Meaning Change in Grammaticalization: An Enquiry into Semantic Reanalysis

Meaning Change in Grammaticalization: An Enquiry into Semantic Reanalysis

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 1-296

  Eckardt, Regine ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GÖTTINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Determiner; Focus; Future tense; Negation; Pragmatics; Reanalysis; Syntax semantics interface; Truth conditional semantics

Indexed keywords

EID: 84920599824     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199262601.001.0001     Document Type: Book

References (287)

1. ABRAHAM, WERNER. 1991. The grammaticalization of the German modal particles. In: Elizabeth C. Traugott and Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: ii: 331-80.
2. ABRAHAM, WERNER. 2001. How far does semantic bleaching go? About grammaticalization that does not terminate in functional categories. In Jan Terje Faarlund (ed.), Grammatical Relations in Change. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 15-64.
3. ANDERSEN, HENNING. 1973. Abductive and deductive change. Language, 49: 765-93.
4. ANDERSEN, HENNING. 2001a. Markedness and the theory of change. In Henning Andersen (ed.), Actualization: Linguistic Change in Progress. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 21-58.
5. ANDERSEN, HENNING. 2001. Actualization and the (uni)directionality of change. In Henning Andersen (ed.), Actualization: Linguistic Change in Progress. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 225-48.
6. ANDERSEN, HENNING. (ed.) 2001c. Actualization: Linguistic Change in Progress. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 219. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
7. ASHBY, WILLIAM J. 1991. When does variation indicate linguistic change in progress? Journal of French Language Studies, 1: 1-19.
8. ASHER, NICHOLAS. 1993. Reference to Abstract Objects in Discourse. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
9. ASHER, NICHOLAS. and LASCARIDES, ALEX. 1998. Questions in dialogue. Linguistics and Philosophy, 21: 237-310.
10. AUWERA, JOHAN VAN DER. 2002. More thoughts on degrammaticalization. In Ilse Wischer and Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New Reflections on Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 19-29.
11. BACH, EMMON. 1989. Informal Lectures on Formal Semantics. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.
12. BACH, EMMON. JELINEK, ELOISE, KRATZER, ANGELIKA, and PARTEE, BARBARA H. (eds.). 1995. Quantification in Natural Languages. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 54. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
13. BAKER, CARL LEROY. 1995. Contrast, discourse prominence, and intensification, with special reference to locally free reflexives in British English. Language, 71: 63-102.
14. BARCELONA, ANTONIO. (ed.) 2000. Metaphor and Metonymy at the Crossroads: A Cognitive Perspective. Topics in English Linguistics 30. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
15. BARTSCH, RENATE. 2002. Consciousness Emerging: The Dynamics of Perception, Imagination, Action, Memory, Thought, and Language. AiCR 39. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
16. BARTH-WEINGARTEN, DAGMAR, and COUPER-KUHLEN, ELIZABETH. 2002. On the development of final though: a case of grammaticalization? In Ilse Wischer and Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New Reflections on Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 345-62.
17. BATLLORI, MONTSE, HERNANZ, MARIA-LLUÏSA, PICALLO, CARME, and ROCA, FRANCESC (eds.). 2005. Grammaticalization and Parametric Variation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. BEAVER, DAVID. 2004. Five only pieces. Theoretical Linguistics, 30: 45-64.
19. BEAVER, DAVID. and CLARK, BRADY. 2003. Always and only: why not all focus sensitive operators are alike. Natural Language Semantics, 11/4: 323-62.
20. BENVENISTE, ÉMILE. 1960. Etre et avoir dans leur fonctions linguistiques. Bulletin de la Societe Linguistique de Paris, 54:237-50.
21. BENVENISTE, ÉMILE. 1968. Mutations of linguistic categories. In Winifred P. Lehman and Yakov Malkiel (eds.), Directions for Historical Linguistics. Austin: University of Texas Press: 83-94.
22. BIERINGER, ERNST. 1910. Der mittel-und neufranzösische direkte Fragesatz. Göttingen: Dietrichsche Universitäts-Buchdruckerei.
23. BIERWISCH, MANFRED. 1987. Grammatische und konzeptuelle Aspekte von Dimensions-Adjektiven. Berlin: Akademie-Verlag.
24. BIERWISCH, MANFRED.. (ed.) 1989. Dimensional Adjectives: Grammatical Structure and Conceptual Interpretation. Springer Series in Language and Communication 26. Berlin: Springer.
25. BIERWISCH, MANFRED. and LANG, EWALD (eds.). 1989. Dimensional Adjectives. Grammatical Structure and Conceptual Interpretation. Berlin: Springer.
26. BIERWISCH, MANFRED. ZIMMERMANN, ILSE, LANG, EWALD, DÖLLING, JOHANNES, GEORGE, KARIN, and BLUTNER, REINHARD. 1984. Dimensionsadjektive: Semantische Struktur und begriffliche Interpretation. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationsforschung, 37/4(6): 490-512.
27. BLANK, ANDREAS. 1997. Prinzipien des lexikalischen Bedeutungswandels am Beispiel der romanischen Sprachen. Beihefte zur Zeitschrift für romanische Philologie 285. Berlin: Niemeyer.
28. BLANK, ANDREAS. 2003. Words and Concepts in Time. In Regine Eckardt, Klaus v. Heusinger, and Christoph Schwarze (eds.) Words in Time: Diachronic Semantics from Different Points of View. Berlin: de Gruyter: 37-66.
29. BLANK, ANDREAS. and KOCH, PETER (eds.). 2000. Historical Semantics and Cognition. Berlin: de Gruyter.
30. BORKIN, A. 1971. Polarity items in questions. Chicago Linguistic Society, 7: 53-62.
31. BORRIES, ERNST VON and BORRIES, ERIKAVON. 1991. Deutsche Literaturgeschichte, i: Mittelalter, Humanismus, Reformationszeit, Barock. Munich: Deutscher Taschen-buch Verlag.
32. BOTNE, ROBERT. 1998. The evolution of future tenses from serial 'say' constructions in central eastern Bantu. Diachronica, 15/2: 207-30.
33. BRINTON, LAUREL J. 1988. The Development of English Aspectual Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34. BRINTON, LAUREL J. 1996. Pragmatic Markers in English: Grammaticalization and Discourse Functions. Topics in English Linguistics 19. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
35. BÜRING, DANIEL. 1996. The 59th Street Bridge Accent. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Tübingen. Repr. London: Routledge.
36. BÜRING, DANIEL. 1997. The great scope inversion conspiracy. Linguistics and Philosophy, 20: 175-94.
37. BÜRING, DANIEL. 2003. On D-trees, beans and B-accents. Linguistics and Philosophy, 26/5: 511-45.
38. BUTT, MIRIAM, and GEUDER, WILHELM. 2001. On the (semi)lexical status of light verbs. In Norbert Corver and Henk van Riemsdijk (eds.), Semi-lexical Categories: On the Content of Functions Words and the Function of Content Words. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter: 323-70.
39. BUTT, MIRIAM, and GEUDER, WILHELM. 2003. Light verbs in Urdu and grammaticalization. In R. Eckardt, K. von Heusinger, and C. Schwarze (eds.), Words in Time. Berlin: Mouton deGruyter.
40. BYBEE, JOAN. 2003. The development of the category auxiliary in English. Plenary lecture given at the International Conference on Historical Linguistics 2003, Copenhagen.
41. BYBEE, JOAN. PERKINS, REVERE, and PAGLIUCA, WILLIAM. 1994. The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
42. CAMPBELL, LYLE. 2001. What's wrong with grammaticalization? In Lyle Campbell and Richard D. Janda (eds.), Grammaticalization: A Critical Assessment, Language Sciences, 232-233: 113-62.
43. CAMPBELL, LYLE. and JANDA, RICHARD D. 2001. Introduction: conceptions of grammaticalization and their problems. In Lyle Campbell and Richard D. Janda (eds.), Grammaticalization: A Critical Assessment, Language Sciences, 232-233: 93-112.
44. CANN, RONNIE. 1993. Formal Semantics: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. CAREY, KATHLEEN. 1994. The grammaticalization of the perfect in Old English: an account based on pragmatics and metaphor. In William Pagliuca (ed.), Perspectives on Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 103-17.
46. CATALANI, LUIGI. 2001. Die Negation im Mittelfranzösischen. Frankfurt: Lang.
47. CHIERCHIA, GENNARO. 1995. Dynamics of Meaning: Anaphora, Presupposition and the Theory of Grammar. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48. CHIERCHIA, GENNARO. and MCCONNELL-GINET, SALLY. 1990. Meaning and Grammar: An Introduction to Semantics. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
49. CHIERCHIA, GENNARO. 2000. Meaning and Grammar: An introduction to semantics, 2nd edn. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
50. COUPER-KUHLEN, ELIZABETH, and KORTMANN, BERND (eds.). 2000. Cause, Condition, Concession, Contrast. Topics in Engish Linguistics 33. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
51. DANCHEV, ANDREI, and KYTÖ, MERJA. 1994. The construction be going to + infinitive in Early Modern English. In Dieter Kastovsky (ed.), Studies in Modern English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter: 59-78.
52. DAVIDSON, DONALD. 1967. The logical form of action sentences. In N. Rescher (ed.), The Logic of Decision and Action. Pittsburgh: Pittsburgh University Press: 81-95. Reprinted in Donald Davidson, Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1980.
53. DEKKER, PAUL. 1993. Transsentential Meditations: Ups and Downs in Dynamic Semantics. ILLC dissertation series 1. Amsterdam.
54. DETGES, ULRICH. 1999. Wie entsteht Grammatik? Kognitive und pragmatische Determinanten der Grammatikalisierung von Tempusmarkern. In Jürgen Lang and Ingrid Neumann-Holzschuh (eds.), Reanalyse und Grammatikalisierung in den romanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Niemeyer Verlag: 31-52.
55. DIETRICH, W. 1987. La Grammaticalisation du passé composé dans les langues romanes. In C. Buridant (ed.), Romanistique-germanistique: une confrontation. Actes du Colloque de Strasbourg organisé par le Centre de Philologie Romane. Strasbourg: Association des Publications près les Universités de Strasbourg: 81-96.
56. DIETZE, WALTER. 1963. Quirinus Kuhlmann, Ketzer und Poet. Berlin: Rütten und Loenning.
57. DIEWALD, GABRIELE. 2002. A model for relevant types of contexts in grammaticalization. In Ilse Wischer and Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New Reflections on Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 103-20.
58. DIEZ, FRIEDRICH. 1877. Grammatik der romanischen Sprachen, vol. iii. Bonn: Weber.
59. DIK, S. C. 1977. Inductive generalizations in semantic change. In Paul Hopper (ed.), Festschrift for Winfred P. Lehmann. Amsterdam: Benjamins: 283-300.
60. DIRVEN, RENÉ. 2000. Cognitive linguistics. LAUD, Linguistic Agency, Universität Gesamthochschule Essen: Series A, General and Theoretical Papers 515. Essen: LAUD.
61. DIRVEN, RENÉ. and PÖRINGS, RALF (eds.). 2002. Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast. Cognitive Linguistics Research 20. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
62. DIRVEN, RENÉ. and VERSPOOR, MARJOLIN. 1998. Cognitive Exploration of Language and Linguistics. Cognitive Linguistics in Practice 1. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
63. DOES, JAAP VAN DER, and LAMBALGEN, MICHIEL. 2000. A logic of vision. Linguistics and Philosophy, 23/1: 1-99.
64. DÖLLING, JOHANNES. 1995. Ontological domains, semantic sorts and systematic ambiguity. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 43: 785-807.
65. DÖLLING, JOHANNES. 1997. Semantic form and abductive fixation of parameters. In Rob van der Sandt, Reinhard Blutner, and Manfred Bierwisch (eds.), From Underspecification to Interpretation. Working Papers of the Institute of Logic and Linguistics. Heidelberg: IBM Germany: 113-39.
66. DOWTY, DAVID R., WALL, ROBERT E. and PETERS, STANLEY. 1981. Introduction to Montague Semantics. Synthese Language Library 11. Dordrecht: Reidel.
67. ECKARDT, REGINE. 1999. Focus with nominal quantifiers. In Peter Bosch and Rob van der Sandt (eds.), The Focus Book. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 166-87.
68. ECKARDT, REGINE. 2001. Reanalysing 'selbst'. Natural Language Semantics, 9: 371-412.
69. ECKARDT, REGINE. 2002. Event semantics. In Fritz Hamm and Thomas Ede Zimmermann (eds.), Semantics. Sonderheft der Linguistischen Berichte. Hamburg: Buske: 91-120.
70. ECKARDT, 2003a. Eine Runde im Jespersen-Zyklus. Negation, emphatische Negation, negativ-polare Elemente im Altfranzösischen. University of Konstanz online publication at www.up.uni-konstanz.de/kops/.
71. ECKARDT 2003. Virtual signs: the emergence of new meanings by reanalysis. In Paul Dekker and Robert van Rooy (eds.), Proceedings of the Fourteenth Amsterdam Colloquium. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam Publications: 9-12.
72. ECKARDT 2005a. Too poor to mention: subminimal events and negative polarity items. In Claudia Maienborn and A. Wöllstein-Leisten (eds.), Events in Syntax, Semantics and Discourse. Tübingen: Niemeyer: 301-31.
73. ECKARDT 2005b. Infinitesimal events. To appear in Tanja Heyde-Zybatov and Martin Schäfer (eds.), Proceedings of Event 2004 Leipzig. Berlin: deGruyter.
74. EDMONDSON, JEROLD A., and PLANK, FRANS. 1978. Great expectations: an intensive self analysis. Linguistics and Philosophy, 2: 373-413.
75. ETCHEMENDY, JOHN W. 1990. The Concept of Logical Consequence. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
76. FAARLUND, JAN TERJE. 1990. Syntactic Change: Towards a Theory of Historical Syntax. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
77. FAARLUND, JAN TERJE.. (ed.) 2001. Grammatical Relations in Change. Studies in Language Companion 56. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
78. FAUCONNIER, GILLES. 1975a. Pragmatic scales and logical structure. Linguistic Inquiry, 6: 353-75.
79. FAUCONNIER, GILLES. 1975b. Polarity and the scale principle. Chicago Linguistic Society, 11: 188-99.
80. FAUCONNIER, GILLES. 1994. Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
81. FAUCONNIER, GILLES. 1997. Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
82. FAUCONNIER, GILLES. and TURNER, MARK. 1996. Blending as a central process of grammar. In Adele Goldberg (ed.), Conceptual Structure, Discourse and Language. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI: 113-30.
83. FILLMORE, CHARLES. 1985. Frames and the semantics of understanding. Quaderni di semantica, 6/2: 222-53.
84. FINTEL, KAI VON. 1995. The formal semantics of grammaticalization. In Jill N. Beckman (ed.), Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the North East Linguistic Society 25. GLSA, Dept. of Linguistics, UMass at Amherst: ii. 175-89.
85. FISCHER, OLGA, ROSENBACH, ANETTE, and STEIN, DIETER (eds.). 2000. Pathways of Change: Grammaticalization in English. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
86. FLEISCHMANN, SUZANNE. 1982. The Future in Thought and Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
87. FOULET, LUCIEN. 1965. Petite Syntaxe de l'ancien français. 3rd edn. rev. Les Classiques Français du Moyen Âge 21. Paris: Champion.
88. FOX, DANNY. 2000. Economy and Semantic Interpretation. Boston: MIT Press.
89. FREGE, GOTTLOB. 1964. Begriffsschrift und andere Aufsätze. Hildesheim: Olms.
90. FREGE, GOTTLOB. 1970. Begriffsschrift, trans. Jean van Heijenoort and Kurt Gödel. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
91. FRITZ, GERD, and GLONING, THOMAS (eds.). 1997. Untersuchungen zur semantischen Entwicklungsgeschichte der Modalverben im Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
92. GABELENTZ, GEORG VON DER 1901. Die Sprachwissenschaft. Ihre Aufgaben, Methoden und bisherigen Ergebnisse. Tübingen: Gunther Narr Verlag.
93. GÄRDENFORS, PETER. 2000. Conceptual Spaces: The Geometry of Thought. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
94. GEENHOVEN, VEERLE VAN. 1996. Semantic incorporation and indefinite descriptions. Ph.D. dissertation, Tübingen University. Appeared as SfS Report 03-96.
95. GEERAERTS, DIRK. 1997. Diachronic Prototype Semantics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
96. GELDEREN, ELLY VAN. 1993. The Rise of Functional Categories. Linguistics Today 9. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
97. GELDEREN, ELLY VAN. 2004. Grammaticalization as Economy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
98. GENTNER, DEIDRE. 1983. Structure mapping: a theoretical framework for analogy. Cognitive Science, 7: 155-70.
99. GIACALONE RAMAT, ANNA, and HOPPER, PAUL (eds.). 1998. The Limits of Grammaticalization. Typological Studies in Language 37. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
100. GIANNAKIDOU, ANASTASIA. 1998. Polarity Sensitivity as (Non)veridical Dependency. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
101. GIANNAKIDOU, ANASTASIA. 1999. Affective dependencies. Linguistics and Philosophy, 22: 367-421.
102. GIANNAKIDOU, ANASTASIA. 2001. The meaning of free choice. Linguistics and Philosophy, 24/6: 659-735.
103. GINSBERG, M. 1994. AI and nonmonotonic reasoning. In D. Gabbay, C. Hogger, and J. Robinson (eds.) Handbook of Logic in Artificial Intelligence and Logic Programming, iii. Oxford: Clarendon Press: ch. 1.
104. GOEBEL, U., and REICHMANN, O. (eds.). 2001. Frühneuhochdeutsches Wörterbuch. Berlin: de Gruyter.
105. GOOSSENS, LOUIS. 1989. Metonymy in metaphorization: from body parts (and other donor domains) to linguistic action. LAUD publications, Series A, No. 256. Duisburg: University of Duisburg.
106. GREVISSE, MAURICE. 1994. Le Bon Usage: grammaire française. Paris: Duculot.
107. GRICE, H. PAUL. 1975. Logic and conversation. In Peter Cole and Jerry Morgan (eds.), Syntax and Semantics, iii: Speech Acts. New York: Academic Press: 41-58.
108. GRIMM, JACOB, and GRIMM, WILHELM. 1885 [1962]. Deutsches Wörterbuch. Repr. Leipzig: Hirzel.
109. GROENENDIJK, JEROEN, and STOKHOF, MARTIN. 1991. Dynamic predicate logic. Linguistics and Philosophy, 14/1: 39-100.
110. GÜNTHNER, SUSANNE. 1996. From subordination to coordination? Verbsecond position in German causal and concessive constructions. Pragmatics, 6/3: 323-70.
111. GÜNTHNER, SUSANNE. 2000. From concessive connector to discourse marker: the use of obwohl in everyday German interaction. In Elizabeth Couper-Kuhlen and Bernd Kortmann (eds.), Cause, Condition, Concession, Contrast. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter: 439-68.
112. GÜNTHNER, 2001. Lexical-grammatical variation and development: the use of conjunctions as discourse markers in everyday spoken German. In Regine Eckardt and Klaus von Heusinger (eds.), Words in Time: Diachronic Semantics from Different Points of View. Working paper, Linguistic Department, University of Konstanz. Submitted at de Gruyter, Berlin.
113. HAIMAN, JOHN. 1994. Ritualization and the development of language. In William Pagliuca (ed.), Perspectives on Grammaticalization. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 109. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 3-28.
114. HAMM, FRIEDRICH. 1989. Natürlich-sprachliche Quantoren. Tübingen: Niemeyer.
115. HARRIS, ALICE C., and CAMPBELL, LYLE. 1995. Historical Syntax in Crosslinguistic Perspective. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 74. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
116. HARRIS, MARTIN B., and RAMAT, PAOLO (eds.). 1987. Historical Developments of Auxiliaries. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
117. HASPELMATH, MARTIN. 1998. Does grammaticalization need reanalysis? Studies in Language, 22:315-51.
118. HASPELMATH, MARTIN. 1999. Why is grammaticalization irreversible? Linguistics, 37/6: 1043-68.
119. HEIM, IRENE. 1982. The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Amherst, Mass. Printed by University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor, Michigan and as working paper No. 73 of the Sonder-forschungsbereich 99, Linguistic Department, University of Konstanz.
120. HEIM, IRENE. and KRATZER, ANGELIKA. 1998. Semantics in Generative Grammar. Blackwell Textbooks in Linguistics 13. Malden: Blackwell.
121. HEINE, BERND. 1993. Auxiliaries: Cognitive Forces and Grammaticalization. New York: Oxford University Press.
122. HEINE, BERND. 1997a. Cognitive Foundations of Grammar. New York: Oxford University Press.
123. HEINE, BERND. 1997b. Possession: Cognitive Sources, Forces, and Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
124. HEINE, BERND. 2002. On the role of context in grammaticalization. In Ilse Wischer and Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New Reflections on Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 83-102.
125. HEINE, BERND. CLAUDI, ULRIKE, and HÜNNEMEYER, FRIEDERIKE. 1991. Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
126. HEINE, BERND. and KUTEVA, TANIA. 2002. World Lexicon of Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
127. HEINE, BERND. and REH, MECHTHILD. 1984. Syntactic reanalysis. In Grammaticalization and Reanalysis in African Languages. Hamburg: Helmut Buske Verlag: 95-111.
128. HINRICHS, ERHARD. 1986. Temporal anaphor in discourse. Linguistics and Philosophy, 9: 363-82.
129. HOEKSEMA, JACK, and RULLMANN, HOTZE. 2001. Scalarity and polarity: a study of scalar adverbs as polarity items. In Jack, Hoeksema, Hotze Rullmann, Victor Sanchez-Valencia, and Ton van der Wouden (eds.), Perspectives on Negation and Polarity Items. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 129-71.
130. HÖHLE, TILMAN. 1982. Explikationen für 'normale Betonung' und 'normale Wortstellung'. In Werner Abraham (ed.), Satzglieder im Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer: 75-153.
131. HOLE, DANIEL. 2002. Agentive 'selbst' in German. In Graham Katz, Sabine Reinhard, and Philip Reuter (eds.), Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 6, 2001. Institute of Cognitive Science, University of Osnabrück: 3133-50.
132. HOLM, JOHN. 2000. An Introduction to Pidgins and Creoles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
133. HOOP, HELEN DE. 1995. On the characterization of the weak-strong distinction. In E. Bach et al. (eds.), Quantification in Natural Languages. Dordrecht: Kluwer: ii. 421-50.
134. HOPPER, PAUL. 1991. On some principles of grammaticalization. In Elizabeth C. Traugott and Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: i. 17-35.
135. HOPPER, PAUL. and TRAUGOTT, ELIZABETH C. 1993. Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
136. INDURKHYA, BIPIN, 1992. Metaphor and Cognition: An Interactionist Approach. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
137. ITKONEN, ESA. 2002. Grammaticalization as an analogue of hyoptheticodeductive thinking. In Ilse Wischer and Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New Reflections on Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 413-22.
138. JACKENDOFF, RAY. 1983. Semantic Structures. Current Studies in Linguistics Series 18. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
139. JACKENDOFF, RAY. 1998. Why a conceptualist view on reference? A reply to Abbott. Linguistics and Philosophy, 21/2: 211-19.
140. JACOBS, JOACHIM. 1983. Fokus und Skalen. Zur Syntax und Semantik von Gradpartikeln im Deutschen. Tübingen: Niemeyer Verlag.
141. JÄGER, GERHARD. 1996. Topics in Dynamic Semantics. Ph.D. dissertation, Humboldt University, Pub. Munich: Berlin. University of Munich, CIS-Bericht 96-92.
142. JANDA, RICHARD D. 2001. Beyond 'pathways' and 'unidirectionality': on the discontinuity of language transmission and the counterability of grammaticalization. In Lyle Campbell and Richard D. Janda (eds.), Grammaticalization: A Critical Assessment. Language Sciences, 23/2-3: 265-340.
143. JESPERSEN, OTTO. 1917. Negation in English and Other Languages. Historiskfilologiske meddelelser 1.5. Copenhagen: Hoest.
144. JESPERSEN, OTTO. 1922. Die Sprache, ihre Natur, Entwicklung und Entstehung. Heidelberg: Carl Winters Universitätsbuchhandlung.
145. JOSEPH, BRIAN D. 2001. Is there such a thing as 'grammaticalization'? In Lyle Campbell and Richard D. Janda (eds.), Grammaticalization: A Critical Assessment, Language Sciences, 23/2-3: 163-86.
146. KADMON, NIRIT. 2001. Formal Pragmatics: Semantics, Pragmatics, Presupposition, and Focus. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
147. KADMON, NIRIT. and LANDMAN, FRED. 1993. Any. Linguistics and Philosophy 16: 353-422.
148. KAMP, HANS. 1975. Two theories about adjectives. In Edward Keenan (ed.), Formal Semantics of Natural Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 123-55.
149. KAMP, HANS. 1981. A theory of truth and discourse representation. In Jeroen Groendijk, Theo Janssen, and Martin Stokhof (eds.), Formal Methods in the Study of Language. Amsterdam: Mathematical Center: 277-322.
150. KAMP, HANS. and PARTEE, BARBARA. 1995. Prototype theory and compositionality. Cognition, 57/2: 129-93.
151. KAMP, HANS. and REYLE, UWE. 1993. From Discourse to Logic: Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 42. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
152. KEENAN, EDWARD. 2002. Explaining the creation of reflexive pronouns in English. In D. Minkova and R. Stockwell (eds.), Studies in the History of English: A Millenial Perspective. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter: 325-55.
153. KEENAN, EDWARD. 2003. A historical explanation of some binding theoretical facts in English. In John Moore and Maria Polinksy (eds.), The Nature of Explanation in Linguistic Theory. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications: 152-89.
154. KEENAN, EDWARD. and STAVI, JONATHAN. 1986. A semantic characterization of natural language determiners. Linguistics and Philosophy, 9: 253-326.
155. KEMMER, SUZANNE 1995. Emphatic and reflexive-self: expectations, viewpoint, and subjectivity. In Dieter Stein and Suzanne Wright (eds.), Subjectivity and Subjectivism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 55-82.
156. KLEIN, WOLFGANG. 1994. Time in Language. London: Routledge.
157. KOCH, PETER. 1999. Cognitive aspects of semantic change and polysemy: the semantic space HAVE/BE. In A. Blank and P. Koch (eds.), Historical Semantics and Cognition. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter: 279-305.
158. KÖNIG, EKKEHARD. 1992. The Meaning of Focus Particles: A Comparative Perspective. London: Routledge.
159. KÖNIG, EKKEHARD. and SIEMUND, PETER. 1996. Emphatische Reflexiva und Fokusstruktur: Zur Syntax und Bedeutung von 'selbst'. In I. Rosengren (ed.), Sprache und Pragmatik 40. Lund: Gleerup: 1-42.
160. KÖNIG, EKKEHARD. 2000. Intensifiers as sources and targets of semantic change. In Klaus v. Heusinger and Regine Eckardt (eds.), Meaning Change-Meaning Variation. Working Paper No. 106, Fachbereich Sprachwissenschaft, Universität Konstanz: 97-109. Repr. in P. Koch and A. Blank (eds.), Historical Scmantics and Cognition. Berlin: Mouton, 1999: 237-57.
161. KÖNIG, EKKEHARD. and TRAUGOTT, ELIZABETH C. 1988. Pragmatic strengthening and semantic change: the conventionalizing of conversational implicature. In Werner Hüllen (p.273) and Rainer Schulze (eds.), Understanding the Lexicon: Meaning, Sense and World Knowledge in Lexical Semantics. Tübingen: Niemeyer: 110-24.
162. KÖVECSES, ZOLTÀN, and RADDEN, GÜNTER. 1998. Metonymy: developing a cognitive linguistic view. Cognitive Linguistics, 9/1: 37-77.
163. KRATZER, ANGELIKA. 1978. Semantik der Rede: Kontexttheorie, Modalwörter, Konditionalsätze. Königstein/Ts.: Scriptor-Verlag.
164. KRATZER, ANGELIKA. 1981. The notional category of modality. In H. Eikemeyer and H. Rieser (eds.), Words, Worlds, and Contexts. Berlin: de Gruyter: 38-74. Reprinted in Paul Portner and Barbara H. Partee (eds.), Formal Semantics: The Essential Readings. Oxford: Blackwell, 2003: 289-323.
165. KRATZER, ANGELIKA. 1991. Modality. In Arnim von Stechow and Dieter Wunderlich (eds.), Semantik. Ein internationales Handbuch der zeitgenössischen Forschung. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter: 825-34.
166. KRIFKA, MANFRED. 1989. Nominalreferenz und Zeitkonstitution: Zur Semantik von Massentermen, Pluraltermen und Aspektklassen. Munich: Fink.
167. KRIFKA, MANFRED. 1992. Thematic roles as links between nominal reference and temporal constitution. In Iwan Sag and Anna Szabolsci (eds.), Lexical Matters. CSLI Lecture Notes. Standford, Calif.: Stanford University Press: 29-54.
168. KRIFKA, MANFRED. 1993. Focus and presupposition in dynamic interpretation. Journal of Semantics, 10: 269-300.
169. KRIFKA, MANFRED. 1995. The semantics and pragmatics of polarity items. Linguistic Analysis, 25: 209-57.
170. KRIFKA, MANFRED. 1998. Additive particles under stress. Proceedings of SALT 8: 111-28.
171. KRIPKE, SAUL. 1972. Naming and necessity. Repr. in D. Davidson and G. Harman (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language. Dordrecht: Reidel Publishing Company: 253-355.
172. KRUG, MANFRED G. 2000. Emerging English Modals: A Corpus-Based Study of Grammaticalization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
173. LABOV, WILLIAM. 1972. Sociolinguistic Patterns. Philadelphia: University of Philadelphia Press.
174. LABRUM, REBEKKA WHEELOCK. 1982. Conditions on double negation in the history of English in comparison to similar developments in German. Ph.D. dissertation, Stanford University. University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor.
175. LADUSAW, WILLIAM. 1979. Polarity sensitivity as inherent scope relations. Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
176. LAHIRI, UTPAL. 1995. Negative polarity in Hindi. In Proceedings of SALT V, University of Texas, 1995 Ithaca, NY: Linguistics Publications, Cornell University: 168-85.
177. LAKOFF, GEORGE, and JOHNSON, MARK. 1980. Metaphors we Live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
178. LAMBALGEN, MICHIEL, and DOES, JAAP VAN DER. 1998. Logic and Cognition. Reader, provided at the European Summer School in Logic, Language, and Information ESSLLI '98, University of Saarbrücken.
179. LANDMAN, FRED. 2000. Events and Plurality. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 76. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
180. LANG, JÜRGEN and NEUMANN-HOLZSCHUH, INGRID (eds.). 1999. Reanalyse und Grammatikalisierung in den romanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Niemeyer Verlag.
181. LANGACKER, RONALD W. 1977. Syntactic reanalysis. In Charles Li (ed.), Mechanisms of Syntactic Change. Austin: University of Texas Press: 57-139.
182. LANGACKER, RONALD W. 1990. Concept, Image, and Symbol: The Cognitive Basis of Grammar. Cognitive Linguistics Research 1. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
183. LANGACKER, RONALD W. 1999. Grammar and conceptualization. Cognitive Linguistics Research 14. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
184. LASERSOHN, PETER. 1995. Plurality, Conjunction and Events. Studies in Linguistics and Philosophy 55. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
185. LEHMANN, CHRISTIAN. 1982 [1995]. Thoughts on Grammaticalization. Munich: Lincom.
186. LEHMANN, CHRISTIAN. 2002. New reflections on grammaticalization and lexicalization. In Ilse Wischer and Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New Reflections on Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 1-18.
187. LEPORE, ERNEST. 2000. Meaning and Argument: An Introduction to Logic through Language. Oxford: Blackwell.
188. LESSAU, DONALD A. 1994. A Dictionary of Grammaticalization, ed. Norbert Boretzky, Werner Enninger, Benedikt Jeßing, and Thomas Stolz. Bochum: Universitätsverlag Brockmeyer.
189. LEVINSON, STEPHEN C. 2000. Presumptive Meanings. Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
190. LEWIS, DAVID. 1973. Counterfactuals. Oxford: Blackwell.
191. LIGHTFOOT, DAVID. 1979. Principles of Diachronic Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
192. LIGHTFOOT, DAVID. 1991. How to Set Parameters: Arguments from Language Change. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
193. LIGHTFOOT, DAVID. 1999. The Development of Language: Acquisition, Change, and Evolution. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
194. LINK, GODEHARD. 1983. The logical analysis of plurals and mass terms: a lattice theoretic approach. In Rainer Bäuerle, Christoph Schwarze, and Arnim von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language. Berlin: de Gruyter: 302-23.
195. LÖBNER, SEBASTIAN. 2001. Understanding Semantics. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell.
196. LOHNSTEIN, HORST. 1996. Formale Semantik und natürliche Sprache. Opladen: West-deutscher Verlag.
197. MEILLET, ANTOINE. 1909. Sur la disparition des formes simples du prétérite. Germanistisch-Romanistische Monatsschrift, 1 (1909): 521 ff. Reprinted in A. Meillet, Linguistique historique et linguistique générale. Paris: Champion, 1948: 149-58.
198. MEILLET, ANTOINE. 1912. L'Évolution des formes grammaticales. Rivista di scienza XII, 26/6. Reprinted in A. Meillet, Linguistique historique et linguistique générale. Paris: Champion, 1948: 130-48.
199. MEYER-LÜBKE, WILHELM. 1890-1902. Grammatik der romanischen Sprachen. Leipzig. Repr. Hildesheim: Olms.
200. MILSARK, GARY. 1977. Toward an explanation of certain peculiarities of the existential construction in English. Linguistic Analysis, 3: 1-29.
201. MONTAGUE, RICHARD. 1973. The proper treatment of quantification in ordinary English. In J. Hintikka, J. Moravcsik, and P. Suppes (eds.), Approaches to Natural Language. Dordrecht: Reidel: Repr. 221-42. in Montague (1974).
202. MONTAGUE, RICHARD. 1974. Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague, ed. and introd. Richmond H. Thomason. New Haven: Yale University Press.
203. MORAVCSIK, EDITH. 1972. Some cross-linguistic generalizations about intensifier constructions. Proceedings of the CLS, 8: 271-7.
204. MOSSÉ, FERNAND. 1938. Histoire de la forme périphrastique être + participe présent en germanique. Paris: Klincksieck.
205. MUSAN, RENATE. 1997. On the Temporal Interpretation of Noun Phrases. New York: Garland.
206. MUSAN, RENATE. 2001. The present perfect in German. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory, 19/2: 355-401.
207. MUSAN, RENATE. 2002. The German Perfect: Its Semantic Composition and its Interactions with Temporal Adverbials. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
208. NEWMEYER, FREDERICK, J. 2001. Deconstructing grammaticalization. In Lyle Campbell and Richard D. Janda (eds.), Grammaticalization: A Critical Assessment, Language Sciences, 23/2-3: 187-230.
209. NOVECK, IRA. 2001. When children are more logical than adults: experimental investigations of scalar implicatures. Cognition, 78: 165-88.
210. NUNBERG, GEOFFREY. 1995. Transfers of meaning. Journal of Semantics, 12: 109-213.
211. OLBERTZ, HELLA. 1993. The grammaticalization of Spanish haber plus participle. In Jaap van Marle, Historical Linguistics 1991: Papers from the 10th International Conference on Historical Linguistics, Amsterdam, 12-16 August 1991. Amsterdam Studies in the Theory and History of Linguistic Science 4; 107. Amsterdam: Benjamins: 243-63.
212. OLBERTZ, HELLA. 1998. Verbal Periphrases in a Functional Grammar of Spanish. Functional Grammar Series 22. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
213. OPITZ, MARTIN. 1624 [1978]. Gesammelte Werke: Kritische Ausgabe, ii: Die Werke von 1621 bis 1626, ed. George Schulz-Behrend. Stuttgart: Anton Hiersemann Verlag.
214. PAGLIUCA, WILLIAM. (ed.) 1994. Perspectives on Grammaticalization. Current Issues in Linguistic Theory 109. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
215. PANTHER, KLAUS-UWE. 1999. Metonymy in Language and Thought. Human Cognitive Processing 4. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
216. PARTEE, BARBARA H. 1989. Many quantifiers. In Proceedings of ESCOL '88. Linguistics Department, Ohio State University.
217. PARTEE, BARBARA H. 1995. Quantificational structures and compositionality. In E. Bach et al. (eds.), Quantification in Natural Languages. Dordrecht: Kluwer: ii. 541-601.
218. PAUL, HERMANN. 1880. Principien [Prinzipien] der Sprachgeschichte. Halle: Niemeyer Verlag. Repr. Student's edition from the 8th edition, Tübingen: Niemeyer, 1970.
219. PÉREZ, AVELINE. 1990. Time in motion: grammaticalization of the be going to construction in English. La Trobe Working Papers in Linguistics, 3: 49-64.
220. PERLE, FRIEDRICH. 1876. Die Negation im Altfranzösischen, Teil I und II. Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie, (repr. Tübingen: 2 (Max Niemeyer Verlag, 1965): 1-24, 407-18.
221. PFEIFER, WOLFGANG. 1995. Etymologisches Wörterbuch des Deutschen. Munich: Deutscher Taschenbuch Verlag.
222. PLANK, FRANS. 1979. Exklusivierung, Reflexivierung, Identifizierung, Relationale Auszeichnung In I. Rosengren (ed.), Sprache und Pragmatik 2. Lund: Gleerup: 330-54.
223. POOLE, JOSHUA. 1646. The English Accidence. Repr. in R. C. Alston (ed.), English Linguistics 1500-1800 (A Collection of Facsimile Reprints). Leeds: Scholar Press Limited, 1967.
224. PORTNER, PAUL and PARTEE, BARBARA HALL. 2003. The Essential Readings in Semantics. Malden, Mass.: Blackwell Publishers.
225. POSNER, REBEKKA. 1984. Double negatives, negative polarity and negative incorporation in Romance: a historical and comparative view. In Annals of the Philological Society 1984. Oxford: Blackwell: 1-26.
226. POSNER, REBEKKA. 1997. Linguistic Change in French. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
227. PRICE, GLANVILLE. 1962. The negative particles 'pas', 'mie' and 'point' in French. Archivum Linguisticum, 14:14-34.
228. PRICE, GLANVILLE. 1993. Pas (point) without ne in interrogative clauses. French Language Studies, 3: 191-5.
229. PRIOR, ARTHUR N. 1967. Past, Present and Future. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
230. PRIOR, ARTHUR N. 1968. Papers on Time and Tense. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
231. PUSTEJOVSKY, JAMES. 1993. Semantics and the Lexicon. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
232. PUSTEJOVSKY, JAMES. 1995. The Generative Lexicon. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
233. PUTNAM, HILARY. 1975. The meaning of 'meaning'. Reprinted in H. Putnam, Philosophical Papers, ii Mind, Language and Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 215-17.
234. REICHENBACH, HANS. 1966. Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York: Free Press.
235. REIS, MARGA, and ROSENGREN, INGER. 1997. A modular approach to the grammar of additive particles. Journal of Semantics, 14: 237-310.
236. ROBERTS, IAN. 1993a. A formal account of grammaticalization in the history of Roman futures. Folia Linguistica Historica, 13: 219-58.
237. ROBERTS, IAN. 1993b. Verbs and Diachronic Syntax: A Comparative History of English and French. Studies in Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 28. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
238. ROBERTS, IAN. and ANNA, ROUSSOU. 2003. Syntactic Change: A Minimalist Approach to Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
239. ROCHETTE, AUGUSTE. (ed.) 1912. Anthologie du Moyen Âge (IXe-XVe siècles): Paris: Ancienne Librairie Poussielgue, de Gigord.
240. ROOTH, MATS. 1985. Association with focus. Ph.D. dissertation. Boston: MIT.
241. ROOTH, MATS. 1992. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics, 1: 75-116.
242. ROOY, ROBERT VAN. 2003. Negative polarity items in questions. Journal of Semantics, 20: 239-73.
243. SÆBØ, KJELL JOHAN. 2001. The semantics of Scandinavian free choice items. Linguistics and Philosophy, 24/6: 737-87.
244. SALVI, GIAMPAOLO. 1987. Syntactic restructuring in the evolution of Romance auxiliaries. In Martin B. Harris and Paolo Ramat (ed.), The Historical Development of Auxiliaries. Berlin: de Gruyter: 225-36.
245. SAPIR, EDWARD. 1921. Language: An Introduction to the Study of Speech. New York: Harcourt.
246. SAUSSURE, FERDINAND DE. 1962. Cours de linguistique générale. ed. Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye. Paris: Payot.
247. SCHEIER, TANJA. 2002. (untitled). Staatsexamen thesis, Department of Linguistics, University of Konstanz.
248. SCHULZE, ALFRED. 1888. Der altfranzösische direkte Fragesatz. Ein Beitrag zur Syntax des Französischen. Leipzig: Hirzel.
249. SCHWARZ, BERNHARD. 2002. How to say even in German. Talk presented at Sinn und Bedeutung SuB VII, Konstanz.
250. SCHWEGLER, ARMIN. 1986. Analyticity and syntheticity: a diachronic perspective with special reference to romance languages. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California at Berkeley. University Microfilms International, Ann Arbor.
251. SCHWEICKHÄUSER, ALFRED. 1852. De la négation dans les langues romanes du midi et du nord de la France. Paris: Firmin Didot Frères.
252. SCHWENTER, SCOTT, and TRAUGOTT, ELIZABETH C. 2000. Invoking scalarity: the development of in fact. Journal of Historical Pragmatics, 1: 7-25.
253. SIEMUND, PETER. 2000. Intensifiers in English and German: A Comparison. London: Routledge.
254. STECHOW, ARNIM VON. 1984. Comparing semantic theories of comparison. Journal of Semantics, 3: 1-77.
255. STERN, GUSTAF. 1921. Swift, swiftly, and their synonyms: a contribution to semantic analysis and theory. Ph.D. thesis, University of Göteborg. Also in Göteborgs Högskolas Ärsskrift, 27. Göteborg, 1921.
256. STERN, GUSTAF. 1931. Meaning and Change of Meaning. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
257. STOCK, EBERHARD. 1996. Deutsche Intonation. Leipzig: Langenscheid.
258. STOLZ, THOMAS. 1994. Grammatikalisierung und Metaphorisierung. Bochum: Universitätsverlag Brockmeyer.
259. SWART, HENRIËTTE DE. 1998. Introduction to Natural Language Semantics. Stanford, Calif.: CSLI Publications.
260. SWEETSER, EVE. 1988. Grammaticalization and semantic bleaching. In Shelley Axmaker, Annie Jaisser, and Helen Singmaster (eds.), Proceedings of the Fourteenth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: 389-405.
261. SWEETSER, 1990. From Etymology to Pragmatics: Metaphorical and Cultural Aspects of Semantic Structure. Cambridge Studies in Linguistics 54. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
262. SWEETSER, 1999. Compositionality and blending: semantic composition in a cognitively realistic framework. In Theo Janssen and Gisela Redecker (eds.), Cognitive Linguistics: Foundations, Scope, and Methodology. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter: 129-62.
263. TABOR, WHITNEY, and TRAUGOTT, ELIZABETH C. 1998. Structural scope expansion and grammaticalization. In Anna Giacalone Ramat and Paul Hopper (eds.), The Limits of Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 229-72.
264. TAYLOR, JOHN RUSSELL. 1989. Linguistic Categorization: Prototypes in Linguistic Theory. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
265. TIMBERLAKE, ALAN. 1977. Reanalysis and actualization in syntactic change. In Charles N. Li (ed.), Mechanisms of Syntactic Change. Austin: University of Texas Press: 141-80.
266. TRAUGOTT, ELIZABETH C. 1972. The History of English Syntax. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
267. TRAUGOTT, ELIZABETH C. 1988. Pragmatic strengthening and grammaticalization. In Shelley Axmaker, Annie Jaisser, and Helen Singmaster (eds.), Proceedings of the 14th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistic Society. Berkeley: Berkeley Linguistic Society: 406-16.
268. TRAUGOTT, ELIZABETH C. 1989. On the rise of epistemic meanings in English: an example of subjectification in semantic change. Language, 57: 33-65.
269. TRAUGOTT, ELIZABETH C. 2003. From subjectification to intersubjectification. In Raymond Hickey (ed.), Motives for Language Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 124-39.
270. TRAUGOTT, ELIZABETH C. and DASHER, RICHARD B. 2002. Regularities in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
271. TRAUGOTT, ELIZABETH C. and HEINE, BERND (eds.). 1991. Approaches to Grammaticalization, vol. i. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
272. TRAUGOTT, ELIZABETH C. and KÖNIG, EKKEHARD. 1991. The semantics-pragmatics of grammaticalization revisited. In Elizabeth Closs Traugott and Bernd Heine (eds.), Approaches to Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: i. 189-218.
273. TURNER, MARK, and FAUCONNIER, GILLES. 1995. Conceptual integration and formal expression. Journal of Metaphor and Symbolic Activity, 10/3: 183-204.
274. UCHE, AARON. 1996/1997. Grammaticization of the verb 'say' to future tense in Obolo. Journal of West African Languages, 26/2: 87-94.
275. ULLMANN, STEPHEN. 1957. The Principles of Semantics. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
276. VÄÄNÄNEN, VEIKO. 1967. Introduction au latin vulgaire. Bibliothèque Française et Romane, series A: Manuels et Études Linguistiques. Paris: Klincksieck.
277. VENDLER, ZENO. 1967. The grammar of goodness. In Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press: 172-96.
278. VISSER, FREDERIKUS T. 1969. An Historical Syntax of the English Language, iii.1: Syntactical Units with Two Verbs. Leiden: Brill.
279. VISSER, FREDERIKUS T. 1973. An Historical Syntax of the English Language, iii/2: Syntactical Units with Two or More Verlos. Leiden: Brill.
280. WALTEREIT, RICHARD. 1999. Reanalyse als metonymischer Prozess. In Jürgen Lang and Ingrid Neumann-Holzschuh (eds.), Reanalyse und Grammatikalisierung in den romanischen Sprachen. Tübingen: Niemeyer Verlag: 19-30.
281. WEBELHUTH, GERT. 1999. Allgemeinwissen und Diskurskreativität als Ursachen von Sprachwandel und Grammatikalisierung: Eine Psycholinguistisch Fundierte Theorie. Talk presented at University of Konstanz.
282. WEGENER, HEIDE. 2002. The evolution of the German modal particle denn. In Ilse Wischer and Gabriele Diewald (eds.), New Reflections on Grammaticalization. Amsterdam: John Benjamins: 379-94.
283. WISCHER, ILSE, and DIEWALD, GABRIELE. 2002. New Reflections on Grammaticalization. Typological Studies in Language 49. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
284. ZIMMERMANN, EDE THOMAS. 1999. Meaning postulates and the modeltheoretic approach to natural language. Linguistics and Philosophy, 22/5: 529-61.
285. ZIRMUNSKIJ, V. M. 1966. The word and its boundaries. Linguistics, 27: 65-91.
286. ZWARTS, FRANCISCUS. 1986. Categoriale grammatica en algebraïsche semantiek: een onderzoek naar negatie en polariteit in het Nederlands. Dissertation, Uni Groningen.
287. ZWARTS, FRANCISCUS. 1998. Three types of polarity. In Fritz Hamm and Erhard Hinrichs (eds.), Plurality and Quantification. Dordrecht: Kluwer: 177-238.