Scientists' prioritization of global coastal research questions

Marine Policy

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 101-111

  Rudd, Murray A ^a   Lawton, Ricky N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Best worst scaling; Coastal science; Collaboration; Interdisciplinary; Research orientation; Research priorities

Indexed keywords

COASTAL ZONE; COASTAL ZONE MANAGEMENT; ENVIRONMENTAL CHANGE; HETEROGENEITY; POLICY MAKING;

EID: 84870495906     PISSN: 0308597X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2012.09.004     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Lotze H.K., Lenihan H.S., Bourque B.J., Bradbury R.H., Cooke R.G., Kay M.C., et al. Depletion, degradation, and recovery potential of estuaries and coastal seas. Science 2006, 312:1806-1809.
2. Camargo J.A., Alonso Á. Ecological and toxicological effects of inorganic nitrogen pollution in aquatic ecosystems: a global assessment. Environ Int 2006, 32:831-849.
3. Small C., Nicholls R.J. A global analysis of human settlement in coastal zones. J Coastal Res 2003, 19:584-599.
4. Roessig J.M., Woodley C.M., Cech J.J., Hansen L.J. Effects of global climate change on marine and estuarine fishes and fisheries. Rev Fish Biol Fisheries 2004, 14:251-275.
5. Vorosmarty C.J., Green P., Salisbury J., Lammers R.B. Global water resources: vulnerability from climate change and population growth. Science 2000, 289:284-288.
6. Prinn R., Paltsev S., Sokolov A., Sarofim M., Reilly J., Jacoby H. Scenarios with MIT integrated global systems model: significant global warming regardless of different approaches. Clim Change 2010, 1-23.
7. Rudd M.A. How research-prioritization exercises affect conservation policy. Conserv Biol 2011, 25:860-866.
8. Sutherland W.J., Fleishman E., Mascia M.B., Pretty J., Rudd M.A. Methods for collaboratively identifying research priorities and emerging issues in science and policy. Methods Ecol Evol 2011, 2:238-247.
9. Reid W.V., Chen D., Goldfarb L., Hackmann H., Lee Y.T., Mokhele K., et al. Earth system science for global sustainability: grand challenges. Science 2010, 330:916-917.
10. Kremer H.H., Le Tissier M.D.A., Burbridge P.R., Talaue-McManus L., Rabalais N.N., Parslow J., et al. Land-ocean interactions in the coastal zone: science plan and implementation strategy 2005, IGBP Secretariat, Stockholm.
11. Sarewitz D., Pielke R.A. The neglected heart of science policy: reconciling supply of and demand for science. Environ Sci Policy 2007, 10:5-16.
12. Lubchenco J. Entering the century of the environment: a new social contract for science. Science 1998, 279:491-497.
13. Liu J., Dietz T., Carpenter S.R., Alberti M., Folke C., Moran E., et al. Complexity of coupled human and natural systems. Science 2007, 317:1513-1516.
14. Weinstein M.P., Baird R.C., Conover D.O., Gross M., Keulartz J., Loomis D.K., et al. Managing coastal resources in the 21st century. Front Ecol Environ 2007, 5:43-48.
15. Brown L.E., Mitchell G., Holden J., Folkard A., Wright N., Beharry-Borg N., et al. Priority water research questions as determined by UK practitioners and policy makers. Sci Total Envir 2010, 409:256-266.
16. Fleishman E., Blockstein D.E., Hall J.A., Mascia M.B., Rudd M.A., Scott J.M., et al. Top 40 priorities for science to inform US conservation and management policy. BioScience 2011, 61:290-300.
17. Morton S.R., Hoegh-Guldberg O., Lindenmayer D.B., Harriss Olson M., Hughes L., McCulloch M.T., et al. The big ecological questions inhibiting effective environmental management in Australia. Austral Ecol 2009, 34:1-9.
18. Pretty J., Sutherland W.J., Ashby J., Auburn J., Baulcombe D., Bell M., et al. The top 100 questions of importance to the future of global agriculture. Int J Agr Sustain 2010, 8:219-236.
19. Rudd M.A., Beazley K.F., Cooke S.J., Fleishman E., Lane D.E., Mascia M.B., et al. Generation of priority research questions to inform conservation policy and management at a national level. Conserv Biol 2011, 25:476-484.
20. Sutherland W.J., Adam W.M., Aronson R.B., Aveling R., Blackburn T.M., Broad S., et al. One hundred questions of importance to the conservation of global biological diversity. Conserv Biol 2009, 23:557-567.
21. Sutherland W.J., Armstrong-Brown S., Armsworth P.R., Brereton T., Brickland J., Campbell C.D., et al. The identification of 100 ecological questions of high policy relevance in the UK. J Appl Ecol 2006, 43:617-627.
22. Borja A., Bricker S.B., Dauer D.M., Demetriades N.T., Ferreira J.G., Forbes A.T., et al. Overview of integrative tools and methods in assessing ecological integrity in estuarine and coastal systems worldwide. Mar Pollut Bull 2008, 56:1519-1537.
23. Sawtooth Software The MaxDiff/Web 6.0 technical paper 2007, Sawtooth Software Inc., Sequim, WA.
24. Dillman D.A., Smyth J.D., Christian L.M. Internet, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: the tailored design method 2009, John Wiley & Sons, New York. 3rd ed.
25. Sawtooth Software CBC Hierarchical Bayes Analysis technical paper 2000, Sawtooth Software, Inc., Sequim, Washington.
26. Vermunt J.K., Magidson J. Latent class models for classification. Comput Stat Data Anal 2003, 41:531-537.
27. Vermunt J.K., Magidson J. Latent class cluster analysis. Applied latent class analysis 2002, 89-106. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. J.A. Hagenaars, A.L. McCutcheon (Eds.).
28. McLachlan G., Peel D. Finite mixture models 2000, Jon Wiley and Sons, New York.
29. Hagenaars J.A. Latent structure models with direct effects between indicators: local dependence models. Sociol Method Res 1988, 16:379-405.
30. Magidson J. SI-CHAID 4.0 user's guide 2005, Statistical Innovations Inc., Belmont, MA.
31. Nicholls R.J., Wong P.P., Burkett V.R., Codignotto J., Hay J., McLean R., et al. Coastal systems and low-lying areas. Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability contribution of working group ii to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change 2007, 315-356. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. M.L. Parry, O.F. Canziani, J.P. Palutikof, P.J. van der Linden, C.E. Hanson (Eds.).
32. Rudd M.A. Scientists' opinions on the global status and management of biological diversity. Conserv Biol 2011, 25:1165-1175.
33. Sarewitz D. How science makes environmental controversies worse. Environ Sci Policy 2004, 7:385-403.
34. Agardy T., Bridgewater P., Crosby M.P., Day J., Dayton P.K., Kenchington R., et al. Dangerous targets? unresolved issues and ideological clashes around marine protected areas. Aquat Conser 2003, 13:353-367.
35. Roberts C.M., Bohnsack J.A., Gell F., Hawkins J.P., Goodridge R. Effects of marine reserves on adjacent fisheries. Science 2001, 294:1920-1923.
36. Rosenfield P.L. The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences. Soc Sci Med 1992, 35:1343-1357.
37. Fox H.E., Christian C., Nordby J.C., Pergams O.R.W., Peterson G.D., Pyke C.R. Perceived barriers to integrating social science and conservation. Conserv Biol 2006, 20:1817-1820.
38. Weingart P. Interdisciplinarity: the paradoxical discourse 2000, University of Toronto Press, Toronto.
39. Metzger N., Zare R.N. Interdisciplinary research: from belief to reality. Science 1999, 283:642-643.
40. Fay D., Borrill C., Amir Z., Haward R., West M.A. Getting the most out of multidisciplinary teams: a multi-sample study of team innovation in health care. J Occup Organ Psychol 2006, 79:553-567.
41. Redclift M. Dances with wolves? Interdisciplinary research on the global environment. Global Environ Chang 1998, 8:177-182.
42. Campbell L.M. Overcoming obstacles to interdisciplinary research. Conserv Biol 2005, 19:574-577.
43. Lee K., Brownstein J.S., Mills R.G., Kohane I.S. Does collocation inform the impact of collaboration?. PLoS One 2010, 5:e14279.
44. Rhoten D. Interdisciplinary research: trend or transition?. Items and Issues 2004, 5:6-11.
45. Jacobson S.K., Robinson J.G. Training the new conservationist: cross-disciplinary education in the 1990s. Environ Conserv 1990, 17:319-327.
46. Walter I., Nutley S., Davies H. What works to promote evidence-based practice? A cross-sector review. Evidence Policy 2005, 1:335-364.
47. Boxall P.C., Englin J., Adamowicz W.L. Valuing aboriginal artifacts: a combined revealed-stated preference approach. J Environ Econ Manage 2003, 45:213-230.
48. Carayol N., Nguyen Thi T.U. Why do academic scientists engage in interdisciplinary research?. Res Evaluat 2005, 14:70-79.
49. Tress B., Tress G., Fry G. Researchers' experiences, positive and negative, in integrative landscape projects. Environ Manage 2005, 36:792-807.
50. Williamson O. Public and private bureaucracies: a transaction cost economics perspective. J Law Econ Organ 1999, 15:306-341.
51. Rudd M.A., Tupper M.H., Folmer H., van Kooten G.C. Policy analysis for tropical marine reserves: directions and challenges. Fish Fish 2003, 4:65-85.