Are traits that experience reinforcement also under sexual selection?

American Naturalist

Volumn 170, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 409-420

  Higgie, Megan ^a   Blows, Mark W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Cuticular hydrocarbons; Drosophila serrata; Mate choice; Mate recognition; Reproductive character displacement; Species recognition

Indexed keywords

HYDROCARBON;

ALLOPATRY; COEXISTENCE; FLY; GEOGRAPHICAL DISTRIBUTION; GEOGRAPHICAL VARIATION; HYDROCARBON; KIN RECOGNITION; MATE CHOICE; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR; SEXUAL SELECTION; SPECIES OCCURRENCE; SYMPATRY;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; DROSOPHILA; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; MALE; METABOLISM; PHENOTYPE; PHYSIOLOGY; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT; SEXUAL SELECTION;

ANIMALS; DROSOPHILA; EVOLUTION; FEMALE; HYDROCARBONS; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; PHENOTYPE; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; VARIATION (GENETICS);

DROSOPHILA BIRCHII; DROSOPHILA SERRATA;

EID: 34548150431     PISSN: 00030147     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/519401     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Aitchison, J. 1986. The statistical analysis of compositional data. Chapman & Hall, London.
2. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
3. Ayala, F. J. 1965. Sibling species of the Drosophila serrata group. Evolution 19:538-545.
4. Barton, N. 2000. The rapid origin of reproductive isolation. Science 290:462-463.
5. Bigelow, R. S. 1965. Hybrid zones and reproductive isolation. Evolution 19:449-458.
6. Blows, M. W. 1998. Evolution of a mate recognition system after hybridization between two Drosophila species. American Naturalist 151:538-544.
7. Blows, M. W., and M. Higgie. 2003. Genetic constraints on the evolution of mate recognition under natural selection. American Naturalist 161:240-253.
8. Blows, M. W., S. F. Chenoweth, and E. Hine. 2004. Orientation of the genetic variance-covariance matrix and the fitness surface for multiple male sexually selected traits. American Naturalist 163:329-340.
9. Butlin, R. K. 1995. Reinforcement: an idea evolving. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 10:432-434.
10. Chenoweth, S. F., and M. W. Blows. 2003. Signal trait sexual dimorphism and mutual sexual selection in Drosophila serrata. Evolution 57:2326-2334.
11. _. 2005. Contrasting mutual sexual selection on homologous signal traits in Drosophila serrata. American Naturalist 165:281-289.
12. Dobzhansky, T. 1951. Genetics and the origin of species. Columbia University Press, New York.
13. Dobzhansky, T., and W. B. Mather. 1961. Evolutionary status of Drosophila serrata. Evolution 15:461-467.
14. Endler, J. A. 1977. Geographic variation, speciation and clines. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
15. _. 1986. Natural selection in the wild. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
16. _. 1989. Conceptual and other problems in speciation. Pages 625-648 in D. Otte and J. A. Endler, eds. Speciation and its consequences. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
17. Endler, J. A., and A. E. Houde. 1995. Geographic variation in female preferences for male traits in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution 49:456-468.
18. Flury, B. 1988. Common principal components and related multivariate models. Wiley, New York.
19. Gerhardt, H. C. 1982. Sound pattern recognition in some North American treefrogs (Anura: Hylidae): implications for mate choice. American Zoologist 22:581-595.
20. Higgie, M., S. Chenoweth, and M. W. Blows. 2000. Natural selection and the reinforcement of mate recognition. Science 290:519-521.
21. Hine, E., S. Lachish, M. Higgie, and M. W. Blows. 2002. Positive genetic correlation between female preference and offspring fitness. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 269:2215-2219.
22. Hine, E., S. Chenoweth, and M. W. Blows. 2004. Multivariate quantitative genetics and the lek paradox: genetic variance in male sexually selected traits of Drosophila serrata under field conditions. Evolution 58:2754-2762.
23. Hoffmann, A. A., and P. A. Parsons. 1988. The analysis of quantitative variation in natural populations with isofemale strains. Genetics Selection Evolution 20:87-98.
24. Hoskin, C. J., M. Higgie, K. R. McDonald, and C. Moritz. 2005. Reinforcement drives rapid allopatric speciation. Nature 437:1353-1356.
25. Howard, D. J. 1993. Reinforcement: origin, dynamics, and fate of an evolutionary hypothesis. Pages 46-69 in R. G. Harrison, ed. Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford University Press, New York.
26. Howard, R. W., L. L. Jackson, H. Banse, and M. W. Blows. 2003. Cuticular hydrocarbons of Drosophila birchii and D. serrata: identification and role in mate choice in D. serrata. Journal of Chemical Ecology 29:961-976.
27. Kirkpatrick, M. 2000. Reinforcement and divergence under assortative mating. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 267:1649-1655.
28. Kirkpatrick, M., and M. J. Ryan. 1991. The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 350:33-38.
29. Liou, L. W., and T. D. Price. 1994. Speciation by reinforcement of premating isolation. Evolution 48:1451-1459.
30. Magiafoglou, A., M. E. Carew, and A. A. Hoffmann. 2002. Shifting clinal patterns and microsatellite variation in Drosophila serrata populations: a comparison of populations near the southern border of the species range. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 15:763-774.
31. Michalak, P., I. Minkov, A. Helin, D. N. Lerman, B. R. Bettencourt, M. E. Feder, A. B. Korol, and E. Nevo. 2001. Genetic evidence for adaptation-driven incipient speciation of Drosophila melanogaster along a microclimatic contrast in "Evolution Canyon," Israel. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 98:13195-13200.
32. Moore, J. A. 1957. An embryologist's view of the species concept. Pages 325-338 in E. Mayr, ed. The species problem. American Association for the Advancement of Science, Washington, DC.
33. Noor, M. A. 1995. Speciation driven by natural selection in Drosophila. Nature 375:674-675.
34. Nosil, P., B. J. Crespi, and C. P. Sandoval. 2003. Reproductive isolation driven by the combined effects of ecological adaptation and reinforcement. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 270:1911-1918.
35. Ortíz-Barrientos, D., and M. A. F. Noor. 2005. Evidence for a one-allele assortative mating locus. Science 310:1467-1467.
36. Otte, D., and J. A. Endler. 1989. Speciation and its consequences. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
37. Pfennig, K. S. 1998. The evolution of mate choice and the potential for conflict between species and mate-quality recognition. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 265:1743-1748.
38. _. 2003. A test of alternative hypotheses for the evolution of reproductive isolation between spadefoot toads: support for the reinforcement hypothesis. Evolution 57:2842-2851.
39. Phelps, S. M., A. S. Rand, and M. J. Ryan. 2006. A cognitive framework for mate choice and species recognition. American Naturalist 167:28-42.
40. Phillips, P. C. 1998. CPC: common principal component analysis program. http://darkwing.uoregon.edu/~pphil/programs/cpc/cpc.htm. University of Oregon, Eugene.
41. Phillips, P. C., and S. J. Arnold. 1999. Hierarchical comparison of genetic variance-covariance matrices. I. Using the Flury hierarchy. Evolution 53:1506-1515.
42. Ptacek, M. B. 2000. The role of mating preferences in shaping interspecific divergence in mating signals in vertebrates. Behavioural Processes 51:111-134.
43. Rand, A. S., M. J. Ryan, and W. Wilczynski. 1992. Signal redundancy and receiver permissiveness in acoustic mate recognition by the túngara frog, Physalaemus pustulosus. American Zoologist 32:81-90.
44. Rundle, H. D., S. F. Chenoweth, P. Doughty, and M. W. Blows. 2005. Divergent selection and the evolution of signal traits and mating preferences. PLoS Biology 3:e368.
45. Ryan, M. J., and A. S. Rand. 1993. Species recognition and sexual selection as a unitary problem in animal communication. Evolution 47:647-657.
46. Saetre, G. P., T. Moum, S. Bures, M. Kral, M. Adamjan, and J. Moreno. 1997. A sexually selected character displacement in flycatchers reinforces premating isolation. Nature 387:589-592.
47. SAS Institute. 1999. SAS/STAT user's guide, version 8. SAS Institute, Cary, NC.
48. Schneider, C. J., T. B. Smith, B. Larison, and C. Moritz. 1999. A test of alternative models of diversification in tropical rainforests: ecological gradients vs. rainforest refugia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 96:13869-13873.
49. Servedio, M. R., and M. Kirkpatrick. 1997. The effects of gene flow on reinforcement. Evolution 51:1764-1772.
50. Servedio, M. R., and M. A. F. Noor. 2003. The role of reinforcement in speciation: theory and data. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 34:339-364.
51. Smith, T. B., R. K. Wayne, D. J. Girman, and M. W. Bruford. 1997. A role for ecotones in generating rainforest biodiversity. Science 276:1855-1857.
52. Turelli, M., N. H. Barton, and J. A. Coyne. 2001. Theory and speciation. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 16:330-343.