Override the controversy: Analytic thinking predicts endorsement of evolution

Cognition

Volumn 142, Issue , 2015, Pages 312-321

  Gervais, Will M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive style; Creationism; Dual process theories; Evolution; Supernatural beliefs

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; CONSENSUS; DEMOGRAPHY; EVOLUTION; HUMAN; INTUITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIGION; THINKING; UNITED STATES; ADOLESCENT; COGNITION; FEMALE; MALE; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ATTITUDE; BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; COGNITION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; RELIGION; THINKING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84930938499     PISSN: 00100277     EISSN: 18737838     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2015.05.011     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Atran S., Norenzayan A. Religion's evolutionary landscape: Counterintuition, commitment, compassion, communion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2004, 27:713-770.
2. Banerjee K., Bloom P. Would Tarzan believe in God? Conditions for the emergence of religious belief. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2013, 17(1):7-8.
3. Bishop B., Anderson C.A. Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1990, 27:415-427.
4. Bloom P. Religion is natural. Developmental Science 2007, 10:147-151.
5. Bloom P., Weisberg D.S. Childhood origins of adult resistance to science. Science 2007, 316(5827):996-997.
6. Brem S.K., Ranney M., Schindel J. Perceived consequences of evolution: College students perceive negative personal and social impact in evolutionary theory. Science Education 2003, 87(2):181-206.
7. Darwin, C. (1871; 2010). The descent of man. Dover books on biology series. Courier Corporation.
8. Demastes S.S., Settlage J., Good R. Students' conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution: Cases of replication and comparison. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1995, 32(5):535-550.
9. Dobzhansky T. Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. American Biology Teacher 1973, 35:125-129.
10. Evans E.M. The emergence of beliefs about the origins of species in school-age children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 2000, 46:221-254.
11. Evans E.M. Cognitive and contextual factors in the emergence of diverse belief systems: Creation versus evolution. Cognitive Psychology 2001, 42(3):217-266.
12. Evans J.S.B.T. In two minds: Dual-process accounts of reasoning. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2003, 7(10):454-459.
13. Evans E.M., Lane J.D. Contradictory or complementary? Creationist and evolutionist explanations of the origin(s) of species. Human Development 2011, 54:144-159.
14. Evans E.M., Spiegel A., Gram W., Frazier B.F., Tare M., Thompson S., et al. A conceptual guide to natural history museum visitors' understanding of evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2010, 47:326-353.
15. Evans J.S.B.T., Stanovich K.E. Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives in Psychological Science 2013, 8:223-241.
16. Frederick S. Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives 2005, 25-42.
17. Gallup (2014: June 2). In US, 42% believe creationist view of human origins. <> Downloaded 13.03.15. http://www.gallup.com/poll/170822/believe-creationist-view-human-origins.aspx.
18. Gelman S.A., Markman E.M. Young children's inductions from natural kinds: The role of categories and appearances. Child Development 1987, 1532-1541.
19. Gelman S.A., Wellman H.M. Insides and essences: Early understandings of the non-obvious. Cognition 1991, 38(3):213-244.
20. Gervais W.M. Perceiving minds and gods: How mind perception enables, constrains, and is triggered by belief in gods. Perspectives on Psychological Science 2013, 8:380-394.
21. Gervais, W. M., & Najle, M. B. (2015). Learned faith: Two specific cultural learning strategies strongly influence the development of religious belief worldwide. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality (in press).
22. Gervais et al. (2015). Analytic thinking and religious disbelief: A 12 country exploration (in preparation).
23. Gervais W.M., Henrich J. The Zeus problem: Why representational content biases cannot explain faith in gods. Journal of Cognition and Culture 2010, 10:383-389.
24. Gervais W.M., Norenzayan A. Analytic thinking promotes religious disbelief. Science 2012, 336:493-496.
25. Gervais W.M., Willard A., Norenzayan A., Henrich J. The cultural transmission of faith: Why natural intuitions and memory biases are necessary, but insufficient, to explain religious belief. Religion 2011, 41:389-410.
26. Greene J.D., Sommerville R.B., Nystrom L.E., Darley J.M., Cohen J.D. An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science 2001, 293(5537):2105-2108.
27. Henrich J. The evolution of costly displays, cooperation, and religion: Credibility enhancing displays and their implications for cultural evolution. Evolution and Human Behaviour 2009, 30:244-260.
28. Henrich J., Heine S.J., Norenzayan A. The weirdest people in the world?. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 2010, 33(2-3):61-83.
29. Hill J.P. Rejecting evolution: The role of religion, education, and social networks. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion 2014, 53(3):575-594.
30. James W. The principles of psychology 1890, Vol. 1. Holt, New York.
31. Kahneman D. Thinking, fast and slow 2011, Macmillan.
32. Kelemen D. Are children 'intuitive theists'?. Psychological Science 2004, 15:295-301.
33. Kelemen D., Emmons N.A., Schillaci R.S., Ganea P.A. Young children can be taught basic natural selection using a picture-storybook intervention. Psychological Science 2014, 25(4):893-902.
34. Kelemen D., Rosset E. The human function compunction: Teleological explanation in adults. Cognition 2009, 111(1):138-143.
35. Kelemen D., Rottman J., Seston R. Professional physical scientists display tenacious teleological tendencies: Purpose-based reasoning as a cognitive default. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2013, 142(4):1074.
36. Lanman J.A. The importance of religious displays for belief acquisition and secularization. Journal of Contemporary Religion 2012, 27(1):49-65.
37. Lanman, J. A., & Buhrmester, M. D. (2015). Religious actions speak louder than words: Exposure to credibility enhancing displays predicts theism (in preparation).
38. Lawson A.E., Worsnop W.A. Learning about evolution and rejecting a belief in special creation: Effects of reflective reasoning skill, prior knowledge, prior belief and religious commitment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 1992, 29(2):143-166.
39. Legare C.H., Lane J.D., Evans E.M. Anthropomorphizing science: How does it affect the development of evolutionary concepts?. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 2013, 59(2):168-197.
40. Lombrozo T., Rehder B. Functions in biological kind classification. Cognitive Psychology 2012, 65(4):457-485.
41. McCauley R.N. Why religion is natural and science is not 2011, Oxford University Press.
42. Miller J.D., Scott E.C., Okamoto S. Public acceptance of evolution. Science 2006, 313(5788):765.
43. Nadelson L.S., Southerland S.A. Development and preliminary evaluation of the measure of understanding of macroevolution: Introducing the MUM. The Journal of Experimental Education 2009, 78(2):151-190.
44. Nehm R.H., Kim S.Y., Sheppard K. Academic preparation in biology and advocacy for teaching evolution: Biology versus non-biology teachers. Science Education 2009, 93(6):1122-1146.
45. Nehm R.H., Schonfeld I.S. Does increasing biology teacher knowledge of evolution and the nature of science lead to greater preference for the teaching of evolution in schools?. Journal of Science Teacher Education 2007, 18(5):699-723.
46. Newman G.E., Keil F.C., Kuhlmeier V.A., Wynn K. Early understandings of the link between agents and order. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 2010, 107(40):17140-17145.
47. Norenzayan A., Gervais W.M. The origins of religious disbelief. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2013, 17:20-25.
48. Paley W. Natural theology: Or, evidences of the existence and attributes of the deity 1802, J. Faulder, London. 1st ed.
49. Pennycook G., Cheyne J.A., Barr N., Koehler D.J., Fugelsang J.A. Cognitive style and religiosity: The role of conflict detection. Memory & Cognition 2014, 42(1):1-10.
50. Pennycook G., Cheyne J.A., Seli P., Koehler D.J., Fugelsang J.A. Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief. Cognition 2012, 123(3):335-346.
51. Petty R., Cacioppo J.T. Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change 2012, Springer Science & Business Media.
52. Pew (2013: December 30). Public's views on human evolution. <> Downloaded 13.03.15. http://www.pewforum.org/2013/12/30/publics-views-on-human-evolution/.
53. Core Team R. R: A language and environment for statistical computing 2013, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria, http://www.R-project.org/.
54. Rissler L.J., Duncan S.I., Caruso N.M. The relative importance of religion and education on university students' views of evolution in the Deep South and state science standards across the United States. Evolution: Education and Outreach 2014, 7(1):24.
55. Rutjens B.T., Van Der Pligt J., Van Harreveld F. Deus or Darwin: Randomness and belief in theories about the origin of life. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 2010, 46(6):1078-1080.
56. Rutjens B.T., van Harreveld F., van der Pligt J., Kreemers L.M., Noordewier M.K. Steps, stages, and structure: Finding compensatory order in scientific theories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2013, 142(2):313.
57. Rutledge M.L., Warden M.A. Evolutionary theory, the nature of science & high school biology teachers: Critical relationships. The American Biology Teacher 2000, 62(1):23-31.
58. Shenhav A., Rand D.G., Greene J.D. Divine intuition: Cognitive style influences belief in God. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 2012, 141(3):423.
59. Shtulman A. Qualitative differences between naive and scientific theories of evolution. Cognitive Psychology 2006, 52:170-194.
60. Shtulman, A. (2015). Cognitive reflection predicts greater increases in understanding of evolution during a biology course. Unpublished raw data: personal communication.
61. Shtulman, A., & McCallum, K. (2014). Cognitive reflection predicts science understanding. In Proceedings of the 36th annual conference of the cognitive science society (pp. 2937-2942).
62. Shtulman A., Calabi P. Cognitive constraints on the understanding and acceptance of evolution. Evolution challenges 2012, 47-65. Oxford University Press, Cambridge, UK. K.S. Rosengren, S. Brem, E.M. Evans, G. Sinatra (Eds.).
63. Shtulman A., Schulz L. The relation between essentialist beliefs and evolutionary reasoning. Cognitive Science 2008, 32:1049-1062.
64. Shtulman A., Valcarcel J. Scientific knowledge suppresses but does not supplant earlier intuitions. Cognition 2012, 124:209-215.
65. Sinatra G.M., Southerland S.A., McConaughy F., Demastes J.W. Intentions and beliefs in students' understanding and acceptance of biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 2003, 40(5):510-528.
66. Sloman S.A. Two systems of reasoning: An update. Dual process theories of the social mind 2014, Guilford Press. J. Sherman, B. Gawronski, Y. Trope (Eds.).
67. Thompson V.A. Why it matters: The implications of autonomous processes for dual-process theories-Commentary on Evans & Stanovich (2013). Perspectives on Psychological Science 2013, 8:253-256.
68. Ware E.A., Gelman S.A. You Get What You Need: An Examination of Purpose-Based Inheritance Reasoning in Undergraduates, Preschoolers, and Biological Experts. Cognitive science 2014, 38(2):197-243.
69. Willard A.K., Norenzayan A. Cognitive biases explain religious belief, paranormal belief, and belief in life's purpose. Cognition 2013, 129(2):379-391.