Anthropomorphizing science: How does it affect the development of evolutionary concepts?

Merrill-Palmer Quarterly

Volumn 59, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 168-197

  Legare, Cristine H ^a   Lane, Jonathan D ^b   Evans, E Margaret ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84877883112     PISSN: 0272930X     EISSN: 15350266     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1353/mpq.2013.0009     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Abbott, H. P. (2003). Unnarratable knowledge: The difficulty of understanding evolution by natural selection. In D. Herman (Ed.), Narrative theory and the cognitive sciences (pp. 143-162). Stanford, CA: CSLI (Center for the Study of Language and Information).
2. Alters, B., & Nelson, C. (2002). Perspective: Teaching evolution in higher education. Evolution, 56, 1891-1901.
3. Beer, G. (2000). Darwin's plots: Evolutionary narrative in Darwin, George Eliot and nineteenth-century fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4. Bloom, P., & Skolnick Weisberg, D.S. (2007). Childhood origins of adult resistance to science. Science, 316, 996-997.
5. Brem, S. K., Ranney, M., & Schindel, J. (2003). Perceived consequences of evolution: College students perceive negative personal and social impact in evolutionary theory. Science Education, 87, 181-206.
6. Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7. Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Carey, S. (2000). Science education as conceptual change. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 21, 13-19.
9. Dennett, D.C. (1988). Precis of the intentional stance. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 11, 495-505.
10. Diamond, J., & Evans, E. M. (2007). Museums teach evolution. Evolution, 61, 1500-1506.
11. Erickson, J. E., Keil, F. C., & Lockhart, K. L. (2010). Sensing the coherence of biology in contrast to psychology: Young children's use of causal relations to distinguish two foundational domains. Child Development, 81, 390-409.
12. Evans, E. M. (2000). The emergence of beliefs about the origins of species in school-age children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 46, 221-254.
13. Evans, E. M. (2001). Cognitive and contextual factors in the emergence of diverse belief systems: Creation versus evolution. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 217-266.
14. Evans, E. M. (2008). Conceptual change and evolutionary biology: A developmental analysis. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 263-294). New York: Routledge.
15. Evans, E. M., & Lane, J. D. (2010, February). Changing children's minds about evolution: A research study. In M. Weiss (Chair), Mind changes: Can outof- school learning contribute to evolution literacy? Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, San Diego, CA.
16. Evans, E. M., & Lane, J. D. (2011). Contradictory or complementary? Creationist and evolutionist explanations of the origin(s) of species. Human Development, 54, 144-159.
17. Evans, E. M., Legare, C., & Rosengren, K. (2011). Engaging multiple epistemologies: Implications for science education. In M. Ferrari & R. Taylor (Eds.), Epistemology and science education: Understanding the evolution vs.intelligent design controversy (pp. 111-139). New York: Routledge.
18. Evans, E. M., Rosengren, K., Lane, J. D., & Price, K. S. (2012). Encountering counterintuitive ideas: Constructing a developmental learning progression for biological evolution. In K. R. Rosengren, S. Brem, E. M. Evans, & G. Sinatra (Eds.), Evolution challenges: Integrating research and practice in teaching and learning about evolution (pp. 174-199). New York: Oxford University Press.
19. Evans, E. M., Spiegel, A., Gram, W., & Diamond, J. (2009). Integrating developmental and free-choice learning frameworks to investigate conceptual change in visitor understanding. Visitor Studies Association (VSA) Articles, Center for the Advancement of Informal Science Education. briefCAISE, January/February (5). Retrieved February 2, 2008, from http://caise.insci. org/news/65/51/Integrating-Developmental-and-Free-Choice-Learning- Frameworks-to-Investigate-Conceptual-Change-in-Visitor- Understanding/ d,resources-page-item-detail
20. Evans, E. M., Spiegel, A., Gram, W., Frazier, B. F., Tare, M., Thompson, S., & Diamond, J. (2010). A conceptual guide to natural history museum visitors' understanding evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47, 326-353. doi:10.1002/tea.20337
21. Gallup. (2007). Evolution, creationism, intelligent design. Retrieved February 2, 2008, from http://www.gallup.com/poll/21814/Evolution-Creationism-Intelligent- Design.aspx
22. Gelman, S. A. (2003). The essential child: Origins of essentialism in everyday thought. New York: Oxford University Press.
23. Herrmann, P. A., French, J. A., DeHart, G. B., & Rosengren, K. S. (2013). Essentialist reasoning and knowledge effects on biological reasoning in young children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly 59 [in this issue].
24. Inagaki, K., & Hatano, G. (2002). Young children's naive thinking about the biological world. New York: Psychology Press.
25. Judson, O. (2009, December 29). Memories in nature. New York Times. Retrieved December 2009 from http://opinionator.blogs.nytimes.com/2009/12/29/ memories-in-nature/
26. Jungwirth, E. (1975). Preconceived adaptation and inverted evolution: A case of distorted concept formation in high school biology. Australian Science Teacher's Journal, 21, 95-100.
27. Keil, F. C. (1989). Concepts, Kinds, and Cognitive Development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
28. Keil, F. C. (1994). The birth and nurturance of concepts by domains: The origins of concepts of living things. In L. A. Hirschfeld & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 234-254). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
29. Kelemen, D. (1999). The scope of teleological thinking in preschool children. Cognition, 70, 241-272.
30. Kelemen, D., & Rosset, E. (2009). The human function compunction: Teleological explanation in adults. Cognition, 111, 138-143.
31. Kelemen, D., Seston, R., & Ganea, P. (2009, April). Reasons to be cheerful: Young children can learn about natural selection from picture books. In E. M. Evans (Chair), Creationism is not the (only) issue: Developmental constraints on an understanding of evolution. Paper presented at the Biennial meeting of the Cognitive Development Society, San Antonio, TX.
32. Lakoff, G. (1993). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In A. Ortony (Ed.), Metaphor and thought (2nd ed., pp. 202-251). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
33. Legare, C. H., Evans, E. M., Rosengren, K., & Harris, P. (2012). The coexistence of natural and supernatural explanations across cultures and development. Child Development, 83, 173-185.
34. Legare, C. H., Hazel, A., French, J., Witt, A., & Evans, E. M. (2007, October). Children's understanding of evolution: Learning from museum exhibits about natural selection. Poster presented at the fifth biennial meeting of the Cognitive Development Society, Santa Fe, NM.
35. Lombrozo, T., Shtulman, A., & Weisberg, M. (2006). The intelligent design controversy: Lessons from psychology and education. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10, 56-57.
36. Macfadden, B. J., Dunckel, B. A., Ellis, S., Dierking, L. D., Abraham-Silver, L., Kisiel, J., & Koke, J. K. (2007). Natural history museum visitors' understanding of evolution. BioScience, 57, 875-882.
37. Malle, B. F., & Knobe, J. (1997). The folk concept of intentionality. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 101-121.
38. Mayr, E. (1982). The growth of biological thought: Diversity, evolution, and inheritance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39. Medin, D. L., & Atran, S. (2004). The native mind: Biological categorization and reasoning in development and across cultures. Psychological Review, 111, 960-983.
40. Metz, K. E., Sisk-Hilton, S., Berson, E., & Ly, U. (2010). Scaffolding children's understanding of the fit between organisms and their environment in the context of the practices of science. In K. Gomez, L. Lyons, & J. Radinsky (Eds.), Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference of the Learning Sciences, Chicago, June 29-July 2 (Vol. 1, pp. 396-403). New York: ACM (Association for Computing Machinery).
41. Moses, L., Baldwin, D., & Malle, A. (Eds.). (2001). Intentions and intentionality: Foundations of social cognition. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
42. Mull, M. S., & Evans, E. M. (2010). Did she mean to do it? Acquiring a folk theory of intentionality. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 107, 207-228.
43. O'Hara, R. J. (1992). Telling the tree: Narrative representation and the study of evolutionary history. Biology and Philosophy, 7, 135-160.
44. Poling, D. A., & Evans, E. M. (2002). Why do birds of a feather flock together? Developmental change in the use of multiple explanations: Intention, teleology, essentialism. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 89-112.
45. Rosset, E. (2008). It's no accident: Our bias for intentional explanations. Cognition, 108, 771-780.
46. Scott, E. C. (2004). Evolution vs. creationism: An introduction. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
47. Shapin, S. (1996). The scientific revolution. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48. Shtulman, A. (2006). Qualitative differences between naive and scientific theories of evolution. Cognitive Psychology, 52, 170-194.
49. Shtulman, A., & Schulz, L. (2008). The relation between essentialist beliefs and evolutionary reasoning. Cognitive Science, 32, 1049-1062.
50. Sinatra, G., Brem, S., & Evans, E. M. (2008). Changing minds? Implications of conceptual change for teaching and learning about biological evolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 1, 189-195.
51. Spiegel, A., Evans, E. M., Frazier, B. F., Hazel, A., Tare, M., Gram, W., & Diamond, J. (2012). Changing museum visitors' concepts of evolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 5, 43-61.
52. Sprinkle, R. H. (2006, February 1). Unremembered intimacies. [Review of the book Beasts of the earth: animals humans, and disease, by E. F. Torrey & R. H. Yolken.] BioScience, 56, 166-167.
53. Tare, M., French, J., Frazier, B., Diamond, J., & Evans, E. M. (2011). Explanatory parent-child conversation predominates at an evolution exhibit. Science Education, 95, 720-744. doi:10.1002/sce.20433
54. Waytz, A., Epley, N., & Cacioppo, J. (2010). Anthropomorphism and dehumanization. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 58-62.
55. Wellman, H. M. (2011). Developing a theory of mind. In U. Goswami (Ed.), The Blackwell handbook of childhood cognitive development (2nd ed., pp. 254-284). New York: Wiley.
56. Zimmer, C. (2007). Evolved for cancer. Scientific American, 296, 68-75.
57. Zohar, A., & Ginossar, S. (1998). Lifting the taboo regarding teleology and anthropomorphism in biology education-Heretical suggestions. Science Education, 82, 679-697.