Relative abundance and the species-specific reinforcement of male mating preference in the Chrysochus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) hybrid zone

Evolution

Volumn 59, Issue 12, 2005, Pages 2639-2655

  Peterson, Merrill A ^a   Honchak, Barbara M ^a,b   Locke, Stefanie E ^a,c   Beeman, Timothy E ^a   Mendoza, Jessica ^a   Green, Jabin ^a   Buckingham, Kati J ^a   White, Michael A ^a,d   Monsen, Kirsten J ^a,e  

^a WESTERN WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^e MONTCLAIR STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bimodal hybrid zone; Hybridization; Reproductive character displacement; Sexual isolation; Speciation

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTION; HYBRID ZONE; MATE CHOICE; RELATIVE ABUNDANCE; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SEXUAL SELECTION;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BEETLE; FEMALE; HYBRIDIZATION; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION DENSITY; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SPECIES DIFFERENCE; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; UNITED STATES;

ANIMALS; BEETLES; FEMALE; GENETIC SPECIATION; HYBRIDIZATION, GENETIC; MALE; POPULATION DENSITY; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; SPECIES SPECIFICITY; WASHINGTON;

CHRYSOCHUS; CHRYSOCHUS AURATUS; CHRYSOCHUS COBALTINUS; CHRYSOMELIDAE; COLEOPTERA;

EID: 30344478823     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1554/05-120.1     Document Type: Article

References (89)

1. Albert, A. Y. K., and D. Schluter. 2004. Reproductive character displacement of male stickleback mate preference: reinforcement or direct selection? Evolution 58:1099-1107.
2. Arnold, S. J., P. A. Verrell, and S. G. Tilley. 1996. The evolution of asymmetry in sexual isolation: a model and test case. Evolution 50:1024-1033.
3. Avise, J. C., and N. C. Saunders. 1984. Hybridization and introgression among species of sunfish (Lepomis): analysis by mitochondrial DNA and allozyme markers. Genetics 108:237-255.
4. Backlund, M., B. Oxelman, and B. Bremer. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships within the Gentiales based on NDHF and RBCL sequences, with particular reference to the Loganiaceae. Am. J. Bot. 7:1029-1043.
5. Barton, N. H. 1980. The fitness of hybrids between two chromosomal races of the grasshopper Podisma pedestris. Heredity 45:47-59.
6. _. 1996. Speciation: more than the sum of the parts. Curr. Biol. 6:1244-1246.
7. Barton, N. H., and G. M. Hewitt. 1985. Analysis of hybrid zones. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 16:113-148.
8. Bateman, A. J. 1948. Intrasexual selection in Drosophila. Heredity 2:349-368.
9. Benito, G. 1997. Energy expenditure and geomorphic work of the cataclysmic Missoula flooding in the Columbia River Gorge, USA. Earth Surf. Proc. Landf. 22:457-472.
10. Benito, G., and J. E. O'Connor. 2003. Number and size of last-glacial Missoula floods in the Columbia River valley between the Pasco Basin, Washington, and Portland, Oregon. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 115:624-638.
11. Bernatchez, L., and C. C. Wilson. 1998. Comparative phylogeography of Nearctic and Palearctic fishes. Mol. Ecol. 7:431-452.
12. Bonduriansky, R. 2001. The evolution of male mate choice in insects: a synthesis of ideas and evidence. Biol. Rev. 76:305-339.
13. Bretz, J. H. 1969. The. Lake Missoula floods and the Channeled Scabland. J. Geol. 77:505-543.
14. Butlin, R. 1987. Speciation by reinforcement. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2:8-13.
15. _. 1989. Reinforcement of premating isolation. Pp. 158-179 in D. Otte and J. A. Endler, eds. Speciation and its consequences. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
16. _. 1995. Reinforcement: an idea evolving. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10:432-434.
17. Butlin, R. K., and T. Tregenza. 1997. Is speciation no accident? Nature 387:551-552.
18. Cain, M. L., V. Andreasen, and D. J. Howard. 1999. Reinforcing selection is effective under a relatively broad set of conditions in a mosaic hybrid zone. Evolution 53:1343-1353.
19. Carroll, A. L. 1994. Interactions between body-size and mating history influence the reproductive success of males of a tortricid moth, Zeiraphera canadensis. Can. J. Zool. 72:2124-2132.
20. Casares, P., M. C. Carracedo, B. del Rio, R. Piñeiro, L. Garcia-Florez, and A. R. Barros. 1998. Disentangling the effects of mating propensity and mating choice in Drosophila. Evolution 52:126-133.
21. Clague, J. J., R. Barendregt, R. J. Enkin, and F. F. Foit Jr. 2003. Paleomagnetic and tephra evidence for tens of Missoula floods in southern Washington. Geology 31:247-250.
22. Coyne, J. A. 1992. Genetics and speciation. Nature 355:511-515.
23. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 1989. Patterns of speciation in Drosophila. Evolution 43:362-381.
24. Cruz, R., M. Carballo, P. Conde-Padín, and E. Rolán- Alvarez. 2004. Testing alternative models for sexual isolation in natural populations of Littorina saxatilis: Indirect support for by-product ecological speciation? J. Evol. Biol. 17:288-293.
25. Dickinson, J. L. 1995. Trade-offs between postcopulatory riding and mate location in the blue milkweed beetle. Behav. Ecol. 6:280-286.
26. _. 1997. Multiple mating, sperm competition, and cryptic female choice in the leaf beetles (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Pp. 164-183 in J. C. Choe and B. J. Crespi, eds. The evolution of paling systems in insects and arachnids. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, U.K.
27. Dobler, S., and B. D. Farrell. 1999. Host use evolution in Chrysochus milkweed beetles: evidence from behaviour, population genetics and phylogeny. Mol. Ecol. 8:1297-1307.
28. Dobzhansky, T. 1940. Speciation as a stage in evolutionary divergence. Am. Nat. 74:312-321.
29. Dussourd, D. E., and T. Eisner. 1987. Vein-cutting behavior: insect counterploy to the latex defense of plants. Science 237:898-901.
30. Gabor, C. R., and M. J. Ryan. 2001. Geographical variation in reproductive character displacement in mate choice by male sailfin mollies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268:1063-1070.
31. Gilbert, D. G., and W. T. Starmer. 1985. Statistics of sexual isolation. Evolution 39:1380-1383.
32. Harrison, R. G. 1998. Linking evolutionary pattern and process: the relevance of species concepts for the study of speciation. Pp. 19-31 in D. J. Howard and S. B. Berlocher, eds. Endless forms: species and speciation. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
33. Hewitt, G. 1990. Divergence and speciation as viewed from an insect hybrid zone. Can. J. Zool. 68:1701-1715.
34. _. 1996. Some genetic consequences of ice ages, and their role in divergence and speciation. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 58:247-276.
35. _. 2000. The genetic legacy of the Quaternary ice ages. Nature 405:907-913.
36. Hey, J. 2001. The mind of the species problem. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:326-329.
37. Higgie, M., S. Chenoweth, and M. W. Blows. 2000. Natural selection and the reinforcement of mate recognition. Science 290:519-521.
38. Höbel, G., and H. C. Gerhardt. 2003. Reproductive character displacement in the acoustic communication system of green tree frogs (Hyla cinerea). Evolution 57:894-904.
39. Howard, D. J. 1993. Reinforcement: origin, dynamics, and fate of an evolutionary hypothesis. Pp. 46-69 in R. G. Harrison, ed. Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
40. _. 1998. Unanswered questions and future directions in the study of speciation. Pp. 439-448 in D. J. Howard and S. B. Berlocher, eds. Endless forms: species and speciation. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
41. _. 1999. Conspecific sperm and pollen precedence and speciation. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 30:109-132.
42. Howard, D. J., M. Reece, P. G. Gregory, J. Chu, and M. Cain. 1998. The evolution of barriers to fertilization between closely related organisms. Pp. 279-288 in D. J. Howard and S. B. Berlocher, eds. Endless forms: species and speciation. Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, U.K.
43. Jennions, M. D., and M. Petrie. 1997. Variation in mate choice and mating preferences: a review of causes and consequences. Biol. Rev. 72:283-327.
44. Jiggins, C. D., and J. Mallet. 2000. Bimodal hybrid zones and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 15:250-255.
45. Jiggins, C. D., W. O. McMillan, W. Neukirchen, and J. Mallet. 1996. What can hybrid zones tell us about speciation? The case of Heliconius erato and H. himera (Lepidoptera: Nymphalidae). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 59:221-242.
46. Jiggins, C. D., R. E. Naisbitt, R. L. Coe, and J. Mallet. 2001. Reproductive isolation caused by colour pattern mimicry. Nature 411:302-305.
47. Jones, A. G., J. R. Arguello, and S. J. Arnold. 2002. Validation of Bateman's principles: a genetic study of sexual selection and mating patterns in the rough-skinned newt. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269:2533-2539.
48. Kelly, J. K., and M. A. F. Noor. 1996. Speciation by reinforcement: a model derived from studies of Drosophila. Genetics 143:1485-1497.
49. Kirkpatrick, M., and M. R. Servedio. 1999. The reinforcement of mating preferences on an island. Genetics 151:865-884.
50. Klicka, J., and R. M. Zink. 1999. Pleistocene effects on North American songbird evolution. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 266:695-700.
51. Lemmon, A. R., C. Smadja, and M. Kirkpatrick. 2004. Reproductive character displacement is not the only possible outcome of reinforcement. J. Evol. Biol. 17:177-183.
52. Lewis, S. M. 2004. Multiple mating and repeated copulations: effects on male reproductive success in red flour beetles. Anim. Behav. 67:799-804.
53. Liou, L. W., and R. D. Price. 1994. Speciation by reinforcement of premating isolation. Evolution 48:1451-1459.
54. Marín, I. 1997. Sexual isolation in Drosophila. III. Estimating isolation using male-choice experiments. J. Theor. Biol. 188:515-524.
55. Marshall, J. L., M. L. Arnold, and D. J. Howard. 2002. Reinforcement: the road not taken. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:558-563.
56. Martin, O. Y., and D. J. Hosken. 2004. Copulation reduces male but not female longevity in Saltella sphondylii (Diptera: Sepsidae). J. Evol. Biol. 17:357-362.
57. Mayden, R. L. 1997. A hierarchy of species concepts: the denouement in the saga of the species problem. Pp. 381-424 in M. F. Claridge, H. A. Dawah, and M. R. Wilson, eds. Species: the units of biodiversity. Chapman and Hall, New York.
58. Mayr, E. 1963. Animal species and evolution. Belknap Press, Cambridge, MA.
59. Merrel, D. J. 1950. Measurement of sexual isolation and selective mating. Evolution 4:326-331.
60. Noor, M. A. 1995a. Speciation driven by natural selection in Drosophila. Nature 375:674-675.
61. _. 1995b. Reinforcement in speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10:492.
62. _. 1999. Reinforcement and other consequences of sympatry. Heredity 83:503-508.
63. Nosil, P., B. J. Crespi, and C. P. Sandoval. 2003. Reproductive isolation driven by the combined effects of ecological adaptation and reinforcement. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270:1911-1918.
64. Parish, D. M. B., and J. C. Coulson. 1998. Parental investment, reproductive success and polygyny in the lapwing, Vanellus vanellus. Anim. Behav. 56:1161-1167.
65. Peterson, M. A., S. Dobler, J. Holland, L. Tantalo, and S. Locke. 2001. Behavioral, molecular, and morphological evidence for a hybrid zone between Chrysochus auratus and C. cobaltinus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 94:1-9.
66. Peterson, M. A., K. J. Monsen, H. Pedersen, T. McFarland, and J. Bearden. 2005. Direct and indirect analysis of the fitness of Chrysochus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) hybrids. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 84:273-286.
67. Pfennig, K. S., and M. A. Simovich. 2002. Differential selection to avoid hybridization in two toad species. Evolution 56:1840-1848.
68. Ribi, G., and S. Oertli. 2000. Frequency of interspecific matings and of hybrid offspring in sympatric populations of Viviparus ater and V. contectus (Mollusca: Prosobranchia). Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 71:133-143.
69. Rice, W. R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223-225.
70. Rieseberg, L. H., S. J. E. Baird, and A. M. Desrochers. 1998. Patterns of mating in wild sunflower hybrid zones. Evolution 52:713-726.
71. Rolán-Alvarez, E., and A. Caballero. 2000. Estimating sexual selection and sexual isolation effects from mating frequencies. Evolution 54:30-36.
72. Rundle, H. D., and D. Schluter. 1998. Reinforcement of stickleback mate preferences: sympatry breeds contempt. Evolution 52:200-208.
73. Sady, M. B. 1994. Survey of the blue milkweed beetle, Chrysochus cobaltinus LeConte (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae), in western Nevada. Coleop. Bull. 48:299.
74. Sætre, G.-P., T. Moum, S. Bures, T. Král, M. Adamjan, and J. Moreno. 1997. A sexually selected character displacement in flycatchers reinforces premating isolation. Nature 387:589-592.
75. Sanderson, N. 1989. Can gene flow prevent reinforcement? Evolution 43:1223-1235.
76. Servedio, M. R. 2001. Beyond reinforcement: the evolution of premating isolation by direct selection on preferences and postmating, prezygotic incompatibilities. Evolution 55:1909-1920.
77. _. 2004. The evolution of premating isolation: local adaptation and natural and sexual selection against hybrids. Evolution 58:913-924.
78. Servedio, M. R., and M. Kirkpatrick. 1997. The effects of gene flow on reinforcement. Evolution 51:1764-1772.
79. Servedio, M. R., and M. A. F. Noor. 2003. The role of reinforcement in speciation: theory and data. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 34:339-364.
80. Simmons, L. W. 2001. Sperm competition and its evolutionary consequences in the insects. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
81. Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf. 1981. Biometry. 2nd ed. Freeman, New York.
82. Sola, T., and K. Kubota. 1998. Genital lock-and-key as a selective agent against hybridization. Evolution 52:1507-1513.
83. Spieth, H. T., and J. M. Ringo. 1983. Mating behavior and sexual isolation in Drosophila. Pp. 315-379 in M. Ashburner, H. L. Carson, and J. N. Thompson Jr., eds. The genetics and biology of Drosophila. Vol. 3C. Academic Press, New York.
84. Szymura, J. M., and N. H. Barton. 1986. Genetic analysis of a hybrid zone between the fire-bellied toads, Bombina bombina and B. variegata, near Cracow in southern Poland. Evolution 40:1141-1159.
85. Trivers, R. L. 1972. Parental investment and sexual selection. Pp. 136-179 in B. Campbell, ed. Sexual selection and the descent of man, 1871-1971. Aldine Publishing Co., Chicago.
86. Waage, J. 1979. Reproductive character displacement in Calopteryx (Odonata: Calopterygidae). Evolution 33:104-116.
87. Wedell, N., M. J. G. Gage, and G. A. Parker. 2002. Sperm competition, male prudence and sperm-limited females. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:313-320.
88. Weiss, H. B., and E. West. 1921. Notes on insects of the spreading dogbane, Apocynum androsaemifolium L., with a description of a new dogbane midge by Dr. E.P. Felt. Can. Entomol. 53:146-152.
89. Williams, C. E. 1992. Movement of the dogbane beetle, Chrysochus auratus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) in a patchy environment. Banisteria 1:8-10.