Reproductive isolation driven by the combined effects of ecological adaptation and reinforcement

Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 270, Issue 1527, 2003, Pages 1911-1918

  Nosil, P ^a   Crespi, B J ^a   Sandoval, C P ^b  

^a SIMON FRASER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Gene flow; Hybridization; Natural selection; Speciation; Timema; Walking stick insects

Indexed keywords

ADAPTATION; EVOLUTION; GENE FLOW; NATURAL SELECTION; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

ARTICLE; EVOLUTIONARY ADAPTATION; FEMALE; GENE FLOW; HYBRID; INSECT; MALE; MATE CHOICE; MATING; MATING SYSTEM; MATING TYPE; MIGRATION; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PLANT; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGENY; REINFORCEMENT; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;

HEXAPODA; INSECTA; PHASMATODEA; TIMEMA; TIMEMA CRISTINAE; TIMEMATIDAE;

EID: 0141526272     PISSN: 09628452     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2003.2457     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Beerli, P. & Felsenstein, J. 2001 Maximum-likelihood estimation of a migration matrix and effective population sizes in n subpopulations by using a coalescent approach. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 4563-4568.
2. Butlin, R. K. 1995 Reinforcement: an idea evolving. Trends Ecol. Evol. 10, 432-433.
3. Cain, M. L., Andreasen, V. & Howard, D. J. 1999 Reinforcing selection is effective under a relatively broad set of conditions in a mosaic hybrid zone. Evolution 53, 1343-1353.
4. Crespi, B. J. & Sandoval, C. P. 2000 Phylogenetic evidence for the evolution of ecological specialization in Timema walking-sticks. J. Evol. Biol. 13, 249-262.
5. Dobzhansky, T. 1951 Genetics and the origin of species. New York: Columbia University Press.
6. Doebeli, M. & Dieckmann, U. 2003 Speciation along environmental gradients. Nature 451, 259-264.
7. Endler, J. A. 1986 Natural selection in the wild. Princeton University Press.
8. Frankham, R. 1995 Effective population size/adult population size ratios in wildlife: a review. Genet. Res. 66, 253-280.
9. Funk, D. J. 1998 Isolating a role for natural selection in speciation: host adaptation and sexual isolation in Neochlamisus bebbianae leaf beetles. Evolution 52, 1744-1759.
10. Funk, D. J., Filchak, K. E. & Feder, J. L. 2002 Herbivorous insects: model systems for the comparative study of speciation ecology. Genetica 116, 251-267.
11. Higgie, M., Chenoweth, S. & Blows, M. W. 2000 Natural selection and the reinforcement of mate recognition. Science 290, 519-521.
12. Howard, D. J. 1993 Reinforcement: origins, dynamics and fate of an evolutionary hypothesis. In Hybrid zones and the evolutionary process (ed. R. G. Harrison), pp. 46-69. New York: Oxford University Press.
13. Jiggins, C. D., Naisbit, R. E., Coe, R. L. & Mallet, J. M. 2001 Reproductive isolation caused by colour pattern mimicry. Nature 411, 302-305.
14. Kelly, J. K. & Noor, M. A. F. 1996 Speciation by reinforcement: a model derived from studies of Drosophila. Genetics 143, 1485-1497.
15. Liou, L. W. & Price, T. D. 1994 Speciation by reinforcement of premating isolation. Evolution 48, 1451-1459.
16. Mayr, E. 1963 Animal species and evolution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
17. Nei, M. 1987 Molecular evolutionary genetics. New York: Columbia University Press.
18. Noor, M. A. 1995 Speciation driven by natural selection in Drosophila. Nature 375, 674-675.
19. Noor, M. A. F. 1999 Reinforcement and other consequences of sympatry. Heredity 83, 503-508.
20. Norusis, M. N. 1993 SPSS for WINDOWS. Advanced statistics. Chicago, IL: SPSS Inc.
21. Nosil, P. & Crespi, B. J. 2003 Does gene flow constrain trait divergence or vice-versa? A test using ecomorphology and sexual isolation in Timema cristinae walking-sticks. Evolution (In the press.)
22. Nosil, P., Crespi, B. J. & Sandoval, C. P. 2002 Host-plant adaptation drives the parallel evolution of reproductive isolation. Nature 417, 441-443.
23. Rolan-Alvarez, E. & Caballero, A. 2000 Estimating sexual selection and sexual isolation effects from mating frequencies. Evolution 54, 30-36.
24. Rundle, H. D. & Schluter, D. 1998 Reinforcement of stickleback mating preferences: sympatry breeds contempt. Evolution 52, 200-208.
25. Rundle, H. D., Nagel, L., Boughman, J. W. & Schluter, D. 2000 Natural selection and parallel speciation in sympatric sticklebacks. Science 287, 306-308.
26. Saetre, G. P., Moum, T., Bures, S., Kral, M., Adamjan, M. & Moreno, J. 1997 A sexually selected character displacement in flycatchers reinforces premating isolation. Nature 387, 589-592.
27. Sanderson, N. 1989 Can gene flow prevent reinforcement? Evolution 43, 1223-1235.
28. Sandoval, C. P. 1993 Geographic, ecological and behavioral factors affecting spatial variation in colour or morph frequency in the walking-stick Timema cristinae. PhD thesis, University of California, Santa Barbara.
29. Sandoval, C. P. 1994a The effects of relative geographic scales of gene flow and selection on morph frequencies in the walking stick Timema cristinae. Evolution 48, 1866-1879.
30. Sandoval, C. P. 1994b Differential visual predation on morphs of Timema cristinae (Phasmatodeae: Timemidae) and its consequences for host range. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 52, 341-356.
31. Schluter, D. 1988 Estimating the form of natural selection on a quantitative trait. Evolution 42, 849-861.
32. Schluter, D. 2000 The ecology of adaptive radiation. Oxford University Press.
33. Servedio, M. R. 2000 Reinforcement and the genetics of non-random mating. Evolution 54, 21-29.
34. Servedio, M. R. 2001 Beyond reinforcement: the evolution of premating isolation by direct selection on preferences and postmating, prezygotic incompatibilities. Evolution 55, 1909-1920.
35. Servedio, M. R. & Kirkpatrick, M. 1997 The effects of gene flow on reinforcement. Evolution 51, 1764-1772.
36. Slatkin, M. 1980 Ecological character displacement. Ecology 61, 163-177.
37. Zouros, E. & D'Entremont, C. J. 1980 Sexual isolation among populations of Drosophila mojavensis: response to pressure from a related species. Evolution 34, 421-430.