Reproductive character displacement of epicuticular compounds and their contribution to mate choice in drosophila subquinaria and drosophila recens

Evolution

Volumn 68, Issue 4, 2014, Pages 1163-1175

  Dyer, Kelly A ^a   White, Brooke E ^a   Sztepanacz, Jacqueline L ^b,c   Bewick, Emily R ^a   Rundle, Howard D ^b  

^a Department of Genetics University of Georgia ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

Mate choice; Pheromones; Reinforcement; Sexual selection; Speciation

Indexed keywords

CHARACTER DISPLACEMENT; FLY; MATE CHOICE; MATE RECOGNITION; PHEROMONE; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SEXUAL SELECTION;

DROSOPHILA RECENS; DROSOPHILA SUBQUINARIA;

PHEROMONE;

ANIMAL; CHEMISTRY; DECISION MAKING; DROSOPHILA; FEMALE; GENETICS; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; SYMPATRY;

ANIMALS; CHOICE BEHAVIOR; DROSOPHILA; FEMALE; GENETIC SPECIATION; MALE; PHEROMONES; REPRODUCTION; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; SYMPATRY;

EID: 84898059390     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/evo.12335     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. Aitchison, J. 1986. The statistical analysis of compositional data. Chapman and Hall, Lond.
2. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
3. Bedhomme, S., A. K. Chippindale, N. G. Prasad, M. Delcourt, J. K. Abbott, M. A. Mallet, and H. D. Rundle 2011. Male-limited evolution suggests no extant intralocus sexual conflict over the sexually dimorphic cuticular hydrocarbons of Drosophila melanogaster. J. Genet. 90:443-452.
4. Blows, M. W., and R. A. Allan 1998. Levels of mate recognition within and between two Drosophila species and their hybrids. Am. Nat. 152:826-837.
5. Candolin, U. 2003. The use of multiple cues in mate choice. Biol. Rev. 78:575-595.
6. Chenoweth, S. F., and M. W. Blows 2006. Dissecting the complex genetic basis of mate choice. Nat. Rev. Genet. 7:681-692.
7. Chenoweth, S. F., H. D. Rundle, and M. W. Blows 2008. Genetic constraints and the evolution of display trait sexual dimorphism by natural and sexual selection. Am. Nat. 171:22-34.
8. Coyne, J. A., A. P. Crittenden, and K. Mah 1994. Genetics of a pheromonal difference contributing to reproductive isolation in Drosophila. Science 265:1461-1464.
9. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr 2004. Speciation. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
10. Curtis, S., J. L. Sztepanacz, B. E. White, K. A. Dyer, H. D. Rundle, and P. Mayer 2013. Epicuticular compounds of Drosophila subquinaria and D. recens: identification, quantification, and their role in female mate choice. J. Chem. Ecol. 39:579-590.
11. de Oliveira, C. C., M. H. Manfrin, F. D. Sene, L. L. Jackson, and W. J. Etges 2011. Variations on a theme: diversification of cuticular hydrocarbons in a clade of cactophilic Drosophila. BMC Evol. Biol. 11:179.
12. Delcourt, M., and H. D. Rundle 2011. Condition dependence of a multicomponent sexual display trait in Drosophila serrata. Am. Nat. 177:812-823.
13. Dobzhansky, T. 1951. Genetics and the origin of species. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
14. Dyer, K. A., B. Charlesworth, and J. Jaenike 2007. Chromosome-wide linkage disequilibrium as a consequence of meiotic drive. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 104:1587-1592.
15. Etges, W. J., and M. A. Ahrens 2001. Premating isolation is determined by larval-rearing substrates in cactophilic Drosophila mojavensis. V. Deep geographic variation in epicuticular hydrocarbons among isolated populations. Am. Nat. 158:585-598.
16. Etges, W. J., C. C. de Oliveira, M. G. Ritchie, and M. A. Noor 2009. Genetics of incipient speciation in Drosophila mojavensis. II. Host plants and mating status influence cuticular hydrocarbon QTL expression and G × E interactions. Evolution 63:1712-1730.
17. Ferveur, J. F. 2005. Cuticular hydrocarbons: their evolution and roles in Drosophila pheromonal communication. Behav. Genet. 35:279-295.
18. Frentiu, F. D., and S. F. Chenoweth 2010. Clines in cuticular hydrocarbons in two Drosophila species with independent population histories. Evolution 64:1784-1794.
19. Giglio, E. M., and K. A. Dyer 2013. Divergence of premating behaviors in the sister species Drosophila subquinaria and D. recens. Ecol. Evol. 3:365-374.
20. Gosden, T. P., and S. F. Chenoweth 2011. On the evolution of heightened condition dependence of male sexual displays. J. Evol. Biol. 24:685-692.
21. Grillet, M., L. Dartevelle, and J. F. Ferveur 2006. A Drosophila male pheromone affects female sexual receptivity. Proc. Biol. Sci. 273:315-323.
22. Higgie, M., and M. W. Blows 2007. Are traits that experience reinforcement also under sexual selection? Am. Nat. 170:409-420.
23. Higgie, M., S. Chenoweth, and M. W. Blows 2000. Natural selection and the reinforcement of mate recognition. Science 290:519-521.
24. Hoskin, C. J. and M. Higgie 2010. Speciation via species interactions: the divergence of mating traits within species. Ecol. Lett. 13:409-420.
25. Howard, D. J. 1993. Reinforcement: origin, dynamics, and fate of an evolutionary hypothesis. Pp. 46-69 in R. G. Harrison, ed. Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
26. Howard, R. W. and G. J. Blomquist 2005. Ecological, behavioral, and biochemical aspects of insect hydrocarbons. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 50:371-393.
27. Howard, R. W., L. L. Jackson, H. Banse, and M. W. Blows 1993. Cuticular hydrocarbons of Drosophila birchii and D. serrata: identification and role in mate choice in D. serrata. J. Chem. Ecol. 29:961-976.
28. Hunt, J., R. R. Snook, C. Mitchell, H. S. Crudgington, and A. J. Moore 2012. Sexual selection and experimental evolution of chemical signals in Drosophila pseudoobscura. J. Evol. Biol. 25:2232-2241.
29. Jaenike, J., K. A. Dyer, C. Cornish, and M. S. Minhas 2006. Asymmetrical reinforcement and Wolbachia infection in Drosophila. PLoS. Biol. 4:1852-1862.
30. Jallon, J. M., and J. R. David 1987. Variations in cuticular hydrocarbons among the 8 species of the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup. Evolution 41:294-302.
31. Koukou, K., H. Pavlikaki, G. Kilias, J. H. Werren, K. Bourtzis, and S. N. Alahiotisi 2006. Influence of antibiotic treatment and Wolbachia curing on sexual isolation among Drosophila melanogaster cage populations. Evolution 60:87-96.
32. Kwan, L., and H. D. Rundle 2010. Adaptation to desiccation fails to generate pre- and postmating isolation in replicate Drosophila melanogaster laboratory populations. Evolution 64:710-723.
33. Mendelson, T. C., and K. L. Shaw 2012. The (mis)concept of species recognition. Trends Ecol Evol 27:421-427.
34. Miller, W. J., L. Ehrman, and D. Schneider 2010. Infectious speciation revisited: impact of symbiont-depletion on female fitness and mating behavior of Drosophila paulistorum. PLoS Pathog. 6:e1001214.
35. Mullen, S. P., T. C. Mendelson, C. Schal, and K. L. Shaw 2007. Rapid evolution of cuticular hydrocarbons in a species radiation of acoustically diverse Hawaiian crickets (Gryllidae : Trigonidiinae : Laupala). Evolution 61:223-231.
36. Noor, M. A. F., and J. A. Coyne 1996. Genetics of a difference in cuticular hydrocarbons between Drosophila pseudoobscura and D. persimilis. Genet. Res. 68:117-123.
37. Ortiz-Barrientos, D., B. A. Counterman, and M. A. F. Noor 2004. The genetics of speciation by reinforcement. PLoS. Biol. 2:2256-2263.
38. Ortiz-Barrientos, D., A. Grealy, and P. Nosil 2009. The genetics and ecology of reinforcement implications for the evolution of prezygotic isolation in sympatry and beyond. Year in Evol. Biol. 1168:156-182.
39. Rundle, H. D., and S. F. Chenoweth 2011. Stronger convex (stabilizing) selection on homologous sexual display traits in females than in males: a multipopulation comparison in Drosophila serrata. Evolution 65:893-899.
40. Rundle, H. D., S. F. Chenoweth, P. Doughty, and M. W. Blows 2005. Divergent selection and the evolution of signal traits and mating preferences. PLoS Biol. 3:1988-1995.
41. Saetre, G. P., and S. A. Saether 2010. Ecology and genetics of speciation in Ficedula flycatchers. Mol. Ecol. 19:1091-1106.
42. Servedio, M. R., and M. A. F. Noor 2003. The role of reinforcement in speciation: theory and data. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. S. 34:339-364.
43. Sharon, G., D. Segal, J. M. Ringo, A. Hefetz, I. Zilber-Rosenberg, and E. Rosenberg 2010. Commensal bacteria play a role in mating preference of Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107:20051-20056.
44. Shoemaker, D. D., V. Katju, and J. Jaenike 1999. Wolbachia and the evolution of reproductive isolation between Drosophilla recens and Drosophila subquinaria. Evolution 53:1157-1164.
45. Wheeler, M. R. 1960. New species of the quinaria group of Drosophila (Diptera, Drosophilidae). Southwestern Nat. 5:1430-1446.
46. Yukilevich, R. 2012. Asymmetrical patterns of speciation uniquely support reinforcement in Drosophila. Evolution 66:1430-1446.