Balancing credibility, relevance and legitimacy: A critical assessment of trade-offs in science-policy interfaces

Science and Public Policy

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2014, Pages 194-206

  Sarkki, Simo ^a   Niemelä, Jari ^b   Tinch, Rob ^c   van den Hove, Sybille ^c,d   Watt, Allan ^e   Young, Juliette ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OULU   (Finland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HELSINKI   (Finland)

^c Median SCP   (Spain)

^d INSTITUT DE CIÈNCIA I TECNOLOGIA AMBIENTALS   (Spain)

^e CENTRE FOR ECOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Credibility; Legitimacy; Relevance; Science policy interface; Trade off

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; DEMAND ANALYSIS; PLANNING THEORY; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT; RESEARCH WORK; TECHNOLOGY POLICY; THEORETICAL STUDY; TRADE-OFF;

EID: 84898420415     PISSN: 03023427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/scipol/sct046     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Ascher, W., Steelman, T. and Healy, R. (2010) Knowledge and Environmental Policy: Re-imagining the Boundaries of Science and Politics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. BESAFE. (2013) 'Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: Arguments for our future Environment', Project funded by EU Framework Programme 7 http://www.ymparisto.fi/de fault.asp?contentid=394234&lan=en&clan=en accessed 7 February 2013.
3. BIOMOT. (2013) 'Motivational Strength of Ecosystem Services and Alternative Ways to Express the Value of Biodiversity'. Project funded by EU Framework Programme 7 http:// www.biomotivation.eu/ accessed 7 February 2013.
4. Blockstein, D. E. (2002) 'How to lose your political virginity while keeping your scientific credibility', BioScience, 52: 91-6.
5. Bradshaw, G. A. and Borchers, J. G. (2000) 'Uncertainty as information: Narrowing the science-policy gap', Conservation Ecology, 4/1: 7 http://www.consecol.orgyvol4 yiss1yart7 accessed 15 April 2013.
6. Brundtland, G. H. (1997) 'The scientific underpinning of policy', Science, 277: 457.
7. Busan Outcome. (2010) 'Report of the Third Ad-hoc Intergovernmental and Multi-stakeholder Meeting on an Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services', held at Busan, Republic of Korea, http://www.ipbes.net/resources/previous-ipbes-meetings/3rdmeeting-on-ipbes.html accessed 12 August 2013.
8. Campbell Keller, A. (2009) Science in Environmental Policy: The Politics of Objective Advice. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Cash, D. W., Clark, W. C., Alcock, F., Dickson, N. M. et al. (2003) 'Knowledge systems for sustainable development', PNAS, 100/14: 8086-91.
10. Cash, D. W., Clark, W. C., Alcock, F., Dickson, N. M. and Moser, S. C. (2000) 'Linking global and local scales: Designing dynamic assessment and management processes', Global Environmental Change, 10: 109-20.
11. CBD Aichi Biodiversity Targets. (2012), Convention on Biological Diversity http://www.cbd.int/sp/targets/ accessed 7 February 2013.
12. Collingridge, D. and Reeve, C. (1986) Science Speaks to Power, The Role of Experts in Policy Making. London: Pinter.
13. European Environment Agency. (2013) 'Late Lessons from Early Warnings: Science, Precaution, Innovation', European Environment Agency Report 1/13. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.
14. Engels, A. (2005) 'The science-policy interface', Integrated Assessment Journal, 5: 7-26.
15. Farrell, A. E. and Jäger, J. (eds) (2006) Assessments of Regional and Global Environmental Risks. Designing Processes for the Effective Use of Science in Decision Making. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.
16. Funtowicz, S. O. and Ravetz, J. (1993) 'Science for the postnormal age', Futures, 25: 739-55.
17. Girod, B., Wiek, A., Mieg, H. and Hulme, M. (2009) 'The evolution of the IPCC's emissions scenarios', Environmental Science and Policy, 12: 103-18.
18. Gubrium, A. (2009) 'Digital storytelling: An emergent method for health promotion research and practice', Health Promotion Practice, 10: 186-91.
19. Haas, P. M. (2004) 'When does power listen to truth? A constructivist approach to the policy process', Journal of European Public Policy, 11: 569-92.
20. Hall, D. J. and Paradice, D. (2005) 'Philosophical foundations for a learning oriented knowledge management system for decision support', Decision Support Systems, 39: 445-61.
21. Hisschemöller, M., Hoppe, R., Groenewegen, P. and Midden, C. (2001) 'Knowledge use and political choice in Dutch environmental policy: A problem structuring perspective on real life experiments in extended peer review'. In: Hisschemöller, M., Dunn, W., Hoppe, R. and Ravetz, J. (eds) Knowledge, Power and Participation in Environmental Policy Analysis, pp. 437-70. New Brunswick, NJ: Transactions Publishers.
22. Jacob, M. (2006) 'Re-norming science-society relation', Tertiary Education and Management, 12: 21-36.
23. Jasanoff, S. (1994) The Fifth Branch. Science Advisers as Policymakers. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
24. Koetz, T., Farrell, K. N. and Bridgewater, P. (2012) 'Building better science-policy interfaces for international environmental governance: Assessing potential within the Intergovernmental Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services', International Environmental Agreements, 12: 1-21.
25. Labonte, R., Feather, J. and Hills, M. (1999) 'A story/dialogue method for health promotion knowledge development and evaluation', Health Education Research, 14: 39-50.
26. Leemans, R. (2008) 'Personal experiences with the governance of the policy-relevant IPCC and Millennium Ecosystem Assessments', Global Environmental Change, 18: 12-7.
27. Lentsch, J. and Weingart, P. (2011) 'Quality control in the advisory process: Towards an institutional design for robust science advice'. In: Lentsch, J. and Weingart, P. (eds) The Politics of Scientific Advice: Institutional Design for Quality Assurance, pp. 353-74. New York: CUP.
28. Lövbrand, E. (2011) 'Co-producing European climate science and policy: A cautionary note on the making of useful knowledge', Science and Public Policy, 38: 225-36.
29. McGlade, J. and van den Hove, S. (2013) 'Ecosystems and managing the dynamics of change'. In: Gee, D., Grandjean, P., Foss, S., van den Hove, S. et al. (eds) Late Lessons from Early Warnings: Science, Precaution, Innovation, pp. 407-28, European Environment Agency Report 1/2013. Copenhagen: European Environment Agency.
30. McNie, E. C. (2007) 'Reconciling the supply of scientific information with user demands: An analysis of the problem and review of the literature', Environmental Science and Policy, 10: 17-38.
31. Michaels, D. (2008) Doubt is Their Product. How Industry's Assault on Science Threatens Your Health. New York: OUP.
32. Miles, E. L., Snover, A. K., Whitley Binder, L. C., Sarachik, E. S. et al. (2006) 'An approach to designing a national climate service', PNAS, 103/52: 19616-23.
33. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005) Ecosystems and Human Well-Being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.
34. Moll, P. and Zander, U. (2006) Managing the Interface: From Knowledge to Action in Global Change and Sustainability Science. Munich, Germany: Oekom Verlag.
35. Nowotny, H. (2003) 'Democratising expertise and socially robust knowledge', Science and Public Policy, 30: 151-6.
36. Nowotny, H., Scott, P. and Gibbons, M. (2001) Re-Thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
37. Oreskes, N. and Conway, E. M. (2010) Merchants of Doubt: How a Handful of Scientists Obscured the Truth on Issues from Tobacco Smoke to Global Warming. New York: Bloomsbury.
38. Paloniemi, R., Apostolopoulou, E., Primmer, E., Grodzinska-Jurczak, M. et al. (2012) 'Biodiversity conservation across scales: Lessons from a science-policy dialogue', Nature Conservation, 2: 7-19.
39. Petersen, A. C., Cath, A., Hage, M., Kunseler, E. and van der Sluijs, J. P. (2011) 'Post-normal science in practice at the Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency', Science, Technology, and Human Values, 36: 362-88.
40. Phelan, P. (2000) 'Evaluation of scientific productivity', The Scientist, 14/19: 39.
41. Pielke, R. A. (2007) The Honest Broker. Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics. Cambridge, UK: CUP.
42. Renn, O. (1995) 'Styles of using scientific expertise: A comparative framework', Science and Public Policy, 22: 147-156.
43. Sarkki, S. and Karjalainen, T. P. (2012) 'Science and issue advocacy in a forestry debate in Northern Finland', Polar Journal, 2: 125-38.
44. Sarkki, S., Karjalainen, T. P., Niemelä , J., Tinch, R. and SPIRAL team (2012a) 'Attributes of Science-Policy Interfaces and their Linkages to Instruments and Mechanisms for Encouraging Behaviour that Reduces Negative Human Impacts on Biodiversity'. Deliverable 3.1 of EU 7th Framework Programme Project SPIRAL http://www.spiral-project.eu/content/documents accessed 7 February 2013.
45. Sarkki, S., Karjalainen, T. P., Niemelä , J., Tinch, R. and SPIRAL team (2012b) 'Recommendations for the Improvement of the Science-Policy Process for Developing the Integration of Indicators and Other Mechanisms for Influencing Behaviour to Reduce Negative Human Impacts on Biodiversity'. Deliverable 3.2 of EU 7th Framework Programme Project SPIRAL http://www.spiralproject. eu/content/documents accessed 7 February 2013.
46. SPIRAL. (2013) 'Science-policy interfaces for biodiversity: Research, action and learning', Project funded by EU's 7th Framework Programme http://www.spiral-project.eu/ accessed 7 February 2013.
47. Stirling, A. (2010) 'Keep it complex', Nature, 468: 1029-31.
48. Turnhout, E., Hisschemöller, M. and Eijsackers, H. (2008) 'Science on Wadden Sea policy: From accommodation to advocacy', Environmental Science and Policy, 11: 227-39.
49. Van den Hove, S. (2006) 'Between consensus and compromise: Acknowledging the negotiation dimension in participatory approaches', Land Use Policy, 23: 10-7.
50. Van den Hove, S. (2007) 'A rationale for science-policy interfaces', Futures, 39: 807-26.
51. Van der Sluijs, J. (2006) 'Uncertainty, assumptions and value commitments in the knowledge base of complex environmental problems'. In: Guimara~ es Pereira, A., Guedes Vaz., S. and Tognetti, S. (eds) Interfaces Between Science and Society, pp. 64-81. Sheffield, UK: Greenleaf Publishing.
52. Van Kerkhoff, L. and Lebel, L. (2006) 'Linking knowledge and action for sustainable development', Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 31: 445-77.
53. Vogel, C., Moser, S. C., Kasperson, R. E. and Dabelko, G. D. (2007) 'Linking vulnerability, adaptation, and resilience science to practice: Pathways, players, and partnerships', Global Environmental Change, 17: 349-64.
54. Watson, R. (2005) 'Turning science into policy: Challenges and experiences from the science-policy interface', Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society London B, Biological Sciences, 360/1454: 471-7.
55. Weichselgartner, J. and Kasperson, R. (2010) 'Barriers in the science-policy-practice interface: Toward a knowledge-actionsystem in global environmental change research', Global Environmental Change, 20: 266-77.
56. White, D. D., Wutich, A., Larson, K. L., Gober, P. et al. (2010) 'Credibility, salience, and legitimacy of boundary objects: Water managers' assessment of a simulation model in an immersive decision theater', Science and Public Policy, 37: 219-32.
57. Wilson, D. C. (2009) The Paradoxes of Transparency: Science and the Ecosystem Approach to Fisheries Management in Europe. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
58. Wynne, B. (1982) Rationality and Ritual: The Windscale Inquiry and Nuclear Decisions in Britain . Chalfont St. Giles, UK: British Society for the History of Science.