Generation of Priority Research Questions to Inform Conservation Policy and Management at a National Level;Generación de Preguntas de Investigación Prioritarias para Informar a las Políticas y Gestión de la Conservación a Nivel Nacional

Conservation Biology

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 476-484

  Rudd, Murray A ^a   Beazley, Karen F ^b   Cooke, Steven J ^c   Fleishman, Erica ^d   Lane, Daniel E ^e   Mascia, Michael B ^f   Roth, Robin ^g   Tabor, Gary ^h   Bakker, Jiselle A ^e   Bellefontaine, Teresa ⁱ   Berteaux, Dominique ^j   Cantin, Bernard ⁱ   Chaulk, Keith G ^k   Cunningham, Kathryn ^e   Dobell, Rod ^l   Fast, Eleanor ^m   Ferrara, Nadia ⁿ   Findlay, C Scott ^e   Hallstrom, Lars K ^o   Hammond, Thomas ^p   Hermanutz, Luise ^k   Hutchings, Jeffrey A ^b   Lindsay, Kathryn E ^q   Marta, Tim J ^r   Nguyen, Vivian M ^c   Northey, Greg ^s   Prior, Kent ^t   Ramirez Sanchez, Saudiel ^u   Rice, Jake ^u   Sleep, Darren J H ^v   Szabo, Nora D ^e   Trottier, Geneviève ^w   Toussaint, Jean Patrick ^x   Veilleux, Jean Philippe ⁱ   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^b DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^f World Wildlife Fund ^*  (United States)

^g YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^h Center for Large Landscape Conservation   (United States)

ⁱ Policy Research Initiative   (Canada)

^j UNIVERSITÉ DU QUÉBEC À RIMOUSKI   (Canada)

^k MEMORIAL UNIVERSITY OF NEWFOUNDLAND   (Canada)

^l UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

^m Food and Water Watch Council of Canadians   (Canada)

ⁿ Government of Canada   (Canada)

^o UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^p Division Cientifica   (Canada)

^q ENVIRONMENT CANADA   (Canada)

^r AGRICULTURE AND AGRI FOOD CANADA   (Canada)

^s Canadian Federation of Med Students   (Canada)

^t PARKS CANADA   (Canada)

^u FISHERIES AND OCEANS CANADA   (Canada)

^v NATIONAL COUNCIL FOR AIR AND STREAM IMPROVEMENT   (Canada)

^w CANADIAN FOOD INSPECTION AGENCY   (Canada)

^x INRS INSTITUT ARMAND FRAPPIER   (Canada)

more..

Author keywords

Collaboration; Evidence based policy; Research impact; Research priorities; Science advice

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOGENIC EFFECT; ARCTIC ENVIRONMENT; BIODIVERSITY; BOREAL FOREST; DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; INDIGENOUS POPULATION; POLICY REFORM; PRIORITIZATION; PROBABILITY; RESOURCE MANAGEMENT; TUNDRA; WETLAND;

ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; CANADA; CLIMATE CHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; LEGAL ASPECT; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

BIODIVERSITY; CANADA; CLIMATE CHANGE; CONSERVATION OF NATURAL RESOURCES; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; POPULATION DYNAMICS;

CANADA;

EID: 79953871674     PISSN: 08888892     EISSN: 15231739     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1739.2010.01625.x     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Balvanera, P., A. B. Pfisterer, N. Buchmann, J.-S. He, T. Nakashizuka, D. Raffaelli, and B. Schmid 2006. Quantifying the evidence for biodiversity effects on ecosystem functioning and services. Ecology Letters 9:1146-1156.
2. Bobrow, D. B., and J. S. Dryzek 1987. Policy analysis by design. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
3. Dobell, R. 2002. Social risk, political rationality and official responsibility: risk management in context. The Walkerton Inquiry, Toronto.
4. Environment Canada. 2006. A biodiversity outcomes framework for Canada. Environment Canada, Ottawa.
5. Fisher, B., R. K. Turner, and P. Morling 2009. Defining and classifying ecosystem services for decision making. Ecological Economics 68:643-653.
6. Folke, C., T. Hahn, P. Olsson, and J. Norberg 2005. Adapative governance of social-ecological systems. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30:441-473.
7. Ford, J. D., and T. Pearce 2010. What we know, do not know, and need to know about climate change vulnerability in the western Canadian Arctic: a systematic literature review. Environmental Research Letters 5:014008, DOI.
8. Ford, J. D., T. Pearce, F. Duerden, C. Furgal, and B. Smit 2010. Climate change policy responses for Canada's Inuit population: the importance of and opportunities for adaptation. Global Environmental Change 20:177-191.
9. Government of Canada. 2000. A framework for science and technology advice: principles and guidelines for the effective use of science and technology advice in government decision making. Government of Canada, Ottawa.
10. Government of Canada. 2001. A Canadian perspective on the precautionary approach/principle - discussion document. Government of Canada, Ottawa.
11. Government of Canada. 2007. Mobilizing science and technology to Canada's advantage. Industry Canada, Ottawa.
12. Groffman, P., et al. 2006. Ecological thresholds: the key to successful environmental management or an important concept with no practical application? Ecosystems 9:1-13.
13. Howlett, M. 2009. Policy analytical capacity and evidence-based policy-making: lessons from Canada. Canadian Public Administration 52:153-175.
14. Ingraham, M. W., and S. G. Foster 2008. The value of ecosystem services provided by the U.S. National Wildlife Refuge System in the contiguous U.S. Ecological Economics 67:608-618.
15. Kremen, C., N. M. Williams, and R. W. Thorp 2002. Crop pollination from native bees at risk from agricultural intensification Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 99:16812-16816.
16. Leonard, J., C. Ragan, and F. St-Hilare, editors. 2007. A Canadian priorities agenda: policy choices to improve economic and social well-being. Institute for Research on Public Policy, Ottawa, Canada.
17. Lerdau, M., and L. Slobodkin 2002. Trace gas emissions and species-dependent ecosystem services. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 17:309-312.
18. MEA (Millenium Ecosystem Assessment). 2005. Living beyond our means: natural assets and human well-being. Island Press, Washington, D.C.
19. Morton, S. R., et al. 2009. The big ecological questions inhibiting effective environmental management in Australia. Austal Ecology 34:1-9.
20. Myers, S. S., and J. A. Patz 2009. Emerging threats to human health from global environmental change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 34:223-252.
21. NRTEE (National Round Table on the Environment and the Economy). 2003. Securing Canada's natural capital: a vision for nature conservation in the 21st century. NRTEE, Ottawa, Canada.
22. Nutley, S. M., I. Walter, and H. T. O. Davies 2007. Using evidence: how research can inform public services. The Policy Press, Bristol, United Kingdom.
23. Pretty, J., et al. 2010. The top 100 questions of importance to the future of global agriculture. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 8:219-236.
24. Prowse, T. D., and C. Furgal 2009. Northern Canada in a changing climate: major findings and conclusions. Ambio 38:290-292.
25. Pullin, A. S., T. M. Knight, and A. R. Watkinson 2009. Linking reductionist science and holistic policy using systematic reviews: unpacking environmental policy questions to construct an evidence-based framework. Journal of Applied Ecology 46:970-975.
26. Rigby, E. 2005. Linking research and policy on Capitol Hill: insights from research brokers. Evidence & Policy 1:195-214.
27. Rose, G. A. 2007. Cod: the ecological history of the North Atlantic fisheries. Breakwater Books, St. John's, Newfoundland.
28. Rudd, M. A. 2004. An institutional framework for designing and monitoring ecosystem-based fisheries management policy experiments. Ecological Economics 48:109-124.
29. Rudd, M. A. 2009. National values for regional aquatic species at risk in Canada. Endangered Species Research 6:239-249.
30. Scott, J. M., D. D. Goble, A. M. Haines, J. A. Wiens, and M. C. Neel 2010. Conservation-reliant species and the future of conservation. Conservation Letters 3:91-97.
31. Shulha, L. M., and J. B. Cousins 1997. Evaluation use: theory, research, and practice since1986. Evaluation Practice 18:195-208.
32. Stern, P. C. 2000. Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behavior. Journal of Social Issues 56:407-424.
33. Sutherland, W. J., et al. 2006. The identification of 100 ecological questions of high policy relevance in the UK. Journal of Applied Ecology 43:617-627.
34. Sutherland, W. J., et al. 2009. One hundred questions of importance to the conservation of global biological diversity. Conservation Biology 23:557-567.
35. TBS (Treasury Board Secretariat). 2007. Canadian cost-benefit analysis guide: regulatory proposals. TBS, Ottawa, Canada.
36. TEEB (The Economics of Ecosystems and Biodiversity). 2009. The economics of ecosystems and biodiversity for national and international policy makers - summary: responding to the value of nature. TEEB, Bonn, Germany.
37. Weiss, C. H. 1978. Improving the linkage between social research and public policy. Pages 28-80 in L. E. Lynn, editor. Knowledge and policy: the uncertain connection. National Academy of Sciences, Washington, D.C.