Evolution of premating reproductive isolation among conspecific populations of the sea rock-pool beetle ochthebius urbanelliae driven by reinforcing natural selection

Evolution

Volumn 66, Issue 4, 2012, Pages 1284-1295

  Porretta, Daniele ^a   Urbanelli, Sandra ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TUSCIA   (Italy)

^b SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

Assortative mating; Natural selection; Reinforcement; Reproductive isolation; Speciation

Indexed keywords

ALLOPATRY; ASSORTATIVE MATING; BEETLE; CONSPECIFIC; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; NATURAL SELECTION; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; ROCK POOL; SYMPATRY;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BEETLE; FEMALE; GENETICS; ITALY; MALE; MATE CHOICE; PHYSIOLOGY; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SYMPATRY;

ANIMALS; BEETLES; FEMALE; ITALY; MALE; MATING PREFERENCE, ANIMAL; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SYMPATRY;

ITALY; TYRRHENIAN COAST;

COLEOPTERA; OCHTHEBIUS;

EID: 84859442409     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: 15585646     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01535.x     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Arnqvist, G., and L. Rowe 2005. Sexual conflict. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ
2. Audisio, P., M. Trizzino, A. De Biase, G. Rossetti, E. Mancini, and G. Antonini 2010. Molecular and morphological evidence of a new sibling species of Calobius (Coleoptera: Hydraenidae) of the C. quadricollis complex from peninsular Italy. It. J. Zool. 77:29-37.
3. Beier, M. 1956. ber Ko{double acute}rperbau und Lebensweise von Ochtebius quadricollis steinbühleri Rtt. Und O. Adriaticus Rtt. (Col. Hydroph. Hydraen.). Thalassia Jugosl. 1:93-242.
4. Carvajal-Rodriguez, A., and E. Rolán-Alvarez 2006. JMATING: a software for the analysis of sexual selection and sexual isolation effects from mating frequency data. BMC Evol. Biol. 6:40-44.
5. Casares, P., M. C. Carracedo, B. D. Rio, R. Piñeiro, L. García-Florés, and A. R. Barros 1998. Disentangling the effects of mating propensity and mating choice in Drosophila. Evolution 52:126-133.
6. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr 2004. Speciation. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA
7. Coyne, J. A., S. Elwyn, and E. Rolán-Alvarez 2005. Impact of experimental design on Drosophila sexual isolation studies. Direct effect and comparison to field hybridization data. Evolution 59:2588-2601.
8. Dayan, T., and D. Simberloff 2005. Ecological and community-wide character displacement: the next generation. Ecol. Lett. 8:875-894.
9. Higgie, M., and M. W. Blows 2007. Are traits that experience reinforcement also under sexual selection? Am. Nat. 170:409-420.
10. Higgie, M., and M. W. Blows 2008. The evolution of reproductive character displacement conflicts with how sexual selection operates within a species. Evolution 62:1192-1203.
11. Higgie, M., S. Chenoweth, and M. W. Blows 2000. Natural selection and the reinforcement of mate recognition. Science 290:519-521.
12. Hoskin, C. J., and H. Higgie 2010. Speciation via species interactions: the divergence of mating traits within species. Ecol. Lett. 13:409-420.
13. Hoskin, C. J., H. Higgie, K. R. McDonald, and C. Moritz 2005. Reinforcement drives rapid allopatric speciation. Nature 437:1353-1356.
14. Howard, D. J. 1993. Reinforcement: origin, dynamics and fate of an evolutionary hypothesis. Pp. 46-69 in R. G. Harrison, ed. Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process. Oxford Univ. Press, New York
15. Jennings, J. H., and W. J. Etges 2010. Species hybrids in the laboratory but not in nature: a reanalysis of premating isolation between Drosophila arizonae and D. mojavensis. Evolution 64:587-598.
16. Kawano, K. 2002. Character displacement in giant rhinoceros beetles. Am. Nat. 159:255-271.
17. Lemmon, E. M. 2009. Diversification of conspecific signals in sympatry: geographic overlap drives multidimensional reproductive character displacement in frogs. Evolution 63:1155-1170.
18. McPeek, M. A., and S. Gavrilets 2006. The evolution of female mating preferences: differentiation from species with promiscuous males can promote speciation. Evolution 60:1967-1980.
19. Nosil, P., B. J. Crespi, and C. P. Sandoval. 2003. Reproductive isolation driven by the combined effects of ecological adaptation and reinforcement. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 270:1911-1918.
20. Ortiz-Barrientos, D., A. Grealy, and P. Nosil 2009. The genetics and ecology of reinforcement. Ann. NY Acad. Sci. 1168:156-182.
21. Pérez-Figuero, A., A. Caballero, and E. Rolán-Alvarez 2005. Comparing the estimation properties of different statistics for measuring sexual isolation from mating frequencies. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 85:307-318.
22. Peterson, M. A., B. M. Honchak, S. E. Locke, T. E. Beeman, J. Mendoza, J. Green, K. J. Buckingham, M. A. White, and K. J. Monsen 2005. Relative abundance and the species-specific reinforcement of male mating preference in the Chrysochus (Coleoptera: Chrysomelidae) hybrid zone. Evolution 22:2639-2655.
23. Pfennig, K. S., and D. W. Pfennig 2009. Character displacement: ecological and reproductive responses to a common evolutionary problem. Quat. Rev. Biol. 84:253-276.
24. Pfennig, D. W., and K. S. Pfennig 2010. Character displacement and the origins of diversity. Am. Nat. 176:26-44.
25. Pfennig, K. S., and A. M. Rice 2007. An experimental test of character displacement's role in promoting postmating isolation between conspecific populations in contrasting competitive environments. Evolution 61:2433-2443.
26. Pfennig, K. S., and M. J. Ryan 2006. Reproductive character displacement generates reproductive isolation among conspecific populations: an artificial neural network study. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 273:1361-1368.
27. Rice, A. M., and D. W. Pfennig 2010. Does character displacement initiate speciation? Evidence of reduced gene flow between populations experiencing divergent selection. J. Evol. Biol. 23:854-866.
28. Ritchie, M. G. 2007. Sexual selection and speciation annu. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 38:79-102.
29. Rolán-Alvarez, E., and A. Caballero 2000. Estimating sexual selection and sexual isolation effects from mating frequencies. Evolution 54:30-36.
30. Rundle, H. D., and D. Schluter 2004. Natural selection and ecological speciation in sticklebacks. Pp. 192-209 in U. Dieckmann, M. Doebeli, J. A. J. Metz, and D. Tautz, eds. Adaptive speciation. Cambridge Univ. Press, UK
31. Servedio, M. R., and M. A. F. Noor. 2003. The role of reinforcement in speciation: theory and data. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 34:339-364.
32. Smadja, C., and R. Butlin 2006. A new role for reinforcement. Heredity 96:422-423.
33. Svensson, E. I., K. Karlsson, M. Friberg, and F. Eroukhmanoff 2007. Gender differences in species recognition and the evolution of asymmetric sexual isolation. Curr. Biol. 17:1943-1947.
34. Urbanelli, S. 2002. Genetic divergence and reproductive isolation in the Ochthebius (Calobius) complex (Coleoptera: Hydraenidae). Heredity 88:333-341.
35. Urbanelli, S., and D. Porretta 2008. Evidence of reinforcement of premating isolation between two species of the genus Ochthebius (Coleoptera: Hydraenidae). Evolution 62:1520-1527.
36. Urbanelli, S., P. Sallicandro, E. De Vito, E. Colonnelli, and L. Bullini 1996. Molecular reexamination of the taxonomy of Ochthebius (Calobius) (Coleoptera: Hydraenidae) from the Mediterranean and Macaronesian Regions. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 89:623-636.
37. Weissing, F. J., P. Edelaar, and G. Sander van Doorn 2011. Adaptive speciation theory: a conceptual review. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 65:461-480.