Language, space and mind: The conceptual geometry of linguistic meaning

Language, Space and Mind: The Conceptual Geometry of Linguistic Meaning

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 1-333

  Chilton, Paul ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84928368351     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511845703     Document Type: Book

References (312)

1. Amorapanth, P., Kranjec, A., Bromberger, B., Matthew Lehet, M., Widick, P., Woods, A.J., Kimberg, D. Y. and Anjan Chatterjee, A. 2012. Language, perception, and the schematic representation of spatial relations. Brain and Language, 120(3): 226-36.
2. Andersen, R. A. 1995. Coordinate transformations and motor planning in posterior parietal cortex. In M. S. Gazzaniga (ed.), The Cognitive Neurosciences, pp. 519-32. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
3. Anderson, J. 1971. The Grammar of Case: Towards a Localist Theory. Cambridge University Press.
4. Anton, H. and Rorres, C. 1991. Elementary Linear Algebra. New York: Wiley.
5. Arbib, M. A. 2005. From monkey-like action recognition to human language: an evolutionary framework for neurolinguistics. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 28(2): 105-67.
6. Arbib, M. A. (ed.) 2006. From Action to Language via the Mirror Neuron System. Cambridge University Press.
7. Arbib, M. A. 2012. How the Brain Got Language: The Mirror System Hypothesis. Oxford University Press.
8. Asher, N. 1987. A typology for attitude verbs and their anaphoric properties. Linguistics and Philosophy, 10(2): 125-97.
9. Asher, N. and Lascarides, A. 2003. Logics of Conversation. Cambridge University Press.
10. Bach, E. 1986. The algebra of events. Linguistics and Philosophy, 9(1): 5-16.
11. Bahr, G. S. 2003. Psychologists’ belief in visual emission. American Psychologist, 58(6-7): 494-6.
12. Baron-Cohen, S. 1995. Mindblindness: An Essay on Autism and Theory of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Baron-Cohen, S., Leslie, A. M. and Frith, U. 1985. Does the autistic child have a theory of mind? Cognition, 21(1): 37-46.
14. Baron-Cohen, S., Ring, H., Moriarty, J., Schmitz, B. and Ell, P. 1994. Recognition of mental state terms: clinical findings in children with autism and functional neuroimaging study of normal adults. British Journal of Psychiatry, 165(5): 640-9.
15. Behrendt, R.-P. 2011. Neuroanatomy of Social Behaviour: An Evolutionary and Psychoanalytic Perspective. London: Karnac Books.
16. Bergen, B. and Chang, N. 2005. Embodied construction grammar in simulation-based language understanding. In J.-O. Östman and M. Fried (eds.), Construction Grammar(s): Cognitive and Cross-Language Dimensions, pp.147-89. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
17. Berti, A. and Rizzolatti, G. 2002. Coding near and far space. In H.-O. Karnath, D. Milner and G. Vallar (eds.), The Cognitive and Neural Bases of Spatial Neglect, pp. 119-30. Oxford University Press.
18. Bloom, P., Peterson, M., Nadel, L. and Garrett, M. (eds.) 1996. Language and Space. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Bolinger, D. 1977. Meaning and Form. London: Longman.
20. Borg, E. 2007. If mirror neurons are the answer, what was the question? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 14(8): 5-19.
21. Boroditsky, L. 2000. Metaphoric structuring: understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75(1): 1-28.
22. Borsley, R. 1996. Modern Phrase Structure Grammar. Oxford: Blackwell.
23. Brisard, F. 2002. The English present. In F. Brisard (ed.), Grounding: The Epistemic Footing of Deixis and Reference, pp. 251-98. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
24. Brugmann, K. 1885. Griechische Grammatik. Munich: Beck.
25. Bühler, K. 1990 [1934]. The Theory of Language: The Representational Function of Language, translated by D. F. Goodwin. Amsterdam: Benjamins. [Translation of Bühler, K. 1934. Sprachtehorie: Die Darstellungsfunktion der Sprache. Stuttgart: Fischer.]
26. Burgess, N. 2002. The hippocampus, space, and viewpoints in episodic memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Section A, 55(4): 1057-80.
27. Burgess, N., Jeffery, K. J. and O’Keefe, J. 2003. The Hippocampal and Parietal Foundations of Spatial Cognition. Oxford University Press.
28. Byrne, R. 2007. The Rational Imagination: How People Create Alternatives to Reality. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
29. Cai, Q., Van Der Haegen, L. and Brysbaert, M. 2013. Complementary hemispheric specialization for language production and visuospatial attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 110(4): E322-30.
30. Carlson, L. 1981. Aspect and quantification. In P. Tedeschi and A. Zaenen (eds.), Tense and Aspect, pp. 31-64. New York: Academic Press.
31. Carlson, L. A. 2010. Parsing space around objects. In Evans and Chilton (eds.), pp. 115-37.
32. Carlson-Radvansky, L. A. and Irwin, D. E. 1993. Frames of reference in vision and language: where is above? Cognition, 46(3): 223-44.
33. Carlson-Radvansky, L. A., Covey, E. and Lattanzi, K., 1999. “What’ effects on “Where’: functional influences on spatial relations. Psychological Science, 10(6): 516-21.
34. Carlson-Radvansky, L. A., West, R., Taylor, H.A. and Herdon, R. W. 2002. Neural correlates of spatial term use. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 28(6): 1391-407.
35. Carreiras, M., Carr, L., Barber, H. A. and Hernandez, A. 2010. Where syntax meets math: right intraparietal sulcus activation in response to grammatical number agreement violations. NeuroImage, 49(2): 1741-9.
36. Chechlacz, M., Rotshtein, P., Bickerton, W.-L., Hansen, P.C., Deb, S. and Humphreys, G.W. 2010. Separating neural correlates of allocentric and egocentric neglect: distinct cortical sites and common white matter disconnections. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 27(3): 277-303.
37. Chilton, P. 2005. Vectors, viewpoint and viewpoint shift: toward a discourse space theory. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics, 3: 78-116.
38. Chilton, P. 2007. Geometrical concepts at the interface of formal and cognitive models: Aktionsart, aspect and the English progressive. Pragmatics and Cognition, 15(1): 91-114.
39. Chilton, P. 2009. Get and the grasp schema: a new approach to conceptual modelling in image schema semantics. In V. Evans and S. Pourcel (eds.), New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics, pp. 331-70. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
40. Chilton, P. 2010a. From mind to grammar: coordinate systems, prepositions, constructions. In Evans and Chilton (eds.), Language, Cognition and Space, pp. 499-514.
41. Chilton, P. 2010b. The conceptual structure of deontic meaning: a model based on geometrical principles. Language and Cognition, 2(2): 191-220.
42. Chilton, P. 2013. Frames of reference and the linguistic conceptualization of time: present and future. In Jaszczolt and Saussure (eds.), pp. 236-58.
43. Chomsky, N. 1957. Syntactic Structures. The Hague: Mouton.
44. Chomsky, N. 1963. Formal properties of grammars. In R. D. Luce, R. Bush and E. Galanter (eds.), Handbook of Mathematical Psychology, vol. 2, pp. 323-418. New York: Wiley.
45. Chomsky, N. 1965. Aspects of the Theory of Syntax. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46. Chomsky, N. 1981. Lectures on Government and Binding: The Pisa Lectures. Dordrecht: Foris.
47. Chomsky, N. 1995. The Minimalist Program. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
48. Chung, S. and Timberlake, A. 1985. Tense, aspect and mood. In T. Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. 3, Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, pp. 202-58. Cambridge University Press.
49. Clark, H. H. 1973. Space, time, semantics and the child. In T. E. Moore (ed.), Cognitive Development and the Acquisition of Language, pp. 28-64. New York: Academic Press.
50. Colby, C. L. and Goldberg, M. E. 1999. Space and attention in parietal cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 22(3): 19-49.
51. Comrie, B. 1976. Aspect: An Introduction to the Study of Verbal Aspect and Related Problems. Cambridge University Press.
52. Cosmides, L. and Tooby, J. 2000. Consider the source: the evolution of adaptations for decoupling and metarepresentations. In D. Sperber (ed.), Metarepresentation: A Multidisciplinary Perspective, pp. 53-115. Oxford University Press.
53. Coull, J. T., and Nobre, A. C. 1998. Where and when to pay attention: the neural systems for directing attention to spatial locations and to time intervals as revealed by both PET and fMRI. Journal of Neuroscience, 18(18): 7426-35.
54. Coull, J. T., Frith, C. D., Büchel, C. and Nobre, A. C. 2000. Orienting attention in time: behavioural and neuroanatomical distinction between exogenous and endogenous shifts. Neuropsychologia, 38(6): 808-19.
55. Coventry, K. R., and Garrod, S. 2004. Saying, Seeing and Acting: The Psychological Semantics of Spatial Prepositions. London: Taylor & Francis.
56. Coventry, K. R., Prat-Sala, M. and Richards, L. 2001. The interplay between geometry and function in the comprehension of over, under, above, and below. Journal of Memory and Language, 44(3): 376-98.
57. Coventry, K. R., Valdés, B., Castillo, A. and Guijarro-Fuentes, P. 2008. Language within your reach: near-far perceptual space and spatial demonstratives. Cognition, 108(3): 889-95.
58. Coventry, K. R., Lynott, D., Cangelosi, A., Monroux, L., Joyce, D. and Richardson, D. C. 2010. Spatial language, visual attention, and perceptual simulation. Brain and Language, 112(3): 202-13.
59. Croft, W. 2001. Radical Construction Grammar: Syntactic Theory in Typological Perspective. Oxford University Press.
60. Croft, W. 2012. Verbs: Aspect and Causal Structure. Oxford University Press.
61. Croft, W. and Cruse, D. A. 2004. Cognitive Linguistics. Cambridge University Press.
62. Dalimier, C. 2001. Introduction. In C. Dalimier (ed. and transl.), Apollonius Dyscolus: Traité des conjonctions. Paris: Vrin.
63. Damasio, H., Grabowski, T. J., Tranel, D., Ponto, L. L., Hichwa, R. D. and Damasio, A. R. 2001. Neural correlates of naming actions and of naming spatial relations, NeuroImage, 13(6): 1053-64.
64. Damourette, J. and Pichon, E. 1911-36. Des mots à la pensée: Essai de grammaire de la langue française. Paris: d’Artrey.
65. Dancygier, B. 1998. Conditionals and Prediction: Time, Knowledge and Causation in Conditional Constructions. Cambridge University Press.
66. Dancygier, B. 2002. Mental space embeddings, counterfactuality, and the use of unless. English Language and Linguistics, 6(2): 347-77.
67. Dancygier, B. and Sweetser, E. 2005. Mental Spaces in Grammar: Conditional Constructions. Cambridge University Press.
68. Deane, P. D. 1996. On Jackendoff’s conceptual semantics. Cognitive Linguistics 7(1): 35-91.
69. Decety, J. and Lamm, C. 2007. The role of the right temporoparietal junction in social interaction: how low-level computational processes contribute to meta-cognition. Neuroscientist, 13(6): 580-93.
70. Di Pellegrino, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V. and Rizzolatti, G. 1992. Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study. Experimental Brain Research, 91(1): 176-80.
71. Dick, A. S. and Tremblay, P. 2013. Beyond the arcuate fasciculus: consensus and controversy in the connectional anatomy of language. Brain, 135(12): 3529-50.
72. Diessel, H. 1999. Demonstratives: Form, Function and Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
73. Diessel, H. 2006. Demonstratives, joint attention, and the emergence of grammar. Cognitive Linguistics, 17(4): 463-89.
74. Dixon, R. M. W. 1982. Where Have All the Adjectives Gone? And Other Essays in Semantics and Syntax. The Hague: Mouton.
75. Dixon, R. M. W. 1984. The semantic basis of syntactic properties. Proceedings of the 10th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp. 583-95.
76. Dixon, R. M. W. 1991. A New Approach to English Grammar, on Semantic Principles. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
77. Dowty, D. R. 1977. Toward a semantic analysis of verb aspect and the English “imperfective’ progressive. Linguistics and Philosophy, 1(1): 45-77.
78. Dowty, D. R. 1979. Word Meaning and Montague Grammar. Dordrecht: Reidel.
79. Dowty, D. R. 1986. The effects of aspectual class on the temporal structure of discourse: semantics or pragmatics? Linguistics and Philosophy, 9(1): 37-61.
80. Duff, M. C., and Brown-Schmidt, S. 2012. The hippocampus and the flexible use and processing of language. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 6: 1-9.
81. Dummett, M. 2006. Thought and Reality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
82. Eckardt, R. 2006. Meaning Change in Grammaticalization: An Enquiry into Semantic Reanalysis. Oxford University Press.
83. Enfield, N. J. 2003. Demonstratives in space and interaction: data from Lao speakers and implications for semantic analysis. Language, 79(1): 82-117.
84. Evans, V. 2004. The Structure of Time: Language, Meaning and Temporal Cognition. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
85. Evans, V. 2009. How Words Mean: Lexical Concepts, Cognitive Models and Meaning Construction. Oxford University Press.
86. Evans, V. and Chilton, P. (eds.) 2010. Language, Cognition and Space: The State of the Art and New Directions. London: Equinox.
87. Evans, V. and Tyler, A. 2004a. Rethinking English “prepositions of movement’: the case of to and through. Belgian Journal of Linguistics, 18(1): 247-70.
88. Evans, V. and Tyler, A. 2004b. Spatial experience, lexical structure and motivation: the case of in. In G. Radden and K. Panther (eds.), Studies in Linguistic Motivation, pp. 157-92. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
89. Fauconnier, G. 1994. Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge University Press.
90. Fauconnier, G. 1996. Analogical counterfactuals. In G. Fauconnier and E. Sweetser (eds.), Spaces, Worlds and Grammar, pp. 57-90. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
91. Fauconnier, G. 1997. Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge University Press.
92. Fauconnier, G. and Turner, M. 2002. The Way We Think. New York: Basic Books.
93. Feldman, J. and Narayanan, S. 2004. Embodiment in a neural theory of language. Brain and Language, 89(2): 385-92.
94. Fillmore, C. J. 1968. The case for case. In E. W. Bach and R. T. Harms (eds.), Universals in Linguistic Theory, pp.1-88. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
95. Fillmore, C. J. 1997 [1975]. Lectures on Deixis. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. [Fillmore, C. J. 1975. Santa Cruz Lectures on Deixis, 1971. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.]
96. Fillmore, C. J. 1982a. Towards a descriptive framework for spatial deixis. In R. J. Jarvella and W. Klein (eds.), Speech, Place and Action, pp. 31-59. Chichester: Wiley.
97. Fillmore, C. J. 1982b. Frame semantics. In Linguistic Society of Korea (ed.), Linguistics in the Morning Calm, pp.111-37. Seoul: Hanshin Publishing Company.
98. Fillmore, C. J. 1985. Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni dei Semantica, 6(2): 222-53.
99. Fillmore, C. J., Kay, P. and O’Connor, C. 1988. Regularity and idiomaticity in grammatical constructions: the case of let alone. Language, 64(3): 501-38.
100. Fischer, M. H. and Zwaan, R. 2008. Embodied language: a review of the motor system in language comprehension. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 61(6): 825-50.
101. Fleischmann, S. 1989. Temporal distance: a basic linguistic metaphor. Studies in Language, 13(1): 1-50.
102. Fodor, J. D. 1983. The Modularity of Mind. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
103. Fogassi, L. and Ferrari, P. F. 2007. Mirror neurons and the evolution of embodied language. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16(3): 136-41.
104. Fogassi, L. and Ferrari, P. F. 2012. Cortical motor organization, mirror neurons, and embodied language: an evolutionary perspective. Biolinguistics, 6(3-4): 308-37.
105. Fox, M. D., Corbetta, M., Snyder, A. Z., Vincent, J. L. and Raichle, M. E. 2006. Spontaneous neuronal activity distinguishes human dorsal and ventral attention systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 103(26): 10 046-51.
106. Francez, I. and Koontz-Garboden, A. 2012. Semantic variation and the grammar of property concepts. University of Chicago and University of Manchester ms. http://ling.auf.net/lingbuzz/
107. Frawley, W. 1992. Linguistic Semantics. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
108. Frege, G. 1956 [1915]. The thought: a logical enquiry. Mind, New Series, 65(259): 289-311. [First published in the Beiträge zur Philosophie des Deutschen Idealismus, 1915-19.]
109. Friederici, A. D. 2009. Pathways to language: fiber tracts in the human brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(4): 175-81.
110. Gallese, V. 2003. A neuroscientific grasp of concepts: from control to representation. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 358: 1231-40.
111. Gallistel, V. 2005. Embodied simulation: from neurons to phenomenal experience. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 4(1): 23-48.
112. Gallese, V. and Goldman, A. 1998. Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mindreading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2(12): 493-501.
113. Gallese, V. and Lakoff, G. 2005. The brain’s concepts: the role of the sensorymotor system in reason and language. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(3-4): 455-79.
114. Gallese, V., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L. and Rizzolatti, G. 1996. Action recognition in the premotor cortex. Brain, 119(2): 593-609.
115. Gallese, V., Fogassi, L., Fadiga, L. and Rizzolatti, G. 2002. Action representation and the inferior parietal lobule. In W. Prinz and B. Hommel (eds.), Attention and Performance, vol. 19, Common Mechanisms in Perception and Action, pp. 334-55. Oxford University Press.
116. Gallese, V., Keysers, C. and Rizzolatti, G. 2004. A unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(9): 396-403.
117. Gallistel, C. R. 1990. The Organization of Learning. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
118. Gallistel, C. R. 1999. Coordinate transformations in the genesis of directed action. In B. O. M. Bly and D. E. Rummelhart (eds.), Cognitive Science, pp. 1-42. New York: Academic Press.
119. Gallistel, C. R. 2002. Language and spatial frames of reference in mind and brain. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(8): 321-2.
120. Gärdenfors, P. 2000. Conceptual Spaces: The Geometry of Thought. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
121. Geach, P. 1967. Intentional identity. Journal of Philosophy, 64(20): 627-32.
122. Geertz, C. 1973. The Interpretation of Cultures. New York: Basic Books.
123. Givón, T. 1982. Evidentiality and epistemic space. Studies in Language, 6(1): 23-49.
124. Givón, T. 2005. Context as Other Minds: The Pragmatics of Sociality, Cognition and Communication. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
125. Glenberg, A. M. and Kaschak, M. P. 2002. Grounding language in action. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9(3): 558-65.
126. Goldberg, A. E. 1995. A Construction Grammar Approach to Argument Structure. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
127. Goldberg, A. E. 2003. Constructions: a new theoretical approach to language. Trends in Cognitive Science, 7(5): 219-224.
128. Goldberg, A. E., and Jackendoff, R. 2004. The English resultative as a family of constructions. Language 80(3): 532-68.
129. Goldsmith, J. and Woisetschlaeger, E. 1982. The logic of the English progressive. Linguistic Inquiry 13: 79-89.
130. Goodale, M. A., and Milner, A. D. 1992. Separate visual pathways for perception and action. Trends in Neuroscience, 15(1): 20-5.
131. Goodman, N. 1947. The problem of counterfactual conditionals. Journal of Philosophy, 44(5): 113-28.
132. Gramann, K., Müller, H. J., Schönebeck, B. and Debus, G. 2006. The neural basis of ego- and allocentric reference frames in spatial navigation: evidence from spatiotemporal coupled current density reconstruction. Brain Research, 1118: 116-29.
133. Griffiths, J. D., Marslen-Wilson, W. D., Stamatakis, E. A. and Tyler, L. K. 2013. Functional organization of the neural language system: dorsal and ventral pathways are critical for syntax. Cerebral Cortex, 23(1): 139-47.
134. Grodzinsky, Y. and Friederici, A. D. 2006. Neuroimaging of syntax and syntactic processing. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 16(2): 240-6.
135. Gruber, J. S. 1976. Lexical Structures in Syntax and Semantics. Amsterdam: North Holland.
136. Haiman, J. 1983. Iconic and economic motivation. Language, 59(4): 781-819.
137. Haiman, J. 1985. Natural Syntax: Iconicity and Erosion. Cambridge University Press.
138. Haspelmath, M. 1997. From Space to Time: Temporal Adverbials in the World’s Languages, Munich: Lincom Europa.
139. Hauser, M. D., Chomsky, N. and Fitch, W. T. 2002. The faculty of language: what is it, who has it, and how did it evolve? Science, 298: 1565-6.
140. Heine, B. 1993. Auxiliaries: Cognitive Forces and Grammaticalization. Oxford University Press.
141. Herskovits, A. 1986. Language and Spatial Cognition: An Interdisciplinary Study of Prepositions in English. Cambridge University Press.
142. Hickok, G. 2009. The functional neuroanatomy of language. Physics of Life Reviews, 6(3): 121-43.
143. Hickok, G. and Poeppel, D. 2004. Dorsal and ventral streams: a framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language. Cognition, 92(1-2): 67-99.
144. Hill, C. 1982. Up/down, front/back, left/right: a contrastive study of Hausa and English. In J. Weissenborn and W. Klein (eds.), Here and There: Cross-Linguistic Studies on Deixis and Demonstration, pp. 11-42. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
145. Hillis, A. E. 2006. Neurobiology of unilateral spatial neglect. Neuroscientist, 12(2): 153-63.
146. Hoffmann, T. and Trousdale, G. (eds.) 2013. Oxford Handbook of Construction Grammar. Oxford University Press.
147. Hopper, P. and Traugott, E. C. 2003. Grammaticalization. Cambridge University Press.
148. Horn, L. R. 1989. A Natural History of Negation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
149. Hurford, J. 2003. The neural basis of predicate-argument structure. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23(6): 261-83.
150. Hurford, J. 2004. Language beyond our grasp: what mirror neurons can, and cannot, do for the evolution of language. In O. Kimbrough and U. Griebel (eds.), Evolution of Communication Systems: A Comparative Approach, pp. 297-313. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
151. Hurford, J. 2007. The Origins of Meaning. Oxford University Press.
152. Iachini, T., Ruggiero, G., Conson, M. and Trojano, L. 2009. Lateralization of egocentric and allocentric spatial processing after parietal brain lesions. Brain and Cognition, 69(3): 514-20.
153. Israel, M. 2004. The pragmatics of polarity. In L. R. Horn and G. Ward (eds.), The Handbook of Pragmatics, pp. 701-23. Oxford: Blackwell.
154. Jackendoff, R. 1975. On belief contexts. Linguistic Inquiry, 6(1): 53-93.
155. Jackendoff, R. 1976. Toward an explanatory semantic representation. Linguistic Inquiry, 7(1): 89-150.
156. Jackendoff, R. 1990. Semantic Structures. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
157. Jackendoff, R. 2002a. Foundations of Language. Oxford University Press.
158. Jackendoff, R. 2002b. The natural logic of rights and obligations. In R. Jackendoff, P. Bloom and K. Wynn (eds.), Language, pp. 67-95. Logic, and Concepts. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
159. Jackendoff, R. 2011. What is the human language faculty? Two views. Language, 87(3): 586-624.
160. Jackendoff, R. and Pinker, S. 2005. The nature of the language faculty and its implications for evolution of language (Reply to Fitch, Hauser, and Chomsky). Cognition, 97(2): 211-25.
161. Jarvella, R. J. and Klein, W. (eds.) 1982. Speech, Place and Action. Chichester: Wiley.
162. Jaszczolt, K. M. 2009. Representing Time: An Essay on Temporality as Modality. Oxford University Press.
163. Jaszczolt, K. and Saussure, L. de (eds.) 2013. Time: Language, Cognition and Reality. Oxford University Press.
164. Jeannerod, M. 1997. The Cognitive Neuroscience of Action. Oxford: Blackwell.
165. Johnson, M. 1987. The Body in the Mind: The Bodily Basis of Meaning, Imagination, and Reason. Chicago, IL: Chicago University Press.
166. Johnson-Laird, P. 1983. Mental Models. Cambridge University Press.
167. Kamp, H. 1984. A theory of truth and semantic representation. In J. Groenendijk, T. M. V. Janssen and M. Stokhof (eds.), Truth, Interpretation and Information, pp. 115-43. Dordrecht: Foris.
168. Kamp, H. and Reyle, U. 1993. From Discourse to Logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
169. Kamp, H., van Genabith, J. and Reyle, U. 2011. Discourse representation theory. In D. M. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds.), Handbook of Philosophical Logic, vol. 15, pp. 125-394. Dordrecht: Springer.
170. Karlsson, F. 2007. Constraints on multiple central embedding of clauses. Journal of Linguistics, 43(2): 365-92.
171. Karnath, H.-O. 2001. New insights into the functions of the superior temporal cortex. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(8): 568-76.
172. Karnath, H.-O., Ferber, S. and Himmelbach, M. 2001. Spatial awareness is a function of the temporal not the posterior parietal lobe. Nature, 411: 950-53.
173. Kaschak, M. P. and Glenberg, A. M. 2000. Constructing meaning: the role of affordances and grammatical constructions in sentence comprehension. Journal of Memory and Language, 43(3): 508-29.
174. Kaufmann, S., Condoravadi, C. and Harizanov, V. 2005. Formal approaches to modality. In W. Frawley (ed.), The Expression of Modality, pp. 71-105. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
175. Kemmerer, D. 1999. “Near’ and “far’ in language and perception. Cognition, 73(1): 35-63.
176. Kemmerer, D. 2000. Grammatically relevant and grammatically irrelevant features of verb meaning can be independently impaired. Aphasiology, 14(10): 997-1020.
177. Kemmerer, D. 2003. Neuropsychological evidence for the distinction between grammatically relevant and irrelevant components of meaning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 26(6): 684-5.
178. Kemmerer, D. 2006a. The semantics of space: integrating linguistic typology and cognitive neuroscience, Neuropsychologia, 44(9): 1607-21.
179. Kemmerer, D. 2006b. Action verbs, argument structure constructions, and the mirror neuron system. In Arbib (ed.), pp. 347-73.
180. Kemmerer, D. 2010. A neuroscientific perspective on the linguistic encoding of categorical spatial relations. In Evans and Chilton (eds.), Language, Cognition and Space, pp. 139-68.
181. Kenny, A. 1963. Action, Emotion and Will. London: Routledge.
182. Keysers, C. and Gazzola, V. 2010. Social neuroscience: mirror neurons recorded in humans. Current Biology, 20(8): R353-R354.
183. King, J. A., Burgess, N. and Hartley, T. 2002, Human hippocampus and viewpoint dependence in spatial memory. Hippocampus, 12(6): 811-20.
184. Kosslyn, S. M. 1987. Seeing and imagining in the cerebral hemispheres: a computational approach. Psychological Review, 94(2): 148-75.
185. Kövecses, Z. 2000. Metaphor and Emotion: Language, Culture, and Body in Human Feeling. Cambridge University Press.
186. Kratzer, A. 1977. What “must’ and “can’ must and can mean. Linguistics and Philosophy, 1(1): 337-55.
187. Kratzer, A. 1981. The notional category of modality. In H.-J. Eikmeyer and H. Rieser (eds.), Words, Worlds and Contexts, pp. 38-74. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
188. Lakoff, G. 1987. Women, Fire and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
189. Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
190. Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. 1999. Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
191. Lakoff, G. and Núñez, R. E. 2000. Where Mathematics Comes From: How the Embodied Mind Brings Mathematics into Being. New York: Basic Books.
192. Landau, B. 2003. Axes and direction in spatial language and cognition. In van der Zee and Slack (eds.), pp. 18-38.
193. Landau, B. and Jackendoff, R. 1993. “What’ and “where’ in spatial language and spatial cognition. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 16(2): 217-38.
194. Langacker, R. W. 1987. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 1. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
195. Langacker, R. W. 1991. Foundations of Cognitive Grammar, vol. 2. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
196. Langacker, R. W. 1995. Viewing in grammar and cognition. In P. W. Davis (ed.), Alternative Linguistics: Descriptive and Theoretical Models, pp. 153-212. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
197. Langacker, R. W. 1999. Virtual reality. Studies in the Linguistic Sciences, 29(2): 77-103.
198. Langacker, R. W. 2001. The English present tense. English Language and Linguistics, 5(2): 251-72.
199. Langacker, R. W. 2011. The English present: temporal coincidence vs. epistemic immediacy. In A. Patard and F. Brisard (eds.), Cognitive Approaches to Tense, Aspect, and Epistemic Modality, pp. 45-86. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
200. Leclercq, M. and Zimmermann, P. 2002. Applied Neuropsychology of Attention: Theory, Diagnosis, and Rehabilitation. London: Psychology Press.
201. Leslie, A. M. and Frith, U. 1988. Autistic children’s understanding of seeing, knowing and believing. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 6(4): 315-324.
202. Levin, B. 1993. English Verb Classes and Alternations: A Preliminary Investigation. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
203. Levinson, S. 1996. Frames of reference and Molyneux’s questions: cross-linguistic evidence. In Bloom et al. (eds.), pp. 109-69.
204. Levinson, S. 2003. Space in Language and Cognition: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity. Cambridge University Press.
205. Levinson, S. 2004. Deixis. In L. R. Horn and G. Ward (eds.), The Handbook of Pragmatics, pp. 97-121. Oxford: Blackwell.
206. Levinson, S. C., and Meira, S. 2003. “Natural concepts’ in the spatial topological domain: adpositional meanings in crosslinguistic perspective - an exercise in semantic typology. Language, 79(3): 485-516.
207. Lewis, D. 1973. Counterfactuals. Oxford: Blackwell.
208. Livnat, Z. 2002. From epistemic to deontic modality: evidence from Hebrew. Folia Linguistica Historica, 23(1-2): 107-14.
209. Lonergan, B. 1957. Insight: A Study of Human Understanding. London: Longman.
210. Lucy, J. 1992. Language Diversity and Thought: A Reformulation of the Linguistic Relativity Hypothesis. Cambridge University Press.
211. Lyons, J. 1975. Deixis as the source of reference. In E. L. Keenan (ed.), Formal Semantics of Natural Language, pp. 61-83. Cambridge University Press.
212. Lyons, J. 1977. Semantics. Cambridge University Press.
213. MacKay, D. G. 2011. Hippocampus. In P. C. Hogan (ed.), The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the Language Sciences, pp. 357-59. Cambridge University Press.
214. Macnamara, J. 1991. The development of moral reasoning and the foundations of geometry. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour, 21(2): 121-50.
215. Malchukov, A., Haspelmath, M. and Comrie, B. 2010. Ditransitive constructions: a typological overview. In A. Malchukov, M. Haspelmath and B. Comrie (eds.), Studies in Ditransitive Constructions: A Comparative Handbook, pp. 1-64. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
216. Mandler, J. M. 2004. The Foundations of Mind: The Origins of Conceptual Thought. Oxford University Press.
217. McGilchrist, I. 2010. The Master and his Emissary: The Divided Brain and the Making of the Western World. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
218. Michaelis, L. 1998. Aspectual Grammar and Past Time Reference. London: Routledge.
219. Michaelis, L. 2004. Type shifting in construction grammar: an integrated approach to aspectual coercion. Cognitive Linguistics, 15(1): 1-67.
220. Michaelis, L. 2006. Time and tense. In B. Aarts and A. McMahon (eds.), The Handbook of English Linguistics, pp. 220-34. Oxford: Blackwell.
221. Milner, A. D. and Goodale, M. A 1995. The Visual Brain in Action. Oxford University Press.
222. Nagel, T. 1986. The View from Nowhere. Oxford University Press.
223. O’Keefe, J. 1996. The spatial prepositions in English, vector grammar, and the cognitive map theory. In P. Bloom et al. (eds.), pp. 277-316.
224. O’Keefe, J. 2003. Vector grammar, places, and the functional role of the spatial prepositions in English. In van der Zee and Slack (eds.), pp. 69-85.
225. O’Keefe, J. and Burgess, N. 1996. Geometric determinants of the place fields of hippocampal neurons. Nature, 381: 425-8.
226. O’Keefe, J. and Nadel, L. 1978. The Hippocampus as a Cognitive Map. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
227. Paillard, J. 1991. Motor and representational framing of space. In J. Paillard (ed.), Brain and Space, pp. 163-82. Oxford University Press.
228. Palmer, F. 1986. Mood and Modality. Cambridge University Press.
229. Papafragou, A. 1998. The acquisition of modality: implications for theories of semantic representation. Mind and Language, 13(3): 370-99.
230. Papafragou, A. 2000. Modality: Issues in the Semantic-Pragmatic Interface. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
231. Papafragou, A. and Ozturk, O. 2006. The acquisition of epistemic modality. In A. Botinis (ed.), Proceedings of ITRW on Experimental Linguistics in ExLing-2006, pp. 201-4. Online archive: International Speech Communication Association.
232. Petitot, J. 1995. Morphodynamics and attractor syntax: constituency in visual perception and cognitive grammar. In R. F. Port and T. van Gelder (eds.), Mind as Motion: Explorations in the Dynamics of Cognition, pp. 227-81. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
233. Piaget, J. 1954 [1937]. The Construction of Reality in the Child. New York: Basic Books. [Piaget, J. 1937. La construction du réel chez l’enfant. Paris: Delachaux et Niestlé.]
234. Piaget, J. 1967 [1926]. The Child’s Conception of the World. Totowa, NJ: Littlefield, Adams & Co. [Piaget, J. 1926. La représentation du monde chez l’enfant. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.]
235. Piaget, J. and Inhelder, B. 1971 [1966]. Mental Imagery in the Child. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul. [Piaget, J. 1966. L’image mentale chez l’enfant: Études sur le développement des représentations imaginées. Paris: Presses universitaires de France.]
236. Pinker, S. 1997. How the Mind Works. New York: Norton.
237. Piwek, P., Beun, R-J. and Cremers, A. 2007. “Proximal’ and “distal’ in language and cognition: evidence from deictic demonstratives in Dutch. Journal of Pragmatics, 40(4): 694-718.
238. Portner, P. 2009. Modality. Oxford University Press.
239. Postal, P. 1974. On Raising: One Rule of English Grammar and its Theoretical Implications. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
240. Premack, D. and Premack, A. J. 1994. Moral belief: form versus content. In L. A. Hirschfeld and S. A. Gelman (eds.), Mapping the Mind: Domain Specificity in Cognition and Culture, pp. 149-68. Cambridge University Press.
241. Premack, D. and Woodruff, G. 1978. Does the chimpanzee have a “theory of mind’? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 4: 515-26.
242. Previc, F. H. 1990. Functional specialization in the lower and upper visual fields in humans: its ecological origins and neurophysiological implications. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 13(3): 519-75.
243. Pulvermüller, F. 2010. Brain embodiment of syntax and grammar: discrete combinatorial mechanisms spelt out in neuronal circuits. Brain and Language, 112(3): 167-79.
244. Pulvermüller, F. and Fadiga, L. 2010. Active perception: sensorimotor circuits as a cortical basis for language. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 11(5): 351-60.
245. Quine, W. V. O. 1960. Word and Object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
246. Radden, G. 2004. The metaphor time as space across languages. In N. Baumgarten, C. Böttger, M. Motz and J. Probst (eds.), Übersetzen, Interkulturelle Kommunikation, Spracherwerb und Sprachvermittlung - das Leben mit mehreren Sprachen: Festschrift für Juliane House zum 60. Geburtstag, pp. 225-38. Bochum: AKS-Verlag.
247. Ramachandran, V. S., Altschuler, E. L. and Hillier, S. 1997. Mirror agnosia. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B, 264: 645-7.
248. Recanati, F. 2007. Perspectival Thought: A Plea for (Moderate) Relativism. Oxford University Press.
249. Regier, T. and Carlson, L. 2001. Grounding spatial language in perception: an empirical and computational investigation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(2): 273-98.
250. Reichenbach, H. 1947. Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York: Macmillan.
251. Rizzolatti, G. and Arbib, M. A. 1998. Language within our grasp. Trends in Neurosciences, 21(5): 188-94.
252. Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., Fogassi, L. 1996. Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cognitive Brain Research, 3(2): 131-41.
253. Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Fogassi, L. and Gallese, V. 1997. The space around us. Science, 277: 190-1.
254. Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L. and Gallese, V. 2001. Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 2(9): 661-70.
255. Rosenbaum, P. 1967. The Grammar of English Predicate Complement Constructions. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
256. Rothstein, S. 2004. Structuring Events. Oxford: Blackwell.
257. Russell, B. 1905. On denoting. Mind, New Series, 14(56): 479-93.
258. Ryle, G. 1949. The Concept of Mind. London: Hutchinson.
259. Samson, D., Apperly, I. A., Braithwaite, J. J., Andrews, B. J. and Bodley Scott, S. E. 2010. Seeing it their way: evidence for rapid and involuntary computation of what other people see. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 36(5): 1255-66.
260. Saur, D., Kreher, B. W., Schnell, S., Kümmerer, D., Kellmeyer, P., Vrya, M.-S., Roza, U., Musso, M., Glauche, V., Abel, S., Huber, W., Rijntjes, M., Hennig, J. and Weiller, C. 2008. Ventral and dorsal pathways for language. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 105: 18 035-40.
261. Saussure, L. de. 2003. Temps et pertinence: Élements de pragmatique cognitive du temps. Brussels: de Boeck & Larcier.
262. Saussure, L. de. 2013. Perspectival interpretations of tenses. In Jaszczolt and de Saussure (eds.), pp. 46-69.
263. Saussure, L. de and Morency, P. 2012. A cognitive-pragmatic view of the French epistemic future. Journal of French Language Studies, 22(2): 207-23.
264. Siewierska, A. 1998. Languages with and without objects. Languages in Contrast, 1(2): 173-90.
265. Sinha, C. and Jensen de Lopez, K. 2000. Language, culture and the embodiment of spatial cognition. Cognitive Linguistics, 11(1-2): 17-41.
266. Sperber, D. (ed.) 2000. Metarepresentation: A Multidisciplinary Perspective. Oxford University Press.
267. Stalnaker, R. 1968. A theory of conditionals. In N. Rescher (ed.), Studies in Logical Theory, pp. 98-112. Oxford: Blackwell.
268. Stamenov, M. I., and Gallese, V. 2002. Mirror Neurons and the Evolution of Brain and Language. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
269. Sthioul, B. 1998. Temps verbaux et points de vue. In J. Moeschler, J. Jayez, M. Kozlowska, J.-M. Luscher, B. Sthioul and L. de Saussure (eds.), Le temps des événements, pp. 197-220. Paris: Kimé.
270. Strawson, P. F. 1950. On referring. Mind New Series, 59(235): 320-44.
271. Suchan, J. and Karnath, H.-O. 2011. Spatial orienting by left hemisphere language areas: a relict from the past? Brain, 134(10): 3059-70.
272. Sweetser, E. 1982. Root and epistemic modals: causality in two worlds. Proceedings of the 8th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society, pp. 484-507.
273. Sweetser, E. 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge University Press.
274. Sweetser, E. 1996. Mental spaces and the grammar of conditional constructions. In G. Fauconnier and E. Sweetser (eds.), Space, Worlds and Grammar, pp. 318-33. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
275. Talmy, L. 2000 [1983]. How language structures space. In L. Talmy, 2000, vol. 1, pp. 177-254. [Earlier version in H. L. Pick and L. Acredolo (eds.), Spatial Orientation: Theory, Research and Application, pp. 225-82. New York, Plenum Press, 1983.]
276. Talmy, L. 2000 [1985]. Lexicalization patterns. In L. Talmy, 2000, vol. 2, pp. 21-135. [Earlier version in T. Shopen (ed.), Language Typology and Syntactic Description, vol. 3, Grammatical Categories and the Lexicon, pp. 66-168. Cambridge University Press, 1985.]
277. Talmy, L. 2000 [1988]. Force dynamics in language and cognition. In L. Talmy, 2000, vol. 1, pp. 409-70. [Earlier version in Cognitive Science, 2(1): 49-100.]
278. Talmy, L. 2000. Toward a Cognitive Semantics, 2 vols. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
279. Taniwaki, Y. 2005. Achievement verbs and progressive meanings. Journal of Osaka Sangyo University. Humanities, 117: 41-54.
280. Thom, R. 1970. Topologie et linguistique. In A. Haeflinger and R. Narasimham (eds.), Essays on Topology and Related Topics, pp. 226-48. New York: Springer.
281. Tomasello, M. 1999. The Cultural Origins of Human Cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
282. Tomasello, M. (ed.) 2003. The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, vol. 2. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
283. Tomasello, M. 2008. Origins of Human Communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
284. Traugott, E. C. 1989. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: an example of subjectification in semantic change. Language, 65(1): 31-55.
285. Trojano, L., Conson, M., Maffei, R. and Grossi, D. 2006. Categorical and coordinate spatial processing in the imagery domain investigated by rTMS. Neuropsychologia, 44(9): 1567-9.
286. Tyler, A. and Evans, V. 2001. Reconsidering prepositional polysemy networks: the case of over. Language, 77(4): 724-65.
287. Tyler, A. and Evans, V. 2003. The Semantics of English Prepositions: Spatial Scenes, Embodied Meaning and Cognition. Cambridge University Press.
288. Ungerleider, L. G. and Mishkin, M. 1982. Two cortical systems. InD. J. Ingle and R. J.W. Mansfield, Analysis of Visual Behavior, pp. 549-86. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
289. Vandeloise, C. 1991 [1986]. Spatial Prepositions: A Case Study from French. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press. [Vandeloise, C. 1986. L’espace en franc¸ais: sémantique des prépositions spatiales. Paris: Seuil (Travaux Linguistiques).]
290. van der Zee, E. and Slack, J. (eds.) 2003. Representing Direction in Language and Space. Oxford University Press.
291. van Hoek, K. 2003. Pronouns and point of view: cognitive principles of coreference. In M. Tomasello (ed.), The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, vol. 2, pp. 169-94. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
292. Van Valin, R. D. 2001. An Introduction to Syntax. Cambridge University Press.
293. van Zomeren, A. H., and Brouwer, W. H. 1994. Clinical Neuropsychology of Attention. Oxford University Press.
294. Vendler, Z. 1957. Verbs and times. Philosophical Review, 66(2): 143-60.
295. Weiss, P. H., Marshall, J. C., Wunderlich, G., Tellmann, L., Halligan, P. W., Freund, H. J., Zilles, K. and Fink, G. R. 2000. Neural consequences of acting in near versus far space: a physiological basis for clinical dissociations. Brain, 123(12): 2531-41.
296. Werth, P. 1997a. Conditionality as cognitive distance. In A. Athanasiadou and R. Dirven (eds.), On Conditionals Again, pp. 243-71. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
297. Werth, P. 1997b. Remote worlds: the conceptual representation of linguistic would. In J. Nuyts and E. Pederson (eds.), Language and Conceptualisation, pp. 84-115. Cambridge University Press.
298. Werth, P. 1999. Text Worlds: Representing Conceptual Space in Discourse. London: Longman.
299. Whiten, A. (ed.). 1991. Natural Theories of Mind: Evolution, Development and Simulation of Everyday Mindreading. Oxford: Blackwell.
300. Widdows, D. 2004. Geometry and Meaning. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
301. Wierzbicka, A. 1988. The Semantics of Grammar. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
302. Wimmer, H. and Perner, J. 1983. Beliefs about beliefs: representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children’s understanding of deception. Cognition, 13(1): 103-28.
303. Winer, G. A., and Cottrell, J. E. 2002. Fundamentally misunderstanding visual perception: adults’ belief in visual emissions. American Psychologist, 57(6-7): 417-24.
304. Winter, S. and Gärdenfors, P. 1995. Linguistic modality in expressions of social power. Nordic Journal of Linguistics, 18(2): 137-65.
305. Wolff, P. 2007. Representing causation. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 136(1): 82-111.
306. Wolff, P. and Zettergren, M. 2002. A vector model of causal meaning. In W. D. Gray and C. D. Schunn (eds.), Proceedings of the 24th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 944-9. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
307. Yu, N. 1998. The Contemporary Theory of Metaphor: A Perspective from Chinese. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
308. Zwarts, J. 1997. Vectors as relative positions: a compositional semantics of modified PPs. Journal of Semantics, 14(1): 57-86.
309. Zwarts, J. 2003. Vectors across spatial domains: from place to size, orientation, shape, and parts. In van der Zee and Slack (eds.), pp. 39-68.
310. Zwarts, J. 2005. Prepositional aspect and the algebra of paths. Linguistics and Philosophy, 28(6): 739-79.
311. Zwarts, J. 2010. Forceful prepositions. In Evans and Chilton (eds.), pp. 193-213.
312. Zwarts, J. and Winter, Y. 2000. Vector space semantics: a model-theoretic account of locative prepositions. Journal of Logic, Language and Information, 9(2): 171-213.