Pronouns and point of view: Cognitive principles of coreference

The New Psychology of Language: Cognitive and Functional Approaches to Language Structure, Volume II Classic Edition

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 169-194

  Van Hoek, Karen ^a  

^a OAKLAND UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84955121967     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (20)

1. Ariel, M. (1990). Accessing noun phrase antecedents. New York: Routledge.
2. Barry, D. (1988). Dave Barry’s greatest hits. New York: Random House.
3. Bolinger, D. (1979). Pronouns in discourse. In T.Givón (Ed.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 12, Syntax and disrourse (pp. 289–309). New York: Academic Press.
4. Brugman, C., & Lakoff, G. (1987, December). The semantics of aux-inversion and anaphora constraints. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, San Francisco, CA.
5. Druyan, A. (1977). A famous broken heart. New York: Stonehill Publishing.
6. Fauconnier, G. (1985). Mental spaces: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Fox, B. (1987). Dvicourse structure and anaphora. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
8. Givón, T. (1989). The grammar of referential coherence as mental processing instructions (Technical Rep. No. 89–7). Engene, OR: University of Oregon.
9. Givón, T. (1998). The functional approach to grammar. In M.Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language (pp. 41–66). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
10. Kibrik, A. (1999). Reference and working memory: Cognitive inferences from discourse observations. In K.van Hoek, A.Kibrik, & L.Noordman (Eds.), Discourse studies in cognitive linguistics (pp. 29–52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
11. Langacker, R.W. (1985). Observations and speculations on subjectivity. In J.Haiman (Ed.), Iconicity in syntax (pp. 109–150). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
12. Langacker, R.W. (1987). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Vol. 1. Theoretial prerequisites (pp. 231–236). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
13. Langacker, R.W. (1991). Foundations of cognitive grammar: Vol. 2. Descriptive application (p. 323). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
14. Langacker, R.W. (1995). viewing in cognition and grammar. In P.W.Davis (Ed.), Alternative linguistics: Descriptive and theoretical models (pp. 153–212). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
15. Langacker, R.W. (1998). Conceptualization, symbolization and grammar. In M.Tomasello (Ed.), The new psychology of language (pp. 1–39). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
16. MacWhinney, B. (1977). Starting points. Language, 53, 152–168.
17. Reinhart, T. (1983). Anaphora and semantic interpretation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
18. Tomlin, R.S. (1987). Linguistic reflections of cognitive events. In R.Tomlin (Ed.), Coherence and gmunding in disrourse (pp. 455–479). Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
19. van Hoek, K. (1995). Conceptual reference points: A cognitive grammar account of pronominal anaphora constraints. Language, 71(2), 310–340.
20. van Hoek, K. (1997). Anaphora and conceptual structure. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.