Behavioral isolation due to cascade reinforcement in Lucania killifish

American Naturalist

Volumn 185, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 491-506

  Kozak, Genevieve M ^a   Roland, Genevieve ^a   Rankhorn, Clare ^a   Falater, Amy ^a   Berdan, Emma L ^b   Fuller, Rebecca C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT URBANA CHAMPAIGN   (United States)

^b LEIBNIZ INSTITUTE FOR EVOLUTION AND BIODIVERSITY SCIENCE   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cascade reinforcement; Ecological speciation; Premating isolation; Reproductive character displacement; Sexual selection

Indexed keywords

ALLOPATRY; CHARACTER DISPLACEMENT; CONSPECIFIC; ISOLATION EFFECT; MATE CHOICE; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR; SEXUAL SELECTION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY); SYMPATRY; TELEOST; TROPHIC CASCADE;

CYPRINODONTOIDEI; LUCANIA GOODEI; LUCANIA PARVA;

ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; FEMALE; FUNDULIDAE; MALE; MATE CHOICE; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SALINITY; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; SYMPATRY;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; FEMALE; FUNDULIDAE; GENETIC SPECIATION; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SALINITY; SYMPATRY;

EID: 84928248405     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/680023     Document Type: Article

References (71)

1. Albert, A. Y. K., and D. Schluter. 2004. Reproductive character displacement of male stickleback mate preference: reinforcement or direct selection? Evolution 58:1099–1107.
2. Arndt, R. G. E. 1971. Ecology and behavior of the cyprinodont fishes Adinia xenica, Lucania parva, Lucania goodei, and Leptolucania ommata. PhD diss. Cornell University, Ithaca, NY.
3. Bateman, A. J. 1948. Intra-sexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2:349–368.
4. Berdan, E. L., and R. C. Fuller. 2012. A test for environmental effects on behavioral isolation in two species of killifish. Evolution 66: 3224–3237.
5. Bolnick, D. I., M. Turelli, H. Lopez-Fernandez, P. C. Wainwright, and T. J. Near. 2008. Accelerated mitochondrial evolution and “Darwin’s corollary”: asymmetric viability of reciprocal F-1 hybrids in centrarchid fishes. Genetics 178:1037–1048.
6. Booksmythe, I., M. D. Jennions, and P. R. Y. Backwell. 2011. Male fiddler crabs prefer conspecific females during simultaneous, but not sequential, mate choice. Animal Behaviour 81:775–778.
7. Boughman, J. W. 2001. Divergent sexual selection enhances reproductive isolation in sticklebacks. Nature 411:944–948.
8. Boughman, J. W., and H. D. Rundle. 2010. Behavioral ecology and speciation. Pages 471–487 in D. F. Westneat and C. W. Fox, eds. Behavioral ecology and speciation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
9. Boughman, J. W., H. D. Rundle, and D. Schluter. 2005. Parallel evolution of sexual isolation in sticklebacks. Evolution 59:361–373.
10. Butlin, R. K. 1989. Speciation by reinforcement. Pages 158–179 in D. Otte and J. A. Endler, eds. Speciation and its consequences. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
11. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 2004. Speciation. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
12. Curtis, S., J. L. Sztepanacz, B. E. White, K. A. Dyer, H. D. Rundle, and P. Mayer. 2013. Epicuticular compounds of Drosophila subquinaria and D. recens: identification, quantification, and their role in female mate choice. Journal of Chemical Ecology 39:579–590.
13. Dieckmann, U., and M. Doebeli. 1999. On the origin of species by sympatric speciation. Nature 400:354–357.
14. Dunson, W. A., and J. Travis. 1991. The role of abiotic factors in community organization. American Naturalist 138:1067–1091.
15. Dyer, K. A., B. E. White, J. L. Sztepanacz, E. R. Bewick, and H. D. Rundle. 2014. Reproductive character displacement of epicuticular compounds and their contribution to mate choice in Drosophila subquinaria and Drosophila recens. Evolution 68:1163–1175.
16. Fuller, R. C. 2001. Patterns in male breeding behaviors in the bluefin killifish, Lucania goodei: a field study (Cyprinodontiformes: Fundulidae). Copeia 2001:823–828.
17. Fuller, R. C. 2002. Lighting environment predicts relative abundance of male color morphs in bluefin killifish populations. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 269:1457–1465.
18. Fuller, R. C. 2008a. Genetic incompatibilities in killifish and the role of environment. Evolution 62:3056–3068.
19. Fuller, R. C. 2008b. A test for a trade-off in salinity tolerance in early lifehistory stages in Lucania goodei and L. parva. Copeia 2008:154–157.
20. Fuller, R. C., K. L. Carleton, J. M. Fadool, T. C. Spady, and J. Travis. 2004. Population variation in opsin expression in the bluefin killifish, Lucania goodei: a real-time PCR study. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 190:147–154.
21. Fuller, R. C. 2005. Genetic and environmental variation in the visual properties of bluefin killifish, Lucania goodei. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 18:516–523.
22. Fuller, R. C., L. J. Fleishman, M. Leal, J. Travis, and E. Loew. 2003. Intraspecific variation in retinal cone distribution in the bluefin killifish, Lucania goodei. Journal of Comparative Physiology A 189: 609–616.
23. Fuller, R. C., K. E. McGhee, and M. Schrader. 2007. Speciation in killifish and the role of salt tolerance. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 20:1962–1975.
24. Fuller, R. C., and L. A. Noa. 2008. Distribution and stability of sympatric populations of Lucania goodei and L. parva across Florida. Copeia 2008:699–707.
25. Fuller, R. C., L. A. Noa, and R. S. Strellner. 2010. Teasing apart the many effects of lighting environment on opsin expression and foraging preference in bluefin killifish. American Naturalist 176:1–13.
26. Giglio, E. M., and K. A. Dyer. 2013. Divergence of premating behaviors in the closely related species Drosophila subquinaria and D. recens. Ecology and Evolution 3:365–374.
27. Gregorio, O., E. L. Berdan, G. M. Kozak, and R. C. Fuller. 2012. Reinforcement of male mate preferences in sympatric killifish species Lucania goodei and Lucania parva. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 66:1429–1436.
28. Higgie, M., and M. W. Blows. 2007. Are traits that experience reinforcement also under sexual selection? American Naturalist 170: 409–420.
29. Higgie, M., and M. W. Blows. 2008. The evolution of reproductive character displacement conflicts with how sexual selection operates within a species. Evolution 62:1192–1203.
30. Hoskin, C. J., andM. Higgie. 2010. Speciation via species interactions: the divergence of mating traits within species. Ecology Letters 13: 409–420.
31. Hoskin, C. J., M. Higgie, K. R. McDonald, and C. Moritz. 2005. Reinforcement drives rapid allopatric speciation. Nature 437:1353–1356.
32. Howard, D. J. 1993. Reinforcement: origin, dynamics, and fate of an evolutionary hypothesis. Pages 46–69 in R. G. Harrison, ed. Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford University Press, New York.
33. Hubbs, C., and R. R. Miller. 1965. Studies of cyprinodont fishes. XXII. Variation in Lucania parva, its establishment in western United States, and description of a new species from an interiorbasin in Coahuila, Mexico. Miscellaneous Publications Museum of Zoology University of Michigan 127:1–104.
34. Hubbs, C., B. Walker, and R. Johnson. 1943. Hybridization in nature between species of American cyprinodont fishes. Contributions from the Laboratory of Vertebrate Biology, University of Michigan 23:1–21.
35. Jaenike, J., K. A. Dyer, C. Cornish, and M. S. Minhas. 2006. Asymmetrical reinforcement and Wolbachia infection in Drosophila. PLoS Biology 4:e325.
36. Johnson, A. M., and R. C. Fuller. 2015. The meaning of melanin, carotenoid, and pterin pigments in the bluefin killifish, Lucania goodei. Behavioral Ecology 26:158–167. doi:10.1093/beheco/aru164.
37. Kozak, G. M., R. S. Brennan, E. L. Berdan, R. C. Fuller, and A. D. Whitehead AD. 2014. Functional and population genomic divergence within and between two species of killifish adapted to different osmotic niches. Evolution 68:63–80.
38. Kozak, G. M., G. Roland, C. Rankhorn, A. Falater, E. L. Berdan, and R. C. Fuller. 2015. Data from: Behavioral isolation due to cascade reinforcement in Lucania killifish. American Naturalist, Dryad Digital Repository, http://dx.doi.org/10.5061/dryad.ch86c.
39. Kozak, G. M., A. B. Rudolph, B. L. Colon, and R. C. Fuller. 2012. Postzygotic isolation evolves before prezygotic isolation between fresh and saltwater populations of the rainwater killifish, Lucania parva. International Journal of Evolutionary Biology 2012:523967.
40. Lemmon, E. M. 2009. Diversification of conspecific signals in sympatry: geographical overlap drives multidimensional reproductive character displacement in frogs. Evolution 63:1155–1170.
41. Maan, M. E., and O. Seehausen. 2011. Ecology, sexual selection and speciation. Ecology Letters 14:591–602.
42. McGhee, K. E., R. C. Fuller, and J. Travis. 2007. Male competition and female choice interact to determine mating success in the bluefin killifish. Behavioral Ecology 18:822–830.
43. McGhee, K. E., and J. Travis. 2011. Early food and social environment affect certain behaviours but not female choice or male dominance in bluefin killifish. Animal Behaviour 82:139–147.
44. McPeek, M. A., and S. Gavrilets. 2006. The evolution of female mating preferences: differentiation from species with promiscuous males can promote speciation. Evolution 60:1967–1980.
45. Mendelson, T. C., M. D. Martin, and S. M. Flaxman. 2014. Mutationorder divergence by sexual selection: diversification of sexual signals in similar environments as a first step in speciation. Ecology Letters 17:1053–1066.
46. Mendelson, T. C., and K. L. Shaw. 2012. The (mis)concept of species recognition. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 27:421–427.
47. M’Gonigle, L. K., R. Mazzucco, S. P. Otto, and U. Dieckmann. 2012. Sexual selection enables long-term coexistence despite ecological equivalence. Nature 484:506–509.
48. Miller, R. R., W. L. Minckley, and S. M. Norris. 2005. Freshwater fishes of Mexico. Chicago University Press, Chicago.
49. Noor, M. A. F. 1999. Reinforcement and other consequences of sympatry. Heredity 83:503–508.
50. Nosil, P. 2012. Ecological speciation. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
51. Nosil, P., B. J. Crespi, and C. P. Sandoval. 2003. Reproductive isolation driven by the combined effects of ecological adaptation and reinforcement. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 270:1911–1918.
52. Ortiz-Barrientos, D., A. Grealy, and P. Nosil. 2009. The genetics and ecology of reinforcement implications for the evolution of prezygotic isolation in sympatry and beyond. Year in Evolutionary Biology 2009 1168:156–182.
53. Otto, S. P., M. R. Servedio, and S. L. Nuismer. 2008. Frequencydependent selection and the evolution of assortative mating. Genetics 179:2091–2112.
54. Peterson, M. A., B. M. Honchak, S. E. Locke, T. E. Beeman, J. Mendoza, J. Green, K. J. Buckingham, et al. 2005. Relative abundance and the species-specific reinforcement of male mating preference in the Chrysochus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) hybrid zone. Evolution 59:2639–2655.
55. Pfennig, D. W., and K. S. Pfennig. 2010. Character displacement and the origins of diversity. American Naturalist 176:S26–S44.
56. Pfennig, K. S., and A. M. Rice. 2014. Reinforcement generates reproductive isolation between neighbouring conspecific populations of spadefoot toads. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 281:20140949.
57. Pfennig, K. S., and M. J. Ryan. 2006. Reproductive character displacement generates reproductive isolation among conspecific populations: an artificial neural network study. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 273:1361–1368.
58. Porretta, D., and S. Urbanelli. 2012. Evolution of premating reproductive isolation among conspecific populations of the sea rockpool beetle Ochthebius urbanelliae driven by reinforcing natural selection. Evolution 66:1284–1295.
59. R Development Core Team. 2014. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna. http://www.R-project.org/.
60. Rice, A. M., and D. W. Pfennig. 2010. Does character displacement initiate speciation? evidence of reduced gene flow between populations experiencing divergent selection. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 23:854–865.
61. Richards-Zawacki, C. L., and M. E. Cummings. 2011. Intraspecific reproductive character displacement in a polymorphic poison dart frog, Dendrobates pumilio. Evolution 65:259–267.
62. Ritchie, M. G. 2007. Sexual selection and speciation. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 38:79–102.
63. Schluter, D. 2001. Ecology and the origin of species. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16:372–380.
64. Servedio, M. R. 2000. Reinforcement and the genetics of nonrandom mating. Evolution 54:21–29.
65. Servedio, M. R. 2001. Beyond reinforcement: the evolution of premating isolation by direct selection on preferences and postmating, prezygotic incompatibilities. Evolution 55:1909–1920.
66. Servedio, M. R. 2007. Male versus female mate choice: sexual selection and the evolution of species recognition via reinforcement. Evolution 61:2772–2789.
67. Servedio, M. R., and M. A. F. Noor. 2003. The role of reinforcement in speciation: theory and data. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 34:339–364.
68. Servedio, M. R., G. S. Van Doorn, M. Kopp, A. M. Frame, and P. Nosil. 2011. Magic traits in speciation: “magic” but not rare? Trends in Ecology and Evolution 26:389–397.
69. Trivers, R. L. 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. Pages 136–179 in B. Campbell, ed. Sexual selection and the descent of man. Aldine, Chicago.
70. Whitehead, A. 2010. The evolutionary radiation of diverse osmotolerant physiologies in killifish (Fundulus sp.). Evolution 64:2070–2085.
71. Yukilevich, R. 2012. Asymmetical patterns of speciation uniquely support reinforcement in Drosophila. Evolution 66:1430–1446.