Advocacy science and fisheries decision-making

ICES Journal of Marine Science

Volumn 68, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 2007-2012

  Rice, Jake C ^a  

^a FISHERIES AND OCEANS CANADA   (Canada)

Author keywords

advocacy; fisheries advice; marine conservation; science policy interaction

Indexed keywords

ACCOUNTABILITY; ADVOCACY; CONSERVATION MANAGEMENT; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; ECOSYSTEM APPROACH; EXPERT SYSTEM; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; MARINE POLICY; RISK ASSESSMENT; TRADE-OFF;

EID: 80054103903     PISSN: 10543139     EISSN: 10959289     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/icesjms/fsr154     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Bavington, D. L. Y. 2010. Managed Annihilation: An Unnatural History of the Newfoundland Cod Collapse. UBC Press, Vancouver. 224 pp.
2. Belton, V., and Stewart, T. J. 2002. Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. Springer, New York. 400 pp.
3. Butterworth, D. S. 2007. Why a management procedure approach? Some positives and negatives. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 64: 613-617.
4. Butterworth, D. S., and Punt, A. E. 2003. The role of harvest control laws, risk and uncertainty and the precautionary approach in ecosystem-based management. In Responsible Fisheries in the Marine Ecosystem, pp. 311-319. Ed. by M. F. Sinclair, and G. Valdimarsson. CABI Press, and FAO, Rome.
5. Caddy, J. F., and Seijo, J. C. 2005. This is more difficult than we thought! The responsibility of scientists, managers and stakeholders to mitigate the unsustainability of marine fisheries. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B - Biological Sciences, 360: 59-75.
6. Chapel, L., Deffuant, G., Martin, S., and Mullon, C. 2008. Defining yield policies in a viability approach. Ecological Modelling, 212: 10-15.
7. Collins, H. 2009. Social construction of science. In A Companion to the Philosophy of Technology, pp. 84-97. Ed. by J. Kyrre, B. Olsen, S. A. Pedersen, and V. F. Hendricks. Wiley, Chichester, UK.
8. Cury, P., Shannon, L., and Shin, Y-J. 2003. The functioning of marine ecosystems: A fisheries perspective. In Responsible Fisheries in the Marine Ecosystem, pp. 103-123. Ed. by M. F. Sinclair, and G. Valdimarsson. CABI Press, and FAO, Rome.
9. Cury, P. M., Mullon, C., Garcia, S. M., and Shannon, L. J. 2005. Viability theory for an ecosystem approach to fisheries. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 62: 577-584.
10. De Lara, M., Doyen, L., Guilbaud, T., and Rochet, M-J. 2007. Is a management framework based on spawning-stock biomass indicators sustainable? A viability approach. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 64: 761-767.
11. De Lara, M., and Martinet, V. 2009. Multi-criteria dynamic decision under uncertainty: A stochastic viability analysis and an application to sustainable fishery management. Mathematical Biosciences, 218: 118-124.
12. FAO. 1996a. Precautionary approach to fisheries. 1. Guidelines on the precautionary approach to capture fisheries and species introductions. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, 350/1. 52 pp.
13. FAO. 1996b. Precautionary approach to fisheries. 2. Scientific papers. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper 350/2. 210 pp.
14. FAO and UNEP. 2010. Report of the FAO/UNEP Expert Meeting on Impacts of Destructive Fishing Practices, Unsustainable Fishing, and Illegal, Unreported and Unregulated (IUU) Fishing on Marine Biodiversity and Habitats. Rome, 23-25 September 2009. FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Report, 932. 32 pp.
15. Frid, C. L. J., Scott, C. L., Borges, M. F., Daan, N., Gray, T. S., Hatchard, J., Hill, L., et al. 2005. Developing a fisheries ecosystem plan for the North Sea. In Proceedings of the Symposium on Effects of Fishing Activities on Benthic Habitats: Linking Geology, Biology, Socioeconomics, and Management, pp. 835-836. Ed. by P. Barnes, and J. Thomas. American Fisheries Society Symposium, 41.
16. Gamble, R. J., and Link, J. S. 2009. Analyzing the tradeoffs among ecological and fishing effects on an example fish community: A multispecies (fisheries) production model. Ecological Modelling, 220: 2570-2582.
17. Gill, M., and Johnston, K. 2010. Informing food policy: Balancing the evidence. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 69: 621-627.
18. Gitzen, R. A. 2007. The dangers of advocacy in science. Science, 317: 748.
19. Hannesson, R. 1993. Bio-economic Analysis of Fisheries. Halstead Press, New York. 138 pp.
20. Harwood, J., and Stokes, K. 2003. Coping with uncertainty in ecological advice: Lessons from fisheries. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 18: 617-622.
21. Hilborn, R., and Walters, C. J. 1992. Quantitative Fisheries Stock Assessment: Choice, Dynamics and Uncertainty. Chapman and Hall, London. 570 pp.
22. Holt, C. A., and Peterman, R. M. 2008. Uncertainties in population dynamics and outcomes of regulations in sockeye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka) fisheries: Implications for management. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 65: 1459-1474.
23. Hutchings, J. A. 2001. Conservation biology of marine fishes: Perceptions and caveats regarding assignment of extinction risk. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 58: 108-121.
24. ICES. 2004. Report of the 13th ICES Dialogue Meeting: Advancing Scientific Advice for an Ecosystem Approach to Management: Collaboration amongst Managers, Scientists, and Stakeholders. ICES Cooperative Research Report, 267. 59 pp.
25. Jasanoff, S. 2010. Science and society. Testing time for climate science. Science, 328: 695-696.
26. Kraak, S. B. M., Kelly, C. J., Codling, E. A., and Rogan, E. 2010. On scientists' discomfort in fisheries advisory science: The example of simulation-based fisheries management-strategy evaluations. Fish and Fisheries, 11: 119-132.
27. Løkkeborg, S. 2005. Impacts of trawling and scallop dredging on benthic habitats and communities. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, 472. 69 pp.
28. Pestes, L. R., Peterman, R. M., Bradford, M. J., and Wood, C. C. 2008. Bayesian decision analysis for evaluating management options to promote recovery of a depleted salmon population. Conservation Biology, 22: 351-361.
29. Piet, G. J., and Rice, J. C. 2004. Performance of precautionary reference points in providing management advice on North Sea fish stocks. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 61: 1305-1312.
30. Powles, H., Bradford, M. J., Bradford, M. R., Doubleday, M.W., Innes, M. S., and Levings, C. D. 2000. Assessing and protecting endangered marine species. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 57: 669-676.
31. Punt, A. E., and Donovan, G. P. 2007. Developing management procedures that are robust to uncertainty: Lessons from the International Whaling Commission. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 64: 603-612.
32. Reynolds, J. D., Dulvy, N. K., Goodwin, N. B., and Hutchings, J. A. 2005. Biology of extinction risk in marine fishes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B - Biological Sciences, 272: 2337-2344.
33. Rice, J. C. 2006. Every which way but up: The story of cod in the North Atlantic. Bulletin of Marine Science, 78: 429-465.
34. Rice, J. C., and Legace, E. 2007.When control rules collide: A comparison of fisheries management reference points and IUCN criteria for assessing risk of extinction. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 64: 718-722.
35. Ridgeway, L., and Rice, J. C. 2009. International organisations and fisheries governance. In Handbook of Fisheries, pp. 485-504. Ed. by Q. Grafton, R. Hilborn, and M. Williams. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
36. Rose, G. A. 2007. Cod: The Ecological History of the North American Fisheries. Breakwater Books, St John's, Newfoundland. 590 pp.
37. Scott, C. L. (ed.). 2006. The role of anthropogenic and nonanthropogenic forcing factors on the biology of exploited species. WP 1 Deliverable - Review. Incorporating extrinsic drivers into fisheries management (INEXFISH) Proposal/Contract FP6- 022710. University of Liverpool.
38. Scott, J. M., Rachlow, J. L., Lackey, R. T., Pidgorna, A. B., Aycrigg, J. L., Feldman, G. R., Svancara, L. K., et al. 2007. Policy advocacy in science: Prevalence, perspectives, and implications for conservation biologists. Conservation Biology, 21: 29-35.
39. Seijo, J. C., Defeo, O., and Salas, S. 1998. Fisheries bioeconomics - theory, modelling and management. FAO Fisheries Technical Paper, 368. xiv + 112 pp.
40. Shadish,W. R. 2010. Introduction: The perils of science in the world of policy and practice. Health Psychology, 29: 105-106.
41. Sissenwine, M. P., and Mace, P. M. 2003. Governance for responsible fisheries: An ecosystem approach. In Responsible Fisheries in the Marine Ecosystem, pp. 363-390. Ed. by M. F. Sinclair, and G. Valdimarsson. CABI Press, and FAO, Rome.
42. Swan, J., and Gréboval, D. (eds). 2005. Overcoming factors of unsustainability and overexploitation in fisheries: Selected papers on issues and approaches. In International Workshop on the Implementation of the International Fisheries Instruments and Factors of Unsustainability and Overexploitation in Fisheries, Siem Reap, Cambodia, 13-16 September 2004. FAO Fisheries Report, 782. 352 pp.
43. UNEP and IOC-UNESCO. 2009. An Assessment of Assessments, Findings of the Group of Experts, Start-up Phase of a Regular Process for Global Reporting and Assessment of the State of the Marine Environment including Socio-economic Aspects, 4 Volumes. UNESCO, Paris. ISBN 978-92-807-2976-4.
44. Wickens, T. D. 2001. Elementary Signal Detection Theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK. 288 pp.
45. Wilson, D. S. 2005. Evolutionary social constructivism. In The Literary Animal: Evolution and the Nature of Narrative, pp. 37-49. Ed. by J. Gottshcall, D. S. Wilson, and I. L. Evanston. Northwestern University Press, Evanston, IL.