The origins of religious disbelief

Trends in Cognitive Sciences

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 20-25

  Norenzayan, Ara ^a   Gervais, Will M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CULTURAL EVOLUTION; CULTURAL LEARNING; EVOLUTIONARY FRAMEWORK; SCIENTIFIC STUDIES;

COGNITIVE SYSTEMS;

ANALYTIC ATHEISM; APATHEISM; APATHY; COGNITION; CULTURAL FACTOR; ENVIRONMENT; EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION; GENETIC CONSERVATION; HUMAN; INCREDULOUS ATHEISM; INTUITION; MIND BLIND ATHEISM; MOTIVATION; PERSONAL VALUE; PREVALENCE; RELIGION; RELIGIOUS DISBELIEF; RELIGIOUS GROUP; REVIEW; SCIENTIST; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY; SOCIETY; SPIRITUAL CARE; THEORY OF MIND; THINKING;

BIOLOGICAL EVOLUTION; HUMANS; INTUITION; RELIGION; RELIGION AND PSYCHOLOGY;

EID: 84871713266     PISSN: 13646613     EISSN: 1879307X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.11.006     Document Type: Review

References (89)

1. Zuckerman P. Atheism: contemporary numbers and patterns. The Cambridge Companion to Atheism 2007, 47-65. Cambridge University Press. M. Martin (Ed.).
2. Norris P., Inglehart R. Sacred and Secular: Religion and Politics Worldwide 2004, Cambridge University Press.
3. Gervais W.M., Norenzayan A. Analytic thinking promotes religious disbelief. Science 2012, 336:493-496.
4. McCullough M.E., et al. The varieties of religious development in adulthood: a longtitudinal investigation of religion and rational choice. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2005, 89:78-89.
5. Taylor C. A Secular Age 2007, Belknap Harvard.
6. Johnson D. What are atheists for? Hypotheses on the functions of non-belief in the evolution of religion. Religion Brain Behav. 2012, 2:48-70.
7. Geertz A.W., Markusson G.I. Religion is natural, atheism is not: on why everybody is both right and wrong. Religion 2010, 40:152-165.
8. Dawkins R. The God Delusion 2008, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
9. Hedges C. I Don't Believe in Atheists 2008, Free Press.
10. Haidt J. The Righteous Mind: Why Good People are Divided by Politics and Religion 2012, Pantheon Books.
11. Gervais W.M., et al. Do you believe in atheists? Distrust is central to anti-atheist prejudice. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2011, 101:1189-1206.
12. Edgell P., et al. Atheists as 'other': moral boundaries and cultural membership in American society. Am. Sociol. Rev. 2006, 71:211-234.
13. Creating Consilience: Integrating Science and the Humanities 2012, Oxford University Press. E. Slingerland, M. Collard (Eds.).
14. Boyd R., et al. The cultural niche: why social learning is essential for human adaptation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2011, 108:10918-10925.
15. Boyer P. Religion Explained 2001, Basic Books.
16. Barrett J.L. Exploring the natural foundations of religion. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2000, 4:29-34.
17. Atran S., Norenzayan A. Religion's evolutionary landscape: counterintuition, commitment, compassion, communion. Behav. Brain Sci. 2004, 27:713-770.
18. Bloom P. Religion is natural. Dev. Sci. 2007, 10:147-151.
19. Boyer P. Religion: bound to believe?. Nature 2008, 455:1038-1039.
20. Bering J. The existential theory of mind. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 2002, 6:3-24.
21. Bering J. The Belief Instinct: The Psychology of Souls, Destiny, and the Meaning of Life 2011, W.W. Norton.
22. Slingerland E. What Science Offers the Humanities: Integrating Body and Mind 2008, Cambridge University Press.
23. Gervais, W.M. Religious cognition. In Religion, Personality, and Social Behavior (Saroglou, V., ed.), Psychology Press (in press).
24. Norenzayan A., et al. Mentalizing deficits constrain belief in a personal God. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e36880.
25. Schjoedt U., et al. Highly religious participants recruit areas of social cognition in personal prayer. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2009, 4:199-207.
26. Kapogiannis D., et al. Cognitive and neural foundations of religious belief. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:4876-4881.
27. Lane J.D., et al. Children's understanding of ordinary and extraordinary minds. Child Dev. 2010, 81:1475-1489.
28. Taylor M., Carlson S.M. The relation between individual differences in fantasy and theory of mind. Child Dev. 1997, 68:436-455.
29. Gray K., et al. Distortions of mind perception in psychopathology. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 108:477-479.
30. Epley N., et al. Believers' estimates of God's beliefs are more egocentric than estimates of other people's beliefs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2009, 106:21533-21538.
31. Gervais W.M., Norenzayan A. Like a camera in the sky? Thinking about God increases public self-awareness and socially desirable responding. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 2012, 48:298-302.
32. Stark R. Physiology and faith: addressing the 'universal' gender difference in religious commitment. J. Sci. Study Religion 2002, 41:495-507.
33. Atran S. In Gods we Trust: The Evolutionary Landscape of Religion 2002, Oxford University Press.
34. Gray K., Wegner D.M. Blaming god for our pain: human suffering and the divine mind. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 2010, 14:7-16.
35. Norenzayan A., Hansen I.G. Belief in supernatural agents in the face of death. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 2006, 32:174-187.
36. Dechesne M., et al. Literal and symbolic immortality: the effect of evidence of literal immortality on self-esteem striving in response to mortality salience. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2003, 84:722-737.
37. Vail K.E., et al. Exploring the existential function of religion and supernatural agent beliefs among Christians, Muslims, Atheists, and Agnostics. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 2012, 38:1288-1300.
38. Jong J., et al. Foxhole athetism, revisted: the effects of mortality salience on explicit and implicit religious belief. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 2012, 48:983-989.
39. Kay A.C., et al. Randomness, attributions of arousal, and belief in God. Psychol. Sci. 2010, 21:216-218.
40. Rutjens B.T., et al. Deus or Darwin: randomness and belief in theories about the origin of life. J. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 2010, 46:1078-1080.
41. Kay A.C., et al. Religion conviction as compensatory control. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Rev. 2010, 14:37-48.
42. Epley N., et al. Creating social connection through inferential reproduction: loneliness and perceived agency in gadgets, gods, and greyhounds. Psychol. Sci. 2008, 19:114-120.
43. Sibley C.G., Bulbulia J. Faith after an earthquake: A longitudinal study of religion and perceived health before and after the 2011 Christchurch New Zealand earthquake. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e49648. 10.1371/journal.pone.0049648/.
44. Zuckerman P. Society without God 2008, New York University Press.
45. Gervais W.M., et al. The cultural transmission of faith: why innate intuitions are necessary, but insufficient, to explain religious belief. Religion 2011, 41:389-410.
46. Tomasello M., et al. Cultural learning. Behav. Brain Sci. 1993, 16:495-552.
47. Astuti R., Harris P.L. Understanding mortality and the life of the ancestors in rural Madagascar. Cogn. Sci. 2008, 32:713-740.
48. Harris P.L., Koenig M.A. Trust in testimony: how children learn about science and religion. Child Dev. 2006, 77:505-524.
49. Rendell L., et al. Cognitive culture: theoretical and empirical insights into social learning strategies. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2011, 15:68-76.
50. Henrich J., Boyd R. The evolution of conformist transmission and the emergence of between-group differences. Evol. Hum. Behav. 1998, 19:215-241.
51. Henrich J., Gil-White F. The evolution of prestige: freely conferred status as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evol. Hum. Behav. 2001, 22:1-32.
52. Henrich J. The evolution of costly displays, cooperation and religion: credibility enhancing displays and their implications for cultural evolution. Evol. Hum. Behav. 2009, 30:244-260.
53. Birch S.A., et al. Two-year-olds are vigilant of others' non-verbal cues to credibility. Dev. Sci. 2010, 13:363-369.
54. Sosis R., Alcorta C. Signaling, solidarity, and the sacred: the evolution of religious behavior. Evol. Anthropol. 2003, 12:264-274.
55. Gervais W.M., Henrich J. The Zeus problem: why representational content biases cannot explain faith in gods. J. Cogn. Cult. 2010, 10:383-389.
56. Norenzayan, A. Big Gods: How Religion Transformed Cooperation and Conflict, Princeton University Press (in press).
57. Lanman J. The importance of religious displays for belief acquisition and secularization. J. Contemp. Religion 2012, 27:49-65.
58. Norenzayan A., Shariff A.F. The origin and evolution of religious prosociality. Science 2008, 322:58-62.
59. Atran S., Henrich J. The evolution of religion: how cognitive by-products, adaptive learning heuristics, ritual displays, and group competition generate deep commitments to prosocial religions. Biol. Theory 2010, 5:18-30.
60. Kay A.C., et al. Compensatory control: in the mind, in our institutions, in the heavens. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 2009, 18:264-268.
61. Kay A.C., et al. God and the government: testing a compensatory control mechanism for the support of external systems. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2008, 95:18-35.
62. Gervais W.M., Norenzayan A. Reminders of secular authority reduce believers' distrust of atheists. Psychol. Sci. 2012, 23:483-491.
63. Barrett J.L., Keil F.C. Conceptualizing a nonnatural entity: anthropomorphism in God concepts. Cogn. Psychol. 1996, 31:219-247.
64. Kelemen D. Are children 'intuitive theists'?. Psychol. Sci. 2004, 15:295-301.
65. Shenhav A., et al. Divine intuition: cognitive style influences belief in God. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 2012, 141:423-428.
66. Pennycook G., et al. Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief. Cognition 2012, 123:335-346.
67. Larson E.J., Witham L. Leading scientists still reject God. Nature 1998, 394:313-314.
68. McCauley R. Why Religion is Natural and Science is Not 2011, Oxford University Press.
69. Bulbulia J. Ennuitheism. Science and the World's Religions Volume III: Religion and Controversies 2012, 43-64. Praeger. W. Wildman, P. McNamara (Eds.).
70. Norenzayan A., et al. The evolution of religious misbelief. Behav. Brain Sci. 2010, 32:531.
71. Shariff A.F., et al. The Devil's advocate: secular arguments diminish both implicit and explicit religious belief. J. Cogn. Cult. 2008, 8:417-423.
72. Bering J. Atheism is only skin deep: Geertz and Markússon rely mistakenly on sociodemographic data as meaningful indicators or underlying cognition. Religion 2010, 40:166-168.
73. Norenzayan A., Lee A. It was meant to happen: explaining cultural variations in fate attributions. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 2010, 98:702-720.
74. Bering J. The nonexistent purpose of people. Psychologist 2010, 23:290-293.
75. Waytz A., et al. Causes and consequences of mind perception. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2010, 14:383-388.
76. Epley N., et al. On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychol. Rev. 2007, 114:864-886.
77. Guthrie S. Faces in the Clouds 1993, Oxford University Press.
78. Bloom P.U. Descartes' Baby 2004, Basic Books.
79. Astuti R. Are we all natural dualists? A cognitive developmental approach. J. R. Anthropol. Inst. 2001, 7:429-447.
80. Kelemen D., Rosset E. The human function compunction: teleological explanation in adults. Cognition 2009, 111:138-143.
81. Evans E.M. Cognitive and contextual factors in the emergence of diverse belief systems: creation versus evolution. Cogn. Psychol. 2001, 42:217-266.
82. Greenberg J., et al. Terror management theory of self-esteem and cultural worldviews: empirical assessments and conceptual refinements. Adv. Exp. Soc. Psychol. 1997, 29:61-139.
83. Proulx T., et al. Understanding all inconsistency compensation as a palliative response to violated expectations. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2012, 16:285-291.
84. Inzlicht M., Tullett A.M. Reflecting on God: religious primes can reduce neuropsychological response to errors. Psychol. Sci. 2010, 21:1181-1190.
85. Eisenberger N.I., Lieberman M.D. Why rejection hurts: a common neural alarm system for physical and social pain. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2004, 8:294-300.
86. Kirkpatrick L.A., et al. Loneliness, social support, and perceived relationships with God. J. Soc. Pers. Relat. 1999, 16:513-522.
87. Harris P.L. Trusting What We're Told: How Children Learn from Others 2012, Harvard University Press.
88. Zhong C.B., et al. A good lamp is the best police: darkness increases dishonesty and self-interested behavior. Psychol. Sci. 2010, 21:311-314.
89. Bateson M., et al. Cues of being watched enhance cooperation in a real-world setting. Biol. Lett. 2006, 2:412-414.