Policymakers' and scientists' ranks of research priorities for resource-management policy

BioScience

Volumn 64, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 219-228

  Rudd, Murray A ^a   Fleishman, Erica ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

conservation; environmental management; policymaking; research prioritization

Indexed keywords

EID: 84898968938     PISSN: 00063568     EISSN: 15253244     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/biosci/bit035     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Auger P, Devinney TM, Louviere JJ. 2007. Using best-worst scaling methodology to investigate consumer ethical beliefs across countries. Journal of Business Ethics 70: 299-326.
2. Boxall ABA, et al. 2012. Pharmaceuticals and personal care products in the environment: What are the big questions? Environmental Health Perspectives 120: 1221-1229.
3. Braunisch V, Home R, Pellet J, Arlettaz R. 2012. Conservation science relevant to action: A research agenda identified and prioritized by practitioners. Biological Conservation 153: 201-210.
4. Fleishman E, et al. 2011. Top 40 priorities for science to inform US conservation and management policy. BioScience 61: 290-300.
5. Flynn TN, Louviere JJ, Peters TJ, Coast J. 2007. Best-worst scaling: What it can do for health care research and how to do it. Journal of Health Economics 26: 171-189.
6. Gattuso J-P, Mach KJ, Morgan G. 2013. Ocean acidification and its impacts: An expert survey. Climatic Change 117: 725-738.
7. Hackmann H St. Clair AL. 2012. Transformative Cornerstones of Social Science Research for Global Change. International Social Science Council.
8. Hagenaars JA. 1988. Latent structure models with direct effects between indicators: Local dependence models. Sociological Methods and Research 16: 379-405.
9. Hynes S, Hanley N, Scarpa R. 2008. Effects on welfare measures of alternative means of accounting for preference heterogeneity in recreational demand models. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 90: 1011-1027.
10. Lawton JH. 2007. Ecology, politics and policy. Journal of Applied Ecology 44: 465-474.
11. Magidson J, Vermunt JK. 2004. Latent class models. Pages 175-198 in Kaplan D, ed. The Sage Handbook of Quantitative Methodology for the Social Sciences. Sage.
12. Morey E, Thiene M, De Salvo M, Signorello G. 2008. Using attitudinal data to identify latent classes that vary in their preference for landscape preservation. Ecological Economics 68: 536-546.
13. Pahl-Wostl C, Giupponi C, Richards K, Binder C, de Sherbinin A, Sprinz D, Toonen T, van Bers C. 2013. Transition towards a new global change science: Requirements for methodologies, methods, data and knowledge. Environmental Science and Policy 28: 36-47.
14. Pretty J, et al. 2010. The top 100 questions of importance to the future of global agriculture. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 8: 219-236.
15. Rudd MA. 2011. How research-prioritization exercises affect conservation policy. Conservation Biology 25: 860-866.
16. Rudd MA, Lawton RN. 2013. Scientists? prioritization of global coastal research questions. Marine Policy 39: 101-111.
17. Rudd MA, et al. 2011. Generation of priority research questions to inform conservation policy and management at a national level. Conservation Biology 25: 476-484.
18. Scarpa R, Thiene M. 2005. Destination choice models for rock climbing in the Northeastern Alps: A latent-class approach based on intensity of preferences. Land Economics 81: 426-444.
19. Sutherland WJ, et al. 2009. One hundred questions of importance to the conservation of global biological diversity. Conservation Biology 23: 557-567.
20. Sutherland WJ, Fleishman E, Mascia MB, Pretty J, Rudd MA. 2011. Methods for collaboratively identifying research priorities and emerging issues in science and policy. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 2: 238-247.
21. Sutherland WJ, et al. (2012). A collaboratively-derived science-policy research agenda. PLOS ONE 7 (art. e31824).
22. Vermunt JK, Magidson J. 2002. Latent class cluster analysis. Pages 89-106 in Hagenaars JA, McCutcheon AL, eds. Applied Latent Class Analysis. Cambridge University Press.
23. Wedel M, Kamakura W. 2000. Market Segmentation: Conceptual and Methodological Foundations, 2nd ed. Kluwer Academic.