Scientists' framing of the ocean science-policy interface

Global Environmental Change

Volumn 33, Issue , 2015, Pages 44-60

  Rudd, Murray A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Frames; Knowledge production; Ocean research; Research priorities; Science policy interface

Indexed keywords

LONG-TERM CHANGE; MARINE POLICY; PERCEPTION; POLICY IMPLEMENTATION; RESEARCH WORK; WILLINGNESS TO PAY; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; DATA ACQUISITION; DATA MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH; KNOWLEDGE; OCEANOGRAPHY; POLICY MAKING; PRIORITIZATION;

EID: 84929501490     PISSN: 09593780     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.04.006     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Bates R.H., Greif A., Levi M., Rosenthal J.-L., Weingast B. The analytical narrative project. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 2000, 94:696-702.
2. Berkes F., Hughes T.P., Steneck R.S., Wilson J.A., Bellwood D.R., Crona B., Folke C., Gunderson L.H., Leslie H.M., Norberg J., Nystrom M., Olsson P., Osterblom H., Scheffer M., Worm B. Globalization, roving bandits, and marine resources. Science 2006, 311:1557-1558.
3. Bremer S., Glavovic B. Exploring the science-policy interface for Integrated Coastal Management in New Zealand. Ocean Coast. Manag. 2013, 84:107-118.
4. Carney J.P. Science advocacy, defined. Science 2014, 345:243.
5. Carpenter S.R., Armbrust E.V., Arzberger P.W., Stuart Chapin F., Elser J.J., Hackett E.J., Ives A.R., Kareiva P.M., Leibold M.A., Lundberg P., Mangel M., Merchant N., Murdoch W.W., Palmer M.A., Peters D.P.C., Pickett S.T.A., Smith K.K., Wall D.H., Zimmerman A.S. Accelerate synthesis in ecology and environmental sciences. Bioscience 2009, 59:699-701.
6. Cornell S., Berkhout F., Tuinstra W., Tàbara J.D., Jäger J., Chabay I., de Wit B., Langlais R., Mills D., Moll P., Otto I.M., Petersen A., Pohl C., van Kerkhoff L. Opening up knowledge systems for better responses to global environmental change. Environ. Sci. Policy 2013, 28:60-70.
7. Dietz T. Bringing values and deliberation to science communication. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2013, 110:14081-14087.
8. Dixon-Woods M., Agarwal S., Jones D., Young B., Sutton A. Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods. J. Health Serv. Res. Policy 2005, 10:45-53.
9. Doney S.C., Ruckelshaus M., Emmett Duffy J., Barry J.P., Chan F., English C.A., Galindo H.M., Grebmeier J.M., Hollowed A.B., Knowlton N., Polovina J., Rabalais N.N., Sydeman W.J., Talley L.D. Climate change impacts on marine ecosystems. Annu. Rev. Mar. Sci. 2012, 4:11-37.
10. European Marine Board Navigating the Future IV. Position Paper 20 2013, European Marine Board, Ostend, Belgium, 202 pp.
11. Fazey I., Bunse L., Msika J., Pinke M., Preedy K., Evely A.C., Lambert E., Hastings E., Morris S., Reed M.S. Evaluating knowledge exchange in interdisciplinary and multi-stakeholder research. Glob. Environ. Chang. 2014, 25:204-220.
12. Fischer F. Reframing Public Policy: Discursive Politics and Deliberative Practices 2003, Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
13. Furnham A., Boo H.C. A literature review of the anchoring effect. J. Socio-Econ. 2011, 40:35-42.
14. Goertz G., Mahoney J. A Tale of Two Cultures: Qualitative and Quantitative Research in the Social Sciences 2012, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
15. Hackmann H., Moser S.C., St Clair A.L. The social heart of global environmental change. Nat. Clim. Change 2014, 4:653-655.
16. Halpern B.S., Walbridge S., Selkoe K.A., Kappel C.V., Micheli F., D'Agrosa C., Bruno J.F., Casey K.S., Ebert C., Fox H.E., Fujita R., Heinemann D., Lenihan H.S., Madin E.M.P., Perry M.T., Selig E.R., Spalding M., Steneck R., Watson R. A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems. Science 2008, 319:948-952.
17. Hesse-Biber S.N., Leavy P. The Practice of Qualitative Research 2011, Sage Publications, London. 2nd ed.
18. Hisschemöller M., Hoppe R. Coping with intractable controversies: the case for problem structuring in policy design and analysis. Knowl. Technol. Policy 1995, 8:40-60.
19. Hoffman R.R., Shadbolt N.R., Burton A.M., Klein G. Eliciting knowledge from experts: a methodological analysis. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 1995, 62:129-158.
20. Hoppe R. Rethinking the puzzles of the science-policy nexus: from knowledge utilization and science technology studies to types of boundary arrangements. Poiesis Praxis 2005, 3:191-215.
21. Hoppe R. Scientific advice and public policy: expert advisers' and policymakers' discourses on boundary work. Poiesis Praxis 2009, 6:235-263.
22. Hoppe R., Wesselink A. Comparing the role of boundary organizations in the governance of climate change in three EU member states. Environ. Sci. Policy 2014, 44:73-85.
23. Hughes R.N., Hughes D., Smith I.P. Oceans and marine resources in a changing climate. Oceanogr. Mar. Biol. 2013, 51:71-192.
24. Hutchings J.A., CÔté I.M., Dodson J.J., Fleming I.A., Jennings S., Mantua N.J., Peterman R.M., Riddell B.E., Weaver A.J., VanderZwaag D.L. Is Canada fulfilling its obligations to sustain marine biodiversity?. Environ. Rev. 2012, 20:353-361.
25. Jahn T., Bergmann M., Keil F. Transdisciplinarity: between mainstreaming and marginalization. Ecol. Econ. 2012, 79:1-10.
26. Kass G.V. An exploratory technique for investigating large quantities of categorical data. Appl. Stat. 1980, 29:119-127.
27. Kempner J. The chilling effect: how do researchers react to controversy?. PLoS Med. 2008, 5:e222.
28. Lawton R.N., Rudd M.A. A narrative policy approach to environmental conservation. Ambio 2014, 10.1007/s13280-13014-10497-13288.
29. Liu J., Dietz T., Carpenter S.R., Alberti M., Folke C., Moran E., Pell A.N., Deadman P., Kratz T., Lubchenco J., Ostrom E., Ouyang Z., Provencher W., Redman C.L., Schneider S.H., Taylor W.W. Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science 2007, 317:1513-1516.
30. Lubchenco J. Entering the century of the environment: a new social contract for science. Science 1998, 279:491-497.
31. Lupia A. Communicating science in politicized environments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2013, 110:14048-14054.
32. Magidson J. SI-CHAID 4.0 User's Guide 2005, Statistical Innovations Inc, Belmont, MA.
33. Magidson J., Vermunt J.K. An extension of the CHAID tree-based segmentation algorithm to multiple dependent variables. Classification: The Ubiquitous Challenge 2005, 176-183. Springer, Heidelberg. C. Weihs, W. Gaul (Eds.).
34. McGoodwin J.R. Understanding the Cultures of Fishing Communities: A Key to Fisheries Management and Food Security 2001, 287. FAO, Rome.
35. McNie E.C. Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: an analysis of the problem and review of the literature. Environ. Sci. Policy 2007, 10:17-38.
36. Meagher L., Lyall C., Nutley S. Flows of knowledge, expertise and influence: a method for assessing policy and practice impacts from social science research. Res. Eval. 2008, 17:163-173.
37. Meyer J.L., Frumhoff P.C., Hamburg S.P., de la Rosa C. Above the din but in the fray: environmental scientists as effective advocates. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2010, 8:299-305.
38. Mooney H.A., Duraiappah A., Larigauderie A. Evolution of natural and social science interactions in global change research programs. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2013, 110:3665-3672.
39. National Research Council Sea change: 2015-2025 decadal survey of ocean sciences. Report summary 2015, National Academy of Sciences, Washington, DC, 12 pp.
40. Neff M.W. What research should be done and why? Four competing visions among ecologists. Front. Ecol. Environ. 2011, 9:462-469.
41. Nowotny H., Scott P., Gibbons M. Rethinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty 2001, Blackwell, Maiden, MA.
42. Nursey-Bray M.J., Vince J., Scott M., Haward M., O'Toole K., Smith T., Harvey N., Clarke B. Science into policy? Discourse, coastal management and knowledge. Environ. Sci. Policy 2014, 38:107-119.
43. Owens S. Making a difference? Some perspectives on environmental research and policy. Trans. Inst. Br. Geogr. 2005, 30:287-292.
44. Pahl-Wostl C., Giupponi C., Richards K., Binder C., de Sherbinin A., Sprinz D., Toonen T., van Bers C. Transition towards a new global change science: requirements for methodologies, methods, data and knowledge. Environ. Sci. Policy 2013, 28:36-47.
45. Parker M., Acland A., Armstrong H.J., Bellingham J.R., Bland J., Bodmer H.C., Burall S., Castell S., Chilvers J., Cleevely D.D., Cope D., Costanzo L., Dolan J.A., Doubleday R., Feng W.Y., Godfray H.C.J., Good D.A., Grant J., Green N., Groen A.J., Guilliams T.T., Gupta S., Hall A.C., Heathfield A., Hotopp U., Kass G., Leeder T., Lickorish F.A., Lueshi L.M., Magee C., Mata T., McBride T., McCarthy N., Mercer A., Neilson R., Ouchikh J., Oughton E.J., Oxenham D., Pallett H., Palmer J., Patmore J., Petts J., Pinkerton J., Ploszek R., Pratt A., Rocks S.A., Stansfield N., Surkovic E., Tyler C.P., Watkinson A.R., Wentworth J., Willis R., Wollner P.K.A., Worts K., Sutherland W.J. Identifying the science and technology dimensions of emerging public policy issues through horizon scanning. PLoS ONE 2014, 9:e96480.
46. Parry S., Murphy J. Towards a framework for analysing interactions between social science and environmental policy. Evid. Policy 2013, 9:531-546.
47. Petes L.E., Howard J.F., Helmuth B.S., Fly E.K. Science integration into US climate and ocean policy. Nat. Clim. Change 2014, 4:671-677.
48. Ragin C.C. The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies 1987, 216. University of California Press.
49. Reed M.S., Graves A., Dandy N., Posthumus H., Hubacek K., Morris J., Prell C., Quinn C.H., Stringer L.C. Who's in and why? A typology of stakeholder analysis methods for natural resource management. J. Environ. Manag. 2009, 90:1933-1949.
50. Rice J.C. Advocacy science and fisheries decision-making. ICES J. Mar. Sci. 2011, 68:2007-2012.
51. Rudd M.A. How research-prioritization exercises affect conservation policy. Conserv. Biol. 2011, 25:860-866.
52. Rudd M.A. Scientists' opinions on the global status and management of biological diversity. Conserv. Biol. 2011, 25:1165-1175.
53. Rudd M.A. Scientists' perspectives on global ocean research priorities. Front. Mar. Sci. 2014, 1:36. 10.3389/fmars.2014.00036.
54. Rudd M.A., Beazley K.F., Cooke S.J., Fleishman E., Lane D.E., Mascia M.B., Roth R., Tabor G., Bakker J.A., Bellefontaine T., Berteaux D., Cantin B., Chaulk K.G., Cunningham K., Dobell R., Fast E., Ferrara N., Findlay C.S., Hallstrom L.K., Hammond T., Hermanutz L., Hutchings J.A., Lindsay K.E., Marta T.J., Nguyen V.M., Northey G., Prior K., Ramirez-Sanchez S., Rice J., Sleep D.J.H., Szabo N.D., Trottier G., Toussaint J.-P., Veilleux J.-P. Generation of priority research questions to inform conservation policy and management at a national level. Conserv. Biol. 2011, 25:476-484.
55. Rudd M.A., Fleishman E. Policymakers' and scientists' ranks of research priorities for resource-management policy. Bioscience 2014, 64:219-228.
56. Rudd M.A., Lawton R.N. Scientists' prioritization of global coastal research questions. Mar. Policy 2013, 39:101-111.
57. Sarkki S., Niemelä J., Tinch R., van den Hove S., Watt A., Young J. Balancing credibility, relevance and legitimacy: a critical assessment of trade-offs in science-policy interfaces. Sci. Public Policy 2014, 41:194-206.
58. Scarpa R., Thiene M. Destination choice models for rock climbing in the Northeastern Alps: a latent-class approach based on intensity of preferences. Land Econ. 2005, 81:426-444.
59. Smith K.E. The politics of ideas: the complex interplay of health inequalities research and policy. Sci. Public Policy 2014, 41:561-574.
60. Spruijt P., Knol A.B., Vasileiadou E., Devilee J., Lebret E., Petersen A.C. Roles of scientists as policy advisers on complex issues: a literature review. Environ. Sci. Policy 2014, 40:16-25.
61. Stafford S.G., Bartels D.M., Begay-Campbell S., Bubier J.L., Crittenden J.C., Cutter S.L., Delaney J.R., Jordan T.E., Kay A.C., Libecap G.D., Moore J.C., Rabalais N.N., Rejeski D., Sala O.E., Shepherd J.M., Travis J. Now is the time for action: transitions and tipping points in complex environmental systems. Environment 2010, 52:38-45.
62. Sutherland W.J., Fleishman E., Mascia M.B., Pretty J., Rudd M.A. Methods for collaboratively identifying research priorities and emerging issues in science and policy. Methods Ecol. Evolut. 2011, 2:238-247.
63. Swart R., Biesbroek R., Capela Lourenço T. Science of adaptation to climate change and science for adaptation. Front. Environ. Sci. 2014, 2:29. 10.3389/fenvs.2014.00029.
64. van Kerkhoff L., Lebel L. Linking knowledge and action for sustainable development. Annu. Rev. Environ. Resour. 2006, 31:445-477.
65. Vermunt J.K., Magidson J. Technical Guide for Latent GOLD 4.0: Basic and Advanced 2005, Statistical Innovations Inc., Belmont, MA, 256 pp.
66. Weaver C.P., Mooney S., Allen D., Beller-Simms N., Fish T., Grambsch A.E., Hohenstein W., Jacobs K., Kenney M.A., Lane M.A., Langner L., Larson E., McGinnis D.L., Moss R.H., Nichols L.G., Nierenberg C., Seyller E.A., Stern P.C., Winthrop R. From global change science to action with social sciences. Nat. Clim. Change 2014, 4:656-659.
67. Wedel M., Kamakura W.A. Market Segmentation: Conceptual and Methodological Foundations 2000, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Norwell, MA. 2nd ed.
68. Wells P.G. Canadian aquatic science and environmental legislation under threat. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 2013, 69:1-2.
69. Wittrock B. Social knowledge and public policy: eight models of interaction. Social Sciences and Modern States: National Experiences and Theoretical Crossroads 1991, 333-354. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. P. Wagner, C.H. Weiss, B. Wittrock, H. Woolmann (Eds.).