The chilling effect: How do researchers react to controversy? (PLoS Medicine (2008) 5, 11, (e222) DOI:10.1371/journal.pmed.0050222);The chilling effect: how do researchers react to controversy?

PLoS Medicine

Volumn 5, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 1571-1578

  Kempner, Joanna ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CENSORSHIP; FUNDING; INTERVIEW; MEDICAL RESEARCH; POLITICS; SCIENTIST; ADULT; ATTITUDE; ECONOMICS; FEMALE; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HUMAN; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; PEER REVIEW; PERSONNEL; QUESTIONNAIRE; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; ATTITUDE; BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; DATA COLLECTION; FEMALE; FINANCING, GOVERNMENT; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (U.S.); PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; POLITICS; QUESTIONNAIRES; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; RESEARCH SUPPORT AS TOPIC; UNITED STATES;

EID: 56749157659     PISSN: 15491277     EISSN: 15491676     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1000014     Document Type: Erratum

References (41)

1. Mooney C (2005) The republican war on science. New York: Basic Books. 342 p.
2. [No author listed] (2004) Scientific integrity in policymaking: An investigation into the Bush administration's misuse of science. Washington (D. C.): Union of Concerned Scientists. pp 1-49.
3. Shulman S (2007) Undermining science: Suppression and distortion in the Bush administration. Berkeley: University of California Press. 202 p.
4. Simoncelli T, Stanley J (2005) Science under siege: The Bush Administration's assault on academic freedom and scientific inquiry. New York: American Civil Liberties Union.
5. Harris G (2004 May 8). Morning-after pill ruling defies norm. New York Times.
6. Couzin J (2004) Edict limits U.S. speakers at Bangkok conference. Science 304: 499-500.
7. Malec K (2003) The abortion-breast cancer link: How politics trumped science and informed consent. J Am Phys Surg 8: 41-45.
8. Pear R (2008 April 5) Health database was set up to ignore ′abortion.′ New York Times.
9. Pence M, Hensarling J (2007) Republican Study Committee FY 2007 budget: Contract with America RENEWED. Washington (D. C.): Republican Study Committee, Budget and Spending Taskforce, US House of Representatives. pp. 1-75.
10. Carey B (2004November9) Long after Kinsey, only the brave study sex. New York Times.
11. Herbert B (2003November3) The big chill at the lab. New York Times.
12. Editorial Board (2003November19) Sex in the capital city. Los Angeles Times.
13. Drazen JM, Ingelfinger JR (2003) Grants, politics, and the NIH. N Engl J Med. 349: 2259-2261.
14. Leshner AI (2003) Don't let ideology trump science. Science 302: 1479.
15. Merton RK (1957) Social theory and social structure. New York: Free Press. 702 p.
16. Biagioli Med. (1999) The science studies reader. Routledge: New York. 590 p.
17. Greenberg DS (2001) Science, money and politics: Political triumph and ethical erosion. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press. 544 p.
18. Frickel S, Moore Keds (2006) The new political sociology of science: Institutions, networks, and power. Madison (Wisconsin): University of Wisconsin Press. 487 p.
19. Proctor R, Schiebinger L (2008) Agnotology: The making and unmaking of ignorance. Palo Alto (California): Stanford University Press. 312 p.
20. Martin B (1997) Suppression stories. Wollongong (Australia): Fund for Intellectual Dissent. 171 p.
21. Dixon M (1976) Things which are done in secret. Montreal: Black Rose Books. 296 p.
22. Markowitz G, Rosner D (2003) Deceit and denial: The deadly politics of industrial pollution. Berkeley: University of California Press. 408 p.
23. Suchman M (1998) Secrecy in science: The flock worker's lung investigation. Ann Intern Med 129: 341-344.
24. Holton G, Morrison RSeds. (1979) Limits of scientific inquiry. New York: W.W. Norton. 254 p.
25. Hess DJ (1992) Disciplining heterodoxy, circumventing discipline: Parapsychology, anthropologically. Knowledge and Society, Vol. 9: The Anthropology of Science and Technology. Greenwich (Connecticut): JAI Press. pp. 191-222.
26. Stacey J, Biblarz TJ (2001) (How) does the sexual orientation of parents matter? Am Sociol Rev 66: 159-183.
27. Pillar C (2003October28) A trying time for science. Los Angeles Times.
28. Kempner J, Perlis CS, Merz JF (2005) Forbidden knowledge. Science 307:854.
29. Epstein S (2006) The new attack on sexuality research: Morality and the politics of knowledge production. Sex Res Social Policy 3: 1-12.
30. [No author listed] (2003 July 10) H6575. Congressional Record - House. http://frwebgate.access.gpo.gov/cgi-bin/getpage.cgi?dbname=2003_record&page= H6575&position=all
31. Kaiser J (2003) NIH roiled by inquiries over grants hit list. Science 302: 758.
32. Brainard J (2003) NIH begins review of studies that were questioned at a congressional hearing. Chron High Educ 50: A24.
33. Zerhouni E (2004) Letter to Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. Washington (D. C.): US Department of Health and Human Services.
34. Holstein JA, Gubrium JF (1995) The active interview. Thousand Oaks (California): Sage Publications.
35. Glaser BG (1998) Doing grounded theory - Issues and discussions. Mill Valley (California): Sociology Press.
36. Marshall C, Rossman GB (2006) Designing qualitative research. 3rd Edition. Thousand Oaks (California): Sage Publications. 262 p.
37. SPSS (2005) SPSS for Windows, Rel. 14.0.0. Chicago.
38. Goode E (2003 April 18) Certain words can trip up AIDS grants, scientists say. New York Times.
39. Laumann E, Michael RT, Gagnon JH (1994) A political history of the National Sex Survey of Adults. Family Planning Perspectives. Fam Plann Perspect 26: 34-38.
40. United Status Agency for International Development (2005) Acquisition and assistance policy directive (AAPD 05-04). Implementation of the United States Leadership Against HIV/AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria Act of 2003 - Eligibility limitation on the use of funds and opposition to prostitution and sex trafficking. Available: http://www.usaid.gov/business/business_opportunities/ cib/pdf/aapd05_04.pdf. Accessed 18 September 2008.
41. Busza J (2006) Having the rug pulled from under your feet: One project's experience of the US policy reversal on sex work. Health Policy Plan 21:329-332.