Representing Time: An Essay on Temporality as Modality

Representing Time: An Essay on Temporality as Modality

Volumn , Issue , 2023, Pages 1-192

  Jaszczolt, K M ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85188410823     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/oso/9780199214433.001.0001     Document Type: Book

References (267)

1. Abusch, D. (1988). ‘Sequence of tense, intensionality and scope’. In: H. Borer (ed.). Proceedings of the Seventh West Coast Conference on Formal Linguistics. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. 1-14.
2. Aikhenvald, A. Y. (2004). Evidentiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
3. Allan, K. (2001). Natural Language Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell.
4. Ambjørn, J., J. Jurkiewicz and R. Loll. (2008). ‘The self-organizing quantum universe’. Scientific American, July 2008: 24-31.
5. Aristotle. 1928. De Interpretatione. Transl. by E. M. Edghill. In: The Works of Aristotle. Vol. 1. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 16a-23b.
6. Asher, N. (1993). Reference to Abstract Objects in Discourse. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
7. Asher, N. (2000). ‘Events, facts, propositions, and evolutive anaphora’. In: J. Higginbotham, F. Pianesi and A.C.Varzi (eds). Speaking of Events.Oxford: Oxford University Press. 123-50.
8. Asher, N. and A. Lascarides (2003). Logics of Conversation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Asher, N. and E. McCready (2007). ‘Were, would, might and a compositional account of counterfactuals’. Journal of Semantics 24: 93-129.
10. Atlas, J. D. (1977). ‘Negation, ambiguity, and presupposition’. Linguistics and Philosophy 1: 321-36.
11. Atlas, J. D. (1979). ‘How linguistics matters to philosophy: Presupposition, truth, and meaning’. In: D. Dinneen and C. K. Oh (eds). Syntax and Semantics 11: Presupposition. New York: Academic Press. 265-81.
12. Atlas, J. D. (1989). Philosophy without Ambiguity: A Logico-Linguistic Essay. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
13. Atlas, J. D. (2006). ‘How insensitive can you be? Meanings, propositions, context, and semantical underdeterminacy’. Paper presented at the J. Atlas: Distinguished Scholar Workshop, University of Cambridge, May 2006.
14. van der Auwera, J. and V. A. Plungian (1998). ‘Modality’s semantic map’. Linguistic Typology 2. 79-124.
15. Bach, E. (1981). ‘On time, tense, and aspect: An essay in English metaphysics’. In: P. Cole (ed.). Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press. 63-81.
16. Bach, E. (1986). ‘The algebra of events’. Linguistics and Philosophy 9: 5-16. Reprinted in: I. Mani, J. Pustejovsky, and R. Gaizauskas (eds). 2005. The Language of Time: A Reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 61-9.
17. Bach, K. (2004). ‘Minding the gap’. In: C. Bianchi (ed.). The Semantics/Pragmatics Distinction. Stanford: CSLI Publications. 27-43.
18. Bach, K. (2006). ‘The excluded middle: Semantic minimalism without minimal propositions’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 73: 435-42.
19. Balaguer, M. (2005). ‘Indexical propositions and de re belief ascriptions’. Synthese 146: 325-55.
20. Bartsch, R. (1995). Situations, Tense, and Aspect: Dynamic Discourse Ontology and the Semantic Flexibility of Temporal System in German and English. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
21. Beaver, D. I. (1997). ‘Presupposition’. In: J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (eds). Handbook of Logic and Language. Amsterdam: Elsevier. 939-1008.
22. Bell, D. (1990). Husserl. London: Routledge.
23. Bennett, M. and B. Partee (1978). Toward the Logic of Tense and Aspect in English. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
24. Binnick, R. I. (1991). Time and the Verb: A Guide to Tense and Aspect. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
25. Borg, E. (2004). Minimal Semantics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
26. Brisard, F. (2002). ‘The English present’. In: F. Brisard (ed.). Grounding: The Epistemic Footing of Deixis and Reference. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 251-97.
27. Brisard, F. (2006). ‘Conceptual viewpoints: Elements of a Cognitive-Grammar account of English past-nonpast tense’. Paper presented at Chronos 7, Antwerp.
28. Brogaard, B. (2006). ‘Tensed relations’. Analysis 66: 194-202.
29. Brown, P. and S. C. Levinson (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Bybee, J., R. Perkins, and W. Pagliuca (1994). The Evolution of Grammar: Tense, Aspect, and Modality in the Languages of the World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
31. Cappelen, H. and E. Lepore (2005). Insensitive Semantics: a Defense of Semantic Minimalism and Speech Act Pluralism. Oxford: Blackwell.
32. Cappelle, B. and R. Declerck (2005). ‘Spatial and temporal boundedness in English motion events’. Journal of Pragmatics 37: 889-917.
33. Cappelli, G. (2007). ‘Ireckon I know how Leonardo da Vinci must have felt…': Epistemicity, Evidentiality and English Verbs of Cognitive Attitude. Pari: Pari Publishing.
34. Carruthers, P. (2006). The Architecture of the Mind: Massive Modularity and the Flexibility of Thought. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
35. Carston, R. (1988). ‘Implicature, explicature, and truth-theoretic semantics’. In: R. M. Kempson (ed.). Mental Representations: The Interface Between Language and Reality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 155-81.
36. Carston, R. (1998). ‘Postscript (1995) to Carston 1988'. In: A. Kasher (ed.). Pragmatics: Critical Concepts. Vol. 4. London: Routledge. 464-79.
37. Carston, R. (2002). Thoughts and Utterances: The Pragmatics of Explicit Communication. Oxford: Blackwell.
38. Carston, R. (2007). ‘How many pragmatic systems are there?'. In: M. J. Frápolli (ed.). Saying, Meaning and Referring: Essays on François Recanati’s Philosophy of Language. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 18-48.
39. Casasanto, D. and L. Boroditsky. (2008). ‘Time in the mind: Using space to think about time’. Cognition 106: 579-93.
40. Chisholm, R. M. (1970). ‘Events and propositions’. Noûs 4: 15-24.
41. Chomsky, N. (2004). ‘Beyond explanatory adequacy’. In: A. Belletti (ed.). Structures and Beyond: The Cartography of Syntactic Structures. Vol. 3. New York: Oxford University Press. 104-31.
42. Cole, P. (ed.). (1981). Radical Pragmatics. New York: Academic Press.
43. Comrie, B. (1985). Tense. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44. Condoravdi, C. (2002). ‘Temporal interpretation of modals: Modals for the present and for the past’. In: D. Beaver et al. (eds). The Construction of Meaning. Stanford: CSLI Publications. 59-88.
45. Cram, D. (2007). ‘Shelf life and time horizons in the historiography of linguistics’. Historiographia Linguistica 34: 189-212.
46. Crouch, R. S. and S. G. Pulman (1993). ‘Time and modality in a natural language interface to a planning system’. Artificial Intelligence 63: 265-304. Reprined in: F. C. N. Pereira and B. J. Grosz (eds). 1994. Natural Language Processing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 265-304.
47. Culicover, P. W. and R. Jackendoff (2005). Simpler Syntax. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
48. Dahl, Ö. (1985). Tense and Aspect Systems. Oxford: Blackwell.
49. Davidson, D. (1967). ‘The logical form of action sentences’. In: N. Rescher (ed.). The Logic of Decision and Action. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press. Reprinted in: D. Davidson. 1980. Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 105-22.
50. Davidson, D. (1969). ‘The individuation of events’. In: N. Rescher (ed.). Essays in Honor of Carl G. Hempel. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. Reprinted in: D. Davidson. 1980. Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 163-80.
51. Davidson, D. (1970). ‘Events as particulars’. Noûs 4: 25-32. Reprinted in: D. Davidson. 1980. Essays on Actions and Events. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 181-7.
52. Davies, A. Morpurgo (1983). ‘Mycenaean and Greek prepositions: o-pi, e-pi etc.'. In: A. Heubeck and G. Neumann (eds). Res Mycenaeae: Akten des VII. Internationalen Mykenologischen Colloquiums in Nürnmerg vom 6.-10. April 1981. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck and Ruprecht. 287-310.
53. Davis, W. A. (1998). Implicature: Intention, Convention, and Principle in the Failure of Gricean Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54. Davis, W. A. (2007). ‘How normative is implicature’. Journal of Pragmatics 39: 1655-72.
55. Declerck, R. (2006). The Grammar of the English Verb Phrase. Vol. 1: The Grammar of the English Tense System. A Comprehensive Analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
56. Dekker, P. (2000). ‘Coreference and representationalism’. In K. von Heusinger and U. Egli (eds). Reference and Anaphoric Relations. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 287-310.
57. Diller, A. (1996). ‘Thai and Lao Writing.' In: Peter T. Daniels and William Bright (eds). The World’s Writing Systems. New York: Oxford University Press. 457-66.
58. Dowty, D. R. (1979). Word Meaning and Montague Grammar: The Semantics of Verbs and Times in Generative Semantics and in Montague’s PTQ. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
59. Dowty, D. R. (1982). ‘Tenses, time adverbs, and compositional semantic theory’. Linguistics and Philosophy 5: 23-55.
60. Dowty, D. R. (1986). ‘The effects of aspectual class on the temporal structure of discourse: Semantics or pragmatics?'. Linguistics and Philosophy 9: 37-61. Reprinted in: I. Mani, J. Pustejovsky, and R. Gaizauskas (eds). 2005. The Language of Time: A Reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 333-51.
61. Dowty, D. R. (2007). ‘Compositionality as an empirical problem’. In: C. Barker and P. Jacobson (eds). Direct Compositionality. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 23-101.
62. Dummett, M. (1969). ‘The reality of the past’. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 69: 239-58. Reprinted in: M. Dummett. 1978. Truth and Other Enigmas. London: Duckworth. 358-74.
63. Dummett, M. (2004). Truth and the Past. New York: Columbia University Press.
64. Dummett, M. (2006). Thought and Reality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
65. Eckardt, R. (2006). Meaning Change in Grammaticalization: An Enquiry into Semantic Reanalysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
66. van Eijck, J. and H. Kamp (1997). ‘Representing discourse in context’. In: J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (eds). Handbook of Logic and Language. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science. 179-237.
67. Enç, M. (1987). ‘Anchoring conditions for tense’. Linguistic Inquiry 18: 633-57.
68. Enç, M. (1996). ‘Tense and modality’. In: S. Lappin (ed.). The Handbook of Contemporary Semantic Theory. Oxford: Blackwell. 345-58.
69. Evans, V. (2003). The Structure of Time: Language, Meaning and Temporal Cognition. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins.
70. Evans, V. (2005). ‘The meaning of time: Polysemy, the lexicon and conceptual structure’. Journal of Linguistics 41: 33-75.
71. Farkas, K. (2008). ‘Time, tense, truth’. Synthese 160: 269-84.
72. Fernández, J. (2008). ‘Memory, past and self '. Synthese 160: 103-21.
73. Fine, K. (2005). ‘Tense and reality’. In: K. Fine. Modality and Tense: Philosophical Papers. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 261-320.
74. Fleischman, S. (1982). The Future in Thought and Language: Diachronic Evidence from Romance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
75. Foer, J. (2007). ‘Remember this’. National Geographic, November 2007: 32-55.
76. Galton, A. (1990). ‘A critical examination of Allen’s theory of action and time’. Artificial Intelligence 42: 159-88. Reprinted in: I. Mani, J. Pustejovsky, and R. Gaizauskas (eds). 2005. The Language of Time: A Reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 277-99.
77. Gennari, S. P. (2003). ‘Tense meanings and temporal interpretation’. Journal of Semantics 20: 35-71.
78. Geurts, B. (1999). Presuppositions and Pronouns. Oxford: Elsevier Science.
79. Giora, R. (2003). On Our Mind: Salience, Context, and Figurative Language. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
80. Givón, T. (2005). Context as other Minds: The Pragmatics of Sociality, Cognition and Communication. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins.
81. Grice, H. P. (1975). ‘Logic and conversation’. In: P. Cole and J. L. Morgan (eds). Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 3. New York: Academic Press. Reprinted in: H. P. Grice. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 22-40.
82. Grice, H. P. (1978). ‘Further notes on logic and conversation’. In: P. Cole (ed.). Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 9. New York: Academic Press. Reprinted in: H. P. Grice. 1989. Studies in the Way of Words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 41-57.
83. Grice, H. P. (2001). Aspects of Reason. Ed. by R. Warner. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
84. Groenendijk, J. and M. Stokhof (1991). ‘Dynamic Predicate Logic’. Linguistics and Philosophy 14: 39-100.
85. Gumperz, J. J. and S. C. Levinson (eds) (1996). Rethinking Linguistic Relativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
86. Guttenplan, S. (1994). ‘Memory’. In: S. Guttenplan (ed.). A Companion to the Philosophy of Mind. Oxford: Blackwell. 433-41.
87. de Haan, F. (2006). ‘Typological approaches to modality’. In: W. Frawley (ed.). The Expression of Modality. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 27-69.
88. Hamblin, C. L. (1972). ‘Instants and intervals’. In: J. T. Fraser, F. C. Haber, and G. H. Müller (eds). The Study of Time. Vol. 1. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. 324-31.
89. Hamm, F., H. Kamp, and M. van Lambalgen (2006). ‘There is no opposition between Formal and Cognitive Semantics’. Theoretical Linguistics 32: 1-40.
90. Hawking, S. W. (1988). A Brief History of Time: From the Big Bang to Black Holes. London: Bantam Press.
91. Hawking, S. W. (2001). The Universe in a Nutshell. London: Bantam Press.
92. Heidegger, M. (1953). Sein und Zeit. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. Transl. by J. Stambaugh as Being and Time. 1996. Albany: State University of New York Press.
93. Higginbotham, J. (1985). ‘On semantics’. Linguistic Inquiry 16: 547-93.
94. Higginbotham, J. (1995). ‘Tensed thoughts’. Mind and Language 10: 226-49. Reprinted in: W. Künne, A. Newen, and M. Anduschus (eds). 1997. Direct Reference, Indexicality, and Propositional Attitudes. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications. 21-48.
95. Higginbotham, J. (2000). ‘On events in linguistic semantics’. In: J. Higginbotham, F. Pianesi, and A. C. Varzi (eds). Speaking of Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 49-79.
96. Horn, L. R. (2004). ‘Implicature’. In: L. R. Horn and G. Ward (eds). The Handbook of Pragmatics. Oxford: Blackwell. 3-28.
97. Horn, L. R. (2006). ‘The border wars: A neo-Gricean perspective’. In: K. von Heusinger and K. Turner (eds). Where Semantics Meets Pragmatics: The Michigan Papers. Oxford: Elsevier. 21-48.
98. Hornstein, N. (1990). As Time Goes By: Tense and Universal Grammar. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
99. Horwich, P. (1987). Asymmetries in Time: Problems in the Philosophy of Science. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
100. Horwich, P. (2005). Reflections on Meaning. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
101. Husserl, E. (1900-01). Logische Untersuchungen. Vol. 2. Halle: Max Niemeyer. Reprinted in 1984 after the second edition (1913-21). The Hague: Martinus Nijho V. Husserliana 19/1. Transl. by J. N. Findlay as Logical Investigations. 1970. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
102. Husserl, E. (1928). Vorlesungen zur Phänomenologie des inneren Zeitbewusstseins. Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung IX. Halle: Max Niemeyer. Transl. by J. B. Brough as Lectures on the Phenomenology of the Consciousness of Internal Time in: On the Phenomenology of the Consciousness of Internal Time (1893-1917). Part A. 1991. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
103. Husserl, E. (1939). Erfahrung und Urteil. Untersuchungen zur Genealogie der Logik. Prague: Academia Verlagsbuchhandlung. Transl. by J. S. Churchill and K. Ameriks as Experience and Judgment. Investigations in a Genealogy of Logic. 1973. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
104. Husserl, E. (1950). Cartesianische Meditationen. In: Cartesianische Meditationen und Pariser Vorträge. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff. 41-201. Transl. by D. Cairns as Cartesian Meditations. An Introduction to Phenomenology. 1960. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff.
105. Jackendoff, R. (2002). Foundations of Language: Brain, Meaning, Grammar, Evolution. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
106. James, W. (1890). The Principles of Psychology. London: Macmillan. Reprinted in 1952. Chicago: Encyclopaedia Britannica Inc.
107. Jaszczolt, K. M. (1996). ‘Reported speech, vehicles of thought, and the horizon’. Lingua e Stile 31: 113-33.
108. Jaszczolt, K. M. (1999). Discourse, Beliefs, and Intentions: Semantic Defaults and Propositional Attitude Ascription. Oxford: Elsevier Science.
109. Jaszczolt, K. M. (2000). ‘Belief reports and pragmatic theory: the state of the art’. Introduction to: K. M. Jaszczolt (ed.). The Pragmatics of Propositional Attitude Reports. Oxford: Elsevier Science. 1-12.
110. Jaszczolt, K. M. (2002). Semantics and Pragmatics: Meaning in Language and Discourse. London: Longman.
111. Jaszczolt, K. M. (2003). ‘The modality of the future: A Default-Semantics account’. In: P. Dekker and R. van Rooy (eds). Proceedings from the 14th Amsterdam Colloquium, ILLC, University of Amsterdam. 43-8.
112. Jaszczolt, K. M. (2005). Default Semantics: Foundations of a Compositional Theory of Acts of Communication. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
113. Jaszczolt, K. M. (2006a). ‘Futurity in Default Semantics’. In: K. von Heusinger and K. Turner (eds). Where Semantics Meets Pragmatics: The Michigan Papers. Oxford: Elsevier. 471-92.
114. Jaszczolt, K. M. (2006b). ‘Defaults in semantics and pragmatics’. In: E. N. Zalta (ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/contents.html.
115. Jaszczolt, K. M. (2007). ‘On being post-Gricean’. In: R. A. Nilsen, N. A. A. Amfo, and K. Borthen (eds). Interpreting Utterances: Pragmatics and Its Interfaces. Essays in Honour of Thorstein Fretheim. Oslo: Novus. 21-38.
116. Jaszczolt, K. M. (2008). ‘Psychological explanations in Gricean pragmatics and Frege’s legacy’. In: I. Kecskes and J. Mey (eds). Intentions, Common Ground, and the Egocentric Speaker-Hearer. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 9-45.
117. Jaszczolt, K. M. (forthcoming). ‘Semantics and pragmatics: The boundary issue’. In: K. von Heusinger, P. Portner, and C. Maienborn (eds). Semantics: An International Handbook of Natural Language Meaning. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
118. Jaszczolt, K. M. and J. Srioutai (forthcoming). ‘Communicating about the past through modality in English and Thai’. In: F. Brisard and T. Mortelmans (eds). Cognitive Approaches to Tense, Aspect and Modality. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins.
119. Kamp, H. (1979). ‘Events, instants and temporal reference’. In: R. Bäuerle, U. Egli, and A. von Stechow (eds). Semantics from Different Points of View. Berlin: Springer-Verlag. 376-417.
120. Kamp, H. (1981). ‘A theory of truth and semantic representation’. In: J. Groenendijk, T. M. V. Janssen, and M. Stokhof (eds). Formal Methods in the Study of Language, Mathematical Centre Tract 135, Amsterdam, 277-322. Reprinted in: J. Groenendijk, T. M. V. Janssen, and M. Stokhof (eds). 1984. Truth, Interpretation and Information. Selected Papers from the Third Amsterdam Colloquium. Dordrecht: FORIS. 1-41.
121. Kamp, H. (2001). ‘Presupposition computation and presupposition justification: One aspect of the interpretation of multi-sentence discourse’. In: M. Bras and L. Vieu (eds). Semantic and Pragmatic Issues in Discourse and Dialogue: Experimenting with Current Dynamic Theories. Oxford: Elsevier. 57-84.
122. Kamp, H. (2007). ‘Discourse linking as (simultaneous) constraint solving’. Paper presented at the meeting of the Linguistics Association of Great Britain, King’s College London, August 2007.
123. Kamp, H, J. van Genabith, and U. Reyle (forthcoming). ‘Discourse Representation Theory’. In: D. M. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds). Handbook of Philosophical Logic. Second edition.
124. Kamp, H. and U. Reyle (1993). From Discourse to Logic: Introduction to Modeltheoretic Semantics of Natural Language, Formal Logic and Discourse Representation Theory. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
125. Kamp, H. and M. Schiehlen (2002). ‘Temporal location in natural languages’. In: H. Kamp and U. Reyle (eds). How We Say WHEN It Happens: Contributions to the Theory of Temporal Reference in Natural Language. Tübingen: Max Niemeyer. 181-232.
126. Kaplan, D. (1989). ‘Demonstratives: An essay on the semantics, logic, metaphysics, and epistemology of demonstratives and other indexicals’. In J. Almog, J. Perry, and H.Wettstein (eds). Themes from Kaplan. New York: Oxford University Press. 481-563.
127. Kaufmann, S., C. Condoravdi, and V. Harizanov (2006). ‘Formal approaches to modality’. In: W. Frawley (ed.). The Expression of Modality. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 71-106.
128. Kelly, S. D. (2005). ‘Temporal awareness’. In: D. W. Smith and A. L. Thomasson (eds). Phenomenology and Philosophy of Mind. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 222-34.
129. Kempson, R. M. (1977). Semantic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
130. Kim, J. (1973). ‘Causation, nomic subsumption and the concept of event’. Journal of Philosophy 70: 217-36. Reprinted in: J. Kim. 1993. Supervenience and Mind: Selected Philosophical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 3-21.
131. Kim, J. (1976). ‘Events as property exemplifications’. In: M. Brand and D. Walton (eds). Action Theory. Dordrecht: D. Reidel. 159-77. Reprinted in: J. Kim. 1993. Supervenience and Mind: Selected Philosophical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 33-52.
132. Kim, J. (1987). ' '‘Strong’' and '‘global’' supervenience revisited’. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 48: 315-26. Reprinted in: J. Kim. 1993. Supervenience and Mind: Selected Philosophical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 79-91.
133. Künne, W. (2003). Conceptions of Truth. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
134. Kuhn, S. T. and P. Portner (2002). ‘Tense and time’. In: D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds). Handbook of Philosophical Logic. Vol. 7. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 277-346.
135. Ladusaw, W. (1977). ‘Some problems with tense in PTQ’. Texas Linguistic Forum 6: 89-102.
136. Lakoff, G. (1987). Women, Fire, and Dangerous Things: What Categories Reveal about the Mind. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
137. Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson (1980). Metaphors We Live By. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
138. Lakoff, G. and M. Johnson (1999). Philosophy in the Flesh: The Embodied Mind and Its Challenge to Western Thought. New York: Basic Books.
139. Lakoff, G. and M. Turner (1989).More than Cool Reason: A Field Guide to Poetic Metaphor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
140. van Lambalgen, M. and F. Hamm (2005). The Proper Treatment of Events. Oxford: Blackwell.
141. Landman, F. (2000). Events and Plurality: The Jerusalem Lectures. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
142. Langacker, R. (1987). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 1: Theoretical Prerequisites. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
143. Langacker, R. (1991). Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Vol. 2: Descriptive Application. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
144. Langacker, R. (1999). Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
145. Langacker, R. (2001). ‘The English present tense’. English Language and Linguistics 5: 251-72.
146. Langacker, R. (2006). ‘The English present: Temporal coincidence vs. epistemic immediacy’. Paper presented at Chronos 7, Antwerp. Forthcoming in: F. Brisard and T. Mortelmans (eds). Cognitive Approaches to Tense, Aspect and Modality. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins.
147. Lascarides, A. and N. Asher (1993). ‘Temporal interpretation, discourse relations, and commonsense entailment’ Linguistics and Philosophy 16: 437-93. Reprinted in: I. Mani, J. Pustejovsky, and R. Gaizauskas (eds). 2005. The Language of Time: A Reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 353-95.
148. Leech, G. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
149. Leith, M. and J. Cunningham (2001). ‘Aspect and Interval Logic’. Linguistics and Philosophy 24: 331-81.
150. Levinson, S. C. (2000). Presumptive Meanings: The Theory of Generalized Conversational Implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
151. Levinson, S. C. (2003). Space in Language and Cognition: Explorations in Cognitive Diversity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
152. Levinson, S. C. et al. (2002). ‘Returning the tables: Language affects spatial reasoning’. Cognition 84: 155-88.
153. Levinson, S. C., Meira, S., and The Language and Cognition Group (2003). ' '‘Natural concepts’' in the spatial topological domain -adpositional meanings in crosslinguistic perspective: An exercise in semantic typology’. Language 79: 485-516.
154. Ludlow, P. (1999). Semantics, Tense, and Time: An Essay in the Metaphysics of Natural Language. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
155. Ludlow, P. (2006). ‘Tense’. In: E. Lepore and B. C. Smith (eds). The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 689-715.
156. Łukasiewicz, J. (1961). ‘O determinizmie’. In: J. Šlupecki (ed.). Jan Łukasiewicz. Z zagadnień logiki i Wlozofii. Pisma wybrane. Warszawa: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe. Transl. by Z. Jordan as ‘On determinism’ in: L. Borkowski (ed.). 1970. Jan Łukasiewicz: Selected Works. Amsterdam: North-Holland. 110-28.
157. Lyons, J. (1977). Semantics. 2 volumes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
158. McCready, E. and N. Ogata. (2007). ‘Evidentiality, modality and probability’. Linguistics and Philosophy 30: 147-206.
159. McLaughlin, B. and K. Bennett. (2005). ‘Supervenience’. In: E. N. Zalta (ed.). Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. http://plato.stanford.edu/contents.html
160. McTaggart, J. E. (1908). ‘The unreality of time’. Mind 17. Reprinted in: J. E.McTaggart. 1934. Philosophical Studies. London: E. Arnold. 110-31.
161. Maienborn, C. (2005). ‘On the limits of the Davidsonian approach’. Theoretical Linguistics 31: 275-316.
162. Manni, H. M. (2007). ‘Tense in Mocoví: The temporal property of DP’. In: A. R. Deal (ed.). Proceedings of SULA 4: Semantics of Under-Represented Languages in the Americas. University of Massachusetts Occasional Papers 35. Amherst, MA: Graduate Linguistics Student Association. 129-40.
163. Martí, L. (2006). ‘Unarticulated constituents revisited’. Linguistics and Philosophy 29: 135-66.
164. Matthewson, L. (2006). ‘Temporal semantics in a superficially tenseless language’. Linguistics and Philosophy 29: 673-713.
165. Mellor, D. H. (1993). ‘The unreality of tense’. In: R. Le Poidevin and M. MacBeath (eds). The Philosophy of Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 47-59.
166. Mellor, D. H. (1998). Real Time II. London: Routledge.
167. ter Meulen, A. G. B. (1995). Representing Time in Natural Language: The Dynamic Interpretation of Tense and Aspect. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
168. Meyer, U. (2002). ‘Prior and the platonist’. Analysis 62: 211-16.
169. Mitchell, D. (2004). Cloud Atlas. London: Hodder and Stoughton.
170. Moens, M. and M. Steedman (1988). ‘Temporal ontology and temporal reference’. Computational Linguistics 14: 15-28. Reprinted in: I. Mani, J. Pustejovsky, and R. Gaizauskas (eds). 2005. The Language of Time: A Reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 93-114.
171. Moltmann, F. (2006). ‘Presuppositions and quantifier domains’. Synthese 149: 179-224.
172. Montague, R. (1960). ‘On the nature of certain philosophical entities’. The Monist 53: 159-94. Reprined in: R. Thomason (ed.). 1974. Formal Philosophy: Selected Papers of Richard Montague. New Haven: Yale University Press. 148-87.
173. Montminy, M. (2006). ‘Semantic content, truth conditions and context’. Review article of Cappelen and Lepore 2005. Linguistics and Philosophy 29: 1-26.
174. Mozersky, J. M. (2001). ‘Smith on times and tokens’. Synthese 129: 405-11.
175. Nicolle, S. and B. Clark. (1999). ‘Experimental pragmatics and what is said: A response to Gibbs and Moise’. Cognition 69: 337-54.
176. Nuyts, J. (2001). Epistemic Modality, Language, and Conceptualization: A Cognitive-Pragmatic Perspective. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins.
177. Nuyts, J. (2006). ‘Modality: Overview and linguistic issues’. In: W. Frawley (ed.). The Expression of Modality. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 1-26.
178. Oaklander, L. N. and V. A.White. (2007). ‘B-time: a reply to Tallant’. Analysis 67: 332-40.
179. Ogihara, T. (1996). Tense, Attitudes, and Scope. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
180. Øhrstrøm, P. and P. F. V. Hasle (1995). Temporal Logic: From Ancient Ideas to Artificial Intelligence. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
181. Palmer, F. R. (1979). Modality and the English Modals. London: Longman.
182. Palmer, F. R. (1986). Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
183. Palmer, F. R. (2001). Mood and Modality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Second edition.
184. Papafragou, A. (2000). Modality: Issues in the Semantics-Pragmatics Interface. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science.
185. Parsons, J. (2002). ‘A-theory for B-theorists’. The Philosophical Quarterly 52: 1-20.
186. Parsons, J. (2003). ‘A-theory for tense logicians’. Analysis 63: 4-6.
187. Parsons, T. (1990). Events in the Semantics of English: A Study in Subatomic Semantics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
188. Partee, B. H. (1973). ‘Some structural analogies between tenses and pronouns in English’. Journal of Philosophy 70: 601-9. Reprinted in: B. Partee. 2004. Compositionality in Formal Semantics. Oxford: Blackwell. 50-8.
189. Partee, B. H. (1984). ‘Compositionality’. In: F. Landman and F. Veltman (eds). Varieties of Formal Semantics. Dordrecht: Foris. Reprinted in: B. H. Partee (ed.). 2004. Compositionality in Formal Semantics: Selected Papers by Barbara H. Partee. Oxford: Blackwell. 153-81.
190. Patterson, D. (2003). ‘What is a correspondence theory of truth?'. Synthese 137: 421-44.
191. Pederson, E. et al. (1998). ‘Semantic typology and spatial conceptualization’. Language 74: 557-89.
192. Pelczar, M. W. (2004). ‘The indispensability of Farbung’. Synthese 138: 49-77.
193. Pelczar, M. W. (2007). ‘Forms and objects of thought’. Linguistics and Philosophy 30: 97-122.
194. Penrose, R. (1989). The Emperor’s New Mind: Concerning Computers, Minds, and the Laws of Physics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
195. Perry, J. (2001). Reference and Reflexivity. Stanford, CA: CSLI Publications.
196. Pianesi, F. and A. C. Varzi (2000). ‘Events and event talk: An introduction’. In: J. Higginbotham, F. Pianesi, and A. C. Varzi (eds). Speaking of Events. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 3-47.
197. Pietroski, P. M. ((2005). Events and Semantic Architecture. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
198. Pitts, A. (2005). ‘Assessing the evidence for intuitions about what is said '. Ms, University of Cambridge.
199. Le Poidevin, R. (2007). The Images of Time: An Essay on Temporal Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
200. Portner, P. (2003). ‘The (temporal) semantics and (modal) pragmatics of the perfect’. Linguistics and Philosophy 26: 459-510.
201. Pratt, I. and N. Francez (2001). ‘Temporal prepositions and temporal generalized quantifiers’. Linguistics and Philosophy 24: 187-222.
202. Predelli, S. (2005a). Contexts: Meaning, Truth, and the Use of Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
203. Predelli, S. (2005b). ‘Painted leaves, context, and semantic analysis’. Linguistics and Philosophy 28: 351-74.
204. Predelli, S. (2006). ‘The problem with token-reflexivity’. Synthese 148: 5-29.
205. Prior, A. N. (1957). Time and Modality. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
206. Prior, A. N. (1959). ‘Thank goodness that’s over’. Philosophy 34: 12-17. Reprinted in A. N. Prior. 1976. Papers in Logic and Ethics. London: Duckworth. 78-84.
207. Prior, A. N. (1967). Past, Present and Future. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
208. Prior, A. N. (1968a). Papers on Time and Tense. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
209. Prior, A. N. (1968b). ‘Now’. Noûs 2: 101-19.
210. Prior, A. N. (1968c). ‘Tense logic and the logic of earlier and later’. In: Papers on Time and Tense. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 116-34.
211. Prior, A. N. (1968d). ‘Tense logic for non-permanent existents’. In: Papers on Time and Tense. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 145-60.
212. Prior, A. N. (2003). Papers on Time and Tense: New Edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
213. Quine, W. V. O. (1960). Word and Object. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
214. Ramchand, G. and P. Svenonius (forthcoming). ‘Mapping a parochial lexicon onto universal semantics’. In: M. T. Biberauer (ed.). Limits of Syntactic Variation. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins.
215. Ramsey, F. (1927). ‘Facts and propositions’. Aristotelian Society Supplementary Volume VII: 153-70.
216. Recanati, F. (1989). ‘The pragmatics of what is said’. Mind and Language 4: 295-329. Reprinted in: S. Davis (ed.). 1991. Pragmatics: A Reader. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 97-120.
217. Recanati, F. (1993). Direct Reference: From Language to Thought. Oxford: Blackwell.
218. Recanati, F. (2001). ‘What is said’. Synthese 128: 75-91.
219. Recanati, F. (2002). ‘Unarticulated constituents’. Linguistics and Philosophy 25: 299-345.
220. Recanati, F. (2004). Literal Meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
221. Recanati, F. (2005). ‘Literalism and contextualism: Some varieties’. In: G. Preyer and G. Peter (eds). Contextualism in Philosophy: Knowledge, Meaning, and Truth. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 171-96.
222. Recanati, F. (2007a). Perspectival Thought: A Plea for (Moderate) Relativism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
223. Recanati, F. (2007b). ‘It is raining (somewhere)'. Linguistics and Philosophy 30: 123-46.
224. Recanati, F. (2007c). Reply to Carston 2007. In: M. J. Frápolli (ed.). Saying, Meaning and Referring: Essays on François Recanati’s Philosophy of Language. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan. 49-54.
225. Reichenbach, H. (1948). Elements of Symbolic Logic. New York: Macmillan.
226. Rothstein, S. (2004). Structuring Events: A Study in the Semantics of Lexical Aspect. Oxford: Blackwell.
227. Sattig, T. (2006). The Language and Reality of Time. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
228. Saul, J. M. (2002). ‘What is said and psychological reality; Grice’s project and relevance theorists’ criticisms’. Linguistics and Philosophy 25: 347-72.
229. Saul, J. M. (2007). Simple Sentences, Substitution, and Intuitions. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
230. Saurer, W. (1984). A Formal Semantics of Tense, Aspect and Aktionsarten. Bloomington: Indiana University Linguistics Club.
231. Schein, B. (2002). ‘Events and the semantic content of thematic relations’. In: G. Preyer and G. Peter (eds). Logical Form and Language. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 263-344.
232. Schiffer, S. (1991). ‘Does Mentalese have a compositional semantics?'. In: B. Loewer and G. Rey (eds).Meaning in Mind: Fodor and his Critics. Oxford: Blackwell. 181-99.
233. Schiffer, S. (1994). ‘A paradox of meaning’. Noûs 28: 279-324.
234. Schiffer, S. (2003). The Things We Mean. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
235. Schnieder, B. (2006). ‘Truth-making without truth-makers’. Synthese 152: 21-46.
236. Schopenhauer, A. (1819). Die Welt als Wille und Vorstellung. Leipzig. Transl. by E. F. J. Payne as The World as Will and Representation. 2 vols. 1969. New York: Dover Publications.
237. Simon-Vandenbergen, A.-M. and K. Aijmer (2007). The Semantic Field of Modal Certainty: A Corpus-Based Study of English Adverbs. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
238. Smessaert, H. and A. G. B. ter Meulen (2004). ‘Temporal reasoning with aspectual adverbs’. Linguistics and Philosophy 27: 209-61.
239. Smith, Q. (1993). Language and Time. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
240. Sperber, D. and D. Wilson (1986). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
241. Sperber, D. and D. Wilson (1995). Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell. Second edition.
242. Srioutai, J. (2004). ‘The Thai c1a: A marker of tense or modality?' In: E. Daskalaki et al. (eds). Second CamLing Proceedings. University of Cambridge. 273-80.
243. Srioutai, J. (2006). Time Conceptualization in Thai with Special Reference to D1ay1II, Kh3oe: y, K1aml3ang, Y3u: I and C1a. PhD Thesis. University of Cambridge.
244. Stanley, J. (2000). ‘Context and logical form’. Linguistics and Philosophy 23: 391-434.
245. Stanley, J. (2002). ‘Making it articulated’. Mind and Language 17: 149-68.
246. Stanley, J. (2005). ‘Semantics in context’. In: G. Preyer and G. Peter (eds). Contextualism in Philosophy: Knowledge, Meaning, and Truth. Oxford: Clarendon Press. 221-53.
247. Stanley, J. and Z. G. Szabó (2000). ‘On quantifier domain restriction’.Mind and Language 15: 219-61.
248. Steedman, M. (1997). ‘Temporality’. In: J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (eds). Handbook of Logic and Language. Amsterdam: Elsevier Science. 895-938.
249. de Swart, H. (2007). ‘A cross-linguistic discourse analysis of the Perfect’. Journal of Pragmatics 39: 2273-307.
250. Sysoeva, A. and K. Jaszczolt (2007). ‘Composing utterance meaning: An interface between pragmatics and psychology’. Paper presented at the 10th International Pragmatics Conference, Göteborg, July 2007.
251. Tallant, J. (2007). ‘What is B-time?'. Analysis 67: 147-56.
252. Taylor, B. (1985). Modes of Occurrence: Verbs, Adverbs and Events. Oxford: Blackwell.
253. Thomason, R. H. (1997). ‘Nonmonotonicity in linguistics’. In: J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (eds). Handbook of Logic and Language. Oxford: Elsevier Science. 777-831.
254. Thomason, R. H. (2002). ‘Combinations of tense and modality’. In: D. Gabbay and F. Guenthner (eds). Handbook of Philosophical Logic. Vol. 7. Dordrecht: Kluwer. 205-34.
255. Thornton, A. (1987).Maori Oral Literature As Seen by a Classicist. Dunedin: University of Otago Press.
256. Tonhauser, J. (2007). ‘Nominal tense? The meaning of Guaranínominal temporal markers’. Language 83: 831-69.
257. Traugott, E. C. (2006). ‘Historical aspects of modality’. In: W. Frawley (ed.). The Expression of Modality. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 107-39.
258. Traugott, E. C. and R. B. Dasher (2002). Regularity in Semantic Change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
259. Tynan, J. and E. Delgado Lavín (1997). ‘Mood, tense and the interpretation of conditionals’. In: A. Athanasiadou and R. Dirven (eds). On Conditionals Again. Amsterdam: J. Benjamins. 115-42.
260. Ultan, R. (1972). ‘The nature of future tenses’. Working Papers on Language Universals 8. Reprinted in: J. H. Greenberg (ed.). 1978. Universals of Human Language. Vol. 3, Word Structure. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. 83-123.
261. Ungerer, F. and H.-J. Schmid (1996). An Introduction to Cognitive Linguistics. London: Longman.
262. Vallesi, A., M. A. Binns and T. Shallice. (2008). ‘An effect of spatial-temporal association of response codes: Understanding the cognitive representations of time’. Cognition 107: 501-27.
263. Vendler, Z. (1967). Linguistics in Philosophy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
264. Wekker, H. C. (1976). The Expression of Future Time in Contemporary British English. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
265. Werth, P. (1997). ‘Remote worlds: The conceptual representation of linguistic would’. In: J. Nuyts and E. Pederson (eds). Language and Conceptualization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 84-115.
266. Young, J. (1997). Heidegger, Philosophy, Nazism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
267. Zeevat, H. (1989). ‘A compositional approach to Discourse Representation Theory’. Linguistics and Philosophy 12: 95-131.