Cognitive Constraints on the Understanding and Acceptance of Evolution

Evolution Challenges: Integrating Research and Practice in Teaching and Learning about Evolution

Volumn , Issue , 2012, Pages

  Shtulman, Andrew ^a   Calabi, Prassede ^b  

^a OCCIDENTAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS BOSTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Essentialism; Evolution acceptance; Evolution education; Folk biology; Misconceptions; Na ve theories

Indexed keywords

EID: 84922761451     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199730421.003.0003     Document Type: Chapter

References (69)

1. Andersen, H. C. (1844/1981). The ugly duckling. In L. Owens (Ed. & Trans.), The complete Hans Christian Andersen fairy tales (pp. 15-20). New York: Avenel Books.
2. Astuti, R., & Harris, P. L. (2008). Understanding mortality and the life of the ancestors in rural Madagascar. Cognitive Science, 32, 713-740.
3. Au, T. K. F., Chan, C. K. K., Chan, T. K., Cheung, M. W. L., Ho, J. Y. S., & Ip, G. W. M. (2008). Folkbiology meets microbiology: A study of conceptual and behavioral change. Cognitive Psychology, 57, 1-19.
4. Banet, E., & Ayuso, G. E. (2003). Teaching of biological inheritance and evolution of living beings in secondary schools. International Journal for Science Education, 25, 373-407.
5. Bishop, B., & Anderson, C. A. (1990). Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 415-427.
6. Bohannon, J. (2008). Flunking spore. Science, 322, 531.
7. Bloom, P., & Weisberg, D. S. (2007). Childhood origins of adult resistance to science. Science, 316, 996-997.
8. Bowler, P. J. (1983). The eclipse of Darwinism: Anti-Darwinian theories in the decades around 1900. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
9. Brem, S. K., Ranney, M., & Schindel, J. (2003). Perceived consequences of evolution: College students perceive negative personal and social impact in evolutionary theory. Science Education, 87, 181-206.
10. Brumby, M. N. (1984). Misconceptions about the concept of natural selection by medical biology students. Science Education, 68(4), 493-503.
11. Calabi, P. (1998). Ecology: A systems approach. Dubuque, IA: Kendall Hunt.
12. Calabi, P. (2005). Teaching evolution by natural selection. Unpublished manuscript.
13. Crawford, B. A., Zembal-Saul, C., Munford, D., & Friedrichsen, P. (2005). Confronting prospective teachers' ideas of evolution and scientific inquiry using technology and inquiry-based tasks. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42, 613-637.
14. Chinn, C. A., & Brewer, W. F. (2001). Models of data: A theory of how people evaluate data. Cognition and Instruction, 19, 323-393.
15. Demastes, S. S., Settlage, J., & Good, R. J. (1995). Students' conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution: Cases of replication and comparison. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 32, 535-550.
16. DeVries, R. (1969). Constancy of generic identity in the years three to six. Society for Research in Child Development Monographs, 34 (Whole No. 127).
17. Evans, E. M. (2001). Cognitive and contextual factors in the emergence of diverse belief systems: Creation versus evolution. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 217-266.
18. Ferrari, M., & Chi, M. T. H. (1998). The nature of naïve explanations of natural selection. International Journal of Science Education, 20, 1231-1256.
19. Gelman, S. A. (2003). The essential child: Origins of essentialism in everyday thought. New York: Oxford University Press.
20. Gelman, S. A., & Coley, J. D. (1990). The importance of knowing a dodo is a bird: Categories and inferences in 2-year-old children. Developmental Psychology, 26(5), 796-804.
21. Gelman, S. A., & Markman, E. M. (1987). Young children's inductions from natural kinds: The role of categories over appearances. Child Development, 58, 1532-1541.
22. Gelman, S. A., & Wellman, H. M. (1991). Insides and essences: Early understanding of the nonobvious. Cognition, 38, 213-244.
23. Gould, S. J. (1996). Full house: The spread of excellence from Plato to Darwin. New York: Three Rivers Press.
24. Greene, E. D. (1990). The logic of university students' understanding of evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 875-885.
25. Hickling, A. K., & Gelman, S. A. (1995). How does your garden grow? Early conceptualization of seeds and their place in the plant growth cycle. Child Development, 66, 856-876.
26. Hull, D. (1965). The effect of essentialism on taxonomy: 2000 years of stasis. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 15-16, 314-326.
27. Ingram, E. L., & Nelson, C. E. (2006). Relationship between achievement and students' acceptance of evolution or creation in an upper-level evolution course. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 7-24.
28. Jaswal, V. K., & Markman, E. M. (2007). Looks aren't everything: 24-month-olds' willingness to accept unexpected labels. Journal of Cognition and Development, 8, 93-111.
29. Jensen, M. S., & Finley, F. N. (1995). Teaching evolution using historical arguments in a conceptual change strategy. Science Education, 79, 147-166.
30. Jimenez, A. M. P. (1994). Teaching evolution and natural selection: A look at textbooks and teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 519-535.
31. Johnson, S. C., & Solomon, G. E. A. (1997). Why dogs have puppies and cats have kittens: The role of birth in young children's understanding of biological origins. Child Development, 68(3), 404-419.
32. Keil, F. C. (1989). Concepts, kinds, and cognitive development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
33. Kuhn, D. (1991). The skills of argument. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Lawson, A. E., & Thompson, L. D. (1988). Formal reasoning ability and misconceptions concerning genetics and natural selection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 25, 733-746.
35. Lawson, A. E., & Worsnop, W. A. (1992). Learning about evolution and rejecting a belief in special creation: Effects of reasoning skill, prior knowledge, prior belief and religious commitment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 143-166.
36. Legare, C. H., & Gelman, S. A. (2008). Bewitchment, biology, or both: The co-existence of natural and supernatural explanatory frameworks across development. Cognitive Science, 32, 607-642.
37. Lombrozo, T., Thanukos, A., & Weisberg, M. (2008). The importance of understanding the nature of science for accepting evolution. Evolution: Education and Outreach, 1, 290-298.
38. Mayr, E. (1982). The growth of biological thought: Diversity, evolution, and inheritance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39. Mayr, E. (2001). What evolution is. New York: Basic Books.
40. McKie, R. (2001, February 11). Revealed: The secret of human behavior; Environment, not genes, key to our life. London Observer, p. 1.
41. Medin, D., & Atran, S. (2004). The native mind: Biological categorization and reasoning in development and across cultures. Psychological Review, 111(4), 960-983.
42. Miller, J. D., Scott, E. C., & Okamoto, S. (2006). Public acceptance of evolution. Science, 313, 765-766.
43. Moss, J., & Case, R. (1999). Developing children's understanding of the rational numbers: A new model and an experimental curriculum. Journal for Research in Science Education, 30, 122-147.
44. Nadelson, L. S., & Sinatra, G. M. (2009). Educational professionals' knowledge and acceptance of evolution. Evolutionary Psychology, 7, 490-516.
45. Nehm, R. H., & Reilly, L. (2007). Biology majors' knowledge and misconceptions of natural selection. BioScience, 57, 263-272.
46. Newport, F. (2004). Third of Americans say evidence has supported Darwin's evolution theory. Princeton, NJ: Gallup Organization.
47. Poling, D. A., & Evans, E. M. (2004). Religious belief, scientific expertise, and folk ecology. Journal of Cognition and Culture, 4, 485-524.
48. Rosengren, K. S., Gelman, S. A., Kalish, C., & McCormick, M. (1991). As time goes by: Children's early understanding of biological growth. Child Development, 62, 1302-1320.
49. Russell, S. (2002, December 5). Of mice and men: Striking similarities at the DNA level could aid research. San Francisco Chronicle, p. A1.
50. Rutledge, M. L., & Warden, M. A. (1999). The development and validation of the measure of acceptance of the theory of evolution instrument. School Science and Mathematics, 99, 13-18.
51. Sa, W. C., Kelley, C. N., Ho, C., & Stanovich, K. E. (2005). Thinking about personal theories: Individual differences in the coordination of theory and data. Personality and Individual Differences, 38, 1149-1161.
52. Scott, E. (2005). Evolution vs. creationism: An introduction. Berkeley: University of California Press.
53. Samarapungavan, A., Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1996). Mental models of the earth, sun, and moon: Indian children's cosmologies. Cognitive Development, 11, 491-521.
54. Settlage, J. (1994). Conceptions of natural selection: A snapshot of the sense-making process. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 31, 449-457.
55. Shtulman, A. (2006). Qualitative differences between naïve and scientific theories of evolution. Cognitive Psychology, 52, 170-194.
56. Shtulman, A., & Schulz, L. (2008). The relation between essentialist beliefs and evolutionary reasoning. Cognitive Science, 32, 1049-1062.
57. Sinatra, G. M., Southerland, S. A., McConaughy, F., & Desmastes, J. W. (2003). Intentions and beliefs in students' understanding and acceptance of biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40, 510-528.
58. Slaughter, V., & Lyons, M. (2003). Learning about life and death in early childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 43, 1-30.
59. Slotta, J. D., & Chi, M. T. H. (2006). Helping students understand challenging topics in science through ontology training. Cognition and Instruction, 24, 261-289.
60. Smith, C. L. (2007). Bootstrapping processes in the development of students' commonsense matter theories: Using analogical mappings, thought experiments, and learning to measure to promote conceptual restructuring. Cognition and Instruction, 25, 337-398.
61. Smith, C., Solomon, G. E. A., & Carey, S. (2005). Never getting to zero: Elementary school students' understanding of the infinite divisibility of number and matter. Cognitive Psychology, 51, 101-140.
62. Smith, M. U., Siegel, H., & McInerney, J. D. (1995). Foundational issues in evolution education. Science and Education, 4, 23-46.
63. Southerland, S. A., Abrams, E., Cummins, C. L., & Anzelmo, J. (2001). Understanding students' explanations of biological phenomena: Conceptual frameworks or p-prims? Science Education, 85, 328-348.
64. Springer, K. (1996). Young children's understanding of a biological basis for parent-offspring relations. Child Development, 67, 2841.
65. Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1992). Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 535-585.
66. Vosniadou, S., Ioannides, C., Dimitrakopoulou, A., & Papademetriou, F. (2001). Designing learning environments to promote conceptual change in science. Learning and Instruction, 11, 381-419.
67. Waterston, R. H., Lindblad-Toh, K., Birney, E., et al. (222 coauthors). (2002). Initial sequencing and comparative analysis of the mouse genome. Nature, 420, 20-562.
68. Waxman, S., Medin, D., & Ross, N. (2007). Folkbiological reasoning from a cross-cultural developmental perspective: Early essentialist notions are shaped by cultural beliefs. Developmental Psychology, 43(2), 294-308.
69. Wiser, M., & Amin, T. (2001). Is heat hot? Inducing conceptual change by integrating everyday and scientific perspectives on thermal phenomena. Learning and Instruction, 11, 331-355.