Scientific advice and public policy: Expert advisers' and policymakers' discourses on boundary work

Poiesis und Praxis

Volumn 6, Issue 3-4, 2009, Pages 235-263

  Hoppe, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TWENTE   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 68249146518     PISSN: 16156609     EISSN: 16156617     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10202-008-0053-3     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Bal R (1999) Grenzenwerk. Over het organiseren van normstelling voor de arbeidsplek. Twente University Press, Enschede
2. Bal R, Halffman W (eds) (1998) The politics of chemical risk: Scenarios for a regulatory future. Kluwer, Dordrecht
3. Bal R, Bijker W, Hendriks R (2002) Paradox van Wetenschappelijk Gezag: over de Maatschappelijjke Invloed van de Gezondheidsraad. Gezondheidsraad, Den Haag
4. Bemelmans-Videc M-L (1984) Economen in Overheidsdienst. Bijdragen van Nederlandse Economen aan de Vorming van het Sociaal-Economisch Beleid, 1945-1975.Vakgroep Bestuurskunde, Rijksuniversiteit Leiden (dissertation)
5. Brown SR (1980) Political subjectivity: Applications of Q-methodology in political science. Yale University Press, New Haven
6. CPB/MNP/Rand Europe (2008) Dealing with uncertainity in policymaking. Bilthoven
7. den Butter FAG, Morgan MS (eds) (2000) Empirical models and policy making: Interactions and institutions. Routledge, London
8. Diesing P (1991) How does social science work? Reflections on practice. University of Pittsburgh Press, Pittsburgh
9. Ezrahi Y (1990) The descent of Icarus. Science and the transformation of contemporary democracy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
10. Fuller S (2001) Strategies of knowledge integration. Our fragile World: challenges, opportunities for sustainable development. Tolba MK (ed) EOLSS Publishers (for UNESCO), Oxford, pp 1215-1228
11. Halffman W (2003) Boundaries of regulatory science. Eco-toxicology and aquatic hazards of chemicals in the US, England, and the Netherlands, 1970-1995. Albatros, Boechout
12. Halffman W, Hoppe R (2005) Science/policy boundaries: A changing division of labour in Dutch expert policy advice. In: Maasen S, Weingart P (eds) Democratization of expertise? Exploring novel forms of scientific advice in political decision-making. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 135-152
13. Hoppe R (2002a) Van Flipperkast Naar Grensverkeer. Veranderende Visies op de Relatie tussen Wetenschap en Beleid. AWT Achtergrondstudie nr. 25. Adviesraad voor Wetenschap en Technologiebeleid, Den Haag
14. Hoppe R (2002b) Rethinking the puzzles of the science-policy nexus: Boundary traffic, boundary work and the mutual transgression between STS and Policy Studies. In: Paper prepared for the EASST 2002 Conference, 'Responsibility under Uncertainty', York, 31 July-3 August
15. Hoppe R (2005) Rethinking the science-policy nexus: From knowledge utilization and science technology studies to types of boundary arrangements. Poièsis and Praxis. Int J Technol Assess Ethics Sci 3(3):119-215
16. Hoppe R, Huijs S (2003) Werk op de grens tussen wetenschap en beleid: paradoxen en dilemma's, Rapport nr. 54, Den Haag: Raad voor Ruimtelijk, Milieu- en Natuuronderzoek (RMNO)
17. Jasanoff S (1990) The fifth branch: Science advisers as policy makers. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
18. McKeown B, Thomas D (1988) Q methodology. Sage, Newbury Park
19. Meltsner A (1990) Rules for rulers. The politics of advice. Temple UP, Philadelphia
20. Powell MR (1999) Science at EPA. Information in the regulatory process, Resources for the future, Washington, DC
21. Renn O (1995) Styles of using scientific expertise: A comparative framework. Sci Publ Policy 22(3):147-156
22. Roe E (1994) Narrative policy analysis. Theory and praxis. Duke University Press, Durham and London
23. Schmutzer MEA (1994) Ingenium und Individuum. Eine sozialwissenschaftliche Theorie von Wissenschaft und Technik. Springer, Wien
24. Smith BLR (1992) The advisers. Scientists in the policy process. The Brookings Institution, Washington DC
25. Steel B, List P, Lach D, Shindler B (2004) The role of scientists in the environmental policy process: A case study from the American west. Environ Sci Policy 7:1-13
26. Van Dalen H, Klamer A (1996) Telgen van Tinbergen. Het verhaal van de Nederlandse economen, Uitgeverij Balans
27. Van Eeten MJG (2001) Recasting intractable policy issues: The wider implications of the Netherlands civil aviation controversy. J Policy Anal Manag 20(3):319-414
28. Wittrock B (1991) Social knowledge and public policy: Eight models of interaction. In: Wagner P (ed) Social sciences and modern states: national experiences and theoretical crossroads. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
29. Woodhouse EJ, Nieusma D (1997) When expert advice works, and when it does not. In: IEEE technology and society magazine, Spring, pp 23-29
30. Woodhouse EJ, Nieusma D (2001) Democratic expertise: Integrating, knowledge, power and participation. Knowledge, power, and pariticipation in environmental policy analysis. In: Hisschemöller M, Hoppe R, Dunn WN, Ravetz JR (eds) Policy studies review annual, vol 12, pp 73-96