3. Bacharach, S., Bamberger, P., & Sonnenstuhl, W. (1996). The organizational transformation process: The micropolitics of dissonance reduction and the alignment of logics of action. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 477-506.
4. Baker, M. (2002). Research methods. The Marketing Review, 3, 167-193.
5. Banerjee, S. B. (2007). Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, MA: Edward Elgar.
6. Beckert, J. (1999). Agency, entrepreneurs, and institutional change. The role of strategic choice and institutionalized practices in organizations. Organization Studies, 20(5), 777-799.
7. Beliveau, B., Cottrill, M., & O'Neill, H. (1994). Predicting corporate social responsiveness: A model drawn from three perspectives. Journal of Business Ethics, 13(9), 731-738.
8. Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1967). The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge. London: Penguin Press.
9. Bies, R., Bartunek, J., Fort, T., & Zald, M. (2007). Corporations as social change agents: Individual, interpersonal, institutional and environmental dynamics. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 788-793.
10. Blowfield, M. (2005). Corporate social responsibility: The failing discipline and why it matters for international relations. International Relations, 19(2), 173-191.
11. Blowfield, M., & Frynas, J. G. (2005). Setting new agendas: Critical perspectives on corporate social responsibility in the developing world. International Affairs, 81(3), 499-513.
12. Bondy, K. (2008). The paradox of power in CSR: A case study on implementation. Journal of Business Ethics, 82(2), 307-323.
13. Bondy, K., Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). Multinational corporation codes of conduct: Governance tools for corporate social responsibility? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16(4), 294-311.
14. Boxenbaum, E. (2006). Corporate social responsibility as institutional hybrids. Journal of Business Strategies, 23(1), 45-64.
15. Brammer, S., & Millington, A. (2003). The evolution of corporate charitable contributions in the UK between 1989 and 1999: Industry structure and stakeholder influences. Business Ethics: A European Review, 12(3), 216-228.
16. Burrell, G., & Morgan, G. (1979). Sociological paradigms and organisational analysis. England: Gower Publishing.
17. Campbell, J. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 946-967.
18. Carroll, A. B. (1979). A three dimensional model of corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 4, 497-505.
19. Charmaz, K. (2000). Grounded theory: Objectivist and constructivist methods. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
20. Consolandi, C., Jaiswal-Dale, A., Poggiani, E., & Vercelli, A. (2009). Global standards and ethical stock indexes: The case of the Dow Jones Sustainability Stoxx index. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 185-197.
21. Coupland, C., & Brown, A. D. (2004). Constructing organizational identities on the web: A case study of Royal Dutch/Shell. Journal of Management Studies, 41(8), 1325-1347.
22. Cragg, W., & Greenbaum, A. (2002). Reasoning about responsibilities: Mining company managers on what stakeholders are owed. Journal of Business Ethics, 39, 319-335.
23. Cramer, J. (2005). Experiences with structuring corporate social responsibility in Dutch industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 13, 583-592.
24. Crane, A., Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008a). Corporations and citizenship. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Crane, A., Matten, D., & Spence, L. (2008b). Corporate social responsibility: in a global context. In A. Crane, D. Matten, & L. Spence (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility: Readings and cases in a global context (pp. 3-20). Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
26. Creed, D., Scully, M., & Austin, J. (2002). Clothes make the person? The tailoring of legitimating accounts and the social construction of identity. Organization Science, 13(5), 475-496.
27. Curry, T., Ansolabehere, S., & Herzog, H. (2007). A survey of public attitudes towards climate change and climate change mitigation technologies in the United States: Analysis of 2006 results.
28. Czarniawska, B., & Joerges, B. (1996). Travel of ideas. In B. Czarniawska & G. Sevon (Eds.), Translating the organizational change. New York: Walter De Gruyter.
29. Davenport, K. (2000). Corporate citizenship: A stakeholder approach for defining corporate social performance and identifying measures for assessing it. Business & Society, 39(2), 210-219.
30. Davies, I. A. (2009). Alliances and networks: Creating success in the UK fair trade market. Journal of Business Ethics, 86, 109-126.
31. Davis, K. (1960). Can business afford to ignore corporate social responsibilities? California Management Review, 2, 70-76.
32. Den Hond, F., & De Bakker, F. G. A. (2007). Ideologically motivated activism: How activist groups influence corporate social change activities. Academy of Management Review, 32, 901-924.
33. Detomasi, D. A. (2008). The political roots of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 82, 807-819.
34. Devinney, T. (2009). Is the socially responsible corporation a myth? The good, the bad, and the ugly of Corporate Social Responsibility. Academy of Management Perspectives, 23(2), 44-56.
35. Dijksterhuis, M., van den Bosch, F., & Volberda, H. (1999). Where do new organizational forms come from? Management logics as a source of coevolution. Organization Science, 10(5), 569-582.
36. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147-160.
37. DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. (1991). Introduction. In W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
38. Doane, D. (2005). The myth of CSR: The problem with assuming that companies can do well while also doing good is that markets don't really work that way. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 3(fall), 22-29.
39. Doh, J. P., & Guay, T. R. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, public policy, and NGO activism in Europe and the United States: An institutional-stakeholder perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 47-73.
40. Doh, J., Howton, S., Howton, S., & Siegal, D. (2010). Does the market respond to an endorsement of social responsibility? The role of institutions, information and legitimacy. Journal of Management, 36(6), 1461-1485.
41. Donaldson, T., & Dunfee, T. W. (1994). Toward a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative social contracts theory. Academy of Management Review, 19, 252-284.
42. Donaldson, T., & Preston, L. E. (1995). The stakeholder theory of the corporation: Concepts, evidence, and implications. Academy of Management Review, 20(1), 65-91.
43. Dunning, J. (1998). Reappraising the eclectic paradigm in an age of alliance capitalism. In M. Colombo (Ed.), The changing boundaries of the firm (pp. 29-59). London: Routledge.
44. ECCR. (2006). News release: Responsible investors back Shell shareholder resolution.
45. Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone Publishing Ltd.
46. Elkington, J. (1998). The 'triple bottom line' for twenty-first-century business. In J. V. Mitchell (Ed.), Companies in a world of conflict: NGOs, sanctions and corporate responsibility (pp. 32-69). London: The Royal Institute of International Affairs/Earthscan.
47. European Commission. (2008). Europeans' attitudes towards climate change.
48. Fiss, P., Kennedy, M., & Davis, G. (2011). How golden parachutes unfolded: Diffusion and variation of a controversial practice. Organization Science, Articles in Advance, 1-23.
49. Fiss, P., & Zajac, E. (2004). The diffusion of ideas over contested terrain: The (non)adoption of a shareholder value orientation among German firms. Administrative Science Quarterly, 49, 501-534.
50. Fligstein, N. (2001). Social skill and the theory of fields. Sociological Theory, 19(2), 105-125.
51. Fransen, L. W., & Kolk, A. (2007). Global rule-setting for business: A critical analysis of multi-stakeholder standards. Organization, 14(5), 667-684.
52. Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management. A stakeholder approach. Boston: Pitman.
53. Friedland, R., & Alford, R. (1991). Bringing society back in: Symbols, practices, and institutional contradictions. In W. Powell & P. DiMaggio (Eds.), The new institutionalism in organizational analysis (pp. 232-263). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
54. Friedman, M. (1970). The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits.
55. Garriga, E., & Melé, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53(1-2), 51-71.
56. Gerson, K., & Horowitz, R. (2002). Observation and interviewing: Options and choices inqualitative research. In T. May (Ed.), Qualitative research in action. London: Sage.
57. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
58. Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. New York: Aldine.
59. Global Reporting Initiative. (1999). Sustainability reporting guidelines: Exposure draft for public comment and pilot-testing. In M. Bennett, P. James, & L. Klinkers (Eds.), Sustainable measures: Evaluation and reporting of environmental and social performance. Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf Publishing.
60. Glynn, M. A., & Lounsbury, M. (2005). From the critics' corner: Logic blending, discursive change and authenticity in a cultural production system. Journal of Management Studies, 42(5), 1031-1055.
61. Gond, J.-P., Kang, N., & Moon, J. (2011). The government of self-regulation: On the comparative dynamics of corporate social responsibility. Economy and Society (forthcoming).
62. Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481-510.
63. Gray, R. (2001). Thirty years of social accounting, reporting and auditing: What (if anything) have we learnt? Business Ethics: A European Review, 10(1), 9-15.
64. Hensmans, M. (2003). Social movement organizations: A metaphone for strategic actors in institutional fields. Organization Studies, 24(3), 355-381.
65. Hoffman, A. J. (2001). From heresy to Dogma: An institutional history of corporate environmentalism. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
66. Holstein, J., & Gubrium, J. (1995). The active interview. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
67. Husted, B. W. (2003). Governance choices for corporate social responsibility: To contribute, collaborate or internalize? Long Range Planning, 36(5), 481-498.
68. Husted, B., & Allen, D. (2007). Strategic corporate social responsibility and value creation among large firms: Lessons from the Spanish experience. Long Range Planning, 40, 594-610.
69. Idemudia, U. (2011). Corporate social responsibility and developing countries: Moving the critical CSR research agenda in Africa forward. Progress in Development Studies, 11(1), 1-18.
70. Jackson, G., & Apostolakou, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in Western Europe: An institutional mirror or substitute. Journal of Business Ethics, 94, 371-394.
71. Jermier, J. M., Forbes, L. C., Benn, S., & Orsato, R. J. (2006). The new corporate environmentalism and green politics. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, T. Lawrence, & W. R. Nord (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organization studies (pp. 618-650). London: Sage.
72. Johnson, P. (2006). Whence democracy? A review and critique of the conceptual dimensions and implications of the business case for organizational democracy. Organization, 13(2), 245-274.
73. Kaufman, A., Tiantubtim, E., Pussayapibul, N., & Davids, P. (2004). Implementing voluntary labour standards and codes of conduct in the Thai garment industry. Journal of Corporate Citizenship, 13, 91-99.
74. Keats, D. (2000). Interviewing: A practical guide for students and professionals. Buckingham: Open University Press.
75. King, B., & Pearce, N. (2010). The contentiousness of markets: Politics, social movements and institutional change in markets. Annual Review of Sociology, 36, 249-267.
76. Knight, J. (1992). Institutions and social conflict. Cambridge, USA: Cambridge University Press.
77. Kurucz, E., Colbert, B., & Wheeler, D. (2008). The business case for corporate social responsibility. In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, & D. Siegal (Eds.), The oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 83-112). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
78. Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing fromprocess data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691-710.
79. Langlois, C. C., & Schlegelmilch, B. B. (1990). Do corporate codes of ethics reflect national character? Evidence from Europe and the United States. Journal of International Business Studies, 21(4), 519-539.
80. Laplume, A., Sonpar, K., & Litz, R. (2008). Stakeholder theory: Reviewing a theory that moves us. Journal of Management, 34(6), 1152-1189.
81. Levy, D. L. (2008). Political contestation in global production networks. Academy of Management Review, 33(4), 943-963.
82. Lincoln, Y., & Guba, E. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, Ca: Sage.
83. Linneroth-Bayer, J., Löfstedt, R., & Sjöstedt, G. (2001). Transboundary risk management. London: Earthscan.
84. Lounsbury, M. (2001). Institutional sources of practice variation: Staffing college and university recycling programs. Administrative Science Quarterly, 46(1), 29-56.
85. Lounsbury, M. (2002). Institutional transformation and status mobility: The professionalization of the field of finance. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 255-266.
86. Lounsbury, M., & Crumley, E. (2007). New practice creation: An institutional perspective on innovation. Organization Studies, 28(7), 993-1012.
87. Macalister, T. (2010). Tony Hayward's parting shot: 'I'm too busy to attend Senate hearing.
88. Maignan, I., & Ralston, D. A. (2002). Corporate social responsibility in Europe and the U. S.: Insights from businesses self-presentations. Journal of International Business Studies, 33(3), 497-514.
89. March, J., & Olsen, J. (1989). Rediscovering institutions: The organizational basis of politics. New York: Free Press.
90. Marquis, C., Glynn, M. A., & Davis, G. (2007). Community isomorphism and corporate social action. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 925-945.
91. Mason, R. (2010). BP's Tony Hayward resigns after being 'demonised and vilified' in the US.
92. Matten, D., & Crane, A. (2005). Corporate citizenship: Toward an extended theoretical conceptualization. Academy of Management Review, 30(1), 166-179.
93. Matten, D., Crane, A., & Chapple, W. (2003). Behind the mask: Revealing the true face of corporate citizenship. Journal of Business Ethics, 45(1/2), 109-120.
94. Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2004). Corporate social responsibility education in Europe. Journal of Business Ethics, 54(4), 323-337.
95. Matten, D., & Moon, J. (2008). 'Implicit' and 'Explicit' CSR: A conceptual framework for a comparative understanding of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 404-424.
96. McAdam, D., & Scott, R. W. (2005). Organizations and movements. In G. Davis, D. McAdam, R. W. Scott, & M. Zald (Eds.), Social movements and organization theory (pp. 4-40). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
97. McWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117-127.
98. Meyer, J., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: Formal structures as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340-363.
99. Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1998). Data management and analysis methods. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. Thousand Oaks, California: Sage.
100. Mitchell, R. K., Agle, B. R., & Wood, D. J. (1997). Toward a theory of stakeholder identification and salience: Defining the principle of who and what really counts. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 853-886.
101. Moon, J. (2002). Business social responsibility and new governance. Government and Opposition, 37(3), 385-408.
102. Moon, J., Crane, A., & Matten, D. (2005). Can corporations be citizens? Corporate citizenship as a metaphor for business participation in society. Business Ethics Quarterly, 15(3), 427-451.
103. Moon, J., & Orlitzky, M. (2010). Corporate social responsibility education. In D. Swanson & D. Fisher (Eds.), Assessing business ethics education. Information Age Publishing.
104. Moon, J., & Vogel, D. (2008). Corporate social responsibility, government and civil society. In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, & D. Siegal (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
105. Morgan, G. (1980). Paradigms, metaphors, and puzzle solving in organization theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 25(4), 605-622.
106. Morsing, M. (2003). Conspicuous responsibility: Communicating responsibility-To whom? In M. Morsing & C. Thyssen (Eds.), Corporate values and responsibility: The case of Denmark. Frederiksberg: Samfundslitteratur.
107. Nattrass, B., & Altomare, M. (1999). The natural step for business: Wealth, ecology and the evolutionary corporation. Gabriola Island, Canada: New Society Publishers.
108. Newell, P. (2005). Citizenship, accountability and community: The limits of the CSR agenda. International Affairs, 81(3), 541-557.
109. Norman, W., & MacDonald, C. (2004). Getting to the bottom of "Triple Bottom Line". Business Ethics Quarterly, 14(2), 243-262.
110. Owen, D., & O'Dwyer, B. (2008). Corporate social responsibility: The reporting and assurance dimension. In A. Crane, A. McWilliams, D. Matten, J. Moon, & D. Siegel (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of corporate social responsibility (pp. 384-412). Oxford: OUP.
111. Parent, M., & Deephouse, D. (2007). A case study of stakeholder identification and prioritization by managers. Journal of Business Ethics, 75, 1-23.
112. Phillips, R. (1997). Stakeholder theory and a principle of fairness. Business Ethics Quarterly, 7, 51-66.
113. Phillips, R. (2003). Stakeholder theory and organizational ethics. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler.
114. Phillips, R., Freeman, R. E., & Wicks, A. C. (2003). What stakeholder theory is not. Business Ethics Quarterly, 13(4), 479-502.
115. Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2006). Strategy & society: The link between competitive advantage and corporate social responsibility. Harvard Business Review, 84(12), 78-92.
116. Powell, W., & DiMaggio, P. (1991). The new institutionalism in organizational analysis. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
117. Prieto-Carron, M., Lund-Thomsen, P., Chan, A., Muro, A., & Bhushan, C. (2006). Critical perspectives on CSR and development: What we know, what we don't know, and what we need to know. International Affairs, 82(5), 977-987.
118. Rijnders, S., & Boer, H. (2004). A typology of continuous improvement implementation process. Knowledge and Process Management, 11(4), 283-296.
119. Ritchie, J., & Spencer, L. (2002). Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In A. M. Huberman & M. B. Miles (Eds.), The qualitative researcher's companion. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
120. Saunders, M., Lewis, P., & Thornhill, A. (2007). Research methods for business students 4e. England: Pearson Education Ltd.
121. Schaltegger, S., & Wagner, M. (2006). Managing the business case for sustainability. Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf Publishing.
122. Scherer, A. G., & Palazzo, G. (2007). Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility-Business and society seen from a Habermasian perspective. Academy of Management Review, 32(4), 1096-1120.
123. Scherer, A., Palazzo, G., & Matten, D. (2009). Introduction to the special issue: Globalization as a challenge for business responsibilities. Business Ethics Quarterly, 19(3), 327-347.
124. Scott, W. R. (2001). Institutions and organizations. London: Sage Publications.
125. Selznick, P. (1949). TVA and the grass roots: A study in the sociology of formal organization. Los Angeles, CA: University of California Press Berkley.
126. Sethi, S. P. (1975). Dimensions of corporate social performance: An analytical framework. California Management Review, 17(3), 58-64.
127. Silverman, D. (2001). Interpreting qualitative data. London: Sage.
128. Spiggle, S. (1994). Analysis and interpretation of qualitative data in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 21, 491-503.
129. Stern, R., & Barley, S. (1996). Organizations and social systems: Organization theory's neglected mandate. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41(3), 146-162.
130. Stevens, J., Steensma, H. K., Harrison, D., & Cochran, P. (2004). Symbolic or substantive document? The influence of ethics codes on financial executives 'decisions'. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 181-195.
131. Strauss, A. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
132. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
133. Swanson, D. (1999). Toward an integrative theory of business and society: A research strategy for corporate social performance. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 506-521.
134. Tempel, A., & Walgenbach, P. (2007). Global standardization of organisational forms and management practices? What new institutionalism and the business-systems approach can learn from each other. Journal of Management Studies, 44(1), 1-24.
135. Thornton, P. (2002). The rise of the corporation in a craft industry: Conflict and conformity in institutional logics. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 81-101.
136. Thornton, P., & Ocasio, W. (2008). Institutional logics. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, K. Sahlin, & R. Suddaby (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism. London, UK: Sage.
137. Tolbert, P., & Zucker, L. (1996). The institutionalization of institutional theory. In S. Clegg, C. Hardy, & W. Nord (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
138. Waddock, S. (2004). Parallel universes: Companies, academics, and the progress of corporate citizenship. Business & Society Review (00453609), 109(1), 5-42.
139. WBCSD. (2005). Business for development. Business solutions in support of the Millennium Development Goals. Geneva: World Business Council for Sustainable Development.
140. Windsor, D. (2006). Corporate social responsibility: Three key approaches. Journal of Management Studies, 43(1), 93-114.
141. Wood, D. J. (1991). Corporate social performance revisited. Academy of Management Review, 16, 691-718.
142. Zadek, S. (2006). Responsible competitiveness: Reshaping global markets through responsible business practices. Corporate Governance, 6(4), 334-348.
143. Zilber, T. (2002). Institutionalization as an interplay between actions, meanings, and actors: The case of a rape crisis center in Israel. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 234-254.
144. Zilber, T. (2006). The work of the symbolic in institutional processes: Translations of rational myths in Israeli High Tech. Academy of Management Journal, 49(2), 281-303.