Reinforcement and the genetics of nonrandom mating

Evolution

Volumn 54, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 21-29

  Servedio, Maria R ^a,b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Assortative mating; Isolating mechanisms; Models; Preferences; Reinforcement; Speciation

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTION; GENETICS; MATING BEHAVIOR; REINFORCEMENT;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 0034103850     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.0014-3820.2000.tb00003.x     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. Baker, M. C., and A. E. M. Baker. 1990. Reproductive behavior of female buntings: isolating mechanisms in a hybridizing pair of species. Evolution 44:332-338.
2. Balkau, B., and M. W. Feldman. 1973. Selection for migration modification. Genetics 74:171-174.
3. Barton, N. H., and M. Turelli. 1991. Natural and sexual selection on many loci. Genetics 127:229-255.
4. Borland, M. 1986. Size-assortative mating in threespine stickle-backs from two sites on the Salmon River, British Columbia. M.Sc. thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C., Canada.
5. Caisse, M., and J. Antonovics. 1978. Evolution in closely adjacent plant populations. Heredity 40:371-384.
6. Clayton, N. S. 1990. Assortative mating in zebra finch subspecies, Taeniopygia guttata guttata and Taeniopygia guttata castanotis. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 330:351-370.
7. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 1989. Patterns of speciation in Drosophila. Evolution 43:362-381.
8. Crosby, J.L. 1970. The evolution of genetic discontinuity: computer models of the selection of barriers to interbreeding between subspecies. Heredity 25:253-297.
9. Dickson, H., and J. Antonovics. 1973. Theoretical considerations of sympatric divergence. Am. Nat. 107:256-273.
10. Felsenstein, J. 1981. Skepticism towards Santa Rosalia, or why are there so few kinds of animals? Evolution 35:124-138.
11. Foote, C. J., and P. A. Larkin. 1988. The role of male choice in the assortative mating of anadromous and non-anadromous sock-eye salmon (Oncorhynchus nerka). Behaviour 106:43-62.
12. Gerhardt, H. C. 1994. Reproductive character displacement of female mate choice in the grey treefrog, Hyla chrysoscelis. Anim. Behav. 47:959-969.
13. Groth, J. G. 1993. Call matching and positive assortative mating in red crossbills. Auk 110:398-401.
14. Johnston, R. F., and S. G. Johnson. 1989. Nonrandom mating in feral pigeons. Condor 91:23-29.
15. Jones, I. L., and R. Montgomerie. 1991. Mating and remating of least auklets (Aethia pusilla) relative to ornamental traits. Behav. Ecol. 2:249-257.
16. Kelly, J. K., and M. A. F. Noor. 1996. Speciation by reinforcement: a model derived from studies of Drosophila. Genetics 143: 1485-1497.
17. Kirkpatrick, M. 1982. Sexual selection and the evolution of female choice. Evolution 36:1-12.
18. Kirkpatrick, M., Price, T., and S. J. Arnold. 1990. The Darwin-Fisher theory of sexual selection in monogamous birds. Evolution 44:180-193.
19. Lande, R. 1981. Models of speciation by sexual selection and adaptation on polygenic traits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 78: 3721-3725.
20. Liou, L. W., and T. D. Price. 1994. Speciation by reinforcement of premating isolation. Evolution 48:1451-1459.
21. Maekawa, K., S. Nakano, and S. Yamamoto. 1994. Spawning behaviour and size-assortative mating of Japanese charr in an artificial lake-inlet stream system. Environ. Biol. Fish. 39: 109-117.
22. Maynard Smith, J. 1966. Sympatric speciation. Am. Nat. 100: 637-650.
23. Nagel, L., and D. Schluter. 1998. Body size, natural selection, and speciation in sticklebacks. Evolution 52:209-218.
24. Noor, M. A. 1995. Speciation driven by natural selection in Drosophila. Nature 375:674-675.
25. Nuechterlein, G. L. 1981. Courtship behavior and reproductive isolation between western grebe color morphs. Auk 98:335-349.
26. Payne, R. J. H., and D. C. Krakauer. 1997. Sexual selection, space, and speciation. Evolution 51:1-9.
27. Ridgway, M. S., and J. D. McPhail. 1984. Ecology and evolution go sympatric sticklebacks (Gasterosteus): mate choice and reproductive isolation in the Enos Lake species pair. Can. J. Zool. 62:1813-1818.
28. Rundle, H. D., and D. Schluter. 1998. Reinforcement of stickleback mate preferences: sympatry breeds contempt. Evolution 52: 200-208.
29. Sanderson, N. 1989. Can gene flow prevent reinforcement? Evolution 43:1223-1235.
30. Sætre, G.-P., T. Mourn, S. Bures, M. Král, M. Adamjan, and J. Moreno. 1997. A sexually selected character displacement in flycatchers reinforces premating isolation. Nature 387:589-591.
31. Sætre, G.-P., M. Král, S. Bures, and R. A. Ims. 1999. Dynamics of a clinal hybrid zone and a comparison with island hybrid zones of flycatchers (Fidecula hypoleuca and F. albicollis). J. Zool. Lond. 247:53-64.
32. Servedio, M. R., and M. Kirkpatrick. 1997. The effects of gene flow on reinforcement. Evolution 51:1764-1772.
33. Spencer, H. G., B. H. McArdle, and D. M. Lambert. 1986. A theoretical investigation of speciation by reinforcement. Am. Nat. 128:241-262.
34. Sved, J. A. 1981. A two-sex polygenic model for the evolution of premating isolation. I. Deterministic theory for natural populations. Genetics 97:197-215.
35. Teale, S. A., B. J. Hager and F. X. Webster. 1994. Pheromone based assortative mating in a bark beetle. Anim. Behav. 48: 569-578.