A conceptual guide to natural history museum visitors' understanding of evolution

Journal of Research in Science Teaching

Volumn 47, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 326-353

  Evans, E Margaret ^a   Spiegel, Amy N ^b   Gram, Wendy ^c,g   Frazier, Brandy N ^d   Tare, Medha ^e   Thompson, Sarah ^a   Diamond, Judy ^f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA LINCOLN   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA STATE MUSEUM   (United States)

^g NATIONAL ECOLOGICAL OBSERVATORY NETWORK   (United States)

Author keywords

Cognitive development; Conceptual change; Creationist beliefs; Culture; Evoluation; Intuitive beliefs; Museums

Indexed keywords

BIOLOGICAL CHANGES; COGNITIVE DEVELOPMENT; CONCEPTUAL CHANGE; CORRELATIONAL ANALYSIS; CULTURAL FACTORS; EDUCATIONAL SETTINGS; EVOLUTIONARY THEORIES; GENERAL PUBLICS; HIGHER EDUCATION; MUSEUM VISITOR; NATURAL HISTORY; REASONING PATTERNS; THEORETICAL MODELS;

EDUCATION COMPUTING;

MUSEUMS;

EID: 77449134339     PISSN: 00224308     EISSN: 10982736     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tea.20337     Document Type: Article

References (77)

1. Almquist, A.J., & Cronin, J.E. (1988). Fact, fancy and myth on human evolution. Current Anthropology, 29, 520-522.
2. Abraham-Silver, L., & Kisiel, J. (2008). Comparing visitors' conceptions of evolution: Examining understanding outside the United States. Visitor Studies, 11(1), 41-54.
3. Antonovics, J., Abbate, J.L., Baker, C.H., Daley, D., Hood, M.E., Jenkins, C.E., Johnson, L.J., Murray, J.J., Panjeti,V., Rudolf, V.H., Sloan, D., & Vondrasek, J. (2007). Evolution by any other name: Antibiotic resistance and avoidance of the E-Word. PLos Biology, 5(2), e30. 10.1371/journal.pbio. 0050030.
4. Atran, S. (1990). Cognitive foundations of natural history: Towards an anthropology of science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
5. Banet, E., & Ayuso, G.E. (2003). Teaching of biological inheritance and evolution of living beings in secondary school. International Journal of Science Education, 25, 373-407.
6. Beardsley, P.M. (2004). Middle school student learning in evolution: Are current standards achievable? The American Biology Teacher, 66(9), 604-613.
7. Bishop, B.A.,&Anderson, C.W. (1990). Student conceptions of natural selection and its role in evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 415-428.
8. Bloom, P., & Weisberg, D.S. (2007). Childhood origins of adult resistance to science. Science, 316, 996-997.
9. Bowler, P.J. (2009). Darwin's originality. Science, 323, 223-226.
10. Brownback, S. (2007). (2007, May 31). Op-Ed Contributor: What I Think About Evolution. The New York Times.
11. Brumby, M.N. (1984). Misconceptions about the concept of natural selection by medical biology students. Science Education, 68(4), 493-503.
12. Carey, S. (1985). Conceptual change in childhood. Cambridge. MA: MIT Press.
13. Catley, K.M. (2006). Darwin's missing link-A novel paradigm for evolution education. Science Education, 90, 767-783.
14. Chambers, R. (1994).Vestiges of the natural history of creation and other evolutionary writings (originally published in 1844 and 1845). Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
15. Clough, E.E., & Wood-Robinson, C. (1985a). How secondary students interpret instances of biological adaptation. Journal of Biological Education, 19, 125-130.
16. Clough, E.E., & Wood-Robinson, C. (1985b). Children's understanding of inheritance. Journal of Biological Education, 19, 304-310.
17. Dagher, Z.R., & BouJaoude, S. (1997). Scientific views and religious beliefs of college students: The case of biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 34, 429-445.
18. Diamond, J., & Evans, E.M. (2007). Museums teach Evolution. Evolution, 61(6), 1500-1506.
19. Diamond, J., & Scotchmoor, J. (2006). Exhibiting evolution. Museums and Social Issues, 1, 21-48.
20. Diamond, J., Spiegel, A., Meier, D., & Disbrow, S. (2004). Virus and the whale: Exploring evolution in a museum collaboration. Proceedings of the Third Conference of the International Committee for University Museums and Collections (UMAC). September 21-26, 2003, pp. 7-11.
21. diSessa, A.A., Gillespie, N.M., & Esterly, J.B. (2004). Coherence versus fragmentation in the development of the concept of force. Cognitive Science, 28, 843-900.
22. diSessa, A.A. (2008). A bird's-eye view of the "pieces" vs. "coherence" controversy. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 35-60). New York: Routledge.
23. Evans, E.M. (2000). The emergence of beliefs about the origins of species in school-age children. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly: A Journal of Developmental Psychology, 46, 221-254.
24. Evans, E.M. (2001). Cognitive and contextual factors in the emergence of diverse belief systems: Creation versus evolution. Cognitive Psychology, 42, 217-266.
25. Evans, E.M. (2005). Teaching and learning about evolution. In J. Diamond (Ed.), The virus and the whale: Explore evolution in creatures small and large. Arlington, VA: NSTA Press.
26. Evans, E.M. (2008). Conceptual change and evolutionary biology: A developmental analysis. In S. Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 263-294). New York, NY: Routledge.
27. Evans, E.M., Legare, C., & Rosengren, K. (in press). Engaging multiple epistemologies: Implications for science education. In M. Ferrari & R. Taylor (Eds.), Evolution, epistemology, and science education. New York, NY: Routledge.
28. Futuyma, D.J. (1998). Evolutionary biology (3rd ed.). Sunderland, MA: Sinauer Associates.
29. Gallup. (2007). Evolution, Creationism, Intelligent Design. Retrieved February 2, 2008 from the Gallup Poll Website: http://www.gallup.com/poll/21814/ Evolution-Creationism-Intelligent-Design.aspx.
30. Gelman, S.A. (2003). The essential child: Origins of essentialism in everyday thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31. Gergely, G., & Csibra, G. (2003). Teleological reasoning in infancy: The naive theory of rational action. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7(7), 287-292.
32. Good, R. (1992).Evolution education:An area of needed research. Journal ofResearch in Science Teaching, 29, 10-19.
33. Greene, E.D. (1990). The logic of university students' misunderstanding of natural selection. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 27, 875-885.
34. Griffith, J.A.,&Brem, S.K. (2004).Teaching evolutionary biology: Pressures, stress, and coping. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 41(8), 791-809.
35. Inagaki, K.,&Hatano, G. (2002).Young children's naive thinking about the biological world. NewYork: Psychology Press.
36. Jones, D.-W. (2005, December). Smart Sponsors, http://www. scienceagainstevolution.org/v10i3f.htm.
37. Kampourakis, K., & Zogza, V. (2007). Students' preconceptions about evolution: How accurate is the characterization as "Lamarckian" when considering the history of evolutionary thought? Science & Education, 16, 393-422.
38. Keil, F.C. (1994). The birth and nurturance of concepts by domains: The origins of concepts of living things. In L.A. Hirschfeld & S.A. Gelman (Eds.), Mapping the mind: Domain specificity in cognition and culture (pp. 234-254).Cambridge: CUP.
39. Kelemen, D. (1999). Beliefs about purpose: On the origins of teleological thought. In M. Corballis & S. Lea (Eds.), The descent of mind: Psychological perspectives on hominid evolution (pp. 278-294). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
40. Kelemen, D. (2004). Are children intuitive theists? Reasoning about purpose and design in nature. Psychological Science, 15, 295-301.
41. Korn, R. (1995). An analysis of difference between visitors at natural history museums and science centers. Curator, 38, 150-160.
42. Lawson, A.E.,&Worsnop,W.A. (1992). Learning about evolution and rejecting a belief in special creation: Effects of reflective reasoning skill, prior knowledge, prior belief and religious commitment. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29, 143-166.
43. Legare, C.H., & Gelman, S.A. (2008). Bewitchment, biology, or both: The co-existence of natural and supernatural explanatory frameworks across development. Cognitive Science: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 32, 607-642.
44. Lerner, L.S. (2000). Good and bad science in U.S. schools. Nature, 407, 287-290.
45. Macfadden, B.J., Dunckel, B.A., Ellis, S., Dierking, L.D., Abraham-Silver, L., Kisiel, J., Koke, J. (2007). Natural history museum visitors' understanding of evolution. BioScience, 57, 875-882.
46. Mayr, E. (1982). The growth of biological thought: Diversity, evolution and inheritance. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47. Mazur, A. (2005). Believers and disbelievers in evolution. Politics and the Life Sciences, 8, 55-61.
48. Medin, D.L.,&Atran, S. (2004). The native mind: Biological categorization and reasoning in development and across cultures. Psychological Review, 111(4), 960-983.
49. Mervis, J. (2006, 6 January). Judge Jones defines science-and why intelligent design isn't. Science, 311, 34.
50. Miller, J.D., Scott, E.C., & Okamoto, S. (2006). Public acceptance of evolution. Science, 313, 765-766.
51. Miles, M.B., & Huberman, A.M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
52. Morris, H.M., & Parker, G.E. (1982). What is creation science. El Cajon, CA.: Master Books.
53. National Science Board. (2008). Science and technology: Public attitudes and understanding. In Science and engineering indicators, 2008 (pp. 7.3-7.47). Arlington, VA: National Science Foundation.
54. Nehm, R.H.,&Reilly, L. (2007). Biology majors knowledge and misconceptions of natural selection. BioScience, 57, 263-272.
55. Nesse, R.M.,&Williams, G.C. (1996).Whyweget sick: The newscience of Darwinian medicine. NewYork:Vintage Books.
56. Numbers, R.L. (1992). The creationists: The evolution of scientific creationism. New York: Knopf.
57. Numbers, R.L. (2003). Science without God: Natural laws and Christian beliefs. In D.C. Lindberg & R.L. Numbers (Eds.), When science and Christianity meet (pp. 265-285). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
58. Piaget, J. (1929). The child's conception of the world. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanhead.
59. Poling, D.A., & Evans, E.M. (2002). Why do birds of a feather flock together? Developmental change in the use of multiple explanations: Intention, teleology, essentialism. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 20, 89-112.
60. Poling, D.A.,&Evans, E.M. (2004a). Religious belief, scientific expertise, and folk ecology. Journal of Cognition and Culture: Studies in the Cognitive Anthropology of Science, 4, 485-524.
61. Poling, D.A., & Evans, E.M. (2004b). Are dinosaurs the rule or the exception? Developing concepts of death and extinction. Cognitive Development, 19, 363-383.
62. Quammen, D. (2006). The reluctant Mr. Darwin. New York: Norton.
63. Scott, E.C. (2004). Evolution vs. creationism. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
64. Scott, E.C.,&Matzke, N.J. (2007). Biological design in science classrooms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104, 8669-8676.
65. Shtulman, A. (2006). Qualitative differences between naive and scientific theories of evolution. Cognitive Psychology, 52, 170-194.
66. Shtulman, A., & Schulz, L. (2008). The relationship between essentialist beliefs and evolutionary reasoning. Cognitive Science, 32, 1049.
67. Sinatra, G.M., Southerland, S.A., McConaughy, F., & Demastes, J.W. (2003). Intentions and beliefs in students' understanding and acceptance of biological evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 40(5), 510-5528.
68. Smith, M.U., & Siegel, H. (2004). Knowing, believing, and understanding: What goals for science education? Science & Education, 13, 553-582.
69. Southerland, S.A., Abrams, E., Cummins, C.L., & Anzelmo, J. (2001). Understanding students' explanations of biological phenomena: Conceptual frameworks or P-Prims. Science Education, 85, 328-348.
70. Spiegel, A.N., Evans, E.M., Gram, W., & Diamond, J. (2006). Museum visitors' understanding of evolution. Museums & Social Issues, 1, 67-84.
71. Spiegel, A., Evans, E.M., Frazier, B.F., Hazel, A., Tare, M., Gram,W.,&Diamond, J. (submitted). Changing museum visitors' concepts of evolution.
72. Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M., Call, J., Behne, T., & Moll, H. (2005). Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28, 675-735.
73. Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W.F. (1992). Mental models of the earth: A study of conceptual change in childhood. Cognitive Psychology, 24, 535-585.
74. Vosniadou, S.,Vamvakoussi, X.,&Skopeliti, I. (2008). The framework theory approach to the problem of conceptual change. In S.Vosniadou (Ed.), International handbook of research on conceptual change (pp. 3-34). NewYork: Routledge.
75. Wandersee, J.H., Mintzes, J.J., & Novak, J.D. (1994). Research on alternative conceptions in science. In D. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 177-210). New York: Macmillan.
76. Wellman, H.M.,&Gelman, S.A. (1998). Knowledge acquisition in foundational domains. InW. Damon, D.Kuhn,& R. Siegler (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology, Vol.2: Cognition, perception and language (5th ed., pp. 523-574). New York: Wiley.
77. Woodward, A.L. (2009). Infants' grasp of others' intentions. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(1), 53-57.