Self-regulated learning: the role of motivation, emotion, and use of learning strategies in students’ learning experiences in a self-paced online mathematics course

Distance Education

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 80-99

  Cho, Moon Heum ^a   Heron, Michele L ^b  

^a Sungkyunkwan University   (South Korea)

^b KENT STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

emotion; learning strategies; motivation; remedial online mathematics; self regulated learning

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928431331     PISSN: 01587919     EISSN: 14750198     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01587919.2015.1019963     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Abar, B., & Loken, E. (2010). Self-regulated learning and self-directed study in a pre-college sample. Learning and Individual Differences, 20, 25–29. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2009.09.002
2. Artino, A. R. (2007). Online military training: Using a social cognitive view of motivation and self-regulation to understand students’ satisfaction, perceived learning and choice. The Quarterly Review of Education, 8, 191–202. Retrieved from http://www.infoagepub.com/quarterly-review-of-distance-education.html
3. Artino, A. R. (2008). Motivational beliefs and perceptions of instructional quality: Predicting satisfaction with online training. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 24, 260–270. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2007.00258.x
4. Artino, A. R. (2009a). Online learning: Are subjective perceptions of instructional context related to academic success? The Internet and Higher Education, 12, 117–125. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2009.07.003
5. Artino, A. R. (2009b). Think, feel, act: Motivational and emotional influences on military students’ online academic success. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 21, 146–166. doi:10.1007/s12528-009-9020-9
6. Azevedo, R., Moos, D. C., Greene, J. A., Winters, F., & Cromley, J. G. (2008). Why is externally-facilitated regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia? Educational Technology Research and Development, 56, 45–72. doi:10.1007/s11423-007-9067-0
7. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
8. Boekaerts, M., & Corno, L. (2005). Self-regulation in the classroom: A perspective on assessment and intervention. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 54, 199–231. doi:10.1111/j.1464-0597.2005.00205.x
9. Brants, L., & Struyven, K. (2009). Literature review of online remedial education: A European perspective. Industry and Higher Education, 23, 269–275. doi:10.5367/000000009789346112
10. Carmichael, C., & Taylor, J. A. (2005). Analysis of student beliefs in a tertiary preparatory mathematics course. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 36, 713–719. doi:10.1080/00207390500271065
11. Cho, M.-H. (2012). Online student orientation in higher education: A developmental study. Educational Technology Research and Development, 60, 1051–1069. doi:0.1007/s11423-012-9271-4
12. Cho, K., & Cho, M.-H. (2013). Training of self-regulated learning skills on a social network system. Social Psychology of Education, 16, 617–634. doi:10.1007/s11218-013-9229-3
13. Cho, M.-H., & Kim, B. J. (2013). Students’ self-regulation for interaction with others in online learning environments. The Internet and Higher Education, 17, 69–75. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2012.11.001
14. Cho, M.-H., & Shen, D. (2013). Self-regulation in online learning. Distance Education, 34, 290–301. doi:10.1080/01587919.2013.835770
15. Kim, C., & Hodges, C. B. (2012). Effects of an emotion control treatment on academic emotions, motivation and achievement in an online mathematics course. Instructional Science, 40, 173–192. doi:10.1007/s11251-011-9165-6
16. Kim, C., Park, S. W., & Cozart, J. (2014). Affective and motivational factors of learning in online mathematics courses. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45, 171–185. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01382.x
17. Kramarski, B., & Gutman, M. (2006). How can self-regulated learning be supported in mathematical E-learning environments? Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 22, 24–33. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2729.2006.00157.x
18. Kuo, Y.-C., Walker, A. E., Schroder, K. E. E., & Belland, B. R. (2014). Interaction, internet self-efficacy, and self-regulated learning as predictors of student satisfaction in online education courses. The Internet and Higher Education, 20, 35–50. doi:10.1016/j.iheduc.2013.10.001
19. Lee, Y., & Choi, J. (2011). A review of online course dropout research: Implications for practice and future research. Educational Technology Research and Development, 59, 593–618. doi:0.1007/s11423-010-9177-y
20. Love, B., Hodge, A., Grandgenett, N., & Swift, A. W. (2014). Student learning and perceptions in a flipped linear algebra course. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 45, 317–324. doi:10.1080/0020739X.2013.822582
21. National Center for Education Statistics. (2003). Remedial education at degree-granting post-secondary institutions in fall 2000. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2004/2004010.pdf
22. National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/about/bdscomm/list/mathpanel/report/final-report.pdf
23. Pajares, F. (1997). Current directions in self-efficacy research. In M. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 10, pp. 1–49). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
24. Pekrun, R. (2006). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: Assumptions, corollaries, and implications for educational research and practice. Educational Psychology Review, 18, 315–341. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9029-9
25. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Daniels, L. M., Stupnisky, R. H., & Perry, R. P. (2010). Boredom in achievement settings: Exploring control-value antecedents and performance outcomes of a neglected emotion. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 531–549. doi:10.1037/a0019243
26. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Frenzel, A. C., Barchfeld, P., & Perry, R. P. (2011). Measuring emotions in students’ learning and performance: The achievement emotions questionnaire (AEQ). Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 36–48. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.10.002
27. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., & Perry, R. P. (2005). Achievement emotions questionnaire (AEQ): User’s manual. Munich: Department of Psychology, University of Munich.
28. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students’ self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational Psychologist, 37, 91–105. doi:10.1207/S15326985EP3702_4
29. Pintrich, P. R. (1989). The dynamic interplay of student motivation and cognition in the college classroom. In C. Ames & M. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Motivation enhancing environments (Vol. 6, pp. 117–160). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
30. Pintrich, P. R. (1999). The role of motivation in promoting and sustaining self-regulated learning. International Journal of Educational Research, 31, 459–470. doi:10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00015-4
31. Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 385–407. doi:1040-726X/04/1200-0385/0
32. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & Mckeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the motivated strategies for learning questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801–813. doi:10.1177/0013164493053003024
33. Rienties, B., Kaper, W., Struyven, K., Tempelaar, D., van Gastel, L., Vrancken, S., … Virgailaitė-Mečkauskaitė, E. (2012). A review of the role of information communication technology and course design in transitional education practices. Interactive Learning Environments, 20, 536–581. doi:10.1080/10494820.2010.542757
34. Scheiter, K., & Gerjets, P. (2007). Learner control in hypermedia environments. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 285–307. doi:10.1007/s10648-007-9046-3
35. Vrugt, A., & Oort, F. (2008). Metacognition, achievement goals, study strategies and academic achievement: Pathways to achievement. Metacognition and Learning, 3, 123–146. doi:10.1007/s11409-008-9022-4
36. Winne, P. H. (2001). Self-regulated learning viewed from models of information processing. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement (pp. 153–189). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
37. Xu, D., & Jaggars, S. S. (2011). Online and hybrid course enrollment and performance in Washington State Community and Technical Colleges. New York, NY: Teachers College.
38. Yukselturk, E., & Bulut, S. (2007). Predictors for student success in an online course. Educational Technology & Society, 10, 71–83. Retrieved from http://www.ifets.info/
39. Zimmerman, B. J. (2011). Motivational sources and outcomes of self-regulated learning and performance. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 49–64). New York, NY: Routledge.
40. Zimmerman, B. J., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1988). Construct validation of a strategy model of student self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 284–290. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.80.3.284
41. Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. (2011). Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance. New York, NY: Routledge.