Speciation via species interactions: The divergence of mating traits within species

Ecology Letters

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 409-420

  Hoskin, Conrad J ^a   Higgie, Megan ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Community ecology; Disruptive selection; Ecological speciation; Magic traits; Mating preferences; Mating signals; Reinforcement; Reproductive character displacement; Sexual selection; Sympatric speciation

Indexed keywords

COMMUNITY ECOLOGY; DIVERGENCE; HYBRIDIZATION; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; MATING BEHAVIOR; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; REPRODUCTIVE STRATEGY; SEXUAL SELECTION; SYMPATRY;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; ECOSYSTEM; GENETIC SELECTION; GEOGRAPHY; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION;

ANIMALS; ECOSYSTEM; GENETIC SPECIATION; GEOGRAPHY; SELECTION, GENETIC; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

EID: 77951745980     PISSN: 1461023X     EISSN: 14610248     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01448.x     Document Type: Article

References (81)

1. Amézquita A, Hödl W, Lima AP, Castellanos L, Erdtmann L, de Araújo MC. Masking interference and the evolution of the acoustic communication system in the Amazonian dendrobatid frog Allobates femoralis. Evolution 2006, 60:1874-1887.
2. Andersson M. Sexual Selection 1994, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
3. Andersson M, Simmons LW. Sexual selection and mate choice. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2006, 21:296-302.
4. Balakrishnan CN, Sorenson MD. Song discrimination suggests premating isolation among sympatric indigobird species and host races. Behav. Ecol. 2006, 17:473-478.
5. Bickford D, Lohman DJ, Sodhi NS, Ng PKL, Meier R, Winker K. Cryptic species as a window on diversity and conservation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2007, 22:148-155.
6. Boughman JW. How sensory drive can promote speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2002, 17:571-577.
7. Brown WL, Wilson EO. Character displacement. Syst. Zool. 1956, 5:49-64.
8. Buckley LB, Jetz W. Linking global turnover of species and environments. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2008, 105:17836-17841.
9. Butlin RK. Speciation by reinforcement. Trends Ecol. Evol. 1987, 2:8-13.
10. Chek AA, Bogart JP, Lougheed SC. Mating signal partitioning in multi-species assemblages: a null model test using frogs. Ecol. Lett. 2003, 6:235-247.
11. Cooley JR, Marshall DC, Hill KBR, Simon C. Reconstructing asymmetrical reproductive character displacement in a periodical cicada contact zone. J. Evol. Biol. 2006, 19:855-868.
12. Coyne JA, Orr HA. Speciation 2004, Sinauer Associates, Inc., Sunderland, MA
13. Darwin C. On the Origin of Species by Means of Natural Selection, or the Preservation of Favoured Races in the Struggle for Life 1859, John Murray, London
14. Dobzhansky T. Genetics and the Origin of Species 1951, 3rd edn, Columbia University Press, New York
15. Doebeli M, Dieckmann U. Evolutionary branching and sympatric speciation caused by different types of ecological interactions. Am. Nat. 2000, 156:S77-S101.
16. Endler JA. Conceptual and other problems in speciation. Speciation and its Consequences 1989, 625-648. Otte DEndler JA. In, eds, Sinauer, Sunderland, MA, pp
17. Endler JA. Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. Am. Nat. 1992, 139:S125-S153.
18. Gaskett A, Winnick C, Herberstein M. Orchid sexual deceit provokes ejaculation. Am. Nat. 2008, 171:E206-E212.
19. Gavrilets S. Coevolutionary chase in exploiter-victim systems with polygenic characters. J. Theor. Biol. 1997, 186:527-534.
20. Gavrilets S. Fitness Landscapes and the Origin of Species 2004, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
21. Gavrilets S, Hastings A. Coevolutionary chase in two-species systems with applications to mimicry. J. Theor. Biol. 1998, 191:415-427.
22. Gavrilets S, Hayashi TI. Speciation and sexual conflict. Evol. Ecol. 2005, 19:167-198.
23. Gray DA, Cade WH. Sex, death and genetic variation: natural and sexual selection on cricket song. Proc. R. Soc. B 1999, 266:707-709.
24. Haynes KF, Yeargan KV. Exploitation of intraspecific communication systems: illicit signalers and receivers. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 1999, 92:960-970.
25. Higgie M, Blows MW. Are traits that experience reinforcement also under sexual selection? Am. Nat. 2007, 170:409-420.
26. Higgie M, Blows MW. The evolution of reproductive character displacement conflicts with how sexual selection operates within a species. Evolution 2008, 62:1192-1203.
27. Higgie M, Chenoweth S, Blows MW. Natural selection and the reinforcement of mate recognition. Science 2000, 290:519-521.
28. Höbel G, Gerhardt HC. Reproductive character displacement in the acoustic communication system of green tree frogs (Hyla cinerea). Evolution 2003, 57:894-904.
29. Hosken DJ, Martin OY, Wigby S, Chapman T, Hodgson DJ. Sexual conflict and reproductive isolation in flies. Biol. Lett 2009, 5:697-699.
30. Hoskin CJ. Description, biology and conservation of a new species of Australian tree frog (Amphibia: Anura: Hylidae: Litoria) and an assessment of the remaining populations of Litoria genimaculata Horst, 1883: systematic and conservation implications of an unusual speciation event. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 2007, 91:549-563.
31. Hoskin CJ, Higgie M, McDonald KR, Moritz C. Reinforcement drives rapid allopatric speciation. Nature 2005, 437:1353-1356.
32. Howard DJ. Reinforcement: origin, dynamics, and fate of an evolutionary hypothesis. Hybrid Zones and the Evolutionary Process 1993, 46-69. Harrison RG. In, ed, Oxford University Press, New York, pp
33. Jiggins CD, Estrada C, Rodrigues A. Mimicry and the evolution of premating isolation in Heliconius melpomene Linnaeus. J. Evol. Biol. 2004, 17:680-691.
34. Jiggins CD, Naisbit RE, Coe RL, Mallet J. Reproductive isolation caused by colour pattern mimicry. Nature 2001, 411:302-305.
35. Kingsolver JG, Pfennig DW. Patterns and power of phenotypic selection in nature. Bioscience 2007, 57:561-572.
36. Kirkpatrick M, Ryan MJ. The evolution of mating preferences and the paradox of the lek. Nature 1991, 350:33-38.
37. Lande R. Models of speciation by sexual selection on polygenic traits. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1981, 78:3721-3725.
38. Littlejohn MJ, Loftus-Hills JJ. An experimental evaluation of premating isolation in the Hyla ewingi complex (Anura: Hylidae). Evolution 1968, 22:659-663.
39. Maynard Smith J. Sympatric speciation. Am. Nat. 1966, 100:637-650.
40. Mayr E. Animal Species and Evolution 1963, Belknap Press, Cambridge
41. McPeek MA, Gavrilets S. The evolution of female mating preferences: differentiation from species with promiscuous males can promote speciation. Evolution 2006, 60:1967-1980.
42. Nagel L, Schluter D. Body size, natural selection, and speciation in sticklebacks. Evolution 1998, 52:209-218.
43. Naisbit RE, Jiggins CD, Mallet J. Disruptive sexual selection against hybrids contributes to speciation between Heliconius cydno and Heliconius melpomene. Proc. R. Soc. B 2001, 268:1849-1854.
44. Nei M, Maruyama T, Wu CI. Models of evolution of reproductive isolation. Genetics 1983, 103:557-579.
45. Noor MA. Speciation driven by natural selection in Drosophila. Nature 1995, 375:674-675.
46. Noor MAF. Reinforcement and other consequences of sympatry. Heredity 1999, 83:503-508.
47. Nosil P, Crespi BJ, Sandoval CP. Reproductive isolation driven by the combined effects of ecological adaptation and reinforcement. Proc. R. Soc. B 2003, 270:1911-1918.
48. Otte D. Speciation in Hawaiian crickets. Speciation and its Consequences 1989, 482-526. Otte DEndler JA. In, eds, Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, pp
49. Panhuis TM, Butlin R, Zuk M, Tregenza T. Sexual selection and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2001, 16:364-371.
50. Parker GA, Partridge L. Sexual conflict and speciation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 1998, 353:261-274.
51. Payne RB, Barlow CR, Balakrishnan CN, Sorenson MD. Song mimicry of black-bellied firefinch Lagonosticta rara and other finches by the brood-parasitic Cameroon indigobird Vidua camerunensis in West Africa. Ibis 2005, 147:130-143.
52. Payne RB, Payne LL, Woods JL. Song learning in brood-parasitic indigobirds Vidua chalybeata: song mimicry of the host species. Anim. Behav. 1998, 55:1537-1553.
53. Payne RB, Payne LL, Woods JL, Sorenson MD. Imprinting and the origin of parasite-host species associations in brood-parasitic indigobirds, Vidua chalybeata. Anim. Behav. 2000, 59:69-81.
54. Pfennig KS. Female spadefoot toads compromise on mate quality to ensure conspecific matings. Behav. Ecol. 2000, 11:220-227.
55. Pfennig KS, Ryan MJ. Reproductive character displacement generates reproductive isolation among conspecific populations: an artificial neural network study. Proc. R. Soc. B 2006, 273:1361-1368.
56. Podos J. Correlated evolution of morphology and vocal signal structure in Darwin's finches. Nature 2001, 409:185-188.
57. Price T. Sexual selection and natural selection in bird speciation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 1998, 353:251-260.
58. Reynolds RG, Fitzpatrick BM. Assortative mating in poison-dart frogs based on an ecologically important trait. Evolution 2007, 61:2253-2259.
59. Ritchie MG. Sexual selection and speciation. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2007, 38:79-102.
60. Rundle HD, Nosil P. Ecological speciation. Ecol. Lett. 2005, 8:336-352.
61. Rundle HD, Schluter D. Reinforcement of stickleback mate preferences: sympatry breeds contempt. Evolution 1998, 52:200-208.
62. Sætre GP, Moum T, Bureš S, Král M, Adamjan M, Moreno J. A sexually selected character displacement in flycatchers reinforces premating isolation. Nature 1997, 387:589-592.
63. Saul-Gershenz LS, Millar JG. Phoretic nest parasites use sexual deception to obtain transport to their host's nest. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 2006, 103:14039-14044.
64. Schiestl FP, Peakall R. Two orchids attract different pollinators with the same floral odour compound: ecological and evolutionary implications. Funct. Ecol. 2005, 19:674-680.
65. Schiestl FP, Peakall R, Mant JG, Ibarra F, Schulz C, Franke S, Francke W. The chemistry of sexual deception in an orchid-wasp pollination system. Science 2003, 302:437-438.
66. Schluter D. Ecology and the origin of species. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2001, 16:372-380.
67. Sefc KM, Payne RB, Sorenson MD. Genetic continuity of brood-parasitic indigobird species. Mol. Ecol. 2005, 14:1407-1419.
68. Servedio MR. The evolution of premating isolation: local adaptation and natural and sexual selection against hybrids. Evolution 2004, 58:913-924.
69. Servedio MR, Noor MAF. The role of reinforcement in speciation: theory and data. Ann. Rev. Ecol. Evol. Syst. 2003, 34:339-364.
70. Shuster SM, Wade MJ. Mating Systems and Strategies 2003, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
71. Summers K, Symula R, Clough M, Cronin T. Visual mate choice in poison frogs. Proc. R. Soc. B 1999, 266:2141-2145.
72. Symula R, Schulte R, Summers K. Molecular phylogenetic evidence for a mimetic radiation in Peruvian poison frogs supports a Mullerian mimicry hypothesis. Proc. R. Soc. B 2001, 268:2415-2421.
73. Taper ML, Case TJ. Models of character displacement and the theoretical robustness of taxon cycles. Evolution 1992, 46:317-333.
74. Thompson JN. The Geographic Mosaic of Coevolution 2005, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois
75. Turelli M, Barton NH, Coyne JA. Theory and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2001, 16:330-343.
76. Vamosi SM, Schluter D. Sexual selection against hybrids between sympatric stickleback species: evidence from a field experiment. Evolution 1999, 53:874-879.
77. West-Eberhard MJ. Sexual selection, social competition, and speciation. Q. Rev. Biol. 1983, 58:155-183.
78. Wu CI. A stochastic simulation study on speciation by sexual selection. Evolution 1985, 39:66-82.
79. Zouros E, d'Entremont CJ. Sexual isolation among populations of Drosophila mojavensis: response to pressure from a related species. Evolution 1980, 34:421-430.
80. Zuk M, Kolluru GR. Exploitation of sexual signals by predators and parasitoids. Q. Rev. Biol. 1998, 73:415-438.
81. Zuk M, Rotenberry JT, Tinghitella RM. Silent night: adaptive disappearance of a sexual signal in a parasitized population of field crickets. Bio. Lett. 2006, 2:521-524.