Time-lapse imaging assay using the BioStation CT: A sensitive drug-screening method for three-dimensional cell culture

Cancer Science

Volumn 106, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 757-765

  Sakamoto, Ruriko ^a   Rahman, M Mamunur ^b   Shimomura, Manami ^c   Itoh, Manabu ^d   Nakatsura, Tetsuya ^c  

^a SCIVAX Corporation   (Japan)

^b SCIVAX USA Inc   (United States)

^c NATIONAL CANCER CENTER HOSPITAL EAST   (Japan)

^d SCIVAX Life Sciences Inc   (Japan)

Author keywords

Breast cancer; Drug sensitivity assay; Imaging device; NanoCulture Plates; Three dimensional cell culture

Indexed keywords

PACLITAXEL; TRASTUZUMAB;

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER CELL LINE; CELL CULTURE; CELL GROWTH; CELL MIGRATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG RESPONSE; DRUG SCREENING; DRUG SENSITIVITY; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IN VIVO STUDY; MICROENVIRONMENT; MULTICELLULAR SPHEROID; PRIMARY CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TIME LAPSE IMAGING; VELOCITY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CELL MOTION; FEMALE; PATHOLOGY; PROCEDURES; TUMOR CELL CULTURE;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; CELL MOVEMENT; DRUG SCREENING ASSAYS, ANTITUMOR; FEMALE; HUMANS; SPHEROIDS, CELLULAR; TIME-LAPSE IMAGING; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TUMOR CELLS, CULTURED;

EID: 84930616832     PISSN: 13479032     EISSN: 13497006     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/cas.12667     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Baker BM, Chen CS. Deconstructing the third dimension-how 3D culture microenvironments alter cellular cues. J Cell Sci 2012; 125: 1-10.
2. McCaffrey LM, Macara IG. Epithelial organization, cell polarity and tumorigenesis. Trends Cell Biol 2011; 21: 727-35.
3. Raghavan S, Shen CJ, Desai RA, Sniadecki NJ, Nelson CM, Chen CS. Decoupling diffusional from dimensional control of signaling in 3D culture reveals a role for myosin in tubulogenesis. J Cell Sci 2010; 123: 2877-83.
4. Saar M, Zhao H, Nolley R et al. Spheroid culture of LuCaP 147 as an authentic preclinical model of prostate cancer subtype with SPOP mutation and hypermutator phenotype. Cancer Lett 2014; 351: 272-80.
5. Lee GY, Kenny PA, Lee EH, Bissell MJ. 3D culture models of normal and malignant breast epithelial cells. Nat Methods 2007; 4: 359-65.
6. Haycock JW. 3D cell culture: a review of current approaches and techniques. Methods Mol Biol 2011; 695: 1-15.
7. Mueller-Klieser W. Multicellular spheroids: a review on cellular aggregates in cancer research. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 1987; 113: 101-22.
8. Mueller-Klieser W. Tumor biology and experimental therapeutics. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2000; 36: 123-39.
9. Yamada KM, Cukierman E. Modeling tissue morphogenesis and cancer in 3D. Cell 2007; 130: 601-10.
10. Sutherland RM. Cell and environment interactions in tumor microregions: the multicell spheroid model. Science 1988; 240: 177-84.
11. Nyga A, Cheema U, Loizidou M. 3D tumor models: novel in vitro approaches to cancer studies. J Cell Commun Signal 2011; 5: 239-48.
12. Pampaloni F, Reynaud EG, Stelzer EH. The third dimension bridges the gap between cell culture and live tissue. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 2007; 8: 839-45.
13. Pickl M, Ries CH. Comparison of 3D and 2D tumor models reveals enhanced HER2 activation in 3D associated with an increased response to trastuzumab. Oncogene 2009; 28: 461-8.
14. Wang F, Weaver VM, Petersen OW, Larabell CA, Dedhar S, Briand P. Reciprocal interactions between beta-integrin and epidermal growth factor receptor in three-dimensional basement membrane breast cultures: a different perspective in epithelial biology. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 1998; 95: 14821-6.
15. Liu H, Radisky DC, Wang F, Bissell MJ. Polarity and proliferation are controlled by distinct signaling pathways downstream of PI3-kinase in breast epithelial tumor cells. J Cell Biol 2004; 164: 603-12.
16. Weigelt B, Lo AT, Park CC et al. HER2 signaling pathway activation and response of breast cancer cells to HER2-targeting agents is dependent strongly on the 3D microenvironment. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2010; 122: 35-43.
17. Weaver VM, Lelievre S, Lakins JN, Chrenek MA, Jones JC, Giancotti F. Beta4 integrin-dependent formation of polarized three-dimensional architecture confers resistance to apoptosis in normal and malignant mammary epithelium. Cancer Cell 2002; 2: 205-6.
18. Yoshii Y, Waki A, Yoshida K et al. The use of nanoimprinted scaffolds as 3D culture models to facilitate spontaneous tumor cell migration and well-regulated spheroid formation. Biomaterials 2011; 32: 6052-8.
19. Karlsson H, Fryknäs M, Larsson R, Nygren P. Loss of cancer drug activity in colon cancer HCT-116 cells during spheroid formation in a new 3-D spheroid cell culture system. Exp Cell Res 2012; 318: 1577-85.
20. Friedl P, Wolf K. Tumor-cell invasion and migration: diversity and escape mechanism. Nat Rev Cancer 2003; 3: 362-74.
21. Limame R, Wouters A, Pauwels B et al. comparative analysis of dynamic cell viability, migration and invasion assessments by novel real-time technology and classic endpoint assays. PLoS One 2012; 7: e46536.
22. Ampuja M, Jokimäki R, Juuti-Uusitalo K et al. BMP4 inhibits the proliferation of breast cancer cells and induces an MMP-dependent migratory phenotype in MDA-MB-231 cells in 3D environment. BMC Cancer 2013; 13: 429.
23. Deakin NO, Turner CE. Distinct roles for paxillin and hic-5 in regulating breast cancer cell morphology, invasion, and metastasis. Mol Biol Cell 2011; 22: 327-41.
24. Matsui T, Takano M, Yoshida K et al. Neural stem cells directly differentiated from partially reprogrammed fibroblasts rapidly acquire gliogenic competency. Stem Cells 2012; 30: 1109-19.
25. Lin S, Fonteno S, Satish S, Bhanu B, Talbot P. Video bioinformatics analysis of human embryonic stem cell colony growth. J Vis Exp 2010; 39: 1933.
26. Paraic AK, Genee YL, Connie AM, Neve RM, Semeiks JR, Spellman PT. The morphologies of breast cancer cell lines in three-dimensional assays correlate with their profiles of gene expression. Mol Oncol 2007; 1: 84-96.
27. Bissell DM, Hammaker LE, Meyer UA. Parenchymal cells from adult rat liver in nonproliferating monolayer culture. I Functional studies. J Cell Biol 1973; 59: 722-32.
28. Bissell DM, Tilles JG. Morphology and function of cells of human embryonic liver in monolayer culture. J Cell Biol 1971; 50: 222-31.
29. Bissell MJ. The differentiated state of normal and malignant cells or how to define a "normal" cell in culture. Int Rev Cytol 1981; 70: 27-100.
30. Emerman JT, Pitelka DR. Maintenance and induction of morphological differentiation in dissociated mammary epithelium on floating collagen membranes. In vitro 1977; 13: 316-28.
31. Celli JP, Rizvi I, Evans CL, Abu-Yousif AO, Hasan T. Quantitative imaging reveals heterogeneous growth dynamics and treatment-dependent residual tumor distributions in a three-dimensional ovarian cancer model. J Biomed Opt 2010; 15: 051603.
32. dit Faute MA, Laurent L, Ploton D, Poupon MF, Jardillier JC, Bobichon H. Distinctive alterations of invasiveness, drug resistance and cell-cell organization in 3D-cultures of MCF-7, a human breast cancer cell line, and its multidrug resistant variant. Clin Exp Metastasis 2002; 19: 161-8.
33. Hiroto M, Xlaoblao W, Eisuke M, Mekada E. Integrin signal masks growth-promotion activity of HB-EGF in monolayer cell cultures. J Cell Sci 2009; 122: 4277-86.
34. Härmä V, Schukov HP, Happonen A et al. Quantification of dynamic morphological drug responses in 3D organotypic cell cultures by automated image analysis. PLoS One 2014; 9: e96426.
35. Härmä V, Virtanen J, Mäkelä R et al. A comprehensive panel of three-dimensional models for studies of prostate cancer growth, invasion and drug responses. PLoS One 2010; 5: 10431.
36. Rondón-Lagos M, Di Cantogno LV, Marchiò C et al. Differences and homologies of chromosomal alterations within and between breast cancer cell lines: a clustering analysis. Mol Cytogenet 2014; 7: 1-14.